t3x-nr-passkeys-be

Projects that follow the best practices below can voluntarily self-certify and show that they've achieved an Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) best practices badge.

There is no set of practices that can guarantee that software will never have defects or vulnerabilities; even formal methods can fail if the specifications or assumptions are wrong. Nor is there any set of practices that can guarantee that a project will sustain a healthy and well-functioning development community. However, following best practices can help improve the results of projects. For example, some practices enable multi-person review before release, which can both help find otherwise hard-to-find technical vulnerabilities and help build trust and a desire for repeated interaction among developers from different companies. To earn a badge, all MUST and MUST NOT criteria must be met, all SHOULD criteria must be met OR be unmet with justification, and all SUGGESTED criteria must be met OR unmet (we want them considered at least). If you want to enter justification text as a generic comment, instead of being a rationale that the situation is acceptable, start the text block with '//' followed by a space. Feedback is welcome via the GitHub site as issues or pull requests There is also a mailing list for general discussion.

We gladly provide the information in several locales, however, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the translations, the English version is the authoritative version.
If this is your project, please show your badge status on your project page! The badge status looks like this: Badge level for project 12037 is silver Here is how to embed it:
You can show your badge status by embedding this in your markdown file:
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12037/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12037)
or by embedding this in your HTML:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12037"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/12037/badge"></a>


These are the Silver level criteria. You can also view the Passing or Gold level criteria.

Baseline Series: Baseline Level 1 Baseline Level 2 Baseline Level 3

        

 Basics 17/17 ●

  • General

    Note that other projects may use the same name.

    TYPO3 extension for passwordless backend authentication via WebAuthn/FIDO2 Passkeys

    Please use SPDX license expression format; examples include "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", and "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Do not include single quotes or double quotes.
    If there is more than one language, list them as comma-separated values (spaces optional) and sort them from most to least used. If there is a long list, please list at least the first three most common ones. If there is no language (e.g., this is a documentation-only or test-only project), use the single character "-". Please use a conventional capitalization for each language, e.g., "JavaScript".
    The Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) is a structured naming scheme for information technology systems, software, and packages. It is used in a number of systems and databases when reporting vulnerabilities.

  • Prerequisites


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST achieve a passing level badge. [achieve_passing]

  • Basic project website content


    Enough for a badge!

    The information on how to contribute MUST include the requirements for acceptable contributions (e.g., a reference to any required coding standard). (URL required) [contribution_requirements]

    CONTRIBUTING.md documents quality requirements (PHPStan level 10, PER-CS3.0 code style, unit tests, mutation tests) and PR process including conventional commits and signed commits. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md


  • Project oversight


    Enough for a badge!

    The project SHOULD have a legal mechanism where all developers of non-trivial amounts of project software assert that they are legally authorized to make these contributions. The most common and easily-implemented approach for doing this is by using a Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO), where users add "signed-off-by" in their commits and the project links to the DCO website. However, this MAY be implemented as a Contributor License Agreement (CLA), or other legal mechanism. (URL required) [dco]
    The DCO is the recommended mechanism because it's easy to implement, tracked in the source code, and git directly supports a "signed-off" feature using "commit -s". To be most effective it is best if the project documentation explains what "signed-off" means for that project. A CLA is a legal agreement that defines the terms under which intellectual works have been licensed to an organization or project. A contributor assignment agreement (CAA) is a legal agreement that transfers rights in an intellectual work to another party; projects are not required to have CAAs, since having CAA increases the risk that potential contributors will not contribute, especially if the receiver is a for-profit organization. The Apache Software Foundation CLAs (the individual contributor license and the corporate CLA) are examples of CLAs, for projects which determine that the risks of these kinds of CLAs to the project are less than their benefits.

    All commits are required to use --signoff (Signed-off-by trailer) for DCO compliance, as documented in CONTRIBUTING.md. Compliance is verified during code review and via project contribution guidelines. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-request-process


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST clearly define and document its project governance model (the way it makes decisions, including key roles). (URL required) [governance]
    There needs to be some well-established documented way to make decisions and resolve disputes. In small projects, this may be as simple as "the project owner and lead makes all final decisions". There are various governance models, including benevolent dictator and formal meritocracy; for more details, see Governance models. Both centralized (e.g., single-maintainer) and decentralized (e.g., group maintainers) approaches have been successfully used in projects. The governance information does not need to document the possibility of creating a project fork, since that is always possible for FLOSS projects.

