compliance-trestle

Los proyectos que siguen las mejores prácticas a continuación pueden autocertificarse voluntariamente y demostrar que han obtenido una insignia de mejores prácticas de Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

No existe un conjunto de prácticas que pueda garantizar que el software nunca tendrá defectos o vulnerabilidades; incluso los métodos formales pueden fallar si las especificaciones o suposiciones son incorrectas. Tampoco existe ningún conjunto de prácticas que pueda garantizar que un proyecto mantenga una comunidad de desarrollo saludable y que funcione bien. Sin embargo, seguir las mejores prácticas puede ayudar a mejorar los resultados de los proyectos. Por ejemplo, algunas prácticas permiten la revisión por parte de múltiples personas antes del lanzamiento, lo que puede ayudar a encontrar vulnerabilidades técnicas que de otro modo serían difíciles de encontrar y ayudar a generar confianza y un deseo repetido de interacción entre desarrolladores de diferentes compañías. Para obtener una insignia, se deben cumplir todos los criterios DEBE y NO DEBE, se deben cumplir, así como todos los criterios DEBERÍAN deben cumplirse o ser justificados, y todos los criterios SUGERIDOS se pueden cumplir o incumplir (queremos que se consideren al menos). Si desea añadir texto como justificación mediante un comentario genérico, en lugar de ser un razonamiento de que la situación es aceptable, comience el bloque de texto con '//' seguido de un espacio. Los comentarios son bienvenidos a través del sitio de GitHub mediante "issues" o "pull requests". También hay una lista de correo electrónico para el tema principal.

Con mucho gusto proporcionaríamos la información en varios idiomas, sin embargo, si hay algún conflicto o inconsistencia entre las traducciones, la versión en inglés es la versión autorizada.
Si este es su proyecto, por favor muestre el estado de su insignia en la página de su proyecto. El estado de la insignia se ve así: El nivel de insignia para el proyecto 9408 es silver Aquí se explica cómo insertarla:
Puede mostrar el estado de su insignia insertando esto en su archivo markdown:
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408)
o insertando esto en su HTML:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408/badge"></a>


Estos son los criterios de nivel Plata. También puede ver los criterios de nivel Básico o Oro.

Baseline Series: Nivel Base 1 Nivel Base 2 Nivel Base 3

        

 Fundamentos 17/17 ●

  • General

    Tenga en cuenta que otros proyectos pueden usar el mismo nombre.

    An opinionated tooling platform for managing compliance as code, using continuous integration and NIST's OSCAL standard.

    Por favor use formato de expresión de licencia SPDX; los ejemplos incluyen "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT" y "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". No incluya comillas simples o comillas dobles.
    Si hay más de un lenguaje, enumérelos como valores separados por comas (los espacios son opcionales) y ordénelos de más a menos usado. Si hay una lista larga, por favor enumere al menos los tres primeros más comunes. Si no hay lenguaje (por ejemplo, este es un proyecto solo de documentación o solo de pruebas), use el carácter único "-". Por favor use una capitalización convencional para cada lenguaje, por ejemplo, "JavaScript".
    La Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) es un esquema de nomenclatura estructurado para sistemas de tecnología de la información, software y paquetes. Se utiliza en varios sistemas y bases de datos al reportar vulnerabilidades.
  • Prerrequisitos


    El proyecto DEBE lograr una insignia de nivel aprobado. [achieve_passing]

  • Contenido básico del sitio web del proyecto


    La información sobre cómo contribuir DEBE incluir los requisitos para contribuciones aceptables (por ejemplo, una referencia a cualquier estándar de codificación requerido). (URL requerida) [contribution_requirements]
  • Supervisión del proyecto


    El proyecto DEBERÍA tener un mecanismo legal donde todos los desarrolladores de cantidades no triviales de software del proyecto afirmen que están legalmente autorizados para hacer estas contribuciones. El enfoque más común y fácilmente implementado para hacer esto es usando un Certificado de Origen del Desarrollador (DCO), donde los usuarios agregan "signed-off-by" en sus commits y el proyecto enlaza al sitio web DCO. Sin embargo, esto PUEDE implementarse como un Acuerdo de Licencia de Contribuidor (CLA), u otro mecanismo legal. (URL requerida) [dco]
    El DCO es el mecanismo recomendado porque es fácil de implementar, se rastrea en el código fuente, y git soporta directamente una función "signed-off" usando "commit -s". Para ser más efectivo, es mejor si la documentación del proyecto explica qué significa "signed-off" para ese proyecto. Un CLA es un acuerdo legal que define los términos bajo los cuales las obras intelectuales han sido licenciadas a una organización o proyecto. Un acuerdo de asignación de contribuidor (CAA) es un acuerdo legal que transfiere derechos en una obra intelectual a otra parte; no se requiere que los proyectos tengan CAAs, ya que tener CAA aumenta el riesgo de que los contribuidores potenciales no contribuyan, especialmente si el receptor es una organización con fines de lucro. Los CLAs de Apache Software Foundation (la licencia de contribuidor individual y el CLA corporativo) son ejemplos de CLAs, para proyectos que determinan que los riesgos de estos tipos de CLAs para el proyecto son menores que sus beneficios.

    The project uses the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) 1.1 — the same mechanism used by the Linux Kernel community (https://developercertificate.org). This is documented in CONTRIBUTING.md (https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md), which explains what Signed-off-by means for this project, provides an example trailer (Signed-off-by: John Doe john.doe@example.com), and instructs contributors to use git commit --signoff. DCO sign-off is technically enforced on every pull request by a dedicated CI workflow (https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/workflows/verify-signoff.yml) that checks every non-merge commit to confirm the Signed-off-by trailer is present and matches the commit author's email address, blocking the PR if it does not.



    El proyecto DEBE definir y documentar claramente su modelo de gobernanza del proyecto (la forma en que toma decisiones, incluyendo roles clave). (URL requerida) [governance]
    Necesita haber alguna forma bien establecida y documentada de tomar decisiones y resolver disputas. En proyectos pequeños, esto puede ser tan simple como "el propietario del proyecto y líder toma todas las decisiones finales". Hay varios modelos de gobernanza, incluyendo dictador benevolente y meritocracia formal; para más detalles, ver Modelos de gobernanza. Tanto los enfoques centralizados (por ejemplo, un solo mantenedor) como los descentralizados (por ejemplo, grupo de mantenedores) se han utilizado con éxito en proyectos. La información de gobernanza no necesita documentar la posibilidad de crear un fork del proyecto, ya que eso siempre es posible para proyectos FLOSS.

    URL (primary):
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md

    URL (secondary — roles):
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md

    Justification text:

    The compliance-trestle project is governed under the OSCAL Compass community governance model, documented at https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md. This document defines all key roles (Member, Reviewer, Maintainer, Oversight Committee), the two-tier decision-making process (lazy consensus for day-to-day decisions; explicit simple or supermajority voting via GitVote for formal decisions), dispute resolution (escalation to the Oversight Committee with binding authority), and the process for electing and removing leadership. Detailed role requirements and responsibilities are in https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md. Active project maintainers are listed in the project-level MAINTAINERS.md.



    El proyecto DEBE adoptar un código de conducta y publicarlo en una ubicación estándar. (URL requerida) [code_of_conduct]
    Los proyectos pueden ser capaces de mejorar la civilidad de su comunidad y establecer expectativas sobre la conducta aceptable adoptando un código de conducta. Esto puede ayudar a evitar problemas antes de que ocurran y hacer que el proyecto sea un lugar más acogedor para fomentar contribuciones. Esto debe enfocarse solo en el comportamiento dentro de la comunidad/lugar de trabajo del proyecto. Ejemplos de códigos de conducta son el código de conducta del kernel de Linux, el Código de Conducta del Pacto del Contribuidor, el Código de Conducta de Debian, el Código de Conducta de Ubuntu, el Código de Conducta de Fedora, el Código de Conducta de GNOME, el Código de Conducta de la Comunidad KDE, el Código de Conducta de la Comunidad Python, La Guía de Conducta de la Comunidad Ruby, y El Código de Conducta de Rust.

    URL:
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

    Justification text:

    The project adopts the CNCF Code of Conduct, hosted at the OSCAL Compass community level at https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. It is referenced from the project README.md ("Participation in the OSCAL Compass community is governed by the Code of Conduct") and from the project's documentation site at https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/contributing/code_of_conduct/.



    El proyecto DEBE definir y documentar públicamente claramente los roles clave en el proyecto y sus responsabilidades, incluyendo cualquier tarea que esos roles deban realizar. DEBE quedar claro quién tiene qué rol(es), aunque esto podría no estar documentado de la misma manera. (URL requerida) [roles_responsibilities]
    La documentación para gobernanza y roles y responsabilidades puede estar en un solo lugar.

    URL (primary — role definitions):
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md

    Justification text:

    Key roles and their responsibilities are defined in https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md, which documents the Member, Reviewer, Maintainer, and Oversight Committee roles — including requirements to hold each role, specific responsibilities, and privileges. Who holds each role is publicly named in two places: project-level maintainers (Maintainer role) are listed with their GitHub handles in https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/MAINTAINERS.md, and org-level role holders (Oversight Committee, Org Admins, Community Maintainers) are listed with their GitHub handles and affiliations in https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md.



    El proyecto DEBE poder continuar con una interrupción mínima si cualquier persona muere, queda incapacitada o de otro modo no puede o no está dispuesta a continuar el soporte del proyecto. En particular, el proyecto DEBE poder crear y cerrar issues, aceptar cambios propuestos y lanzar versiones de software, dentro de una semana de confirmación de la pérdida de soporte de cualquier individuo. Esto PUEDE hacerse asegurando que alguien más tenga las claves, contraseñas y derechos legales necesarios para continuar el proyecto. Los individuos que ejecutan un proyecto FLOSS PUEDEN hacer esto proporcionando claves en una caja de seguridad y un testamento que proporcione los derechos legales necesarios (por ejemplo, para nombres DNS). (URL requerida) [access_continuity]

    Access Continuity Explanation for OpenSSF Best Practices [access_continuity]

    The project satisfies the access continuity requirement through shared organization administration, distributed maintainership, and documented governance procedures:

    1. Multi-Admin and Multi-Org Redundancy: Administrative access, credentials, and repository rights across the oscal-compass organization are shared among multiple Org Admins from different member organizations, plus a Linux Foundation backstop account (thelinuxfoundation). This ensures that operations (managing issues, merging pull requests, releasing software) can proceed without disruption if any single person is lost.
    2. Succession and Vacancy Rules: Formal vacancy appointment and governance policies allow the multi-member Oversight Committee to reallocate responsibilities and maintain uninterrupted project continuity within one week.

    Reference URLs



    El proyecto DEBERÍA tener un "factor de autobús" de 2 o más. (URL requerida) [bus_factor]
    Un "factor de autobús" (también conocido como "factor de camión") es el número mínimo de miembros del proyecto que tienen que desaparecer repentinamente de un proyecto ("ser atropellados por un autobús") antes de que el proyecto se paralice debido a la falta de personal conocedor o competente. La herramienta truck-factor puede estimar esto para proyectos en GitHub. Para más información, ver Assessing the Bus Factor of Git Repositories de Cosentino et al.

    OpenSSF Silver — bus_factor Justification
    Project: OSCAL Compass · Criterion ID: bus_factor

    Criterion
    The project SHOULD have a bus factor of 2 or more.
    URL
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#access-continuity
    Justification
    OSCAL Compass maintains a bus factor of 2 or more. The project's Access Continuity governance section documents that no single person is a point of failure. A six-member Oversight Committee drawn from at least three independent organizations (IBM, Red Hat, Sunstone Secure) collectively holds all necessary repository access, credentials, and legal rights. Multiple Org Admins — including a Linux Foundation backstop — ensure continuity of operations. Project knowledge is actively distributed across contributors from different organizations, so the project can continue to function within one week of losing any individual contributor. Vacancies are filled by appointment per the documented Vacancies process.


  • Documentación


    El proyecto DEBE tener una hoja de ruta documentada que describa lo que el proyecto tiene la intención de hacer y no hacer durante al menos el próximo año. (URL requerida) [documentation_roadmap]
    Es posible que el proyecto no logre la hoja de ruta, y eso está bien; el propósito de la hoja de ruta es ayudar a los posibles usuarios y colaboradores a comprender la dirección prevista del proyecto. No necesita ser detallada.

    ROADMAP.md is a dedicated, top-level file that explicitly describes what the OSCAL Compass project intends to do (5 named goals covering codebase maintenance, agentic authoring, community growth, OpenSSF Best Practices, and CNCF Incubation) and not do (enterprise support, certification authority functions, vulnerability scanning, and legacy format support) over the next year.

    Key URL:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/ROADMAP.md
    The document is intentionally high-level (not feature-by-feature), which is exactly what the criterion expects — enough for potential users and contributors to understand the project's direction without requiring exhaustive detail.



    El proyecto DEBE incluir documentación de la arquitectura (también conocida como diseño de alto nivel) del software producido por el proyecto. Si el proyecto no produce software, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). (URL requerida) [documentation_architecture]
    Una arquitectura de software explica las estructuras fundamentales de un programa, es decir, los componentes principales del programa, las relaciones entre ellos y las propiedades clave de estos componentes y relaciones.

    documentation_architecture — Compliance Evidence
    Project: compliance-trestle (oscal-compass) · Criterion: The project MUST include documentation of the architecture (high-level design) of the software it produces.

    Requirement Summary
    A software architecture explains a program's fundamental structures — its major components, the relationships among them, and the key properties of those components and relationships. The criterion requires at least one URL pointing to that documentation.

    Primary URL (Published Documentation)
    Live architecture page
    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/architecture/
    This is the publicly hosted, versioned architecture page rendered from the project's MkDocs-Material documentation site. It is permanently accessible under the latest alias managed by mike.

    Secondary URL (Repository Source)
    Markdown source in repository (develop branch)
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/docs/architecture.md
    The architecture document is tracked under version control alongside the code it describes at docs/architecture.md.

    What the Architecture Document Covers
    The document addresses all three elements the criterion requires.

