Argentum

Projects that follow the best practices below can voluntarily self-certify and show that they've achieved an Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) best practices badge.

There is no set of practices that can guarantee that software will never have defects or vulnerabilities; even formal methods can fail if the specifications or assumptions are wrong. Nor is there any set of practices that can guarantee that a project will sustain a healthy and well-functioning development community. However, following best practices can help improve the results of projects. For example, some practices enable multi-person review before release, which can both help find otherwise hard-to-find technical vulnerabilities and help build trust and a desire for repeated interaction among developers from different companies. To earn a badge, all MUST and MUST NOT criteria must be met, all SHOULD criteria must be met OR be unmet with justification, and all SUGGESTED criteria must be met OR unmet (we want them considered at least). If you want to enter justification text as a generic comment, instead of being a rationale that the situation is acceptable, start the text block with '//' followed by a space. Feedback is welcome via the GitHub site as issues or pull requests There is also a mailing list for general discussion.

We gladly provide the information in several locales, however, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the translations, the English version is the authoritative version.
If this is your project, please show your baseline badge status on your project page! The baseline badge status looks like this: Baseline badge level for project 12957 is baseline-3 Here is how to embed the baseline badge:
You can show your baseline badge status by embedding this in your markdown file:
[![OpenSSF Baseline](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12957/baseline)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12957)
or by embedding this in your HTML:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12957"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12957/baseline"></a>


These are the Baseline Level 2 criteria. These are criteria version v2026.02.19.

Baseline Series: Baseline Level 1 Baseline Level 2 Baseline Level 3

        

 Basics

  • General

    Note that other projects may use the same name.

    Argentum is a local-first AI workspace. It runs on your own machine so your data stays with you. You can chat with AI providers you choose, route conversations through Telegram, Discord, or other channels, keep memory across sessions, and use a full desktop app instead of juggling browser tabs.

    Please use SPDX license expression format; examples include "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", and "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Do not include single quotes or double quotes.
    If there is more than one language, list them as comma-separated values (spaces optional) and sort them from most to least used. If there is a long list, please list at least the first three most common ones. If there is no language (e.g., this is a documentation-only or test-only project), use the single character "-". Please use a conventional capitalization for each language, e.g., "JavaScript".
    The Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) is a structured naming scheme for information technology systems, software, and packages. It is used in a number of systems and databases when reporting vulnerabilities.

    Argentum runs entirely locally - no cloud subscriptions, no data leaves the machine.
    Suitable for self-hosting on desktop, server, or via Docker.

    Built with TypeScript-first approach, with Rust-based desktop client for Windows/macOS/Linux.
    Supports 8+ messaging channels to unify communication in one interface.

    Ideal for developers and power users who want an AI assistant under their own control.

 Controls 19/19 ●

  • Controls


    Enough for a badge!

    When a CI/CD task is executed with no permissions specified, the CI/CD system MUST default the task's permissions to the lowest permissions granted in the pipeline. [OSPS-AC-04.01]
    Configure the project's settings to assign the lowest available permissions to new pipelines by default, granting additional permissions only when necessary for specific tasks.

    GitHub Actions defaults to read-only permissions (contents:read, metadata:read) for all workflows without explicit permissions. This is GitHub's built-in behavior. All project workflows explicitly declare required permissions for clarity.


    Enough for a badge!

    When an official release is created, that release MUST be assigned a unique version identifier. [OSPS-BR-02.01]
    Assign a unique version identifier to each release produced by the project, following a consistent naming convention or numbering scheme. Examples include SemVer, CalVer, or git commit id.

    Git tags following SemVer pattern: v0.0.7, v0.0.8, etc.
    Each release tagged in git with unique version identifier.
    Releases published at https://github.com/AG064/argentum/releases


    Enough for a badge!

    When an official release is created, that release MUST contain a descriptive log of functional and security modifications. [OSPS-BR-04.01]
    Ensure that all releases include a descriptive change log. It is recommended to ensure that the change log is human-readable and includes details beyond commit messages, such as descriptions of the security impact or relevance to different use cases. To ensure machine readability, place the content under a markdown header such as "## Changelog".

    Changelog is present in release notes.


    Enough for a badge!

    When a build and release pipeline ingests dependencies, it MUST use standardized tooling where available. [OSPS-BR-05.01]
    Use a common tooling for your ecosystem, such as package managers or dependency management tools to ingest dependencies at build time. This may include using a dependency file, lock file, or manifest to specify the required dependencies, which are then pulled in by the build system.
    • npm (package.json + package-lock.json) for Node.js/TypeScript dependencies
    • Cargo (Cargo.toml + Cargo.lock) for Rust/Tauri desktop dependencies
    • Dockerfile: RUN npm install pulls from package.json lockfile
    • Standard lockfile tracking ensures reproducible builds

    Enough for a badge!