    The project is maintained by Netresearch DTT GmbH with governance documented in CONTRIBUTING.md (contribution process, quality requirements, PR review process) and CODEOWNERS (team ownership). Architectural decisions are documented in the DeveloperGuide. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST adopt a code of conduct and post it in a standard location. (URL required) [code_of_conduct]
    Projects may be able to improve the civility of their community and to set expectations about acceptable conduct by adopting a code of conduct. This can help avoid problems before they occur and make the project a more welcoming place to encourage contributions. This should focus only on behavior within the community/workplace of the project. Example codes of conduct are the Linux kernel code of conduct, the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct, the Debian Code of Conduct, the Ubuntu Code of Conduct, the Fedora Code of Conduct, the GNOME Code Of Conduct, the KDE Community Code of Conduct, the Python Community Code of Conduct, The Ruby Community Conduct Guideline, and The Rust Code of Conduct.

    CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md implements the Contributor Covenant 3.0. Referenced from CONTRIBUTING.md. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST clearly define and publicly document the key roles in the project and their responsibilities, including any tasks those roles must perform. It MUST be clear who has which role(s), though this might not be documented in the same way. (URL required) [roles_responsibilities]
    The documentation for governance and roles and responsibilities may be in one place.

    CODEOWNERS defines @netresearch/typo3-team ownership of all code areas (Classes/, Tests/, .github/). CONTRIBUTING.md defines contributor roles and expectations. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST be able to continue with minimal interruption if any one person dies, is incapacitated, or is otherwise unable or unwilling to continue support of the project. In particular, the project MUST be able to create and close issues, accept proposed changes, and release versions of software, within a week of confirmation of the loss of support from any one individual. This MAY be done by ensuring someone else has any necessary keys, passwords, and legal rights to continue the project. Individuals who run a FLOSS project MAY do this by providing keys in a lockbox and a will providing any needed legal rights (e.g., for DNS names). (URL required) [access_continuity]

    The GitHub organization (netresearch) owns the repository with multiple team members having admin access via @netresearch/typo3-team. Repository access is not dependent on any single individual. CODEOWNERS assigns team ownership. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS


    Enough for a badge!

    The project SHOULD have a "bus factor" of 2 or more. (URL required) [bus_factor]
    A "bus factor" (aka "truck factor") is the minimum number of project members that have to suddenly disappear from a project ("hit by a bus") before the project stalls due to lack of knowledgeable or competent personnel. The truck-factor tool can estimate this for projects on GitHub. For more information, see Assessing the Bus Factor of Git Repositories by Cosentino et al.

    Project is owned by Netresearch DTT GmbH organization with team-level access (@netresearch/typo3-team). Multiple developers have repository access. Knowledge documented in 11 RST chapters, ADRs, and AGENTS.md. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/tree/main/Documentation and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS


  • Documentation


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST have a documented roadmap that describes what the project intends to do and not do for at least the next year. (URL required) [documentation_roadmap]
    The project might not achieve the roadmap, and that's fine; the purpose of the roadmap is to help potential users and contributors understand the intended direction of the project. It need not be detailed.

    GitHub Issues with the 'enhancement' label serve as a public roadmap. Feature requests are tracked via structured issue templates. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/issues?q=label%3Aenhancement and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST include documentation of the architecture (aka high-level design) of the software produced by the project. If the project does not produce software, select "not applicable" (N/A). (URL required) [documentation_architecture]
    A software architecture explains a program's fundamental structures, i.e., the program's major components, the relationships among them, and the key properties of these components and relationships.

    Documentation/DeveloperGuide/Index.rst documents the architecture: component overview, data flow, controllers, services, domain model, middleware, and event listeners. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/DeveloperGuide/Index.rst


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST document what the user can and cannot expect in terms of security from the software produced by the project (its "security requirements"). (URL required) [documentation_security]
    These are the security requirements that the software is intended to meet.

    Documentation/Security/Index.rst documents all security measures: HMAC-signed challenge tokens, nonce replay protection, rate limiting, user enumeration prevention, credential ownership verification. SECURITY.md covers vulnerability reporting. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Security/Index.rst and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST provide a "quick start" guide for new users to help them quickly do something with the software. (URL required) [documentation_quick_start]
    The idea is to show users how to get started and make the software do anything at all. This is critically important for potential users to get started.

    Documentation/Installation/Index.rst provides step-by-step installation instructions including Composer require, extension activation, and initial configuration. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Installation/Index.rst


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST make an effort to keep the documentation consistent with the current version of the project results (including software produced by the project). Any known documentation defects making it inconsistent MUST be fixed. If the documentation is generally current, but erroneously includes some older information that is no longer true, just treat that as a defect, then track and fix as usual. [documentation_current]
    The documentation MAY include information about differences or changes between versions of the software and/or link to older versions of the documentation. The intent of this criterion is that an effort is made to keep the documentation consistent, not that the documentation must be perfect.

    Documentation is updated with each release. The Changelog documents all changes per version. All 11 RST documentation chapters are kept current with the codebase. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Changelog/Index.rst and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/tree/main/Documentation


    Enough for a badge!

