keyboard-a11y-tester

遵循以下最佳实践的项目将能够自愿的自我认证,并显示他们已经实现了核心基础设施计划(OpenSSF)徽章。

没有一套可以保证软件永远不会有缺陷或漏洞的做法;如果规范或假设是错误的,即使合适的方法也可能失败。也没有哪些做法可以保证一个项目能够维持健康和运作良好的开发者社区。但是,遵循最佳做法可以帮助改善项目的成果。例如,一些做法可以在发布之前进行多人评估,这可以帮助您找到其他难以找到的技术漏洞,并帮助建立信任,并希望不同公司的开发人员之间进行重复的交互。要获得徽章,必须满足所有“必须”和“禁止”的条款,满足所有“应该”条款或有合适的理由,所有“建议”条款必须满足或未满足(至少希望考虑)。欢迎通过 GitHub网站创建问题或提出请求进行反馈。另外还有一个一般讨论邮件列表

如果这是您的项目,请在您的项目页面上显示您的徽章状态!徽章状态如下所示: 项目13561的徽章级别为passing 这里是如何嵌入它:
您可以通过将其嵌入在您的Markdown文件中:
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561)
或将其嵌入到HTML中来显示您的徽章状态:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561/badge"></a>


这些是黄金级别条款。您还可以查看通过白银级别条款。

Baseline Series: 基准等级1 基准等级2 基准等级3

        

 基本 0/5

  • 常规

    请注意,其他项目可能使用相同的名称。

    An AI-assisted web accessibility tester that behaves like two W3C personas at once: a keyboard-only user ("Ade") and a screen-reader user ("Lakshmi"). It drives a page keyboard-only, records what happens at every focus stop, and emits evidence-linked findings mapped to specific WCAG success criteria — against any website.

    请使用 SPDX许可证表达格式;例子包括“Apache-2.0”,“BSD-2-Clause”,“BSD-3-Clause”,“GPL-2.0+”,“LGPL-3.0 +”,“MIT”和“(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)”。
    如果有多种语言,请将它们列为逗号分隔值(可选空格),并将它们从最多到最少使用。如果有长列表,请至少列出前三个最常见的列表。如果没有语言(例如,这是仅文档或仅测试项目),请使用单个字符“ - ”。请使用每种语言的常规大小写,例如“JavaScript”。
    通用平台枚举(CPE)是用于信息技术系统,软件和软件包的结构化命名方案。在报告漏洞时,它可用于多个系统和数据库。

    keyboard-a11y-tester

    An AI-assisted web accessibility tester that behaves like two W3C personas at once: a
    keyboard-only user ("Ade") and a screen-reader user ("Lakshmi"). It drives a page
    keyboard-only, records what happens at every focus stop, and emits evidence-linked
    findings mapped to specific WCAG success criteria — against any website. Both
    personas run in the same pass by default; a --persona flag restricts to just one.

    It has two layers:

    • a deterministic runner (scripts/runner.mjs) that owns the mechanical, reproducible
      work — driving the page keyboard-only, capturing a per-step trace + screenshots, and
      computing the machine-decidable checks for both personas;
    • an AI-judgment layer — the invoking agent — that reads the trace/screenshots/census
      and judges what rules can't (task completion, logical focus/reading order, form
      quality, announcement quality). See SKILL.md for how an agent drives it.

    Standalone and portable: it depends only on playwright, yaml, pngjs, pixelmatch,
    and @guidepup/virtual-screen-reader, needs no bundled test cases, and writes all output
    to a per-user temp directory (never into this folder). The screen-reader persona
    never drives a real screen reader (NVDA/VoiceOver) — see "Screen-reader detection" below.

    Documentation: docs/usage.md (setup, dependencies, quick start,
    CAPTCHAs) · docs/interface.md (full CLI reference, output file
    schema, WCAG checks table).

    Quick start

    As a Claude Code plugin — register this repo as a plugin marketplace, then install it:

    /plugin marketplace add ezufelt/keyboard-a11y-tester
    /plugin install keyboard-a11y-tester@ezufelt
    

    The first command registers this repo as a marketplace (named ezufelt, per
    .claude-plugin/marketplace.json); the second installs the plugin. Once installed, the
    skill in SKILL.md becomes available to the agent.