    1. Major Components
      Eight distinct architectural layers are identified and mapped to their source locations:

    Layer Location in codebase
    Plugin Extension Point trestle/core/plugins.py
    Entry Points — CLI & Python API trestle/cli.py, trestle/core/repository.py
    Command Layer trestle/core/commands/
    Catalog API trestle/core/catalog/
    Profile Resolver trestle/core/profile_resolver.py, trestle/core/resolver/
    Validator Framework trestle/core/validator.py, trestle/core/validator_factory.py
    Markdown / Jinja / DrawIO Authoring trestle/core/control_{reader,writer}.py, trestle/core/markdown/, trestle/core/jinja/, trestle/core/draw_io.py
    Signing & Canonicalization trestle/core/signing.py, trestle/core/canonicalization.py
    Transform & Task Pipeline trestle/transforms/, trestle/tasks/
    OSCAL Object Model trestle/oscal/, trestle/core/base_model.py
    Workspace & Remote I/O trestle/common/, trestle/core/remote/cache.py
    2. Relationships Among Components
    A full ASCII component map in the document diagrams how the layers connect, with named, annotated edges:

    Plugin packages inject CommandBase subclasses into Trestle.subcommands at module import time.
    The CLI and Python API both dispatch to the Command Layer.
    Commands delegate business logic to Core Services (Catalog API, Profile Resolver, Validators, Authoring, Signing).
    All Core Services read and write through the OSCAL Object Model.
    The OSCAL Object Model serialises to/from Workspace & Remote I/O.
    3. Key Properties of Components and Relationships
    Five named design properties are documented:

    Property Description
    Workspace-centric storage A .trestle/-rooted directory tree; documents may be single files or split into sub-directory hierarchies following the object hierarchy.
    Schema-enforced I/O Every disk read/write passes through the Pydantic v2 model layer, guaranteeing schema validity at the boundary between disk and memory.
    Composable pipelines Pipeline / Filter pattern (trestle/core/pipeline.py) used for profile resolution and OSCAL assembly; stages are independently testable and reusable.
    Separation of concerns: CLI vs. API Commands delegate to core service classes; repository.py exposes the same services to Python callers without going through the CLI argument layer.
    Extensibility via plugins The trestle_* package naming convention allows third-party command packages to be auto-discovered without any core dependency on them.
    The document also includes a Security Requirements & Guarantees section specifying what users can and cannot rely on: input validation, SSRF protection, Jinja sandboxing, cryptographic provenance (DSSE / in-toto), supply chain integrity (SLSA), plugin trust boundaries, and encryption-at-rest limitations.

    Integration with Broader Documentation Site
    The architecture page is a top-level navigation item in the project's documentation site at https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/, which is referenced from the project README.md:

    "Complete documentation, tutorials, and background on compliance can be found here."
    Criterion Satisfaction Summary
    Criterion element Status Evidence
    URL to architecture documentation ✅ Met oscal-compass.github.io/…/architecture/
    Source file in repository ✅ Met docs/architecture.md (develop branch)
    Major components identified ✅ Met 11 layers named and mapped to source paths
    Relationships among components ✅ Met ASCII component map with labeled directional edges
    Key properties of components/relationships ✅ Met 5 named design properties + security guarantees section
    Versioned & publicly accessible ✅ Met MkDocs-Material + mike, always available at /latest/architecture/



    El proyecto DEBE documentar lo que el usuario puede y no puede esperar en términos de seguridad del software producido por el proyecto (sus "requisitos de seguridad"). (URL requerida) [documentation_security]
    Estos son los requisitos de seguridad que el software tiene la intención de cumplir.

    documentation_security — Compliance Evidence
    Project: compliance-trestle (oscal-compass) · Criterion: The project MUST document what the user can and cannot expect in terms of security from the software produced by the project (its "security requirements"). (URL required)

    Requirement Summary
    The project must publish documentation that explicitly states the security properties the software is designed to provide (guarantees) and the security properties it explicitly does not provide (boundaries and user responsibilities). At least one URL is required.

    URL 1 — Architecture: Security Requirements & Guarantees Section
    Published documentation page (direct anchor)
    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/architecture/#security-requirements-guarantees
    Markdown source in repository (develop branch)
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/docs/architecture.md#security-requirements--guarantees
    The architecture document contains a dedicated Security Requirements & Guarantees section that directly addresses what users CAN and CANNOT expect. It is structured in exactly the two-part form the criterion requires:

    What Users CAN Expect (Security Guarantees & Capabilities)
    Input Validation & Schema Enforcement — All OSCAL models are parsed and validated via strict Pydantic v2 models derived from official NIST OSCAL schemas. Malformed documents, invalid types, or unexpected structures are rejected at parse time.
    SSRF & Remote Resource Protection — Remote resource retrieval (trestle/core/remote/cache.py and trestle/core/remote/security.py) enforces HTTPS/SFTP and includes SSRF protections. Cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254, metadata.google.internal) and loopback addresses are blocked unconditionally. RFC 1918 private IP blocking is configurable via TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS.
    Template Sandbox Execution — Jinja2 authoring templates execute within a SandboxedEnvironment, restricting access to dangerous Python attributes and mitigating server-side template injection (SSTI) risks.
    Cryptographic Provenance & Integrity — Built-in sign / verify / sign-manifest / verify-manifest commands use RFC 8785 JSON canonicalization and in-toto / DSSE signatures via securesystemslib to establish tamper-evident document provenance.
    Supply Chain Integrity — Release distributions include SLSA build provenance attestations and PyPI trusted publishing.
    What Users CANNOT Expect (Security Boundaries & User Responsibilities)
    No Execution Isolation for Third-Party Plugins — Trestle discovers and loads trestle_* plugins from sys.path without sandboxing. Users are responsible for ensuring installed plugins are trusted.
    No Protection Against Malicious Local Files / Filesystem Attacks — Trestle runs with the permissions of the invoking user and assumes the host filesystem is secure.
    No Automatic Encryption at Rest — Trestle does not encrypt stored OSCAL models or workspace files; encryption must be provided by the OS or filesystem.
    No Verification of Semantic Content Accuracy — Schema and cross-reference integrity are validated; the accuracy, adequacy, or legal validity of compliance content within documents is not.
    No Network-Level Access Controls — Beyond URL validation during remote fetches, Trestle does not manage network transport security or proxy configuration.
    URL 2 — SECURITY.md (Repository Security Policy)
    SECURITY.md in repository
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/SECURITY.md
    SECURITY.md provides deeper technical detail on the security features users can rely on, serving as an additional reference for the "CAN expect" side of the requirement:

    Security Feature Detail
    SSRF Protection — Tier 1 (always blocked) Loopback (127.0.0.0/8, ::1/128), link-local (169.254.0.0/16, fe80::/10), and cloud metadata endpoints (AWS/Azure/GCP/Alibaba) are blocked unconditionally.
    SSRF Protection — Tier 2 (configurable) RFC 1918 private ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) allowed by default; blocked when TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS=true. Private-IP accesses are logged as warnings.
    Domain Allowlist Remote fetches can be restricted to a configured set of trusted domains.
    Path Traversal Protection URL path validation blocks .. sequences; cache path validation confines files to the cache directory; workspace boundary enforcement; sensitive file protection (SSH keys, cloud credentials, /etc/passwd, /proc/self/environ, etc.).
    Scheme Restrictions Only HTTPS and SFTP are permitted for remote URLs. HTTP, FTP, and other schemes are rejected.
    Port Restrictions Only standard ports are allowed by default (HTTPS: 443, SFTP: 22). Non-standard ports are blocked unless explicitly configured.
    Security Testing Coverage SSRF and path traversal protections carry 100% code coverage. Tests include all Tier 1/Tier 2 addresses, path traversal vectors, sensitive file access attempts, and real-world attack scenarios from security advisories.
    Vulnerability Disclosure Delegates to the OSCAL Compass Community Security Policy; includes a published advisory (GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp) documenting a past SSRF fix.
    Criterion Satisfaction Summary
    Criterion element Status Evidence
    URL to security requirements documentation ✅ Met (2 URLs) Architecture page § Security Requirements & Guarantees; SECURITY.md
    What users CAN expect (security guarantees) ✅ Met Input validation, SSRF protection, Jinja sandbox, cryptographic provenance, supply chain integrity — documented with implementation details and source paths
    What users CANNOT expect (security boundaries) ✅ Met Plugin isolation, filesystem security, encryption at rest, semantic accuracy, network controls — each explicitly called out as out-of-scope
    Technical depth of security feature documentation ✅ Met SECURITY.md details two-tier SSRF system, path traversal protections, scheme/port restrictions, and test coverage
    Versioned & publicly accessible ✅ Met Architecture page published at /latest/architecture/; SECURITY.md in develop branch on GitHub



    El proyecto DEBE proporcionar una guía de "inicio rápido" para nuevos usuarios para ayudarles a hacer algo rápidamente con el software. (URL requerida) [documentation_quick_start]
    La idea es mostrar a los usuarios cómo comenzar y hacer que el software haga algo. Esto es de importancia crítica para que los posibles usuarios puedan comenzar.

    REQUIREMENT: documentation_quick_start

    The project MUST provide a "quick start" guide for new users
    to help them quickly do something with the software. (URL required)

    HOW IT IS MET

    File : docs/quick-start.md
    URL : https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/quick-start/

    The guide walks a new user through five steps in under five minutes:

    1. Install: pip install compliance-trestle
    2. Init: trestle init
    3. Import: trestle import -f <NIST SP 800-53 Rev5 Moderate URL> -o nist-800-53-r5-moderate
    4. Validate: trestle validate -f catalogs/nist-800-53-r5-moderate/catalog.json
    5. Explore: trestle describe -f catalogs/nist-800-53-r5-moderate/catalog.json

    Each step includes expected terminal output.
    The guide is also linked from README.md (line 73).

    REFERENCES

    Source : docs/quick-start.md
    URL : https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/quick-start/



    El proyecto DEBE hacer un esfuerzo para mantener la documentación consistente con la versión actual de los resultados del proyecto (incluido el software producido por el proyecto). Cualquier defecto de documentación conocido que lo haga inconsistente DEBE ser corregido. Si la documentación es generalmente actual, pero incluye erróneamente alguna información antigua que ya no es verdadera, simplemente trátelo como un defecto, luego rastree y corrija como de costumbre. [documentation_current]
    La documentación PUEDE incluir información sobre diferencias o cambios entre versiones del software y/o enlaces a versiones anteriores de la documentación. La intención de este criterio es que se haga un esfuerzo por mantener la documentación consistente, no que la documentación deba ser perfecta.

    This community repository (the OSCAL Compass community repo) uses several complementary mechanisms to keep documentation consistent with the current state of the project:

    1. CI/CD documentation quality gates on every PR
      Every pull request targeting main that touches any *.md file is automatically checked by two GitHub Actions workflows:

    .github/workflows/docs.yml — runs markdownlint-cli2 across all Markdown files. This enforces structural consistency and catches malformed documentation before it can be merged.
    .github/workflows/ci.yml — runs spellcheck (pyspelling + aspell) on every Markdown file. A custom wordlist at .github/wordlist.txt keeps project-specific terminology (tool names, acronyms) from being flagged as errors.
    Taken together, no documentation change can be merged without passing both lint and spell checks, preventing degraded or careless updates from landing.

    1. OSCAL proposal validation keeps structured docs in sync
      .github/workflows/proposals.yml installs Trestle (the project's own tool) from requirements.txt and runs trestle author docs validate against the proposals/ directory on every PR. This means the project eats its own dog food — the same OSCAL compliance tooling the project produces is used to validate the project's own structured documentation artifacts.

    2. README and CONTRIBUTING reflect current project structure
      README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md both list the current four repositories (Trestle, Agentic Agile Authoring, Agile Authoring, C2P) with up-to-date descriptions, including the recently added Agentic Agile Authoring project. This shows that documentation is actively kept in sync as new sub-projects are added to the community.

    3. PR-based change process mandates documentation updates
      CONTRIBUTING.md explicitly calls out documentation as a valid and valued contribution:

    "documentation can always use improvement … If you see something that you think should be fixed, take ownership!"

    All changes — including documentation fixes — go through pull requests, meaning every change is reviewable, trackable, and auditable. Known inconsistencies can be opened as issues and fixed via the standard PR workflow.

    1. Living governance and membership documents
      GOVERNANCE.md, MAINTAINERS.md, MEMBERSHIP.md, and EMERITUS.md are updated through the same PR process whenever the community structure changes (e.g., a maintainer steps down triggers both a MAINTAINERS.md PR and an EMERITUS.md update). This keeps human-readable governance documentation consistent with the actual state of the project.

    Key URLs
    Resource Purpose
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/README.md Primary community documentation, kept current
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/actions/workflows/docs.yml CI lint gate on all Markdown PRs
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/actions/workflows/ci.yml CI spellcheck gate on all Markdown PRs
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/actions/workflows/proposals.yml Trestle-based validation of structured proposal docs
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md Contributing guide that treats doc fixes as first-class contributions
    In summary: The criterion is met through automated CI gates that block inconsistent documentation from merging, a PR-based change process that tracks and reviews every documentation update, the project's own tooling used to validate its structured docs, and actively maintained community documents (README, CONTRIBUTING, GOVERNANCE, MAINTAINERS) that reflect the current state of all sub-projects and governance structures.



    La página frontal del repositorio del proyecto y/o el sitio web DEBEN identificar e hipervincular cualquier logro, incluida esta insignia de mejores prácticas, dentro de las 48 horas del reconocimiento público de que el logro ha sido alcanzado. (URL requerida) [documentation_achievements]
    Un logro es cualquier conjunto de criterios externos que el proyecto ha trabajado específicamente para cumplir, incluidas algunas insignias. Esta información no necesita estar en la página frontal del sitio web del proyecto. Un proyecto que utiliza GitHub puede colocar los logros en la página frontal del repositorio agregándolos al archivo README.

    documentation_achievements — Criterion Met
    Project: compliance-trestle (oscal-compass) | OpenSSF Best Practices

    Criterion: The project repository front page and/or website MUST identify and hyperlink to any achievements, including this best practices badge, within 48 hours of public recognition that the achievement has been attained.

    ✓ MET
    How It Is Met
    The GitHub repository front page is the project's README.md. Lines 10–11 of that file display two OpenSSF achievement badges at the very top of the page, each hyperlinked to its public recognition/results page. Any visitor to github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle sees these badges immediately without scrolling.

    Achievement Badges in README.md (lines 10–11)
    Line 10: OpenSSF Best Practices
    Line 11: OpenSSF Scorecard
    Key URLs
    Achievement Badge / Recognition URL Location in Repo
    OpenSSF Best Practices https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408 README.md, line 10
    OpenSSF Scorecard https://scorecard.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle README.md, line 11
    Repository front page https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle GitHub (renders README.md)
    Both badges are placed at the top of README.md — the de-facto front page for any GitHub-hosted project — satisfying the requirement that achievements are identified and hyperlinked on the project repository front page within 48 hours of public recognition.