    The project repository front page and/or website MUST identify and hyperlink to any achievements, including this best practices badge, within 48 hours of public recognition that the achievement has been attained. (URL required) [documentation_achievements]
    An achievement is any set of external criteria that the project has specifically worked to meet, including some badges. This information does not need to be on the project website front page. A project using GitHub can put achievements on the repository front page by adding them to the README file.

    README.md displays achievement badges (CI status, Codecov coverage, OpenSSF Scorecard, PHPStan level 10, Infection MSI, TYPO3 compatibility, PHP version) and documents the full feature set. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be#readme


  • Accessibility and internationalization


    Enough for a badge!

    The project (both project sites and project results) SHOULD follow accessibility best practices so that persons with disabilities can still participate in the project and use the project results where it is reasonable to do so. [accessibility_best_practices]
    For web applications, see the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0) and its supporting document Understanding WCAG 2.0; see also W3C accessibility information. For GUI applications, consider using the environment-specific accessibility guidelines (such as Gnome, KDE, XFCE, Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows). Some TUI applications (e.g. `ncurses` programs) can do certain things to make themselves more accessible (such as `alpine`'s `force-arrow-cursor` setting). Most command-line applications are fairly accessible as-is. This criterion is often N/A, e.g., for program libraries. Here are some examples of actions to take or issues to consider:
    • Provide text alternatives for any non-text content so that it can be changed into other forms people need, such as large print, braille, speech, symbols or simpler language ( WCAG 2.0 guideline 1.1)
    • Color is not used as the only visual means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element. ( WCAG 2.0 guideline 1.4.1)
    • The visual presentation of text and images of text has a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, except for large text, incidental text, and logotypes ( WCAG 2.0 guideline 1.4.3)
    • Make all functionality available from a keyboard (WCAG guideline 2.1)
    • A GUI or web-based project SHOULD test with at least one screen-reader on the target platform(s) (e.g. NVDA, Jaws, or WindowEyes on Windows; VoiceOver on Mac & iOS; Orca on Linux/BSD; TalkBack on Android). TUI programs MAY work to reduce overdraw to prevent redundant reading by screen-readers.

    This is a backend-only TYPO3 extension. The user interface is rendered by TYPO3's FormEngine and backend module framework, which handle accessibility compliance. The extension does not implement custom frontend UI. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be#overview and https://docs.typo3.org/m/typo3/reference-coreapi/main/en-us/ApiOverview/FormEngine/Index.html


    Enough for a badge!

    The software produced by the project SHOULD be internationalized to enable easy localization for the target audience's culture, region, or language. If internationalization (i18n) does not apply (e.g., the software doesn't generate text intended for end-users and doesn't sort human-readable text), select "not applicable" (N/A). [internationalization]
    Localization "refers to the adaptation of a product, application or document content to meet the language, cultural and other requirements of a specific target market (a locale)." Internationalization is the "design and development of a product, application or document content that enables easy localization for target audiences that vary in culture, region, or language." (See W3C's "Localization vs. Internationalization".) Software meets this criterion simply by being internationalized. No localization for another specific language is required, since once software has been internationalized it's possible for others to work on localization.

    The extension uses TYPO3's standard xlf localization framework. All user-facing labels are in English xlf files (Resources/Private/Language/*.xlf) ready for translation. TYPO3 handles display language switching natively. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/tree/main/Resources/Private/Language and https://docs.typo3.org/m/typo3/reference-coreapi/main/en-us/ApiOverview/Localization/Index.html


  • Other


    Enough for a badge!

    If the project sites (website, repository, and download URLs) store passwords for authentication of external users, the passwords MUST be stored as iterated hashes with a per-user salt by using a key stretching (iterated) algorithm (e.g., Argon2id, Bcrypt, Scrypt, or PBKDF2). If the project sites do not store passwords for this purpose, select "not applicable" (N/A). [sites_password_security]
    Note that the use of GitHub meets this criterion. This criterion only applies to passwords used for authentication of external users into the project sites (aka inbound authentication). If the project sites must log in to other sites (aka outbound authentication), they may need to store authorization tokens for that purpose differently (since storing a hash would be useless). This applies criterion crypto_password_storage to the project sites, similar to sites_https.

