rullst-connect

Projects that follow the best practices below can voluntarily self-certify and show that they've achieved an Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) best practices badge.

There is no set of practices that can guarantee that software will never have defects or vulnerabilities; even formal methods can fail if the specifications or assumptions are wrong. Nor is there any set of practices that can guarantee that a project will sustain a healthy and well-functioning development community. However, following best practices can help improve the results of projects. For example, some practices enable multi-person review before release, which can both help find otherwise hard-to-find technical vulnerabilities and help build trust and a desire for repeated interaction among developers from different companies. To earn a badge, all MUST and MUST NOT criteria must be met, all SHOULD criteria must be met OR be unmet with justification, and all SUGGESTED criteria must be met OR unmet (we want them considered at least). If you want to enter justification text as a generic comment, instead of being a rationale that the situation is acceptable, start the text block with '//' followed by a space. Feedback is welcome via the GitHub site as issues or pull requests There is also a mailing list for general discussion.

We gladly provide the information in several locales, however, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the translations, the English version is the authoritative version.
If this is your project, please show your baseline badge status on your project page! The baseline badge status looks like this: Baseline badge level for project 13360 is in_progress Here is how to embed the baseline badge:
You can show your baseline badge status by embedding this in your markdown file:
[![OpenSSF Baseline](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13360/baseline)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13360)
or by embedding this in your HTML:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13360"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13360/baseline"></a>


These are the Baseline Level 3 criteria. These are criteria version v2026.02.19.

Baseline Series: Baseline Level 1 Baseline Level 2 Baseline Level 3

        

 Basics

  • General

    Note that other projects may use the same name.

    Rust Connect is an elegant, async-first, and Developer Experience (DX) focused OAuth2 authentication library for Rust,

    Please use SPDX license expression format; examples include "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", and "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Do not include single quotes or double quotes.
    If there is more than one language, list them as comma-separated values (spaces optional) and sort them from most to least used. If there is a long list, please list at least the first three most common ones. If there is no language (e.g., this is a documentation-only or test-only project), use the single character "-". Please use a conventional capitalization for each language, e.g., "JavaScript".
    The Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) is a structured naming scheme for information technology systems, software, and packages. It is used in a number of systems and databases when reporting vulnerabilities.

    Rullst Connect 🦀

    Crates.io
    Downloads
    Documentation
    License: MIT
    Rust Version

    Rullst Connect is an elegant, async-first, and Developer Experience (DX) focused OAuth2 authentication library for Rust. It simplifies the integration of social logins into your Rust web applications, providing a standardized interface across multiple providers.

    🛡️ Quality & Security Audits

    CI & Coverage Security & Analysis Formal & Advanced Testing
    CI Build<br>Coverage<br>Spellcheck CodeQL<br>Cargo Deny<br>Machete<br>OpenSSF Scorecard Fuzz Testing<br>Mutants<br>Kani
    Publish Semver Checks Zero Panics<br>Audit: 10/10

    ✨ Features

    • 🚀 Async & Fast: Built on top of tokio and reqwest.
    • 🧩 Standardized: All providers return a unified ConnectUser struct.
    • 🛡️ Type-Safe: Robust error handling using thiserror (ConnectError).
    • 🔌 Framework Agnostic: Works seamlessly with Rullst, Axum, Actix, Leptos, Dioxus, or any other framework.
    • 🔐 Enterprise Security: Built-in OIDC Discovery, JWKS validation, and automated CSRF tower-sessions.
    • 📺 Device Flow: Native RFC 8628 support for headless CLI and Smart TV auth.
    • 🛠️ Testing: Embedded Mock IdP router for seamless offline local E2E testing.

    📚 Important Documents:

    📦 Supported Providers

    Official support for 11 core providers:

    1. Google
    2. GitHub
    3. Microsoft / Azure AD
    4. Apple (Sign in with Apple)
    5. Auth0
    6. AWS Cognito
    7. Facebook
    8. X (Twitter) (Strict PKCE requirement)
    9. Discord
    10. LinkedIn
    11. OIDC (OpenID Connect Custom Provider)

    🛠️ Installation

    Add the package to your Cargo.toml. If you use Rullst, Axum, Actix, or Leptos, you can enable their specific features for native Extractor support!