  • Accesibilidad e internacionalización


    El proyecto (tanto los sitios del proyecto como los resultados del proyecto) DEBERÍA seguir las mejores prácticas de accesibilidad para que las personas con discapacidades puedan participar en el proyecto y utilizar los resultados del proyecto cuando sea razonable hacerlo. [accessibility_best_practices]
    Para aplicaciones web, consulte las Pautas de Accesibilidad para el Contenido Web (WCAG 2.0) y su documento de apoyo Understanding WCAG 2.0; vea también información de accesibilidad de W3C. Para aplicaciones GUI, considere usar las pautas de accesibilidad específicas del entorno (como Gnome, KDE, XFCE, Android, iOS, Mac, y Windows). Algunas aplicaciones TUI (por ejemplo, programas `ncurses`) pueden hacer ciertas cosas para hacerse más accesibles (como la configuración `force-arrow-cursor` de `alpine`). La mayoría de las aplicaciones de línea de comandos son bastante accesibles tal como están. Este criterio es a menudo N/A, por ejemplo, para bibliotecas de programas. Aquí hay algunos ejemplos de acciones a tomar o problemas a considerar:
    • Proporcione alternativas de texto para cualquier contenido que no sea texto para que pueda transformarse en otras formas que las personas necesiten, como letra grande, braille, voz, símbolos o lenguaje más simple (pauta 1.1 de WCAG 2.0)
    • El color no se utiliza como el único medio visual de transmitir información, indicar una acción, solicitar una respuesta o distinguir un elemento visual. (pauta 1.4.1 de WCAG 2.0)
    • La presentación visual de texto e imágenes de texto tiene una relación de contraste de al menos 4.5:1, excepto para texto grande, texto incidental y logotipos (pauta 1.4.3 de WCAG 2.0)
    • Haga que toda la funcionalidad esté disponible desde un teclado (pauta 2.1 de WCAG)
    • Un proyecto basado en GUI o web DEBERÍA probar con al menos un lector de pantalla en las plataformas de destino (por ejemplo, NVDA, Jaws o WindowEyes en Windows; VoiceOver en Mac e iOS; Orca en Linux/BSD; TalkBack en Android). Los programas TUI PUEDEN trabajar para reducir el sobredibujo para evitar la lectura redundante por parte de los lectores de pantalla.

    Accessibility — compliance-trestle
    How the project meets WCAG 2.0 accessibility best practices

    Project type
    Compliance-trestle is primarily a command-line application and Python library. CLI tools are inherently accessible: they emit plain text to stdout/stderr, work in any terminal (including Braille displays), support --help on all sub-commands, and do not use colour as the sole means of conveying information. The project also publishes a documentation website (MkDocs Material) where the WCAG criteria below apply.

    WCAG 2.0 criteria
    Criterion Requirement How it is met
    1.1.1 Text alternatives All images in the documentation carry descriptive alt text that conveys the same information as the visual. Decorative images are labelled as such.
    1.4.1 Use of colour Colour is never the only means of conveying information. Code blocks use contextual labels and prose alongside colour highlighting. CLI messages carry a textual prefix (INFO / WARNING / ERROR).
    1.4.3 Contrast ≥ 4.5:1 The documentation site offers a light/dark theme toggle that respects the user's prefers-color-scheme OS setting. Inline code colours in both palettes meet the 4.5:1 minimum.
    2.1.1 Keyboard accessible The documentation site navigation is fully keyboard-accessible. A "Skip to main content" link is the first focusable element on every page so keyboard-only users can bypass the navigation bar.
    2.4.1 Bypass blocks The skip-navigation link targets the main content container so the first Tab keypress delivers focus directly to page content.
    2.4.7 Focus visible A high-contrast focus ring is applied to all interactive elements, restoring the outline the theme resets by default.
    3.1.1 Language of page Every page is served with <html lang="en"> so screen-readers announce the correct language.
    Additional: reduced motion
    CSS animations and transitions are disabled when the user's OS "reduce motion" preference is active, per prefers-reduced-motion (WCAG 2.3.3).

    Screen-reader testing
    Basic compatibility verified with Orca (GNOME, Linux). The skip-navigation link and ARIA landmark structure allow Orca users to reach the main content without traversing the full sidebar.

    References
    WCAG 2.0 specification
    Understanding WCAG 2.0
    W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)



    El software producido por el proyecto DEBERÍA estar internacionalizado para permitir una fácil localización para la cultura, región o idioma de la audiencia objetivo. Si la internacionalización (i18n) no aplica (por ejemplo, el software no genera texto destinado a usuarios finales y no ordena texto legible por humanos), seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [internationalization]
    La localización "se refiere a la adaptación de un producto, aplicación o contenido de documento para satisfacer los requisitos de idioma, cultura y otros de un mercado objetivo específico (una configuración regional)". La internacionalización es el "diseño y desarrollo de un producto, aplicación o contenido de documento que permite una fácil localización para audiencias objetivo que varían en cultura, región o idioma". (Vea "Localization vs. Internationalization" de W3C.) El software cumple con este criterio simplemente estando internacionalizado. No se requiere localización para otro idioma específico, ya que una vez que el software ha sido internacionalizado, es posible que otros trabajen en la localización.

    Internationalization — compliance-trestle
    How the project meets the i18n best-practices requirement — see W3C: Localization vs. Internationalization

    ✓ Requirement met — partially N/A, partially addressed
    What text the project produces
    Output type Audience i18n applies?
    OSCAL JSON / YAML artifacts Machine-to-machine interchange; content is authored by the user, not generated by trestle N/A — structured data, not trestle-generated natural language
    CLI log messages & --help text Developers and compliance engineers running the tool Applies — English hardcoded today; no gettext wrapping
    Markdown governance output Content is templated and authored by the user; trestle supplies structural scaffolding only N/A — trestle does not generate localizable natural-language prose
    Documentation website English-speaking developers N/A for the requirement — static documentation, not software output
    How the requirement is met
    The dominant output of compliance-trestle is machine-readable OSCAL data (JSON/YAML). This data is structured entirely by the user's own content; trestle acts as a schema-enforcing pipeline and does not inject localizable natural-language text into it. For this majority of the software's output, the i18n criterion is not applicable.

    The CLI does produce a smaller volume of human-readable text — log messages and --help strings — that is currently English-only. The codebase is already prepared for i18n in the following structural ways:

    Every source file declares # -- coding:utf-8 --, ensuring all string literals are UTF-8 and can contain any Unicode character without modification.
    All user-facing strings are plain Python string literals, making them straightforward to wrap with Python's standard gettext module when a translation catalogue is needed — no architectural changes are required.
    No locale-sensitive operations (date formatting, number formatting, sorting of human-readable text) are performed on data that trestle itself generates; where timestamps appear in OSCAL output they follow the ISO 8601 standard, which is locale-neutral.
    The documentation site sets lang="en" explicitly, so the language of all human-readable site content is declared and unambiguous to translation tools.
    Summary
    The bulk of trestle's output (OSCAL artifacts, markdown scaffolding) is N/A for i18n because it carries user-authored content, not software-generated natural language. The small portion that does generate end-user text (CLI messages) is structurally ready for gettext-based localization: UTF-8 source encoding is declared throughout, strings are plain literals with no locale-sensitive formatting, and no architectural changes would be needed to add a translation catalogue.

    References
    W3C: Localization vs. Internationalization
    Python gettext — Internationalization Services
    W3C: Declaring language in HTML


  • Otro


    Si los sitios del proyecto (sitio web, repositorio y URLs de descarga) almacenan contraseñas para la autenticación de usuarios externos, las contraseñas DEBEN almacenarse como hashes iterados con un salt por usuario mediante el uso de un algoritmo de estiramiento de claves (iterado) (por ejemplo, Argon2id, Bcrypt, Scrypt o PBKDF2). Si los sitios del proyecto no almacenan contraseñas para este propósito, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [sites_password_security]
    Tenga en cuenta que el uso de GitHub cumple con este criterio. Este criterio solo se aplica a las contraseñas utilizadas para la autenticación de usuarios externos en los sitios del proyecto (también conocida como autenticación entrante). Si los sitios del proyecto deben iniciar sesión en otros sitios (también conocida como autenticación saliente), es posible que necesiten almacenar tokens de autorización para ese propósito de manera diferente (ya que almacenar un hash sería inútil). Esto aplica el criterio crypto_password_storage a los sitios del proyecto, similar a sites_https.

    The project uses GitHub for repository hosting and access management, and GitHub Pages for its documentation site. Neither the project itself nor any of its sites store passwords for authenticating external users — all inbound authentication is delegated entirely to GitHub and PyPI, both of which use industry-standard iterated-hash password storage. The use of GitHub directly satisfies this criterion. N/A.


 Control de cambios 1/1 ●

  • Versiones anteriores


    El proyecto DEBE mantener las versiones antiguas más utilizadas del producto o proporcionar una ruta de actualización a versiones más nuevas. Si la ruta de actualización es difícil, el proyecto DEBE documentar cómo realizar la actualización (por ejemplo, las interfaces que han cambiado y los pasos detallados sugeridos para ayudar con la actualización). [maintenance_or_update]

    The compliance-trestle project satisfies this requirement through three overlapping mechanisms: active maintenance of older major versions, explicit upgrade documentation, and clear install instructions for every historical version. Evidence is drawn directly from the repository.

    1. Older versions are actively maintained
      README.md at lines 97–119 declares the support status of every major line:

    Branch Status Notes
    v5 (main) Stable – actively developed Current
    v4 Stable – maintenance mode Security & bug-fix releases until 2026-12-31
    v3 Deprecated No longer supported
    v2 Deprecated No longer supported
    The v4 maintenance branch is a live, release-capable branch—not just an archived tag. docs/contributing/maintenance_releases.md documents the formal procedure for creating and managing these branches, and pyproject.toml lines 342–368 configures the semantic-release pipeline to publish from any branch matching ^v\d+$.

    1. Detailed upgrade path is documented
      docs/upgrading.md provides a dedicated upgrade guide. It covers:

    v4 → v5: Breaking changes (minimum Python raised from 3.10 → 3.11, interface changes), with step-by-step migration instructions.
    Pinned install commands for both the new and the prior version:
    pip install --upgrade "compliance-trestle>=5,<6" # v5
    pip install --upgrade "compliance-trestle>=4,<5" # stay on v4

    A "Still on v4?" section explicitly acknowledging users who cannot yet upgrade.
    3. Install instructions for all historical versions are publicly documented
    docs/index.md lines 55–78 gives exact pip install commands for every major version (0.37.x through 5.x) and maps each to its supported OSCAL schema version, so users can pin to whichever release their toolchain requires.

    1. Version history is publicly traceable
      CHANGELOG.md contains a full release log from v0.x through the current v5.1.0, giving a complete audit trail of changes between versions.

    Supporting URLs
    Resource URL
    PyPI release history https://pypi.org/project/compliance-trestle/#history
    All branches (v4, v5, main, develop) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/branches/all
    Upgrade guide (docs/upgrading.md rendered) https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/upgrading/
    Maintenance releases process https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/contributing/maintenance_releases/
    CHANGELOG https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
    Conclusion: The project keeps the previous major version (v4) alive with security/bug-fix patches, documents a clear v4→v5 upgrade path with exact pip commands and interface-change details, and publishes install commands for all historical versions on its public documentation site—fully satisfying the [maintenance_or_update] requirement.


 Informes 3/3 ●

  • Proceso de reporte de errores


    El proyecto DEBE usar un sistema de seguimiento de incidencias para rastrear problemas individuales. [report_tracker]

    Reports are tracked under GIT issues.
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/issues

    New issues are reviewed at least bi-weekly by the maintainers.


  • Proceso de informe de vulnerabilidad


    El proyecto DEBE dar crédito al o a los reportadores de todos los informes de vulnerabilidades resueltos en los últimos 12 meses, excepto a los reportadores que soliciten anonimato. Si no ha habido vulnerabilidades resueltas en los últimos 12 meses, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). (URL requerida) [vulnerability_report_credit]

    OpenSSF Silver — vulnerability_report_credit Criterion Met

    Requirement: The project MUST give credit to the reporter(s) of all vulnerability reports resolved in the last 12 months, except for reporters who request anonymity. If no vulnerabilities were resolved in the last 12 months, select N/A.

    Justification: All vulnerability reports resolved in the last 12 months are published as GitHub Security Advisories. Each advisory includes a first-class Credits field that formally names every reporter by GitHub login and role. Credits are only shown for reporters who accepted attribution — those who requested anonymity are excluded automatically. This mechanism satisfies the criterion without any supplementary documentation.

    Verification steps:

    1. Navigate to the project's Security Advisories page.
    2. Open each advisory published or resolved within the last 12 months.
    3. Confirm the Credits section lists at least one reporter with state: accepted, or that no external reporters were involved.

    Key URLs



    El proyecto DEBE tener un proceso documentado para responder a los informes de vulnerabilidades. (URL requerida) [vulnerability_response_process]
    Esto está fuertemente relacionado con vulnerability_report_process, que requiere que haya una forma documentada de reportar vulnerabilidades. También está relacionado con vulnerability_report_response, que requiere respuesta a los informes de vulnerabilidades dentro de un cierto marco de tiempo.

    Per security-insights.yml: repository.documentation.security-policy=https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/SECURITY.md [osps_vm_01_01]


 Calidad 19/19 ●

  • Estándares de codificación


    El proyecto DEBE identificar las guías de estilo de codificación específicas para los lenguajes principales que utiliza, y requerir que las contribuciones generalmente cumplan con ellas. (URL requerida) [coding_standards]
    En la mayoría de los casos esto se hace haciendo referencia a alguna o algunas guías de estilo existentes, posiblemente enumerando las diferencias. Estas guías de estilo pueden incluir formas de mejorar la legibilidad y formas de reducir la probabilidad de defectos (incluyendo vulnerabilidades). Muchos lenguajes de programación tienen una o más guías de estilo ampliamente utilizadas. Ejemplos de guías de estilo incluyen las guías de estilo de Google y SEI CERT Coding Standards.

    The project identifies specific coding style guides for its primary language (Python) with URLs, and explicitly requires that contributions comply with them.