    This extension replaces password authentication with WebAuthn passkeys. No passwords are stored or managed by this extension. Password handling is delegated to TYPO3 core's SaltedPasswordService. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be#overview and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Introduction/Index.rst


 Change Control 1/1 ●

  • Previous versions


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST maintain the most often used older versions of the product or provide an upgrade path to newer versions. If the upgrade path is difficult, the project MUST document how to perform the upgrade (e.g., the interfaces that have changed and detailed suggested steps to help upgrade). [maintenance_or_update]

    The project is actively maintained with releases in February 2026 (v0.5.0), regular commits, responsive issue handling, and a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/releases and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/commits/main


 Reporting 3/3 ●

  • Bug-reporting process


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST use an issue tracker for tracking individual issues. [report_tracker]

    GitHub Issues is used as the public issue tracker, with structured templates for bugs and feature requests. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/issues


  • Vulnerability report process


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST give credit to the reporter(s) of all vulnerability reports resolved in the last 12 months, except for the reporter(s) who request anonymity. If there have been no vulnerabilities resolved in the last 12 months, select "not applicable" (N/A). (URL required) [vulnerability_report_credit]

    SECURITY.md explicitly states: 'We will credit vulnerability reporters in the security advisory (unless anonymity is requested).' See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/SECURITY.md#what-to-expect


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST have a documented process for responding to vulnerability reports. (URL required) [vulnerability_response_process]
    This is strongly related to vulnerability_report_process, which requires that there be a documented way to report vulnerabilities. It also related to vulnerability_report_response, which requires response to vulnerability reports within a certain time frame.

    SECURITY.md defines a detailed response process: acknowledgment, assessment, fix development, coordinated disclosure, and reporter credit. Response SLAs range from 48 hours (Critical) to 14 business days (Low). See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/SECURITY.md#response-timeline


 Quality 19/19 ●

  • Coding standards


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST identify the specific coding style guides for the primary languages it uses, and require that contributions generally comply with it. (URL required) [coding_standards]
    In most cases this is done by referring to some existing style guide(s), possibly listing differences. These style guides can include ways to improve readability and ways to reduce the likelihood of defects (including vulnerabilities). Many programming languages have one or more widely-used style guides. Examples of style guides include Google's style guides and SEI CERT Coding Standards.

    The project enforces PER-CS3.0 code style (PHP-CS-Fixer) and PHPStan level 10 with ergebnis/phpstan-rules for maximum static analysis strictness. Standards are documented in CONTRIBUTING.md. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#quality-requirements and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Build/.php-cs-fixer.php


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST automatically enforce its selected coding style(s) if there is at least one FLOSS tool that can do so in the selected language(s). [coding_standards_enforced]
    This MAY be implemented using static analysis tool(s) and/or by forcing the code through code reformatters. In many cases the tool configuration is included in the project's repository (since different projects may choose different configurations). Projects MAY allow style exceptions (and typically will); where exceptions occur, they MUST be rare and documented in the code at their locations, so that these exceptions can be reviewed and so that tools can automatically handle them in the future. Examples of such tools include ESLint (JavaScript), Rubocop (Ruby), and devtools check (R).

    Coding standards are enforced at multiple levels: CaptainHook pre-commit hooks run lint and PHPStan locally, and the GitHub Actions CI pipeline fails on any style violation or PHPStan error. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Build/captainhook.json


  • Working build system


    Enough for a badge!

    Build systems for native binaries MUST honor the relevant compiler and linker (environment) variables passed in to them (e.g., CC, CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS, and LDFLAGS) and pass them to compiler and linker invocations. A build system MAY extend them with additional flags; it MUST NOT simply replace provided values with its own. If no native binaries are being generated, select "not applicable" (N/A). [build_standard_variables]
    It should be easy to enable special build features like Address Sanitizer (ASAN), or to comply with distribution hardening best practices (e.g., by easily turning on compiler flags to do so).

    PHP/Composer project with no compilation step. There are no standard build variables (DESTDIR, PREFIX, etc.) applicable to interpreted PHP code distributed via Composer. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/composer.json and https://getcomposer.org/doc/01-basic-usage.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The build and installation system SHOULD preserve debugging information if they are requested in the relevant flags (e.g., "install -s" is not used). If there is no build or installation system (e.g., typical JavaScript libraries), select "not applicable" (N/A). [build_preserve_debug]
    E.G., setting CFLAGS (C) or CXXFLAGS (C++) should create the relevant debugging information if those languages are used, and they should not be stripped during installation. Debugging information is needed for support and analysis, and also useful for measuring the presence of hardening features in the compiled binaries.

    PHP is an interpreted language. There are no compilation artifacts or debug symbols to preserve. Source code is shipped directly via Composer packages. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/composer.json and https://packagist.org/packages/netresearch/nr-passkeys-be


    Enough for a badge!

    The build system for the software produced by the project MUST NOT recursively build subdirectories if there are cross-dependencies in the subdirectories. If there is no build or installation system (e.g., typical JavaScript libraries), select "not applicable" (N/A). [build_non_recursive]
    The project build system's internal dependency information needs to be accurate, otherwise, changes to the project may not build correctly. Incorrect builds can lead to defects (including vulnerabilities). A common mistake in large build systems is to use a "recursive build" or "recursive make", that is, a hierarchy of subdirectories containing source files, where each subdirectory is independently built. Unless each subdirectory is fully independent, this is a mistake, because the dependency information is incorrect.