    You can either run:

    cargo add rullst-connect
    

    Or manually add it to your Cargo.toml:

    [dependencies]
    rullst-connect = "10.0.1"
    tokio = { version = "1.52", features = ["full"] }
    

    🚀 Quick Start

    1. Initialize the Provider

    Choose your provider and pass your credentials and callback URL:

    use rullst_connect::prelude::*;
    
    let github = GithubProvider::new(
        "YOUR_CLIENT_ID".to_string(),
        "YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET".to_string(),
        "http://localhost:3000/auth/github/callback".to_string(),
    );
    

    2. Redirect the User

    Get the authorization URL and redirect your user:

    let url = github.redirect_url();
    // Example in Axum: return Redirect::temporary(&url);
    

    3. Handle the Callback & Get User

    When the user returns to your callback URL with a code query parameter, exchange it for a ConnectUser:

    let params = rullst_connect::provider::ExchangeParams {
        auth_code: code,
        ..Default::default()
    };
    match github.get_user(params).await {
        Ok(user) => {
            println!("Welcome, {}!", user.name);
            println!("Email: {:?}", user.email);
            println!("Avatar: {:?}", user.avatar_url);
        }
        Err(_) => return (StatusCode::INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, "Failed to get user".to_string()),
    }
    

    🛡️ CSRF Protection (State Parameter)

    To prevent Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, you should generate a secure random string, save it in a session/cookie, and pass it to the provider.

    // 1. Generate a random state string and save it in the session
    let state = "random_secure_string";
    
    // 2. Get the authorization URL with the state parameter using the builder
    let url = github.with_state(state).redirect_url();
    // return Redirect::temporary(&url);
    
    // 3. In the callback route, verify if the query param `state` matches your session!
    // If you are using the optional `axum` or `actix` features, you can use `verify_state`:
    // params.verify_state(&state_from_session)?;
    

    🔄 Refreshing Tokens

    If an access token expires, you can seamlessly renew it without asking the user to login again by using their refresh_token:

    let refreshed_user = github.refresh_token("existing_refresh_token_string").await?;
    // Tokens are wrapped in `secrecy::SecretString` to prevent accidental log leakage ([REDACTED]).
    // When you need to send it to an API, expose it explicitly:
    use secrecy::ExposeSecret;
    let raw_token = refreshed_user.access_token.expose_secret();
    println!("Successfully refreshed token securely!");
    

    🔒 PKCE Support (v9.0.0+)

    All providers natively support PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) to mitigate authorization code interception attacks. Some providers like X (Twitter) v2 strictly require it.

    use rullst_connect::pkce::generate_pkce;
    
    // 1. Generate challenge and verifier
    let (code_verifier, code_challenge) = generate_pkce();
    
    // 2. Save `code_verifier` in the user's session or a secure HttpOnly cookie!
    
    // 3. Get the URL with PKCE natively using the builder pattern
    let auth_url = provider.with_pkce(&code_challenge).redirect_url();
    
    // 4. In the callback route, fetch the user using the saved verifier:
    let params = rullst_connect::provider::ExchangeParams {
        auth_code: &code,
        code_verifier: Some(&code_verifier),
        ..Default::default()
    };
    let user = provider.get_user(params).await.unwrap();
    

    🧑‍💻 Full Example with Axum

    You can find a complete working server using the Axum framework in the examples directory. Just run:

    cargo run --example axum_server
    

    📦 Releasing a New Version

    This project uses cargo-release to automate version bumps, README synchronization, and CHANGELOG management.
    The publish workflow in .github/workflows/publish.yml runs when a vX.Y.Z tag is pushed, and it can also be triggered manually from GitHub Actions.

    To release a new version, simply run:

    # install it first if you haven't: cargo install cargo-release
    cargo release patch --execute  # for v1.0.x patches
    cargo release minor --execute  # for v1.x.0 features
    cargo release major --execute  # for vX.0.0 breaking changes
    

    This will automatically bump versions, tag the release, and push to GitHub, triggering the crates.io publish workflow.

    For the exact release checklist and what to do next time, see RELEASING.md.