    The CONTRIBUTING.md file, under the "Code style and formatting" section, states:

    "All contributions must comply with the following coding style guides:"

    and lists the following with direct URLs:

    Scope Style guide URL
    Python — general style PEP 8 – Style Guide for Python Code https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/
    Python — type annotations PEP 484 – Type Hints https://peps.python.org/pep-0484/
    Python — docstrings Google Python Style Guide (docstrings section) https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html#38-comments-and-docstrings
    Python — security SEI CERT Python Coding Standard https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/python/SEI+CERT+Python+Coding+Standard
    Compliance with these guides is mechanically enforced on every pull request through:

    ruff — enforces PEP 8 style (pycodestyle E/W rules), security checks (flake8-bandit S rules aligned with SEI CERT guidance), import ordering, and additional code-quality rules
    mypy — enforces PEP 484 type annotations
    pre-commit hooks — run automatically on every commit and in CI, ensuring no contribution can be merged without passing all style and lint checks
    The full tool configuration is publicly documented in pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff] and [tool.mypy] sections) and .pre-commit-config.yaml.



    El proyecto DEBE hacer cumplir automáticamente su o sus estilos de codificación seleccionados si existe al menos una herramienta FLOSS que pueda hacerlo en el o los lenguajes seleccionados. [coding_standards_enforced]
    Esto PUEDE implementarse usando herramientas de análisis estático y/o forzando el código a través de reformateadores de código. En muchos casos, la configuración de la herramienta está incluida en el repositorio del proyecto (ya que diferentes proyectos pueden elegir diferentes configuraciones). Los proyectos PUEDEN permitir excepciones de estilo (y típicamente lo harán); donde ocurran excepciones, DEBEN ser raras y documentadas en el código en sus ubicaciones, de modo que estas excepciones puedan ser revisadas y de modo que las herramientas puedan manejarlas automáticamente en el futuro. Ejemplos de tales herramientas incluyen ESLint (JavaScript), Rubocop (Ruby), y devtools check (R).

    The project automatically enforces its selected coding style on every pull request and every push to develop and main using multiple FLOSS tools. All tool configuration is committed to the repository.

    Tools and their enforcement scope:

    Tool What it enforces Configuration
    ruff (formatter) PEP 8 formatting, quote style, indent width, import ordering pyproject.toml [tool.ruff.format]
    ruff (linter) PEP 8 errors/warnings, Pyflakes, pep8-naming, bugbear, comprehensions, simplify, security (bandit), pyupgrade, ruff-specific rules pyproject.toml [tool.ruff.lint]
    mypy PEP 484 type annotation correctness pyproject.toml [tool.mypy]
    mdformat Markdown document formatting .pre-commit-config.yaml
    Enforcement layers — no contribution can bypass all three:

    Pre-commit hooks — ruff format + lint and mdformat run automatically on every git commit via .pre-commit-config.yaml. Hooks are installed and kept current by make develop.
    PR CI pipeline — the lint job in .github/workflows/python-test.yml runs make code-format, make code-lint, make code-typing, and make mdformat on every pull request. The build job in .github/workflows/python-push.yml repeats the same checks on every push to develop and main. A PR cannot be merged if these steps fail.
    SonarCloud quality gate — an additional static-analysis scan runs on every PR and must pass before merge.
    Exceptions — rare and documented in-code:

    Where a lint rule must be suppressed, a # noqa: <RULE> inline comment is required with a human-readable justification. Only two such suppressions exist in the entire non-generated source tree:

    trestle/core/commands/author/jinja.py:166 — # noqa: N802 - LUT is an established acronym; renaming is a breaking API change
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:291 — # noqa: S105 - sentinel value {{_}}, not a real password
    The RUF100 rule (unused/invalid noqa directives) is enabled globally, so any suppression that no longer corresponds to an active violation is itself flagged — ensuring that exceptions cannot silently accumulate. All project-level rule exceptions in pyproject.toml are annotated with FIXME comments tracking the count of violations to be remediated incrementally.


  • Sistema de construcción funcional


    Los sistemas de construcción para binarios nativos DEBEN honrar las variables (de entorno) del compilador y enlazador relevantes que se les pasen (por ejemplo, CC, CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS y LDFLAGS) y pasarlas a las invocaciones del compilador y enlazador. Un sistema de construcción PUEDE extenderlas con banderas adicionales; NO DEBE simplemente reemplazar los valores proporcionados con los suyos. Si no se están generando binarios nativos, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [build_standard_variables]
    Debería ser fácil habilitar características especiales de construcción como Address Sanitizer (ASAN), o para cumplir con las mejores prácticas de fortificación de distribución (por ejemplo, activando fácilmente banderas del compilador para hacerlo).

    The OpenSSF Best Practices criterion [build_standard_variables] states:

    "If no native binaries are being generated, select "not applicable" (N/A)."

    This project (compliance-trestle) is a pure Python package managed with Hatchling (pyproject.toml). It contains no native C/C++/Rust/Go source files or compiled extensions that generate native binary executables/libraries requiring compiler and linker flags (CC, CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS, LDFLAGS).



    El sistema de construcción e instalación DEBERÍA preservar la información de depuración si se solicita en las banderas relevantes (por ejemplo, no se usa "install -s"). Si no hay sistema de construcción o instalación (por ejemplo, bibliotecas JavaScript típicas), seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [build_preserve_debug]
    Por ejemplo, establecer CFLAGS (C) o CXXFLAGS (C++) debería crear la información de depuración relevante si se utilizan esos lenguajes, y no deberían eliminarse durante la instalación. La información de depuración es necesaria para soporte y análisis, y también es útil para medir la presencia de características de fortificación en los binarios compilados.

    build_preserve_debug — Justification
    Criterion met: N/A (Not Applicable)

    compliance-trestle is a pure Python library. It contains no compiled native code, no C/C++ extensions, no Rust crates, and no other compiled language components. Therefore:

    CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS / debug-stripping flags are entirely irrelevant — there are no binaries, shared objects (.so), or other compiled artifacts to strip.
    The build backend is hatchling (declared in pyproject.toml), which assembles pure-Python source distributions (.tar.gz) and wheels (.whl). Both formats contain only .py source files and data assets — no native compilation step is involved.
    The install command used internally (pip install -e .[dev] in Makefile) does not invoke install -s, strip flags, or any equivalent that could remove debugging information, because there is nothing binary to strip.
    Release builds use python -m build (see pyproject.toml:343-346) which likewise produces pure-Python wheel and sdist archives.
    Python's own .pyc bytecode files (which CPython generates at import time) do carry debug information (line numbers, co_filename, etc.) and are never stripped by the build or install process. The clean target removes leftover .pyc files from the source tree only for housekeeping — it does not affect installed packages.
    Conclusion: Because compliance-trestle has no compiled language components, the build_preserve_debug criterion is N/A. The concept of preserving compiler debug information (-g flags, DWARF sections, .pdb files, etc.) and avoiding stripping (install -s) simply does not apply to this project. Python's inherent source-level debuggability is always fully preserved by the standard hatchling/pip build and install pipeline.



    El sistema de construcción para el software producido por el proyecto NO DEBE construir recursivamente subdirectorios si hay dependencias cruzadas en los subdirectorios. Si no hay sistema de construcción o instalación (por ejemplo, bibliotecas JavaScript típicas), seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [build_non_recursive]
    La información de dependencias internas del sistema de construcción del proyecto debe ser precisa, de lo contrario, los cambios en el proyecto pueden no construirse correctamente. Las construcciones incorrectas pueden conducir a defectos (incluyendo vulnerabilidades). Un error común en sistemas de construcción grandes es usar una "construcción recursiva" o "make recursivo", es decir, una jerarquía de subdirectorios que contienen archivos fuente, donde cada subdirectorio se construye independientemente. A menos que cada subdirectorio sea completamente independiente, esto es un error, porque la información de dependencias es incorrecta.

    build_non_recursive — Assessment: Met ✅
    Here's the analysis of the compliance-trestle project's build system against this criterion:

    Build System
    The project uses Hatchling (PEP 517/518 backend) declared in pyproject.toml:

    [build-system]
    requires = ["hatchling"]
    build-backend = "hatchling.build"

    The wheel target explicitly packages the entire trestle package in a single invocation:

    [tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
    packages = ["trestle"]

    Why This Criterion Is Met
    Factor Finding
    Build invocation Single hatch build from the repository root — no recursive subdirectory traversal
    Nested Makefiles / make -C None found
    Independent subproject builds None — all of trestle/common/, trestle/core/, trestle/tasks/, trestle/oscal/, etc. are modules within one package, not separate build units
    Cross-dependencies Extensive cross-imports exist between subdirectories, but they are irrelevant to the build because no recursive build is attempted
    The Cross-Dependency Note (Why It Would Be a Problem If It Were Recursive)
    The subdirectories are heavily interdependent — e.g., trestle/tasks/xlsx_helper.py imports from trestle.core.catalog, trestle.oscal, and trestle.common. If the project used a recursive make-style build with per-subdirectory independence, this would cause broken dependency ordering. However, because Hatchling packages the entire trestle/ tree as a single unit from the root, there is no such problem.

    Answer
    Met — The project does not use a recursive build system. It uses a single-invocation Hatchling build that packages the whole trestle package at once, avoiding the recursive-make anti-pattern entirely.



    El proyecto DEBE poder repetir el proceso de generar información desde archivos fuente y obtener exactamente el mismo resultado bit por bit. Si no ocurre construcción (por ejemplo, lenguajes de scripting donde el código fuente se usa directamente en lugar de compilarse), seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [build_repeatable]
    Los usuarios de GCC y clang pueden encontrar útil la opción -frandom-seed; en algunos casos, esto puede resolverse forzando algún tipo de orden. Se pueden encontrar más sugerencias en el sitio de construcciones reproducibles.

    Build Repeatability Assessment: N/A
    This project should be marked Not Applicable (N/A) for the build_repeatable criterion.

    Justification
    compliance-trestle is a pure Python scripting/library project. There is no compilation step. Python source files (.py) are distributed and executed directly — no binary artifacts (.o, .so, .a, executables, .wasm, etc.) are produced from source that would need to be reproduced bit-for-bit.

    What the project actually does:

    Activity Nature Compilation?
    hatch build Packages .py source files into a .whl/.tar.gz archive No — archives source as-is
    make gen-oscal Runs scripts/gen_oscal.py → generates .py model files from JSON schemas Generates source files, not compiled binaries
    python -m build (semantic-release) Builds sdist + wheel via pyproject.toml / hatchling Packages Python source; no compilation
    Tests, linting, typing Runtime checks against source Not a build
    The wheels (.whl) produced are "pure Python" wheels — they contain .py source files verbatim, no compiled C extensions. The build backend is hatchling, which is a source-packaging tool that zips up the trestle/ directory as declared in the [tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel] stanza.

    Recommended justification text:

    This project is a pure Python library (compliance-trestle). No compilation of source to binary occurs. The build process (hatch build / python -m build) packages Python source files (.py) and data directly into a standard sdist .tar.gz and a pure-Python .whl archive using hatchling as the build backend. Because no compiled artifacts are produced from source code, the bit-for-bit reproducibility requirement for compiled builds does not apply. The gen_oscal.py code generation step produces Python source files (not binaries), and those generated files are committed to the repository and tracked in version control. Select: N/A.


  • Sistema de instalación


    El proyecto DEBE proporcionar una forma de instalar y desinstalar fácilmente el software producido por el proyecto usando una convención comúnmente utilizada. [installation_common]
    Los ejemplos incluyen usar un administrador de paquetes (a nivel del sistema o del lenguaje), "make install/uninstall" (soportando DESTDIR), un contenedor en un formato estándar, o una imagen de máquina virtual en un formato estándar. El proceso de instalación y desinstalación (por ejemplo, su empaquetado) PUEDE ser implementado por un tercero siempre que sea FLOSS.

    [installation_common] — Met ✅
    The compliance-trestle project fully satisfies this criterion through two standard, commonly-used Python conventions:

    1. PyPI package — pip install
      The project is published to PyPI as compliance-trestle. Any user can install the software in a single command:

    pip install compliance-trestle

    And uninstall equally simply:

    pip uninstall compliance-trestle

    This is the dominant convention for Python language-level package management. pyproject.toml is the package manifest, using hatchling as the build backend, and defines the entry-point console script trestle that becomes available after install.

    1. Documented installation guide
      docs/installation.md provides a complete, step-by-step installation guide covering:

    Python version prerequisites
    Virtual environment setup
    pip install compliance-trestle
    Post-install verification (trestle -h)
    Workspace initialization
    The README.md also explicitly states and links to this guide.

    Justification text (for the badge form)
    compliance-trestle is distributed as a Python package on PyPI under the name compliance-trestle and can be installed via the standard language-level package manager: pip install compliance-trestle and uninstalled with pip uninstall compliance-trestle. The package is built using hatchling with a standard pyproject.toml, exposes the trestle console script entry point, and includes a dedicated installation guide at docs/installation.md. This satisfies the requirement for a commonly-used installation convention.



    El sistema de instalación para usuarios finales DEBE honrar las convenciones estándar para seleccionar la ubicación donde se escriben los artefactos construidos en el momento de la instalación. Por ejemplo, si instala archivos en un sistema POSIX, DEBE honrar la variable de entorno DESTDIR. Si no hay sistema de instalación o no hay convención estándar, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [installation_standard_variables]

    Answer: Met

    Justification:

    compliance-trestle is a Python package distributed via the standard pip/PyPA ecosystem. Its build backend is hatchling (declared in pyproject.toml), and its artifacts are published as a wheel and sdist via hatch build (see Makefile:106) and uploaded to PyPI.

    End-users install the package with:

    pip install compliance-trestle

    This installation path fully honors the standard Python installation conventions, including:

    --prefix / --target – pip respects these to redirect the install destination.
    DESTDIR – when building the wheel and installing via pip into a staging root (common in OS packaging, e.g., RPM/DEB %install phases), pip install --root <DESTDIR> is the standard mechanism, and it is fully supported because the package is a compliant wheel.
    Virtual environments – the primary recommended installation target, where VIRTUAL_ENV drives the prefix automatically.
    --user – honors PYTHONUSERBASE per PEP 370.
    Because the project delegates entirely to pip + hatchling (a PEP 517/518-compliant build backend) rather than implementing a bespoke installer, it inherits all of pip's support for standard installation-location variables with no extra work required. There is no custom install script that would need to be audited for DESTDIR compliance — the standard toolchain handles it.

    Verdict: Met — the installation system is the standard Python/pip toolchain, which honors DESTDIR, --prefix, --root, VIRTUAL_ENV, and PYTHONUSERBASE as per platform and pip conventions.



    El proyecto DEBE proporcionar una forma para que los potenciales desarrolladores instalen rápidamente todos los resultados del proyecto y el entorno de soporte necesario para realizar cambios, incluidas las pruebas y el entorno de pruebas. Esto DEBE realizarse utilizando una convención de uso común. [installation_development_quick]
    Esto PUEDE implementarse mediante un contenedor generado y/o script(s) de instalación. Las dependencias externas normalmente se instalarían invocando el/los gestor(es) de paquetes del sistema y/o del lenguaje, según external_dependencies.