    PHP/Composer project with no recursive build system. Composer resolves dependencies in a single pass. No Makefile-based recursive builds. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/composer.json and https://getcomposer.org/doc/01-basic-usage.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST be able to repeat the process of generating information from source files and get exactly the same bit-for-bit result. If no building occurs (e.g., scripting languages where the source code is used directly instead of being compiled), select "not applicable" (N/A). [build_repeatable]
    GCC and clang users may find the -frandom-seed option useful; in some cases, this can be resolved by forcing some sort order. More suggestions can be found at the reproducible build site.

    Source-distributed PHP library via Composer/Packagist. Reproducibility of dependency resolution is the consuming application's responsibility via their composer.lock. The extension itself has no compiled artifacts. See https://packagist.org/packages/netresearch/nr-passkeys-be and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/composer.json


  • Installation system


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST provide a way to easily install and uninstall the software produced by the project using a commonly-used convention. [installation_common]
    Examples include using a package manager (at the system or language level), "make install/uninstall" (supporting DESTDIR), a container in a standard format, or a virtual machine image in a standard format. The installation and uninstallation process (e.g., its packaging) MAY be implemented by a third party as long as it is FLOSS.

    Standard Composer installation: 'composer require netresearch/nr-passkeys-be'. This is the standard PHP/TYPO3 package installation method. Documented in Installation guide. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Installation/Index.rst and https://packagist.org/packages/netresearch/nr-passkeys-be


    Enough for a badge!

    The installation system for end-users MUST honor standard conventions for selecting the location where built artifacts are written to at installation time. For example, if it installs files on a POSIX system it MUST honor the DESTDIR environment variable. If there is no installation system or no standard convention, select "not applicable" (N/A). [installation_standard_variables]

    PHP/Composer package installed via 'composer require'. No PREFIX, DESTDIR, or other standard installation variables apply. Composer manages installation paths automatically. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Installation/Index.rst and https://getcomposer.org/doc/01-basic-usage.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST provide a way for potential developers to quickly install all the project results and support environment necessary to make changes, including the tests and test environment. This MUST be performed with a commonly-used convention. [installation_development_quick]
    This MAY be implemented using a generated container and/or installation script(s). External dependencies would typically be installed by invoking system and/or language package manager(s), per external_dependencies.

    CONTRIBUTING.md provides development setup instructions. The Makefile provides 'make up' for a full DDEV development environment setup. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-setup and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Makefile


  • Externally-maintained components


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST list external dependencies in a computer-processable way. (URL required) [external_dependencies]
    Typically this is done using the conventions of package manager and/or build system. Note that this helps implement installation_development_quick.

    All PHP dependencies are declared in composer.json. JavaScript dependencies are declared in package.json. No undeclared external dependencies. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/composer.json and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/package.json


    Enough for a badge!

    Projects MUST monitor or periodically check their external dependencies (including convenience copies) to detect known vulnerabilities, and fix exploitable vulnerabilities or verify them as unexploitable. [dependency_monitoring]
    This can be done using an origin analyzer / dependency checking tool / software composition analysis tool such as OWASP's Dependency-Check, Sonatype's Nexus Auditor, Synopsys' Black Duck Software Composition Analysis, and Bundler-audit (for Ruby). Some package managers include mechanisms to do this. It is acceptable if the components' vulnerability cannot be exploited, but this analysis is difficult and it is sometimes easier to simply update or fix the part.

    Dependabot is enabled for both Composer and npm ecosystems, automatically creating PRs for dependency updates. The dependency-review action checks for vulnerabilities on every PR. Composer audit runs in CI. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/dependabot.yml and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST either:
    1. make it easy to identify and update reused externally-maintained components; or
    2. use the standard components provided by the system or programming language.
    Then, if a vulnerability is found in a reused component, it will be easy to update that component. [updateable_reused_components]
    A typical way to meet this criterion is to use system and programming language package management systems. Many FLOSS programs are distributed with "convenience libraries" that are local copies of standard libraries (possibly forked). By itself, that's fine. However, if the program *must* use these local (forked) copies, then updating the "standard" libraries as a security update will leave these additional copies still vulnerable. This is especially an issue for cloud-based systems; if the cloud provider updates their "standard" libraries but the program won't use them, then the updates don't actually help. See, e.g., "Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper package" by Tom Callaway.

    Composer manages all dependency updates. Dependabot automatically creates PRs for security and version updates. Dependencies are pinned with semver ranges allowing patch updates. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/dependabot.yml and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/composer.json


    Enough for a badge!