    As a standalone clone — clone the repo and install its dependencies:

    git clone https://github.com/ezufelt/keyboard-a11y-tester.git
    cd keyboard-a11y-tester
    npm install
    npx playwright install chromium
    

    Then drive it directly (see Run against any URL).

    Requirements & dependencies

    Requires Node.js ≥ 20 and Chromium (via Playwright), plus five small npm dependencies —
    no build step. Run node scripts/setup-check.mjs to verify both before your first run.

    See docs/usage.md for the full dependency
    table, licensing credit for @guidepup/virtual-screen-reader, and setup instructions.

    Run against any URL (no test file needed)

    # quick unattended blind Tab-crawl of the start page, per viewport
    node scripts/runner.mjs --url https://example.com
    
    # a full scenario, driven live by the agent one keystroke at a time
    node scripts/runner.mjs serve --url https://example.com --goal "find the pricing page" \
    
         --viewport desktop --port 9400
    #   → prints:  READY <session-dir>   (under the system temp dir)
    node scripts/runner.mjs observe <session-dir>
    node scripts/runner.mjs step    <session-dir> --press Tab      # one keystroke; prints observation
    node scripts/runner.mjs step    <session-dir> --press Enter
    node scripts/runner.mjs step    <session-dir> --type "hello@example.com"
    node scripts/runner.mjs finish  <session-dir>                  # writes trace + findings
    node scripts/runner.mjs stop    <session-dir>
    

    See docs/usage.md for the full
    quick-start walkthrough, and docs/interface.md for every CLI flag and
    the complete output file schema.

    Authenticated runs

    Pages behind a login can't be tested with a fresh, logged-out browser. Pass a Playwright
    storageState JSON file with --storage-state <file> to start the browser with its cookies
    and localStorage already loaded (e.g. an already-logged-in session). Generate one with
    context.storageState({ path: 'auth.json' }) or npx playwright codegen --save-storage=auth.json <url>.
    The file is validated (exists, parses as JSON, and looks like a real storageState export —
    i.e. has cookies/origins arrays) before the browser launches — a missing or malformed file
    fails the run immediately rather than silently testing the logged-out site. In serve mode
    it's applied once at launch and the session browser keeps the state alive for every subsequent
    step.

    A storageState file holds live session cookies/tokens — treat it as a secret. Don't commit
    it; .gitignore already excludes auth.json, storageState.json, and *storage-state*.json,
    but a differently-named file won't be caught automatically.

    What the runner does (deterministic layer)

    Playwright (full Chromium, new-headless + SwiftShader for real pixels) drives the page with
    only the keyboard — it never calls .click() or .focus(); if a control is only
    reachable by pointer, that is itself a finding. It drops to a raw CDP session for the
    accessibility tree (Accessibility.getPartialAXTree), the ground truth for name/role/state.
    At startup it fails fast if :focus-visible does not fire on CDP-driven key events
    (every focus-indicator check would otherwise be invalid) — skipped entirely when
    --persona screen-reader is passed, since that persona has no pixel/focus-ring work.

    Checks are evaluated per focus stop the persona actually visits (keyboard persona) or
    against a page-wide structural census (screen-reader persona) — this is scenario
    testing, not an exhaustive page audit. Conformance target: AA is pass/fail, AAA is
    informative.

    WCAG Level Persona Check
    2.4.7 AA keyboard Focus indicator present
    2.4.13 AAA (informative) keyboard Focus indicator strength
    1.4.1 AA keyboard Indicator is not colour-only
    2.1.2 AA keyboard Keyboard trap
    2.4.1 AA keyboard No skip link
    2.4.3 AA keyboard Positive tabindex
    3.2.1 AA keyboard Context change from focus alone
    3.3.2 AA keyboard File input named only by the user-agent default ("Choose File")
    4.1.2 AA keyboard Focusable control with no accessible name
    1.1.1 AA screen-reader Missing alt text/aria-label
    1.3.1 AA screen-reader Heading level skip
    1.3.1 AA screen-reader Duplicate, unlabeled landmark roles
    4.1.2 AA screen-reader Interactive control announced as a bare role
    4.1.3 AA screen-reader Declared live region that never announced anything

    See docs/interface.md for the authoritative version of
    this table (full check descriptions) and the W3C persona references.