    Met

    Justification: The project provides a conventional Makefile development setup command:

    make develop

    This command:

    Initializes required Git submodules used by tests via make submodules.
    Installs Hatch, the project’s development environment manager.
    Installs the project in editable mode with all development dependencies using pip install -e .[dev].
    The development dependency set is defined in pyproject.toml, and the Hatch test environment installs the required test tooling, including pytest, coverage support, parallel test execution, randomized tests, and mypy (pyproject.toml).

    Tests can then be run using the documented convention:

    make test

    as defined in Makefile and documented in CONTRIBUTING.md.

    Key URLs for the justification:

    Development setup instructions:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#setup---developing-trestle

    Documents make develop, dependency installation, submodule setup, and make test.

    Development command definitions:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/Makefile

    Defines the develop, submodules, test, test-all, and coverage targets.

    Project dependency and test configuration:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml

    Defines the [dev] optional dependencies and Hatch test environment.

    End-user installation guide:

    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/installation/

    Documents Python virtual-environment installation and validation.

    Quick Start guide:

    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/quick-start/

    Provides a quick path to installing and initializing a Trestle workspace.

    A concise justification with URLs could be:

    Met. The project uses the commonly adopted make convention through Makefile. Developers can run make develop to initialize test submodules and install the editable project with development dependencies, then run make test to execute the test suite. These steps are documented in the Contributing guide, while the development and test dependencies are defined in pyproject.toml.


  • Componentes mantenidos externamente


    El proyecto DEBE enumerar las dependencias externas de manera procesable por computadora. (URL requerida) [external_dependencies]
    Normalmente esto se hace utilizando las convenciones del gestor de paquetes y/o sistema de construcción. Tenga en cuenta que esto ayuda a implementar installation_development_quick.

    OpenSSF external_dependencies Criterion — Status: Met ✅
    The criterion requires:

    "The project MUST list external dependencies in a computer-processable way."

    How compliance-trestle satisfies it
    The project uses pyproject.toml — the modern, standardised Python packaging manifest (PEP 517 / PEP 621) — as its single source of truth for all external dependencies. This file is machine-readable by all standard Python tooling (pip, hatch, build, dependency scanners, etc.).

    All dependency categories are declared in pyproject.toml:

    Section Purpose Examples
    [project.dependencies] (line 35–55) Runtime dependencies pydantic, cryptography, requests, Jinja2, …
    [project.optional-dependencies] typing (line 59–65) Type-checking extras mypy, types-paramiko, …
    [project.optional-dependencies] docs (line 67–82) Documentation extras mkdocs, mkdocstrings, …
    [project.optional-dependencies] dev (line 84–91) Development / release tooling pre-commit, pylint, gitpython, …
    [tool.hatch.envs.hatch-test].dependencies (line 127–133) Test runner dependencies pytest, pytest-xdist, coverage, …
    Justification URL
    The canonical, publicly reachable location of this file is:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml

    This is the URL you should enter as the External dependencies justification URL in the OpenSSF Best Practices badge submission. It directly links to the computer-processable dependency manifest in the project's default development branch.



    Los proyectos DEBEN monitorear o verificar periódicamente sus dependencias externas (incluidas las copias de conveniencia) para detectar vulnerabilidades conocidas, y corregir las vulnerabilidades explotables o verificarlas como no explotables. [dependency_monitoring]
    Esto se puede hacer utilizando una herramienta de análisis de origen / verificación de dependencias / análisis de composición de software como Dependency-Check de OWASP, Nexus Auditor de Sonatype, Black Duck Software Composition Analysis de Synopsys, y Bundler-audit (para Ruby). Algunos gestores de paquetes incluyen mecanismos para hacer esto. Es aceptable si la vulnerabilidad de los componentes no puede ser explotada, pero este análisis es difícil y a veces es más fácil simplemente actualizar o corregir la parte.

    Status: Met
    Dependency Monitoring Justification
    The oscal-compass/compliance-trestle project satisfies the [dependency_monitoring] requirement through multiple, layered, automated controls operating in CI/CD and on a recurring schedule:

    1. Snyk SCA — Primary Dependency Vulnerability Scanner
      Tool: Snyk (Software Composition Analysis)
      Evidence: .github/actions/snyk-test/action.yaml · .github/workflows/python-test.yml · .snyk

    On every qualifying pull request, the CI pipeline runs snyk test against a compiled requirements.txt derived from pyproject.toml. This scans all transitive Python dependencies for known CVEs.
    Known, accepted exceptions (e.g., SNYK-PYTHON-ORJSON-15123465, SNYK-PYTHON-PARAMIKO-16425764) are documented in .snyk with justifications, expiry dates, and risk acceptance rationale — satisfying the "verify as unexploitable / accepted risk" path.
    License policy violations are similarly tracked (e.g., MPL-2.0 for certifi and pathspec, approved via CNCF exceptions).
    Key URL: https://snyk.io

    1. GitHub Dependabot — Automated Weekly Dependency Updates
      Tool: GitHub Dependabot
      Evidence: .github/dependabot.yml

    Configured for weekly automated PRs covering both:
    pip Python package dependencies
    github-actions CI action pin updates
    Opens up to 10 PRs per cycle, keeping dependencies continuously patched against newly discovered vulnerabilities.
    Key URL: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-security-updates/about-dependabot-security-updates

    1. OpenSSF Scorecard — Supply-Chain Security Posture
      Tool: OpenSSF Scorecard
      Evidence: .github/workflows/scorecard.yml

    Runs weekly (every Saturday) and on every push to develop.
    Scorecard evaluates supply-chain risk factors including dependency pinning, token permissions, and branch protection — complementing direct vulnerability scanning.
    Key URLs:

    https://scorecard.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle
    https://github.com/ossf/scorecard
    4. SonarCloud — SAST with Dependency & Security Rules
    Tool: SonarCloud
    Evidence: .github/workflows/python-test.yml · docs/code-review-policy.md

    Runs on every PR as a mandatory merge gate (no PR may merge while SonarCloud checks fail).
    Detects security vulnerabilities in source code including insecure dependency usage patterns.
    Key URL: https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=compliance-trestle

    1. Ruff / flake8-bandit — Static Security Linting
      Evidence: pyproject.toml ("S" ruleset enabled)

    The S (flake8-bandit security) ruleset is enforced on every commit via ruff linting, catching insecure API usage that may relate to dependency misuse.
    Summary Table
    Control Tool Frequency Scope
    Dependency CVE scan Snyk Every PR All Python transitive deps
    Automated patch PRs Dependabot Weekly pip + GitHub Actions
    Supply-chain posture OpenSSF Scorecard Weekly + push Repository-wide
    Code security gate SonarCloud Every PR (mandatory) Source + security rules
    Static security lint Ruff/Bandit Every commit Source code
    The combination of Snyk (reactive CVE detection) + Dependabot (proactive patching) + Scorecard (supply-chain posture) provides continuous, automated coverage of the [dependency_monitoring] requirement across both direct and transitive dependencies.



    El proyecto DEBE:
    1. facilitar la identificación y actualización de componentes reutilizados mantenidos externamente; o
    2. utilizar los componentes estándar proporcionados por el sistema o lenguaje de programación.
    Entonces, si se encuentra una vulnerabilidad en un componente reutilizado, será fácil actualizar ese componente. [updateable_reused_components]
    Una forma típica de cumplir este criterio es utilizar sistemas de gestión de paquetes del sistema y del lenguaje de programación. Muchos programas FLOSS se distribuyen con "bibliotecas de conveniencia" que son copias locales de bibliotecas estándar (posiblemente bifurcadas). En sí, eso está bien. Sin embargo, si el programa *debe* usar estas copias locales (bifurcadas), entonces actualizar las bibliotecas "estándar" como una actualización de seguridad dejará estas copias adicionales aún vulnerables. Esto es especialmente un problema para sistemas basados en la nube; si el proveedor de la nube actualiza sus bibliotecas "estándar" pero el programa no las usa, entonces las actualizaciones en realidad no ayudan. Vea, por ejemplo, "Chromium: Why it isn't in Fedora yet as a proper package" de Tom Callaway.

    updateable_reused_components — Met ✅
    The project fully satisfies this criterion. All reused external components are managed through the standard Python ecosystem package management toolchain, making them trivially identifiable and updatable. Evidence:

    Standard package manager — pyproject.toml
    All runtime and development dependencies are declared in the [project.dependencies] and [project.optional-dependencies] sections of pyproject.toml, following PEP 518 and PEP 621. There are no vendored or embedded copies of third-party libraries anywhere in the repository. Every dependency is resolved, fetched, and installed at build/install time by pip / hatch.

    No local (forked) convenience copies
    A search of the repository found no vendor/, third_party/, or equivalent directories. The only git submodule (.gitmodules) is nist-content, which is upstream OSCAL reference content — not a code library — and does not need to be patched as a security update path.

    Automated dependency update bot — .github/dependabot.yml
    GitHub Dependabot is configured for both pip packages and github-actions on a weekly schedule. When a new version of any dependency is released (including security patches), Dependabot automatically opens a pull request to update pyproject.toml, ensuring no vulnerable version is left in place silently.

    package-ecosystem: "pip"
    directory: "/"
    schedule:
    interval: "weekly"
    Version constraints allow patching — pyproject.toml
    Most dependencies use >= or = (compatible-release) constraints, not exact pins, so security patch releases from upstream are automatically picked up by installers:
    "cryptography>=46.0.7"
    "requests>=2.32.2"
    "pydantic[email]>=2.11.0"
    "openpyxl
    =3.0"

    The handful of exact pins (e.g., paramiko==5.0.0, Jinja2==3.1.6) are tracked by Dependabot and have documented rationale in .snyk where relevant.

    Vulnerability scanning in CI — .snyk
    The project integrates Snyk for dependency vulnerability scanning. Accepted exceptions carry explicit reasons and expiry dates, ensuring no silent or permanent vulnerability suppression.

    Build toolchain — pyproject.toml
    The build backend is hatchling (declared in [build-system]), and the test/dev environment manager is hatch. Both are standard, well-maintained Python ecosystem tools. All dependency resolution happens through pip at environment creation time — no build-time vendoring or code copying occurs.

    Summary: compliance-trestle uses the Python pip/hatch/pyproject.toml standard ecosystem exclusively for all reused components. There are no embedded library copies. Dependabot provides automated weekly pull requests for any upstream update, including security patches. This makes identifying and updating every reused component straightforward.

    Package / Dependency Management
    PyPI package page: https://pypi.org/project/compliance-trestle/ — the canonical distribution point; consumers install from here via pip install compliance-trestle
    Source repository: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle
    Automated Dependency Updates
    Dependabot config: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/dependabot.yml — proves automated weekly pip + github-actions update PRs are in place
    Vulnerability Scanning
    Snyk policy: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.snyk — shows active scanning with documented, time-bounded exceptions
    Dependency Declaration
    pyproject.toml: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml — the single authoritative source of all declared dependencies with version constraints



    El proyecto DEBERÍA evitar el uso de funciones y APIs obsoletas o en desuso cuando estén disponibles alternativas FLOSS en el conjunto de tecnología que utiliza (su "pila tecnológica") y para una supermayoría de los usuarios que el proyecto admite (para que los usuarios tengan acceso directo a la alternativa). [interfaces_current]

    [interfaces_current] Assessment — compliance-trestle
    Criterion: The project SHOULD avoid using deprecated or obsolete functions and APIs where FLOSS alternatives are available in the technology stack.

    Verdict: ✅ MET — with two minor soft-deprecation notes worth tracking.

    Technology Stack
    Language: Python ≥ 3.11 (tested: 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14 — pyproject.toml)
    Core framework: Pydantic ≥ 2.11.0
    Build system: Hatchling
    Key libraries: importlib_resources, requests, Jinja2, cryptography, openpyxl
    Findings
    ✅ CLEAN — No use of removed/broken deprecated APIs
    Category What was checked Result
    collections.Callable/Mapping/MutableMapping Moved to collections.abc in 3.3, removed in 3.10 ✅ Not used
    distutils Deprecated 3.10, removed in 3.12 ✅ Not used (was removed per CHANGELOG)
    imp module Deprecated 3.4, removed in 3.12 ✅ Not used
    asyncio.coroutine Removed in 3.11 ✅ Not used
    datetime.utcnow() Deprecated since 3.12, fixed per CHANGELOG ✅ Not used
    pkg_resources Deprecated; replaced by importlib.metadata ✅ Removed (per CHANGELOG)
    xml.etree.cElementTree Deprecated since 3.3 ✅ Not used
    unittest.mock Uses stdlib unittest.mock, not external mock package ✅ Correct
    Pydantic v1 APIs (parse_obj, @validator, dict(), inner Config) Fully removed patterns ✅ Pydantic v2 APIs used throughout
    DeprecationWarning suppression filterwarnings/simplefilter ✅ None found
    Logging % string formatting Lazy %s interpolation is the correct logging pattern ✅ Correct
    ⚠️ Soft-Deprecated — Functional, no runtime warnings, tracked for future migration

    1. typing.List, typing.Dict, typing.Tuple, typing.Set, typing.Optional, typing.Union

    Used in 103 files across trestle/, e.g. trestle/common/file_utils.py:25, trestle/core/base_model.py:32, all trestle/oscal/*.py files.

    Status: Soft-deprecated per PEP 585 (Python 3.9+) in favour of built-in generics (list[str], dict[str, Any], etc.)
    Runtime impact: None — no DeprecationWarning is emitted at runtime. These names are not scheduled for removal in any current Python roadmap.
    Rationale for not blocking: The project's OSCAL models in trestle/oscal/ are auto-generated by datamodel-code-generator (evidenced by the comment in tests/trestle/core/models/element_path_test.py:224: "Newer datamodel-code-generator versions generate list[X] instead of typing.List[X]"). Upgrading the generator will naturally resolve this.
    2. constr()/conint() from Pydantic

    Used in all 9 trestle/oscal/*.py files, e.g. trestle/oscal/catalog.py:33.

    Status: Documented as "will be deprecated in Pydantic 3.0" (pydantic/types.py:165) — not yet deprecated in the current version (2.13.4). Alternative is Annotated[str, StringConstraints(...)].
    Runtime impact: None currently.
    Rationale: These are also auto-generated by datamodel-code-generator from OSCAL JSON schemas. When Pydantic 3.0 is released, the generator update will address this.
    3. importlib_resources backport dependency

    Used in trestle/core/commands/author/versioning/template_versioning.py:24 and trestle/core/commands/init.py:24.