    The project SHOULD avoid using deprecated or obsolete functions and APIs where FLOSS alternatives are available in the set of technology it uses (its "technology stack") and to a supermajority of the users the project supports (so that users have ready access to the alternative). [interfaces_current]

    API endpoints are documented in the README (login, self-service, admin routes with HTTP methods and paths) and in the DeveloperGuide RST chapter (controllers, data flow, domain model). See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be#api-endpoints and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/DeveloperGuide/Index.rst


  • Automated test suite


    Enough for a badge!

    An automated test suite MUST be applied on each check-in to a shared repository for at least one branch. This test suite MUST produce a report on test success or failure. [automated_integration_testing]
    This requirement can be viewed as a subset of test_continuous_integration, but focused on just testing, without requiring continuous integration.

    24 functional tests run with a real MySQL database in CI, testing actual database operations (credential CRUD, authentication flow). See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/tree/main/Tests/Functional and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST add regression tests to an automated test suite for at least 50% of the bugs fixed within the last six months. [regression_tests_added50]

    CONTRIBUTING.md states 'Bug fixes should include a regression test'. The PR template includes a test checklist. CI enforces test coverage via mutation testing (MSI >= 80%). See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#writing-tests and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST have FLOSS automated test suite(s) that provide at least 80% statement coverage if there is at least one FLOSS tool that can measure this criterion in the selected language. [test_statement_coverage80]
    Many FLOSS tools are available to measure test coverage, including gcov/lcov, Blanket.js, Istanbul, JCov, and covr (R). Note that meeting this criterion is not a guarantee that the test suite is thorough, instead, failing to meet this criterion is a strong indicator of a poor test suite.

    93.14% statement coverage measured by Codecov, well above the 80% threshold. Coverage is tracked per PR and enforced via Codecov integration. See https://app.codecov.io/gh/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml


  • New functionality testing


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST have a formal written policy that as major new functionality is added, tests for the new functionality MUST be added to an automated test suite. [test_policy_mandated]

    CONTRIBUTING.md mandates tests: 'New features must include unit tests' and 'Bug fixes should include a regression test'. The PR template includes a test checklist item. Mutation testing enforces test quality. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#writing-tests and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST include, in its documented instructions for change proposals, the policy that tests are to be added for major new functionality. [tests_documented_added]
    However, even an informal rule is acceptable as long as the tests are being added in practice.

    CONTRIBUTING.md requires tests for all new features and bug fixes. Tests are documented with PHPDoc comments and organized in structured directories (Unit, Functional, Fuzz). See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#writing-tests


  • Warning flags


    Enough for a badge!

    Projects MUST be maximally strict with warnings in the software produced by the project, where practical. [warnings_strict]
    Some warnings cannot be effectively enabled on some projects. What is needed is evidence that the project is striving to enable warning flags where it can, so that errors are detected early.

    PHPStan runs at maximum level 10 with strict rules (ergebnis/phpstan-rules). PHP strict_types=1 in all source files. PHP-CS-Fixer enforces PER-CS3.0 with strict_param. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Build/phpstan.neon


 Security 13/13 ●

  • Secure development knowledge


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST implement secure design principles (from "know_secure_design"), where applicable. If the project is not producing software, select "not applicable" (N/A). [implement_secure_design]
    For example, the project results should have fail-safe defaults (access decisions should deny by default, and projects' installation should be secure by default). They should also have complete mediation (every access that might be limited must be checked for authority and be non-bypassable). Note that in some cases principles will conflict, in which case a choice must be made (e.g., many mechanisms can make things more complex, contravening "economy of mechanism" / keep it simple).

    The extension implements OWASP secure design principles: HMAC-SHA256 challenge tokens prevent forgery, nonce replay protection prevents reuse attacks, rate limiting prevents brute force, randomized timing prevents user enumeration, credential ownership verification prevents unauthorized access. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Security/Index.rst


  • Use basic good cryptographic practices

    Note that some software does not need to use cryptographic mechanisms. If your project produces software that (1) includes, activates, or enables encryption functionality, and (2) might be released from the United States (US) to outside the US or to a non-US-citizen, you may be legally required to take a few extra steps. Typically this just involves sending an email. For more information, see the encryption section of Understanding Open Source Technology & US Export Controls.

    Enough for a badge!

    The default security mechanisms within the software produced by the project MUST NOT depend on cryptographic algorithms or modes with known serious weaknesses (e.g., the SHA-1 cryptographic hash algorithm or the CBC mode in SSH). [crypto_weaknesses]
    Concerns about CBC mode in SSH are discussed in CERT: SSH CBC vulnerability.