    When an official release is created, that release MUST be signed or accounted for in a signed manifest including each asset's cryptographic hashes. [OSPS-BR-06.01]
    Sign all released software assets at build time with a cryptographic signature or attestations, such as GPG or PGP signature, Sigstore signatures, SLSA provenance, or SLSA VSAs. Include the cryptographic hashes of each asset in a signed manifest or metadata file.

    Sigstore cosign signing pipeline added to release.yml. Pipeline uses GitHub OIDC for keyless signing (no manual key management). All release artifacts from next release (v0.0.8+) will include cryptographic signatures.


    Enough for a badge!

    When the project has made a release, the project documentation MUST include a description of how the project selects, obtains, and tracks its dependencies. [OSPS-DO-06.01]
    It is recommended to publish this information alongside the project's technical & design documentation on a publicly viewable resource such as the source code repository, project website, or other channel.
    • package.json + package-lock.json for Node.js dependencies (npm install)
    • Cargo.toml + Cargo.lock for Rust/Tauri dependencies
    • docs/releases/v*.md describe security-relevant dependency updates in changelog
    • Dockerfile pins npm to 11.15.0 explicitly
    • osv-scanner.toml for vulnerability tracking
    • npm audit in CI pipeline
    • Security advisories tracked via GitHub Security Advisories (https://github.com/AG064/argentum/security/advisories)

    Enough for a badge!

    The project documentation MUST include instructions on how to build the software, including required libraries, frameworks, SDKs, and dependencies. [OSPS-DO-07.01]
    It is recommended to publish this information alongside the project's contributor documentation, such as in CONTRIBUTING.md or other developer task documentation. This may also be documented using Makefile targets or other automation scripts.

    CONTRIBUTING.md now includes accurate build instructions:

    • npm install for dependencies
    • npm run build for production build
    • npm run dev for watch mode
    • npm run docker:build for Docker image
    • npm run rebuild for clean rebuild
    • Desktop app optional section with prepare:llama-server, desktop:dev, desktop:build
    • All required libraries, SDKs, and dependencies documented

    Enough for a badge!

    While active, the project documentation MUST include a list of project members with access to sensitive resources. [OSPS-GV-01.01]
    Document project participants and their roles through such artifacts as members.md, governance.md, maintainers.md, or similar file within the source code repository of the project. This may be as simple as including names or account handles in a list of maintainers, or more complex depending on the project's governance.

    Created MEMBERS.md listing AG064 as lead maintainer with access to all sensitive resources.


    Enough for a badge!

    While active, the project documentation MUST include descriptions of the roles and responsibilities for members of the project. [OSPS-GV-01.02]
    Document project participants and their roles through such artifacts as members.md, governance.md, maintainers.md, or similar file within the source code repository of the project.

    MEMBERS.md now includes Roles & Responsibilities table + Access Inventory listing all sensitive resources.


    Enough for a badge!

    While active, the project documentation MUST include a guide for code contributors that includes requirements for acceptable contributions. [OSPS-GV-03.02]
    Extend the CONTRIBUTING.md or CONTRIBUTING/ contents in the project documentation to outline the requirements for acceptable contributions, including coding standards, testing requirements, and submission guidelines for code contributors. It is recommended that this guide is the source of truth for both contributors and approvers.

    CONTRIBUTING.md includes:

    • PR Checklist: typecheck, lint, tests, clean commits
    • Coding standards via ESLint
    • Conventional Commits format
    • Testing requirements (test suite exists)
    • "Things That Won't Get Merged" clearly states requirements

    Enough for a badge!

    While active, the version control system MUST require all code contributors to assert that they are legally authorized to make the associated contributions on every commit. [OSPS-LE-01.01]
    Include a DCO in the project's repository, requiring code contributors to assert that they are legally authorized to commit the associated contributions on every commit. Use a status check to ensure the assertion is made. A CLA also satisfies this requirement. Some version control systems, such as GitHub, may include this in the platform terms of service.
    • GitHub Terms of Service cover contribution rights when submitting via GitHub UI
    • CONTRIBUTING.md includes: "By contributing, you agree your work will be licensed under MIT"
    • This serves as the contribution assertion

    Enough for a badge!

    When a commit is made to the primary branch, any automated status checks for commits MUST pass or be manually bypassed. [OSPS-QA-03.01]
    Configure the project's version control system to require that all automated status checks pass or require manual acknowledgement before a commit can be merged into the primary branch. It is recommended that any optional status checks are NOT configured as a pass or fail requirement that approvers may be tempted to bypass.
    • Branch protection enabled on development (require PR + 1 approval)
    • CI workflow runs on push/PR: typecheck + lint + tests must pass
    • CodeQL, Scorecard, Trivy workflows run on push to development/main
    • All status checks configured as required, not optional

    Enough for a badge!