    Output

    Everything is written under a per-user temp dir (${TMPDIR}/keyboard-a11y-tester/…, or
    --out): a trace.json (per-step evidence), deterministic-findings.json (WCAG findings),
    screen-reader-census.json (screen-reader persona), and cropped screenshots/step_NNNN.png
    per viewport. See docs/interface.md for the
    complete directory layout and field-by-field schema of every output file.

    Focus-visible detection (2.4.7 AA presence + 2.4.13 AAA strength)

    Presence (AA) uses two independent signals, so a faint-but-real indicator is never
    missed:

    1. the focused element's computed style declares an outline or box-shadow (ground
      truth — recorded in the trace as computed_focus_style), or
    2. pixels change on focus (catches background/colour indicators with no outline).

    Either one means the indicator is present → AA pass. Pixel diffing compares the focused
    frame to a scroll-aligned baseline (the next step's frame, where the element is no longer
    focused — so focus is never manipulated programmatically), measuring ring slices at
    increasing offset (thin and offset outlines), the interior, and top/bottom edge bands.

    Strength (AAA, informative) measures whether the indicator meets 2.4.13 Focus
    Appearance — changed area ≥ a 2px-thick perimeter of the control, and ≥ 3:1 WCAG luminance
    contrast between focused and unfocused states. Advisory only. (This measure is unreliable
    on pages that mutate between steps — e.g. "load more" — because the neighbour-frame
    baseline then differs by content, not just the focus ring; treat AAA numbers on such pages
    with caution. AA presence is unaffected, being driven by the computed style.)

    So 2.4.7 (AA) requires only that an indicator is visible with no size/contrast minimum: a
    faint 1px or low-opacity ring passes AA and is flagged weak at AAA — rather than being
    falsely reported as "no focus indicator."

    Screen-reader detection (Lakshmi)

    The screen-reader persona is emulated, never driven for real: @guidepup/virtual-screen-reader
    builds an ARIA/ACCNAME-spec accessible tree over the live page and computes what a
    spec-compliant screen reader would announce, entirely in the browser's own JS engine — no
    NVDA/JAWS/VoiceOver is launched, and it works the same way on any OS the runner itself
    supports.

    Its self-contained browser bundle is injected via Playwright's context.addInitScript,
    which is not subject to the page's own CSP — verified against both a synthetic CSP-locked
    page and a real CSP-locked production site. Once injected, its virtual cursor tracks
    real keyboard focus automatically
    (it listens for native focusin events), so every
    step you drive with real Tab/Enter/etc. produces a matching sr_announcement with no
    separate "chasing" logic and no drift between what's focused and what's reported as
    announced. The same mechanism also wires a MutationObserver that computes WAI-ARIA
    live-region semantics and captures "assertive: …"/"polite: …" announcements as they
    happen — this is what 4.1.3 (Status Messages) findings are derived from.

    Separately, once per newly-visited page URL, an ephemeral instance walks the entire page
    in reading order (never touching the live per-step monitor) to build
    screen-reader-census.json — the source for the heading-hierarchy, duplicate-landmark,
    missing-alt-text, and bare-role-control checks, since those need whole-page context rather
    than just the stops a keyboard user's Tab order happens to visit.

    This augments but does not replace testing with a real screen reader and real users
    the upstream library's own README says exactly that, and it's worth repeating: this checks
    what a spec-compliant screen reader should announce given the page's ARIA/HTML, not the
    specific quirks of any one real screen reader implementation.

    CAPTCHAs

    CAPTCHAs detect automation and refuse to run; the runner has a page-scoped, human-approved
    compatibility workaround. See docs/usage.md for details.

    License

    MIT © Everett Zufelt. See LICENSE.