    The extension does not use known-weak algorithms. HMAC-SHA256 is used for token signing. WebAuthn uses ECDSA/RSA. Constant-time comparison (hash_equals) prevents timing attacks. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Security/Index.rst


    Enough for a badge!

    The project SHOULD support multiple cryptographic algorithms, so users can quickly switch if one is broken. Common symmetric key algorithms include AES, Twofish, and Serpent. Common cryptographic hash algorithm alternatives include SHA-2 (including SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384 AND SHA-512) and SHA-3. [crypto_algorithm_agility]

    WebAuthn supports multiple signing algorithms: ES256, ES384, ES512, RS256, and more. The algorithm list is configurable. The web-auth/webauthn-lib library handles algorithm negotiation. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Security/Index.rst and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Classes/Service/WebAuthnService.php


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST support storing authentication credentials (such as passwords and dynamic tokens) and private cryptographic keys in files that are separate from other information (such as configuration files, databases, and logs), and permit users to update and replace them without code recompilation. If the project never processes authentication credentials and private cryptographic keys, select "not applicable" (N/A). [crypto_credential_agility]

    Users can register multiple passkeys (different devices/authenticators) and revoke individual credentials. The admin interface allows managing all user credentials. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be#features and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Usage/Index.rst


    Enough for a badge!

    The software produced by the project SHOULD support secure protocols for all of its network communications, such as SSHv2 or later, TLS1.2 or later (HTTPS), IPsec, SFTP, and SNMPv3. Insecure protocols such as FTP, HTTP, telnet, SSLv3 or earlier, and SSHv1 SHOULD be disabled by default, and only enabled if the user specifically configures it. If the software produced by the project does not support network communications, select "not applicable" (N/A). [crypto_used_network]

    Extension does not implement network protocols. TLS/HTTPS is the web server's responsibility. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Installation/Index.rst


    Enough for a badge!

    The software produced by the project SHOULD, if it supports or uses TLS, support at least TLS version 1.2. Note that the predecessor of TLS was called SSL. If the software does not use TLS, select "not applicable" (N/A). [crypto_tls12]

    TLS version configured at the web server level, not by this TYPO3 extension. Extension requires HTTPS per installation docs. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Installation/Index.rst


    Enough for a badge!

    The software produced by the project MUST, if it supports TLS, perform TLS certificate verification by default when using TLS, including on subresources. If the software does not use TLS, select "not applicable" (N/A). [crypto_certificate_verification]
    Note that incorrect TLS certificate verification is a common mistake. For more information, see "The Most Dangerous Code in the World: Validating SSL Certificates in Non-Browser Software" by Martin Georgiev et al. and "Do you trust this application?" by Michael Catanzaro.

    The extension does not make outbound TLS connections or perform certificate verification. All network communication is handled by TYPO3 and the web server infrastructure. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Security/Index.rst and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/DeveloperGuide/Index.rst


    Enough for a badge!

    The software produced by the project MUST, if it supports TLS, perform certificate verification before sending HTTP headers with private information (such as secure cookies). If the software does not use TLS, select "not applicable" (N/A). [crypto_verification_private]

    The extension does not handle network communication directly. All HTTP communication runs through TYPO3's PSR-7/PSR-15 middleware stack and the web server. No direct socket or TLS operations. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Classes/Middleware/PublicRouteResolver.php and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/DeveloperGuide/Index.rst


  • Secure release


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST cryptographically sign releases of the project results intended for widespread use, and there MUST be a documented process explaining to users how they can obtain the public signing keys and verify the signature(s). The private key for these signature(s) MUST NOT be on site(s) used to directly distribute the software to the public. If releases are not intended for widespread use, select "not applicable" (N/A). [signed_releases]
    The project results include both source code and any generated deliverables where applicable (e.g., executables, packages, and containers). Generated deliverables MAY be signed separately from source code. These MAY be implemented as signed git tags (using cryptographic digital signatures). Projects MAY provide generated results separately from tools like git, but in those cases, the separate results MUST be separately signed.

    All releases have GPG-signed tags created locally with 'git tag -s' before pushing. GitHub Releases are created on top of these pre-existing signed tags. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/tags and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/releases


    Enough for a badge!

    It is SUGGESTED that in the version control system, each important version tag (a tag that is part of a major release, minor release, or fixes publicly noted vulnerabilities) be cryptographically signed and verifiable as described in signed_releases. [version_tags_signed]

    All version tags (0.1.0 through 0.5.0) are GPG-signed using 'git tag -s'. The pre-push hook (Build/Scripts/check-tag-version.sh) validates tag-to-version consistency. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/tags and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Build/Scripts/check-tag-version.sh


  • Other security issues


    Enough for a badge!