    Prior to a commit being accepted, the project's CI/CD pipelines MUST run at least one automated test suite to ensure the changes meet expectations. [OSPS-QA-06.01]
    Automated tests should be run prior to every merge into the primary branch. The test suite should be run in a CI/CD pipeline and the results should be visible to all contributors. The test suite should be run in a consistent environment and should be run in a way that allows contributors to run the tests locally. Examples of test suites include unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests.
    • ci.yml: runs npm run typecheck && npm run lint && npm run test:ci on every push/PR
    • npm run test:ci uses Jest with coverage (text-summary, lcov)
    • Contributors can run locally: npm test, npm run test:unit, npm run test:integration
    • Test results visible in GitHub Actions UI for all contributors
    • Consistent environment: GitHub Actions ubuntu-latest

    Enough for a badge!

    When the project has made a release, the project documentation MUST include design documentation demonstrating all actions and actors within the system. [OSPS-SA-01.01]
    Include designs in the project documentation that explains the actions and actors. Actors include any subsystem or entity that can influence another segment in the system. Ensure this is updated for new features or breaking changes.

    docs/architecture.md describes system design with actions and actors

    • Subsystems: Agent Core, Memory, Channels (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp)
    • Security layer: Policy engine, credential manager
    • Feature system: pluggable features in src/features/
    • Data flow diagrams and component interactions documented
    • Updated with each major release

    Enough for a badge!

    When the project has made a release, the project documentation MUST include descriptions of all external software interfaces of the released software assets. [OSPS-SA-02.01]
    Document all software interfaces (APIs) of the released software assets, explaining how users can interact with the software and what data is expected or produced. Ensure this is updated for new features or breaking changes.

    docs/API.md documents all external software interfaces:

    • Agent API, Memory API, Channel API, Config API, Security API
    • REST endpoints for integration
    • WebSocket events
    • CLI commands
    • Data formats and schemas
    • Updated for each release

    Enough for a badge!

    When the project has made a release, the project MUST perform a security assessment to understand the most likely and impactful potential security problems that could occur within the software. [OSPS-SA-03.01]
    Performing a security assessment informs both project members as well as downstream consumers that the project understands what problems could arise within the software. Understanding what threats could be realized helps the project manage and address risk. This information is useful to downstream consumers to demonstrate the security acumen and practices of the project. Ensure this is updated for new features or breaking changes.

    SECURITY.md now includes comprehensive Security Risks & Threat Model section with:

    • 11 risk categories covering credential, authentication, injection, data, network, supply chain, DoS, channel-specific, desktop app, and operational risks
    • 60+ risk entries with Likelihood/Impact/Mitigation assessments
    • Threat actor categories (external attacker, malicious contributor, insider, bots)
    • Specific to v0.0.7 release: llama.cpp local server, Telegram integration, streaming reasoning attack surfaces
    • Updated with each release

    Enough for a badge!

    While active, the project documentation MUST include a policy for coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD), with a clear timeframe for response. [OSPS-VM-01.01]
    Create a SECURITY.md file at the root of the directory, outlining the project's policy for coordinated vulnerability disclosure. Include a method for reporting vulnerabilities. Set expectations for how the project will respond and address reported issues.

    SECURITY.md "Reporting Security Issues" section includes:

    • GitHub Security Advisories для private reporting
    • Maintainer contact: AG064 (GitHub)
    • Expected response: acknowledgment within 24-48 hours, fix timeline based on severity
    • Clear method for reporting vulnerabilities
    • Coordinated disclosure process documented

    Enough for a badge!

    While active, the project documentation MUST provide a means for private vulnerability reporting directly to the security contacts within the project. [OSPS-VM-03.01]
    Provide a means for security researchers to report vulnerabilities privately to the project. This may be a dedicated email address, a web form, VCS specialized tools, email addresses for security contacts, or other methods.

    SECURITY.md "Reporting Security Issues" section:


    Enough for a badge!

    While active, the project documentation MUST publicly publish data about discovered vulnerabilities. [OSPS-VM-04.01]
    Provide information about known vulnerabilities in a predictable public channel, such as a CVE entry, blog post, or other medium. To the degree possible, this information should include affected version(s), how a consumer can determine if they are vulnerable, and instructions for mitigation or remediation.
    • GitHub Security Advisories: public at https://github.com/AG064/argentum/security/advisories
      (shows all reported CVEs with affected versions, severity, remediation)
    • Release notes in docs/releases/v*.md include security-relevant fixes under ## Changelog
    • SECURITY_DEPENDENCY_NOTES.md documents known dependency vulnerabilities


This data is available under the Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). This means that a Data Recipient may share the Data, with or without modifications, so long as the Data Recipient makes available the text of this agreement with the shared Data. Please credit AG064 and the OpenSSF Best Practices badge contributors.

Project badge entry owned by: AG064.
Entry created on 2026-05-24 05:44:50 UTC, last updated on 2026-05-26 00:21:59 UTC. Last achieved passing badge on 2026-05-25 14:37:43 UTC.