  • 先决条件


    该项目必须拥有银级徽章。 [achieve_silver]

  • 项目监督


    项目必须具有2个或更多的“公交车因子”。 (需要网址) [bus_factor]
    “公交车系数”(又名“卡车因子”)是指最少数量的项目成员,如果突然离开项目(“被公交车撞了”),项目会由于缺乏具备知识的或有能力的人员而暂停。 卡车因子 工具可以对GitHub上的项目进行估计。有关详细信息,请参阅Cosentino等人的评估Git存储库的卡车因子


    该项目必须至少有两个不相关的重要贡献者。 (需要网址) [contributors_unassociated]
    如果同一组织(作为雇员或承包商)支付工作费用,并且组织将从项目的结果中受益,则贡献者是相关联的。如果通过其他组织得到财务补助(例如,源自政府或非政府组织,支付给不同组织的科学补助金不会导致捐助者关联),不视为来自同一组织。重要贡献者定义为过去一年对项目做出了不平凡的贡献。一个重要贡献者的良好指标的例子是:编写至少1,000行代码,贡献50个提交或至少提交20页的文档。

  • 其他


    项目必须在每个源文件中包含许可证声明。这可以通过在每个文件开头附近的注释中加入以下内容来实现: SPDX-License-Identifier: [SPDX license expression for project][license_per_file]
    这可以通过在自然语言中包含许可证标识来完成。该项目还可以包括完整许可证文本,或者指向许可证文本的稳定URL。请注意,license_location条款要求项目许可证在标准位置。有关SPDX许可证表达式的更多信息,请参阅SPDX教程。请注意与 copyright_per_file 的关系,其内容通常在许可证信息之前。

 变更控制 1/4

  • 公开的版本控制的源代码存储库


    必须使用通用的分布式版本控制软件(例如,git,mercurial)作为项目的源代码存储库。 [repo_distributed]
    Git不是必须,项目在合适场景可以使用集中版本控制软件(如subversion)。

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git is distributed.



    该项目必须清楚地识别新的或临时贡献者可以执行的小型任务。 (需要网址) [small_tasks]
    此标识通常通过在项目使用的一个或多个标签的问题跟踪器中标记所选问题来完成,例如 up- for-grabs 仅限第一时间,“小修复”,微任务或IdealFirstBug。这些新任务不需要添加功能;他们可以改进文档,添加测试用例或其他有助于项目的内容,并帮助贡献者更了解项目。


    项目必须要求开发人员使用双因素身份验证(2FA)来更改中央存储库或访问敏感数据(如私密漏洞报告)。这种2FA机制可以使用没有密码学机制的方案,如SMS(短消息),尽管不推荐。 [require_2FA]


    项目的双因素身份认证(2FA)应该使用加密机制来防止仿冒。基于短消息服务(SMS)的2FA本身不符合此标准,因为它不被加密。 [secure_2FA]
    满足此条款的2FA机制将是一种基于时间的一次性密码(TOTP)应用程序,可自动生成在一段时间后更改的验证码。请注意, GitHub支持TOTP

 质量 1/7

  • 编码标准


    该项目必须记录其代码检视需求,包括代码检视是如何进行的,必须检查的内容以及哪些是可接纳的内容。 (需要网址) [code_review_standards]
    另请参阅 two_person_review 和contribution_requirements 条款。


    该项目必须至少有50%的修改(作者之外的人提出的)在发布之前审查,以确定是否是一个有价值的修改,并且没有已知的问题,会反对其包含 [two_person_review]

  • 可工作的构建系统


    该项目必须具有可重复构建。如果没有发生构建(例如,直接使用源代码而不是编译的脚本语言),请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 (需要网址) [build_reproducible]
    可重复的构建意味着多方可以独立地重做从源文件生成信息的过程,并获得每比特完全相同的结果。在某些情况下,这可以通过强制某种排序来解决。 JavaScript开发人员可能会考虑使用npm shrinkwrap和webpack的OccurenceOrderPlugin。 GCC和clang用户可能会发现-frandom-seed选项有用。通常可以通过指定可用于重新构建的特定容器或虚拟机的加密散列来为外部方定义构建环境(包括工具集)。 可重复构建项目具有文档指导如何执行此操作。

  • 自动测试套件


    测试套件必须以该语言的标准方式进行调用。 (需要网址) [test_invocation]
    例如“make check”,“mvn test”或“rake test”。

    该项目必须实施持续集成,将新的或更改的代码经常集成到中央代码库中,并对结果进行自动化测试。 (需要网址) [test_continuous_integration]
    在大多数情况下,这意味着每个在项目上全职工作的开发人员至少每天都会整合。

    New project



    如果有至少一个FLOSS工具可以以所选语言度量此条款,该项目的FLOSS自动测试套件必须具有至少90%语句覆盖率。 [test_statement_coverage90]