    🤝 Contributing

    Feel free to open Issues and submit Pull Requests! Want to add a new provider? It's easy! Just implement the Provider trait.

    <!-- ## Contributors ✨ Thanks! <a href="https://github.com/Rullst/rullst-connect/graphs/contributors"> <img src="https://contrib.rocks/image?repo=Rullst/rullst-connect" /> </a> -->

    📄 License

    This project is licensed under the MIT License.

 Controls 0/21

  • Controls


    When a job is assigned permissions in a CI/CD pipeline, the source code or configuration MUST only assign the minimum privileges necessary for the corresponding activity. [OSPS-AC-04.02]
    Configure the project's CI/CD pipelines to assign the lowest available permissions to users and services by default, elevating permissions only when necessary for specific tasks. In some version control systems, this may be possible at the organizational or repository level. If not, set permissions at the top level of the pipeline.


    CI/CD pipelines which accept trusted collaborator input MUST sanitize and validate that input prior to use in the pipeline. [OSPS-BR-01.04]
    CI/CD pipelines should sanitize (quote, escape or exit on expected values) all collaborator inputs on explicit workflow executions. While collaborators are generally trusted, manual inputs to a workflow cannot be reviewed and could be abused by an account takeover or insider threat.


    When an official release is created, all assets within that release MUST be clearly associated with the release identifier or another unique identifier for the asset. [OSPS-BR-02.02]
    Assign a unique version identifier to each software asset produced by the project, following a consistent naming convention or numbering scheme. Examples include SemVer, CalVer, or git commit id.


    The project MUST define a policy for managing secrets and credentials used by the project. The policy should include guidelines for storing, accessing, and rotating secrets and credentials. [OSPS-BR-07.02]
    Document how secrets and credentials are managed and used within the project. This should include details on how secrets are stored (e.g., using a secrets management tool), how access is controlled, and how secrets are rotated or updated. Ensure that sensitive information is not hard-coded in the source code or stored in version control systems.


    When the project has made a release, the project documentation MUST contain instructions to verify the integrity and authenticity of the release assets. [OSPS-DO-03.01]
    Instructions in the project should contain information about the technology used, the commands to run, and the expected output. When possible, avoid storing this documentation in the same location as the build and release pipeline to avoid a single breach compromising both the software and the documentation for verifying the integrity of the software.


    When the project has made a release, the project documentation MUST contain instructions to verify the expected identity of the person or process authoring the software release. [OSPS-DO-03.02]
    The expected identity may be in the form of key IDs used to sign, issuer and identity from a sigstore certificate, or other similar forms. When possible, avoid storing this documentation in the same location as the build and release pipeline to avoid a single breach compromising both the software and the documentation for verifying the integrity of the software.


    When the project has made a release, the project documentation MUST include a descriptive statement about the scope and duration of support for each release. [OSPS-DO-04.01]
    In order to communicate the scope and duration of support for the project's released software assets, the project should have a SUPPORT.md file, a "Support" section in SECURITY.md, or other documentation explaining the support lifecycle, including the expected duration of support for each release, the types of support provided (e.g., bug fixes, security updates), and any relevant policies or procedures for obtaining support.


    When the project has made a release, the project documentation MUST provide a descriptive statement when releases or versions will no longer receive security updates. [OSPS-DO-05.01]
    In order to communicate the scope and duration of support for security fixes, the project should have a SUPPORT.md or other documentation explaining the project's policy for security updates.


    While active, the project documentation MUST have a policy that code collaborators are reviewed prior to granting escalated permissions to sensitive resources. [OSPS-GV-04.01]
    Publish an enforceable policy in the project documentation that requires code collaborators to be reviewed and approved before being granted escalated permissions to sensitive resources, such as merge approval or access to secrets. It is recommended that vetting includes establishing a justifiable lineage of identity such as confirming the contributor's association with a known trusted organization.


    When the project has made a release, all compiled released software assets MUST be delivered with a software bill of materials. [OSPS-QA-02.02]
    It is recommended to auto-generate SBOMs at build time using a tool that has been vetted for accuracy. This enables users to ingest this data in a standardized approach alongside other projects in their environment.