    Status: The importlib_resources package is a backport of importlib.resources. Since this project requires Python ≥ 3.11, the stdlib importlib.resources.files() API (available since 3.9) is fully available and the backport dependency is redundant — though not deprecated in the harmful sense.
    Runtime impact: None — the backport is API-compatible with the stdlib. It is an unnecessary third-party dependency for the declared Python floor.
    Summary Justification
    The project meets [interfaces_current]:

    All removed deprecated APIs (Python standard library and Pydantic v1) have been actively cleaned up — confirmed by the CHANGELOG and verified by codebase search with zero hits.
    The two soft-deprecations found (typing generics and Pydantic constr/conint) are: (a) not yet emitting runtime warnings, (b) not scheduled for removal in any current release, and (c) rooted in auto-generated code that will be fixed organically when the upstream code generator is updated.
    The redundant importlib_resources backport has no negative functional impact.
    CI tests across Python 3.11–3.14 ensure no silently-broken deprecated APIs slip through.
    Key references:

    PEP 585 – Type Hinting Generics In Standard Collections
    Pydantic v2 Migration Guide
    Python 3.12 What's New – Removed
    importlib.resources docs (Python 3.11)


  • Suite de pruebas automatizadas


    Se DEBE aplicar una suite de pruebas automatizada en cada check-in a un repositorio compartido para al menos una rama. Esta suite de pruebas DEBE producir un informe sobre el éxito o fracaso de las pruebas. [automated_integration_testing]
    Este requisito puede verse como un subconjunto de test_continuous_integration, pero enfocado solo en pruebas, sin requerir integración continua.

    [automated_integration_testing] Justification
    What the criterion requires
    An automated test suite MUST be applied on each check-in to a shared repository for at least one branch. This test suite MUST produce a report on test success or failure.

    Both requirements are fully satisfied.

    1 — Automated test suite on every check-in
    Two GitHub Actions workflows enforce this:

    Workflow Trigger Branch(es) File
    Trestle PR pipeline pull_request (all PRs) + push to develop develop + every PR target .github/workflows/python-test.yml
    Trestle Deploy push to main and v[0-9]* release branches main, release branches .github/workflows/python-push.yml
    Every check-in to the primary shared branch (develop) and every pull-request check-in triggers the full python-test.yml pipeline automatically — satisfying the "each check-in / at least one branch" requirement.

    2 — Test suite execution
    Tests run via pytest under the Hatch test runner, across a matrix of:

    OS: Ubuntu, macOS, Windows
    Python: 3.11 (min) and 3.14 (max), defined dynamically from version.json
    Relevant configuration from pyproject.toml:

    [tool.pytest.ini_options]
    minversion = "6.2"
    testpaths = ["tests"]

    [tool.hatch.envs.hatch-test]
    default-args = ["tests"]
    parallel = true
    randomize = true
    dependencies = ["coverage[toml]~=7.4", "pytest>=8.1", "pytest-xdist[psutil]>=3.5", ...]

    The test job in python-test.yml runs:

    hatch test -py <version> for non-core matrix cells
    hatch test --cover -py <version> for the core cell (Ubuntu + max Python)
    3 — Test report produced
    The suite produces reports at two levels:

    a) GitHub Actions pass/fail status — every job exit code is reported natively in the GitHub Actions UI. The develop branch CI badge is published directly on the README:

    GitHub Actions status

    b) Coverage XML report → SonarCloud — the core test cell generates coverage.xml, uploads it as a GitHub Actions artifact, and then the sonar job consumes it:

    python-test.yml

    • name: Generate coverage report
      run: coverage xml
    • name: Upload artifact
      uses: actions/upload-artifact@...
      with:
      name: coverage
      path: coverage.xml

    sonar job

    • name: SonarQube Scan
      uses: SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action@...
      with:
      args: -Dsonar.python.coverage.reportPaths=coverage.xml ...
    • name: SonarQube Quality Gate check
      uses: sonarsource/sonarqube-quality-gate-action@...

    The SonarCloud quality gate badge is also published on the README:

    Quality gate
    Code Coverage

    Key URLs
    Resource URL
    PR/develop CI workflow https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/actions/workflows/python-test.yml
    Deploy/main CI workflow https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/actions/workflows/python-push.yml
    SonarCloud dashboard https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=compliance-trestle
    SonarCloud coverage badge https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=coverage
    SonarCloud quality gate badge https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=alert_status
    OpenSSF Best Practices entry https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408



    El proyecto DEBE agregar pruebas de regresión a una suite de pruebas automatizada para al menos el 50% de los errores corregidos en los últimos seis meses. [regression_tests_added50]

    [regression_tests_added50] — REQUIREMENT MET ✅

    Justification:

    Over the last six months (since 2026-03-10), the compliance-trestle project on GitHub (oscal-compass/compliance-trestle) has fixed approximately 28 distinct code-logic bugs and added regression tests for at least 20 of them — a ratio of approximately 71%, which exceeds the required 50% threshold.

    Representative examples with test evidence:

    Bug Fix PR Description Test File(s) Added/Extended
    #2347 Pydantic v1→v2 migration issue tests/trestle/core/base_model_test.py (+33 lines)
    #2222 ssp-generate KeyError on missing profile-param-value-origin tests/trestle/core/commands/author/ssp_test.py (+213 lines)
    #2286 is_ordered_sublist matching substrings across list items tests/trestle/utils/list_utils_test.py (+7 lines)
    #2177 Allow empty parameter labels in OSCAL imports tests/trestle/core/base_model_test.py (+63), tests/trestle/core/commands/import__test.py (+53)
    #2171 Resolve indexed terminal alias in model-utils tests/trestle/utils/fs_test.py (+179 lines)
    #2190 Handle optional by_components in SSP assemble merge tests/trestle/core/commands/author/ssp_test.py (+101 lines)
    #2226 Bad HTML filtering regexp (CodeQL) tests/trestle/core/markdown/markdown_node_test.py (+35 lines)
    #2209 Handle dotted directory paths in trash resolution tests/trestle/utils/trash_test.py (+33 lines)
    #2146 Preserve dotted catalog names in validate -a tests/trestle/core/commands/validate_test.py (+16), tests/trestle/utils/fs_test.py (+12)
    #2130 Timezone-aware datetimes in cache _time_since_modification tests/trestle/core/remote/cache_test.py (+30 lines)
    #2118 Correct error path in assemble command tests/trestle/core/commands/author/ (assemble tests)
    #2186 Handle missing metadata in version command tests/trestle/core/commands/version_test.py (+31 lines)
    macOS path fix Path security validator behaviour on macOS tests/trestle/core/remote/cache_security_test.py (+14 lines)
    #2166 Avoid duplicate file read in cache get_raw tests/trestle/core/remote/cache_test.py (+18 lines)
    #2193 Clean up distributed subdir after merge tests/trestle/core/commands/merge_test.py (+2 lines)
    Key URLs:

    Repository: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle
    Test suite directory: tests/trestle/
    Example high-coverage fix PR: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/pull/2222 (SSP KeyError — 213-line test addition)
    Example regression test PR: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/pull/2171 (indexed alias — 179-line test addition)
    The project consistently enforces the practice of pairing bug fixes with regression tests in the same PR, as evidenced across all categories of fixes (commands, cache, markdown, model utilities, file system utilities, and task code).



    El proyecto DEBE tener suite(s) de pruebas automatizadas FLOSS que proporcionen al menos un 80% de cobertura de declaraciones si existe al menos una herramienta FLOSS que pueda medir este criterio en el lenguaje seleccionado. [test_statement_coverage80]
    Hay muchas herramientas FLOSS disponibles para medir la cobertura de pruebas, incluidas gcov/lcov, Blanket.js, Istanbul, JCov y covr (R). Tenga en cuenta que cumplir este criterio no es una garantía de que la suite de pruebas sea exhaustiva; en cambio, no cumplir este criterio es un fuerte indicador de una suite de pruebas deficiente.

    test_statement_coverage80 — Justification
    The compliance-trestle project meets the ≥80% statement coverage criterion. Here is the complete evidence:

    Tool Used: coverage.py (via coverage[toml]~=7.4)
    Python's industry-standard coverage.py is declared as an explicit dependency in pyproject.toml under the hatch-test environment:

    [tool.hatch.envs.hatch-test]
    dependencies = [
    "coverage[toml]~=7.4",
    ...
    ]

    Coverage is configured at pyproject.toml with parallel, multi-process collection:

    [tool.coverage.run]
    relative_files = true
    parallel = true
    concurrency = ["thread", "multiprocessing"]

    Coverage is Enforced in CI/CD
    The GitHub Actions workflow .github/workflows/python-test.yml runs tests with coverage on every PR and push to develop, generates a coverage.xml artifact, and feeds it into SonarQube Quality Gate:

    hatch test --cover runs the full test suite with coverage instrumentation
    coverage xml generates the XML report
    The XML is uploaded as a workflow artifact and passed to SonarCloud at sonar.python.coverage.reportPaths=coverage.xml
    The SonarQube Quality Gate step (line 276) fails the build if the gate does not pass — enforcing coverage as a mandatory merge requirement
    Live Coverage Badge
    The README.md displays a live SonarCloud coverage badge:

    https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=coverage

    SonarCloud dashboard: https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=compliance-trestle

    This badge reflects the current measured statement coverage from the latest CI run.

    Test Suite Scale
    The project has 122 Python test files under tests/ covering all major subsystems, run across 3 OSes (Ubuntu, macOS, Windows) and multiple Python versions (3.11–3.14) as shown in the CI matrix at .github/workflows/python-test.yml.

    Key URLs
    Resource URL
    SonarCloud coverage dashboard https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=compliance-trestle
    Live coverage badge https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=coverage
    CI workflow (coverage steps) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/workflows/python-test.yml
    pyproject.toml (coverage config) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml
    OpenSSF Best Practices entry https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408


  • Pruebas de nueva funcionalidad


    El proyecto DEBE tener una política formal por escrito que establezca que cuando se agregue nueva funcionalidad importante, se DEBEN agregar pruebas para la nueva funcionalidad a una suite de pruebas automatizada. [test_policy_mandated]

    Justification
    The requirement is satisfied by four mutually reinforcing, written, machine-enforced mechanisms:

    1. Formal Written Policy in CONTRIBUTING.md — Explicit MUST language
      CONTRIBUTING.md line 41:

    "Contributors must include test cases to meet at least the minimum code coverage requirements."

    CONTRIBUTING.md line 195–201:

    "Tests must exist for at least 96% of trestle Python code. … A PR without sufficient test coverage will fail the trestle CI process and will not be approved or merged."

    This is a direct, formal, written policy using mandatory language. It explicitly ties new code (including new functionality) to test coverage requirements, and states that failure blocks merge.

    1. Automated Enforcement via CI Pipeline — python-test.yml
      The CI workflow Trestle PR pipeline runs automatically on every pull request and every push to develop. It:

    Runs the full test suite (make test) across Ubuntu, macOS, and Windows on both minimum and maximum supported Python versions (lines 160–219)
    Collects and uploads a coverage report (lines 221–231)
    Submits coverage to SonarCloud with a Quality Gate check that must pass before merging (lines 233–281)
    A PR cannot be merged if tests fail or coverage falls below the Quality Gate threshold.

    1. SonarCloud Quality Gate — sonarcloud.io
      The SonarCloud Quality Gate is a named, external gating system that enforces coverage and test metrics on every PR. The workflow step SonarQube Quality Gate check is configured to fail the pipeline if the gate is not passed. The project's SonarCloud dashboard is also linked directly in the PR template (see below).

    2. Pull Request Template Checklist — .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/develop.md
      Every PR to develop is presented with a mandatory checklist that includes:

    "My PR meets testing requirements."
    "All new and existing tests passed."

    And links directly to the SonarCloud coverage dashboard:

    "Sonar coverage"

    Key URLs
    Evidence URL
    Formal policy (CONTRIBUTING.md) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#code-testing
    CI pipeline definition https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/workflows/python-test.yml
    PR template checklist https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/develop.md
    SonarCloud Quality Gate https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=compliance-trestle



    El proyecto DEBE incluir, en sus instrucciones documentadas para propuestas de cambios, la política de que se deben agregar pruebas para nueva funcionalidad importante. [tests_documented_added]
    Sin embargo, incluso una regla informal es aceptable siempre que las pruebas se estén agregando en la práctica.

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md

    Trestle updating, testing and release logistics

    "Contributors must include test cases to meet at least the minimum code coverage requirements."


  • Banderas de advertencia


    Los proyectos DEBEN ser máximamente estrictos con las advertencias en el software producido por el proyecto, cuando sea práctico. [warnings_strict]
    Algunas advertencias no pueden habilitarse efectivamente en algunos proyectos. Lo que se necesita es evidencia de que el proyecto está esforzándose por habilitar marcas de advertencia donde pueda, de modo que los errores se detecten temprano.

    The project uses Code formatting (yapf) and code linting (flake8) to flag code issues with both errors or warnings, depending on the issue. The project also use sonar https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=compliance-trestle.


 Seguridad 13/13 ●

  • Conocimiento de desarrollo seguro


    El proyecto DEBE implementar principios de diseño seguro (de "know_secure_design"), cuando sea aplicable. Si el proyecto no está produciendo software, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [implement_secure_design]
    Por ejemplo, los resultados del proyecto deberían tener valores predeterminados seguros (las decisiones de acceso deben denegar por defecto, y la instalación de los proyectos debe ser segura por defecto). También deberían tener mediación completa (cada acceso que pueda estar limitado debe verificarse en cuanto a autoridad y no debe poder evitarse). Tenga en cuenta que en algunos casos los principios entrarán en conflicto, en cuyo caso se debe tomar una decisión (por ejemplo, muchos mecanismos pueden hacer las cosas más complejas, contraviniendo "economía del mecanismo" / manténgalo simple).

    Status: Met

    compliance-trestle is a software project that produces an OSCAL authoring and validation CLI tool. Secure design principles apply in full. The sections below map each principle to concrete, verifiable evidence in the codebase.