    The project results MUST check all inputs from potentially untrusted sources to ensure they are valid (an *allowlist*), and reject invalid inputs, if there are any restrictions on the data at all. [input_validation]
    Note that comparing input against a list of "bad formats" (aka a *denylist*) is normally not enough, because attackers can often work around a denylist. In particular, numbers are converted into internal formats and then checked if they are between their minimum and maximum (inclusive), and text strings are checked to ensure that they are valid text patterns (e.g., valid UTF-8, length, syntax, etc.). Some data may need to be "anything at all" (e.g., a file uploader), but these would typically be rare.

    All input is validated in controllers with strict type checking. PHP strict_types=1 is declared in all source files. PHPStan level 10 catches type-safety issues at analysis time. Request payloads are validated via typed DTOs. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Classes/Controller/LoginController.php and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Build/phpstan.neon


    Enough for a badge!

    Hardening mechanisms SHOULD be used in the software produced by the project so that software defects are less likely to result in security vulnerabilities. [hardening]
    Hardening mechanisms may include HTTP headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), compiler flags to mitigate attacks (such as -fstack-protector), or compiler flags to eliminate undefined behavior. For our purposes least privilege is not considered a hardening mechanism (least privilege is important, but separate).

    step-security/harden-runner on all CI jobs. SHA-pinned GitHub Actions. Minimal token permissions (contents: read). Branch protection requires signed commits. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/SECURITY.md#branch-protection


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST provide an assurance case that justifies why its security requirements are met. The assurance case MUST include: a description of the threat model, clear identification of trust boundaries, an argument that secure design principles have been applied, and an argument that common implementation security weaknesses have been countered. (URL required) [assurance_case]
    An assurance case is "a documented body of evidence that provides a convincing and valid argument that a specified set of critical claims regarding a system’s properties are adequately justified for a given application in a given environment" ("Software Assurance Using Structured Assurance Case Models", Thomas Rhodes et al, NIST Interagency Report 7608). Trust boundaries are boundaries where data or execution changes its level of trust, e.g., a server's boundaries in a typical web application. It's common to list secure design principles (such as Saltzer and Schroeer) and common implementation security weaknesses (such as the OWASP top 10 or CWE/SANS top 25), and show how each are countered. The BadgeApp assurance case may be a useful example. This is related to documentation_security, documentation_architecture, and implement_secure_design.

    Security documentation (Documentation/Security/Index.rst) documents security claims with evidence: HMAC-signed tokens prevent forgery, nonce protection prevents replay attacks, rate limiting prevents brute force, fuzz testing validates input handling robustness. Test results provide measurable evidence. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/Documentation/Security/Index.rst and https://app.codecov.io/gh/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be


 Analysis 2/2 ●

  • Static code analysis


    Enough for a badge!

    The project MUST use at least one static analysis tool with rules or approaches to look for common vulnerabilities in the analyzed language or environment, if there is at least one FLOSS tool that can implement this criterion in the selected language. [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]
    Static analysis tools that are specifically designed to look for common vulnerabilities are more likely to find them. That said, using any static tools will typically help find some problems, so we are suggesting but not requiring this for the 'passing' level badge.

    CodeQL (SAST) analyzes for common vulnerability patterns in JavaScript and Actions. PHPStan level 10 catches type errors, null references, and dead code. dependency-review-action blocks high-severity vulnerable dependencies. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/workflows/codeql.yml and https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/blob/main/.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml


  • Dynamic code analysis


    Enough for a badge!

    If the software produced by the project includes software written using a memory-unsafe language (e.g., C or C++), then at least one dynamic tool (e.g., a fuzzer or web application scanner) MUST be routinely used in combination with a mechanism to detect memory safety problems such as buffer overwrites. If the project does not produce software written in a memory-unsafe language, choose "not applicable" (N/A). [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]
    Examples of mechanisms to detect memory safety problems include Address Sanitizer (ASAN) (available in GCC and LLVM), Memory Sanitizer, and valgrind. Other potentially-used tools include thread sanitizer and undefined behavior sanitizer. Widespread assertions would also work.

    Fuzz tests specifically target security-sensitive code paths: challenge token parsing (ChallengeTokenFuzzTest), credential ID handling (CredentialIdFuzzTest), and request payload parsing (RequestPayloadFuzzTest). These detect memory safety and input validation issues. See https://github.com/netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be/tree/main/Tests/Fuzz



This data is available under the Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). This means that a Data Recipient may share the Data, with or without modifications, so long as the Data Recipient makes available the text of this agreement with the shared Data. Please credit Sebastian Mendel and the OpenSSF Best Practices badge contributors.

Project badge entry owned by: Sebastian Mendel.
Entry created on 2026-02-25 16:10:18 UTC, last updated on 2026-02-25 22:33:30 UTC. Last achieved passing badge on 2026-02-25 16:42:22 UTC.