    如果有至少一个FLOSS工具可以以所选语言度量此条款,该项目的FLOSS自动测试套件必须具有至少80%分支覆盖率。 [test_branch_coverage80]

 安全 0/5

  • 使用基础的良好加密实践

    请注意,某些软件不需要使用加密机制。

    项目生成的软件必须支持所有网络通信的安全协议,如SSHv2或更高版本,TLS1.2或更高版本(HTTPS),IPsec,SFTP和SNMPv3。默认情况下,FTP,HTTP,Telnet,SSLv3或更早版本以及SSHv1等不安全协议必须被禁用,只有在用户专门配置时才启用。如果项目生成的软件不支持网络通信,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [crypto_used_network]


    由项目生成的软件必须,如果支持或使用TLS,至少支持TLS版本1.2。请注意,TLS的前身称为SSL。如果软件不使用TLS,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [crypto_tls12]

  • 安全交付防御中间人(MITM)的攻击


    项目网站,存储库(如果可通过网络访问)和下载站点(如果单独)必须包括具有非允许值的密钥加固头。 (需要网址) [hardened_site]
    请注意,GitHub是已知满足的。 https://securityheaders.io/ 等网站可以快速查看。主要头加固包含:内容安全策略(CSP),HTTP严格传输安全性(HSTS),X-Content-Type-Options(“nosniff”),X-Frame-Options和X-XSS-Protection。

  • 其他安全问题


    该项目必须在过去5年内进行安全审查。此审查必须考虑安全需求和安全边界。 [security_review]
    这可以由项目成员完成和/或独立评估。此评估可能由静态和动态分析工具支持,但还必须进行人工审查,以确定工具无法检测到的问题(特别是设计问题)。


    加固机制必须用于项目生产的软件,以便软件缺陷不太可能导致安全漏洞。 (需要网址) [hardening]
    加固机制可能包括HTTP头,如内容安全策略(CSP),用于减轻攻击的编译器标志(如-fstack-protector)或用以消除未定义行为的编译器标志。对于此条款的目的,最小权限不被认为是一种加固机制(最少权限是重要的,但是另有条款)。

 分析 1/2

  • 动态代码分析


    必须在发布之前,至少将一个动态分析工具应用于软件任何候选发布的主要生产版本。 [dynamic_analysis]
    动态分析工具通过执行特定输入来检查软件。例如,项目可以使用模糊工具(例如, American Fuzzy Lop )或Web应用扫描程序(例如, ZAP w3af )。在某些情况下, OSS-Fuzz 项目可以对您的项目应用模糊测试。为满足此条款,动态分析工具需要以某种方式改变输入,以寻找各种问题,或者将其作为一个具有至少80%分支覆盖率的自动测试套件。 动态分析维基百科页面 OWASP的fuzzing页面 识别一些动态分析工具。分析工具可能专注于寻找安全漏洞,但这不是必需的。

    New project



    项目应该在其生成的软件中包含许多运行时断言,并在动态分析期间检查这些断言。 [dynamic_analysis_enable_assertions]
    这个标准并不建议使生产过程中的断言;这完全取决于项目及其用户的决定。该标准的重点是部署之前的动态分析过程中改善故障检测。在生产使用中启用断言与在动态分析(例如测试)期间启用断言完全不同。在某些情况下,在生产中使用断言是极其不明智的(尤其是在高完整性组件中)。存在许多反对在生产环境中启用断言的论点,例如,库不应使调用程序崩溃,它们的存在可能会导致应用商店拒绝,和/或在生产环境中激活断言可能会暴露诸如私钥之类的私有数据。请注意,在许多Linux发行版中都未定义NDEBUG ,因此C / C ++缺省情况下,assert()将在这些环境中启用生产。对于那些环境中的生产,使用不同的断言机制或定义NDEBUG可能很重要。

    New project



该数据可在社区数据许可协议 – 许可性,版本 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0)下获取。这意味着数据接收方可以共享数据,无论是否经过修改,只要数据接收方在共享数据时提供本协议文本。请注明ezufelt和OpenSSF最佳实践徽章贡献者。

项目徽章条目拥有者: ezufelt.
最后更新于 2026-07-10 18:22:26 UTC, 最后更新于 2026-07-10 21:04:01 UTC。 最后在 2026-07-10 21:04:01 UTC 获得通过徽章。