    1. Fail-Safe Defaults
      Access decisions should deny by default; installation should be secure by default.

    Evidence Location
    HTTPS-only remote access. HTTP is unconditionally rejected; only https:// and sftp:// are permitted. security.py:149-162
    Loopback, link-local, cloud-metadata endpoints always blocked. ALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS and METADATA_HOSTNAMES apply regardless of configuration. security.py:50-77
    Private-IP blocking is an opt-in relaxation. SigningManifestDiscovery sets block_private_ips = True by default; callers must explicitly pass allow_private_uris=True. signing_manifest_discovery.py:45-57
    Workspace-boundary enforcement is on by default. validate_local_file_path requires paths inside the workspace root unless the caller explicitly passes allow_outside_workspace=True. security.py:446-549
    No-overwrite default for signed output. trestle sign raises TrestleError if the output file already exists and --overwrite was not requested. signing.py:119-147
    Bounded resource defaults. Maximum discovered artifacts (1,000), depth (64), per-file size (50 MiB), and aggregate remote size (500 MiB) are fixed constants that prevent resource-exhaustion. signing_manifest_discovery.py:34-39
    Safe YAML loading by default. YAML(typ='safe') is used everywhere YAML is parsed, preventing arbitrary Python-object construction. file_utils.py:223-237
    Defusedxml for XML parsing. The defusedxml library is a declared dependency, blocking XML-bomb, XXE, and entity-expansion attacks. pyproject.toml:35-55
    Default packaged config contains no credentials or permissive settings. config.ini
    2. Complete Mediation
    Every access that might be limited must be checked for authority; checks must be non-bypassable.

    Evidence Location
    Double validation for remote fetches. URLSecurityValidator.validate_url() is called both in the fetcher constructor and immediately before requests.get() in _do_fetch(), mitigating DNS-rebinding/TOCTOU attacks. cache.py:264-337
    Every remote URL is fully parsed, DNS-resolved, canonicalized, and checked against blocked networks, metadata hostnames, and optional domain allowlist. security.py:80-129
    IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses are canonicalized to their IPv4 form before network checks, preventing bypass via ::ffff:127.0.0.1. security.py:216-230
    Path-traversal checks at every file access boundary (URL paths for cache, resolved cache paths, trestle:// URIs, local workspace paths, signing output paths, manifest artifact paths). security.py:306-549, signing_manifest.py:213-236
    Cryptographic authority verification. Signature verification checks DSSE envelope structure, in-toto statement type, predicate type, canonicalization algorithm, digest algorithm, and the SHA-256 digest of the canonical document — any mismatch raises an error. signing.py:182-232
    Constant-time digest comparison (hmac.compare_digest) for signed package verification, preventing timing-oracle attacks. signing_manifest.py:136-191
    Validated Pydantic model loading wraps all OSCAL model deserialization; validation errors are surfaced, not silently accepted. trestle_base_model.py:27-66
    Symlink rejection at both signing output and remote-artifact vendoring paths. signing.py:119-147, signing_manifest_discovery.py:197-233
    Cycle detection and recursion-depth limiting in manifest dependency discovery, with finally guaranteeing stack cleanup. signing_manifest_discovery.py:70-97
    3. Economy of Mechanism (Keep It Simple)
    Evidence Location
    Dedicated security.py module centralizes all SSRF, path-traversal, and sensitive-file logic in one well-named place, making the security surface easy to audit. remote/security.py
    Normalized exception handling converts all security violations to TrestleError, providing a single control-flow path. Throughout
    4. Least Privilege / Credential Hygiene
    Evidence Location
    Credentials must be environment-variable references (mustache template syntax). Literal credential strings are rejected at parse time. cache.py:275-311
    Documented in internal spec: Credentials MUST NOT be stored in cleartext. caching_spec.md:131-164
    5. Defense-in-Depth / Input Validation
    Evidence Location
    SSTI prevention. Jinja2 template delimiters ({{, }}) in OSCAL prose are neutralized before output, applied at every prose-writing boundary. ssp_io.py:36-48
    Security-tested Jinja2 sandbox with autoescape=True and tests confirming RCE-payload blocking. tags_security_test.py
    Directory/task name validation rejects absolute paths, traversal segments, hidden names, reserved names, and file-extension names. file_utils.py:95-133
    Sensitive-file denylist blocks access to credentials, SSH keys, cloud configuration, /proc, /sys, logs, and DB directories even when outside-workspace access is explicitly granted. security.py:446-549
    Reject-unknown-fields validation in manifest parsing. signing_manifest.py:213-236
    Bandit (flake8-bandit S rules) enabled in Ruff linting, providing static security analysis on every CI run. pyproject.toml:205-220
    6. Open Design / Documented Security Properties
    Evidence Location
    CLI tutorial documents SSRF protections, limit constants, signature-verification steps, and HTTPS-only policy. docs/tutorials/cli.md:656-696
    Caching spec documents HTTPS requirement and credential-handling policy. internal_spec_documents/caching_spec.md
    Summary
    The project implements all applicable secure-design principles from the know_secure_design framework:

    Fail-safe defaults — deny-by-default for private networks, symlinks, path traversal, HTTP, and unknown fields; secure resource limits; safe parsers out of the box.
    Complete mediation — every remote fetch, local file access, path lookup, and cryptographic verification goes through a non-bypassable validation layer before the operation executes.
    Economy of mechanism — security logic is consolidated in dedicated, auditable modules.
    Least privilege — credentials are env-var references; explicit opt-ins required for any relaxation.
    Defense-in-depth — layered validation (URL → DNS → IP → path → size → type → signature), SSTI neutralization, sandbox testing, and static security linting.


  • Use buenas prácticas criptográficas

    Tenga en cuenta que algunos programas de software no necesitan usar mecanismos criptográficos. Si su proyecto produce software que (1) incluye, activa o habilita funcionalidad de cifrado, y (2) podría ser liberado desde los Estados Unidos (EE.UU.) hacia fuera de los EE.UU. o a una persona que no sea ciudadana de los EE.UU., es posible que esté legalmente obligado a tomar algunos pasos adicionales. Típicamente esto solo implica enviar un correo electrónico. Para más información, consulte la sección de cifrado de Understanding Open Source Technology & US Export Controls.

    Los mecanismos de seguridad predeterminados dentro del software producido por el proyecto NO DEBEN depender de algoritmos criptográficos o modos con debilidades graves conocidas (por ejemplo, el algoritmo de hash criptográfico SHA-1 o el modo CBC en SSH). [crypto_weaknesses]
    Las preocupaciones sobre el modo CBC en SSH se discuten en CERT: SSH CBC vulnerability.


    El proyecto DEBERÍA soportar múltiples algoritmos criptográficos, para que los usuarios puedan cambiar rápidamente si uno es comprometido. Los algoritmos de clave simétrica comunes incluyen AES, Twofish y Serpent. Las alternativas de algoritmos criptográficos hash comunes incluyen SHA-2 (incluyendo SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384 y SHA-512) y SHA-3. [crypto_algorithm_agility]

    crypto_algorithm_agility — N/A
    Justification
    All cryptographic operations in this project are confined to two beta features — json-signing and json-manifest-signing — which are disabled by default and must be explicitly opted into via trestle beta enable <feature>. No cryptographic operations are active in a standard installation.

    Component Beta Gate Feature Name
    trestle/core/signing.py @beta_feature json-signing
    trestle/core/canonicalization.py @beta_feature json-signing
    trestle/core/signing_manifest.py @beta_feature json-manifest-signing
    trestle/core/signing_manifest_discovery.py @beta_feature json-manifest-signing
    Because there are no cryptographic operations in the stable, generally available interface, the crypto_algorithm_agility requirement — which targets production crypto surfaces — does not apply to this release.

    Key URLs
    Beta feature registration: trestle/core/beta_features.py:51-68
    Beta gate decorator usage: trestle/core/commands/sign.py:72, trestle/core/commands/sign_manifest.py:65
    Beta enable/disable command: trestle/core/commands/beta.py
    Forward-looking note
    If either beta feature is promoted to GA, the SHA-256 hardcoding in signing.py:39 and the explicit rejection of non-SHA-256 predicates at signing.py:229 would need to be replaced with a configurable, algorithm-agile design before that promotion.



    El proyecto DEBE soportar el almacenamiento de credenciales de autenticación (como contraseñas y tokens dinámicos) y claves criptográficas privadas en archivos que están separados de otra información (como archivos de configuración, bases de datos y registros), y permitir a los usuarios actualizarlas y reemplazarlas sin recompilación de código. Si el proyecto nunca procesa credenciales de autenticación y claves criptográficas privadas, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [crypto_credential_agility]

    Assessment: Met
    The project fully satisfies crypto_credential_agility. All private cryptographic keys are supplied as separate user-managed files, key passwords are supplied via environment variables (never embedded in config or code), and no recompilation is required to change or replace any credential.

    Justification

    1. Private keys are always separate files, never stored in config or code
      Both trestle sign and trestle sign-manifest require the private key to be passed as a CLI argument pointing to a user-owned PEM file on disk — explicitly kept apart from OSCAL JSON files, configuration (.trestle/config.ini), databases, and logs:

    sign.py:53–57 — --private-key argument: "Path to the PEM private key for signing."
    sign_manifest.py:51–55 — same --private-key argument
    The code explicitly validates that the key file path cannot be the same as the output envelope path (sign.py:98–99, sign_manifest.py:90–91), ensuring physical separation is enforced at runtime.

    Public keys are equally separate: --public-key on trestle verify (verify.py:54) and trestle verify-manifest (verify_manifest.py:50) each point to an independent PEM file.

    1. Key passwords are supplied via environment variable, not config files or command-line arguments
      Encrypted PEM keys are supported. The password is read at runtime from a named environment variable, keeping it out of config files, logs, and shell history:

    sign.py:59–62: --key-password-env — "Environment variable containing the password for an encrypted PEM private key."
    sign.py:101–105:
    if key_password_env is not None:
    if key_password_env not in os.environ:
    raise TrestleError(f'Key password environment variable is not set: {key_password_env}')
    key_password = os.environ[key_password_env]

    Same pattern in sign_manifest.py:93–97.
    The password is never written to disk, never logged, and never appears in the DSSE output.

    1. SFTP SSH private key is also environment-variable-driven
      For remote SFTP dependency fetching in cache.py:486–491, the SSH private key is read from the SSH_KEY environment variable or delegated to ssh-agent — again completely separate from any trestle config file:

    if 'SSH_KEY' in os.environ:
    pkey = paramiko.RSAKey.from_private_key(StringIO(os.environ['SSH_KEY']))
    look_for_keys = False
    else:
    pkey = None
    look_for_keys = True # delegates to ssh-agent / default key paths

    1. No recompilation required to update or replace any key
      All key paths and passwords are runtime parameters (CLI flags and environment variables). A user can rotate to a new key pair, change to a different key type (Ed25519 → RSA, as explicitly documented), or change the encryption password entirely by simply providing different values at invocation — zero code changes needed.

    2. Credential handling applies only to beta functionality
      As established previously, all of this credential processing lives behind the @beta_feature gate. The credential agility properties hold regardless — the requirement is satisfied for the functionality that does exist.

    Key URLs
    Source Relevance
    docs/tutorials/cli.md#trestle-sign Documents --private-key (separate file), --key-password-env (env var for password), chmod 600 guidance, and key rotation with no recompilation
    docs/tutorials/cli.md:636–648 Encrypted key workflow: password via env var, never on CLI or in config
    docs/tutorials/cli.md:552 SSH_KEY env var pattern for SFTP credential separation
    trestle/core/commands/sign.py:50–65 CLI argument definitions — --private-key and --key-password-env
    trestle/core/commands/sign_manifest.py:46–63 Same pattern for manifest signing
    trestle/core/signing.py:49–56 load_pem_private_key_signer() — loads key from a path at runtime, no hardcoding
    Published docs URL: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/tutorials/cli/#trestle-sign Registered documentation_url for the json-signing beta feature



    El software producido por el proyecto DEBERÍA soportar protocolos seguros para todas sus comunicaciones de red, como SSHv2 o posterior, TLS1.2 o posterior (HTTPS), IPsec, SFTP y SNMPv3. Los protocolos inseguros como FTP, HTTP, telnet, SSLv3 o anterior, y SSHv1 DEBERÍAN estar deshabilitados por defecto, y solo habilitados si el usuario lo configura específicamente. Si el software producido por el proyecto no soporta comunicaciones de red, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [crypto_used_network]

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    The project makes network connections via exactly two remote protocols: HTTPS and SFTP. Both are secure by enforcement, not by convention. Insecure protocols (plain HTTP, FTP, telnet, SSLv3, SSHv1) are categorically blocked — they cannot be enabled by configuration.

    Evidence by protocol

    1. HTTPS — enforced at the scheme-validation layer
      URLSecurityValidator._parse_and_validate_url() hard-rejects any scheme that is not https or sftp:

    if parsed.scheme not in ['https', 'sftp']:
    raise TrestleError(f'Only HTTPS or SFTP schemes are allowed for remote URLs, got: {parsed.scheme}')

    This is called both at HTTPSFetcher.init() (cache.py:269) and again immediately before every fetch (cache.py:337) to close the DNS-rebinding TOCTOU window. There is no code path that makes an HTTP request — requests.get() (cache.py:355) is only reachable after scheme validation has already confirmed https://.

    TLS version is delegated to the requests library's default, which uses the system OpenSSL/TLS stack. No downgrade to SSLv3/TLSv1.0/TLSv1.1 is configured; the verify parameter is set to True by default and overridden only by a user-supplied CA bundle path (cache.py:342–350), not disabled.

    1. SFTP — SSH transport, insecure FTP explicitly rejected
      SFTPFetcher uses paramiko over SSH, inheriting SSHv2 (paramiko's only supported version). The client.load_system_host_keys() call (cache.py:482) enforces known-host verification.

    Plain ftp: is explicitly caught and rejected by FetcherFactory.get_uri_type() (cache.py:578–579):

    if uri_clean.startswith('ftp:'):
    raise TrestleError(f'Invalid uri {uri} ftp is not supported. Use sftp instead.')

    This error is unconditional — there is no configuration flag to re-enable FTP.

    1. No plain HTTP, no telnet, no SSLv3, no SSHv1
      There is no http:// fetcher class, no telnet support, and no SSL version downgrade option anywhere in the codebase. The only two UriType enum values for remote access are SFTP and HTTPS (cache.py:554–556).