    When the project has made a release comprising multiple source code repositories, all subprojects MUST enforce security requirements that are as strict or stricter than the primary codebase. [OSPS-QA-04.02]
    Any additional subproject code repositories produced by the project and compiled into a release must enforce security requirements as applicable to the status and intent of the respective codebase. In addition to following the corresponding OSPS Baseline requirements, this may include requiring a security review, ensuring that it is free of vulnerabilities, and ensuring that it is free of known security issues.


    While active, project's documentation MUST clearly document when and how tests are run. [OSPS-QA-06.02]
    Add a section to the contributing documentation that explains how to run the tests locally and how to run the tests in the CI/CD pipeline. The documentation should explain what the tests are testing and how to interpret the results.


    While active, the project's documentation MUST include a policy that all major changes to the software produced by the project should add or update tests of the functionality in an automated test suite. [OSPS-QA-06.03]
    Add a section to the contributing documentation that explains the policy for adding or updating tests. The policy should explain what constitutes a major change and what tests should be added or updated.


    When a commit is made to the primary branch, the project's version control system MUST require at least one non-author human approval of the changes before merging. [OSPS-QA-07.01]
    Configure the project's version control system to require at least one non-author human approval of changes before merging into the release or primary branch. This can be achieved by requiring a pull request to be reviewed and approved by at least one other collaborator before it can be merged.


    When the project has made a release, the project MUST perform a threat modeling and attack surface analysis to understand and protect against attacks on critical code paths, functions, and interactions within the system. [OSPS-SA-03.02]
    Threat modeling is an activity where the project looks at the codebase, associated processes and infrastructure, interfaces, key components and "thinks like a hacker" and brainstorms how the system be be broken or compromised. Each identified threat is listed out so the project can then think about how to proactively avoid or close off any gaps/vulnerabilities that could arise. Ensure this is updated for new features or breaking changes.


    While active, any vulnerabilities in the software components not affecting the project MUST be accounted for in a VEX document, augmenting the vulnerability report with non-exploitability details. [OSPS-VM-04.02]
    Establish a VEX feed communicating the exploitability status of known vulnerabilities, including assessment details or any mitigations in place preventing vulnerable code from being executed.


    While active, the project documentation MUST include a policy that defines a threshold for remediation of SCA findings related to vulnerabilities and licenses. [OSPS-VM-05.01]
    Document a policy in the project that defines a threshold for remediation of SCA findings related to vulnerabilities and licenses. Include the process for identifying, prioritizing, and remediating these findings.


    While active, the project documentation MUST include a policy to address SCA violations prior to any release. [OSPS-VM-05.02]
    Document a policy in the project to address applicable Software Composition Analysis results before any release, and add status checks that verify compliance with that policy prior to release.


    While active, all changes to the project's codebase MUST be automatically evaluated against a documented policy for malicious dependencies and known vulnerabilities in dependencies, then blocked in the event of violations, except when declared and suppressed as non-exploitable. [OSPS-VM-05.03]
    Create a status check in the project's version control system that runs a Software Composition Analysis tool on all changes to the codebase. Require that the status check passes before changes can be merged.


    While active, the project documentation MUST include a policy that defines a threshold for remediation of SAST findings. [OSPS-VM-06.01]
    Document a policy in the project that defines a threshold for remediation of Static Application Security Testing (SAST) findings. Include the process for identifying, prioritizing, and remediating these findings.


    While active, all changes to the project's codebase MUST be automatically evaluated against a documented policy for security weaknesses and blocked in the event of violations except when declared and suppressed as non-exploitable. [OSPS-VM-06.02]
    Create a status check in the project's version control system that runs a Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tool on all changes to the codebase. Require that the status check passes before changes can be merged.


This data is available under the Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). This means that a Data Recipient may share the Data, with or without modifications, so long as the Data Recipient makes available the text of this agreement with the shared Data. Please credit @venelouis and the OpenSSF Best Practices badge contributors.

Project badge entry owned by: @venelouis.
Entry created on 2026-06-24 15:16:13 UTC, last updated on 2026-06-24 15:29:00 UTC. Last achieved passing badge on 2026-06-24 15:29:00 UTC.