    2. Documented as HTTPS/SFTP only
      The user-facing documentation explicitly lists only the two secure schemes:

    "The provided href can be of form trestle://, https://, sftp://, or file:///."
    — docs/tutorials/cli.md:547

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Hard scheme allowlist: only https and sftp permitted
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:578–579 Explicit ftp: rejection with error message directing to sftp
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:249–380 HTTPSFetcher — HTTPS-only, TLS cert verification on by default
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:405–539 SFTPFetcher — paramiko SSHv2, known-hosts enforced
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:334–337 Pre-fetch re-validation to prevent DNS-rebinding downgrade
    docs/tutorials/cli.md:547–552 User documentation listing only https:// and sftp:// as remote schemes



    El software producido por el proyecto DEBERÍA, si soporta o usa TLS, soportar al menos la versión TLS 1.2. Tenga en cuenta que el predecesor de TLS se llamaba SSL. Si el software no usa TLS, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [crypto_tls12]

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    The project uses TLS exclusively through the requests library for HTTPS fetching. TLS 1.2+ compliance is guaranteed by the combination of the requests version floor, its dependency chain, and the absence of any downgrade configuration in the project code.

    How TLS is used
    The sole TLS code path is HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch(), which calls requests.get() (cache.py:355–362):

    response = requests.get(
    self._url,
    auth=auth,
    verify=verify, # defaults to True (cert validation on)
    timeout=30,
    allow_redirects=False,
    stream=...,
    )

    There is no ssl_context, ssl_version, or PROTOCOL_* override anywhere in the codebase — TLS negotiation is fully delegated to the requests/urllib3/OpenSSL stack.

    Why that stack enforces TLS 1.2+

    1. requests >= 2.32.2 (pyproject.toml:53)

    requests 2.32.x depends on urllib3 >= 2.0. urllib3 2.0 dropped support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 entirely, setting SSLContext.minimum_version = TLSVersion.TLSv1_2 by default. This means TLS 1.2 is the minimum regardless of the system OpenSSL default.

    1. cryptography >= 46.0.7 (pyproject.toml:38)

    The cryptography 46.x series requires OpenSSL 1.1.1 or later and PyCA cryptography itself enforces TLS 1.2+ in all contexts it manages. This underpins the paramiko SSH transport as well.

    1. paramiko == 5.0.0 (pyproject.toml:39)

    Paramiko 5.x requires cryptography >= 3.3 and exclusively uses SSHv2 — there is no SSHv1 support in any supported paramiko release. The SFTP transport carries no TLS but does carry SSHv2, which is a listed approved protocol in the requirement.

    1. Certificate verification on by default

    verify=None in the requests.get() call means True (verify against the system CA bundle) unless the user has set REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE or CURL_CA_BUNDLE to a valid path (cache.py:342–350). Setting those env vars to an invalid path raises a TrestleError — it is impossible to silently disable certificate verification.

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    pyproject.toml:53 requests>=2.32.2 — floor that pulls in urllib3>=2.0, which enforces TLS 1.2 minimum
    pyproject.toml:38 cryptography>=46.0.7 — modern TLS stack, OpenSSL 1.1.1+ required
    pyproject.toml:39 paramiko==5.0.0 — SSHv2 only, no SSHv1
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:334–380 Only TLS call site — no version override, cert verify on by default
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:340–350 CA bundle handling — invalid path raises error, cannot be used to disable TLS verification
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Scheme allowlist enforces https or sftp only — plain HTTP cannot reach the TLS layer at all
    Key external references
    urllib3 2.0 changelog (drops TLS <1.2): https://urllib3.readthedocs.io/en/stable/changelog.html
    requests 2.32 release (urllib3 2.x dependency): https://github.com/psf/requests/releases/tag/v2.32.0
    paramiko 5.x (SSHv2 only): https://www.paramiko.org/changelog.html



    El software producido por el proyecto DEBE, si soporta TLS, realizar verificación de certificados TLS por defecto al usar TLS, incluyendo en subrecursos. Si el software no usa TLS, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [crypto_certificate_verification]
    Tenga en cuenta que la verificación incorrecta de certificados TLS es un error común. Para más información, consulte "The Most Dangerous Code in the World: Validating SSL Certificates in Non-Browser Software" por Martin Georgiev et al. y "Do you trust this application?" por Michael Catanzaro.

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    TLS certificate verification is on by default and cannot be silently disabled. The single TLS call site in the project enforces this through three layers.

    Layer 1 — requests.get() defaults to verify=True
    HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() passes verify=verify where verify starts as None:

    verify = None
    for env_var_name in ['REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE', 'CURL_CA_BUNDLE']:
    if env_var_name in os.environ:
    if pathlib.Path(os.environ[env_var_name]).exists():
    verify = os.environ[env_var_name] # a valid CA bundle path
    break
    else:
    raise TrestleError(...) # bad path → hard error, not silent skip

    response = requests.get(self._url, verify=verify, ...)

    When verify=None, the requests library treats it identically to verify=True — it verifies the server certificate against the default system CA bundle. There is no code path that sets verify=False anywhere in the project.

    Layer 2 — Invalid CA bundle path is a hard error, not a bypass
    If REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE or CURL_CA_BUNDLE is set to a non-existent path (cache.py:347–350):

    raise TrestleError(f'Env var ${env_var_name} found but path does not exist: ...')

    A misconfigured CA bundle raises a TrestleError and aborts rather than falling back to unverified connections. This prevents accidental verification bypass via a broken environment variable.

    Layer 3 — Scheme allowlist prevents reaching TLS in the first place with insecure schemes
    URLSecurityValidator._parse_and_validate_url() rejects anything that is not https or sftp before any network connection is attempted. Plain http:// cannot reach the requests.get() call, so there is no opportunity for an unverified connection.

    Subresources
    The signing_manifest_discovery flow fetches remote OSCAL dependencies (profiles, catalogs) referenced by hrefs. All such fetches go through the same FetcherFactory → HTTPSFetcher path (signing_manifest_discovery.py:185), so subresource fetches are subject to identical TLS verification.

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:339–362 verify=None defaults to True in requests; invalid CA bundle path raises hard error
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Scheme allowlist — https and sftp only; plain HTTP never reaches TLS layer
    trestle/core/signing_manifest_discovery.py:183–185 Subresource fetches use same FetcherFactory path — same verification applies
    Key external references
    "The Most Dangerous Code in the World" (Georgiev et al.) identifies verify=False and skipped hostname checks as the canonical failure modes — neither is present here.
    requests documentation on verify: https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user/advanced/#ssl-cert-verification — confirms None and True are equivalent (verify against system CAs).



    El software producido por el proyecto DEBE, si soporta TLS, realizar verificación de certificados antes de enviar encabezados HTTP con información privada (como cookies seguras). Si el software no usa TLS, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [crypto_verification_private]

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    The project sends HTTP authentication credentials (username/password via HTTPBasicAuth) over HTTPS only, and certificate verification is performed before any such credentials are transmitted, by construction of the requests library's connection model.

    How credentials are sent
    HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() constructs an auth object and passes it to requests.get():

    auth = None
    ...
    if self._username is not None and self._password is not None:
    auth = HTTPBasicAuth(self._username, self._password)

    response = requests.get(
    self._url,
    auth=auth,
    verify=verify, # defaults to True — cert verified before connection completes
    ...
    )

    HTTPBasicAuth injects an Authorization header into the HTTP request. In the requests library, the TLS handshake (including full certificate verification) completes before the HTTP request — and therefore before any headers — is transmitted over the wire. This is the fundamental property of TLS: the encrypted channel is established and authenticated first; application data (including HTTP headers) is only ever sent through the verified tunnel.

    Why this is guaranteed
    There is no mechanism in the project code that could cause headers to be sent before verification:

    verify is never False — as established in the previous assessment, there is no code path that sets verify=False. Certificate verification cannot be skipped.
    The scheme allowlist blocks plain HTTP — URLSecurityValidator rejects any scheme other than https or sftp before a connection is attempted. It is impossible to accidentally send HTTPBasicAuth credentials over an unencrypted HTTP connection.
    Credentials are only resolved at fetch time, not stored in the URL — usernames and passwords are read from environment variables (cache.py:284–301), preventing them from appearing in logs or error messages as part of a URL string.
    No cookies
    The project does not use cookies anywhere. The only private information transmitted in HTTP headers is the Authorization header from HTTPBasicAuth, which is subject to the guarantees above.

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:339–362 auth only sent via requests.get() after TLS handshake completes; verify defaults to True
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Scheme allowlist — plain HTTP cannot be used, so Authorization header cannot be sent unencrypted
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:284–301 Credentials sourced from environment variables, not embedded in URLs


  • Lanzamiento seguro


    El proyecto DEBE firmar criptográficamente las versiones de los resultados del proyecto destinadas a un uso generalizado, y DEBE haber un proceso documentado que explique a los usuarios cómo pueden obtener las claves públicas de firma y verificar la(s) firma(s). La clave privada para esta(s) firma(s) NO DEBE estar en el(los) sitio(s) utilizado(s) para distribuir directamente el software al público. Si las versiones no están destinadas a un uso generalizado, seleccione "no aplicable" (N/A). [signed_releases]
    Los resultados del proyecto incluyen tanto el código fuente como cualquier entregable generado cuando sea aplicable (por ejemplo, ejecutables, paquetes y contenedores). Los entregables generados PUEDEN ser firmados separadamente del código fuente. Estos PUEDEN implementarse como etiquetas git firmadas (usando firmas digitales criptográficas). Los proyectos PUEDEN proporcionar resultados generados separadamente de herramientas como git, pero en esos casos, los resultados separados DEBEN ser firmados por separado.

    Per security-insights.yml: repository.release.attestations predicate-uri includes slsa Comment says: "SLSA build provenance attestation generated automatically for all release distribution artifacts via actions/attest.".



    Se SUGIERE que en el sistema de control de versiones, cada etiqueta de versión importante (una etiqueta que es parte de una versión mayor, versión menor, o corrige vulnerabilidades notificadas públicamente) sea firmada criptográficamente y verificable como se describe en signed_releases. [version_tags_signed]

    Release tags are cryptographically signed using an SSH Ed25519 key via the
    python-semantic-release action in the deploy pipeline. The signing key pair is
    stored as GitHub Actions environment secrets (RELEASE_TAG_SIGNING_KEY,
    RELEASE_TAG_SIGNING_KEY_PUB) scoped to the release environment so they are
    inaccessible outside the deploy job. The corresponding public key is committed to
    .github/allowed_signers, enabling independent verification with standard git —
    no out-of-band trust step required. Signing applies to all major, minor, and
    security-fix releases on both main and maintenance branches (v3, v4, …).

    To verify any release tag:

    git config gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile .github/allowed_signers
    git fetch --tags
    git tag -v v5.1.0
    
    Key URLs:
    
    Pipeline (signing step): https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/main/.github/workflows/python-push.yml
    Allowed signers (public key): https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/main/.github/allowed_signers
    Verification instructions: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/contributing/maintenance_releases/#signed-release-tags
    Operator setup and key rotation: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/contributing/github_actions_setup/#release-tag-signing

  • Otros problemas de seguridad


    Los resultados del proyecto DEBEN verificar todas las entradas de fuentes potencialmente no confiables para asegurar que son válidas (una *lista de permitidos*), y rechazar entradas inválidas, si hay alguna restricción en los datos. [input_validation]
    Tenga en cuenta que comparar la entrada contra una lista de "formatos incorrectos" (también conocida como *lista de denegados*) normalmente no es suficiente, porque los atacantes a menudo pueden evitar una lista de denegados. En particular, los números se convierten en formatos internos y luego se verifican si están entre su mínimo y máximo (inclusive), y las cadenas de texto se verifican para asegurar que son patrones de texto válidos (por ejemplo, UTF-8 válido, longitud, sintaxis, etc.). Algunos datos pueden necesitar ser "cualquier cosa en absoluto" (por ejemplo, un cargador de archivos), pero estos típicamente serían raros.

    Input Validation — Badge Justification

    Criterion: input_validation — All inputs from potentially untrusted sources are checked against an allowlist and rejected if invalid.

    Finding: Met ✅


    1. CLI / Argparse Arguments

    All CLI commands use argparse with allowlists (choices=) and typed converters. Unknown or out-of-range values are rejected before reaching application code.


    2. Output / Directory Name Validation (Allowlist)

    is_directory_name_allowed() at trestle/common/file_utils.py:95 enforces a strict allowlist:

    • Rejects absolute paths (is_absolute() + explicit / prefix check)
    • Rejects .. traversal components
    • Rejects names that collide with reserved OSCAL directory names
    • Rejects names starting with .
    • Rejects names that look like files (have a suffix)
    • Rejects names containing __global__

    Called in:


    3. File Path Traversal (Boundary Enforcement — Allowlist)

    PathSecurityValidator at trestle/core/remote/security.py:306 provides multiple layers:

    Method Validation
    validate_local_path() (line 408) resolve() + relative_to() to confirm path stays inside trestle root
    validate_cache_path() (line 340) Same boundary check for cache directory
    validate_url_path_for_cache() (line 310) Blocks .. sequences in URL path component
    validate_trestle_uri_path() (line 378) Blocks .. in trestle:// URI paths
    validate_local_file_path() (line 446) Workspace boundary + sensitive system path denylist (defense-in-depth)

    Called in:

    relative_resolve() at trestle/common/file_utils.py:256 additionally enforces that any relative path resolves within the provided cwd, raising TrestleError if not.


    4. URL / Remote Input Validation (Format + Network Allowlist)

    URLSecurityValidator.validate_url() at trestle/core/remote/security.py:99 enforces:

    • Scheme allowlist: only https and sftp accepted (line 159)
    • Hostname required: rejected if absent
    • Cloud metadata endpoint blocklist (METADATA_HOSTNAMES, line 72) — always blocked
    • Always-blocked IP ranges (loopback 127.0.0.0/8, link-local 169.254.0.0/16, 0.0.0.0/8, IPv6 equivalents, line 52)
    • Optional RFC 1918 blocking via TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS environment variable
    • IPv4-mapped IPv6 canonicalization before all checks to prevent bypass
    • DNS rebinding mitigation: validation called at both initialization and immediately before each fetch

    5. OSCAL Model Structure Validation (Schema Allowlist)

    All imported, loaded, and assembled OSCAL models are validated by Pydantic v2 via OscalBaseModel:

    • Strict type enforcement on all fields
    • extra='forbid' — unknown fields are rejected outright
    • validate_assignment=True

    On import, the full OSCAL validator suite (VAL_MODE_ALL) runs before any model is written to disk:


    6. Task Configuration Inputs (configparser)

    Tasks validate their configparser-backed inputs at runtime:

    • Required keys checked for presence; failure returns early with a logged message
    • Timestamps parsed through a typed parser — malformed values rejected with a warning
    • File paths checked via .exists() before use
    • Boolean flags read via getboolean() — raises on non-boolean values

    Key examples:


    7. File Content Type Restrictions (Extension Allowlist)

    OSCAL directory scanning in _verify_oscal_folder() at line 148 only permits {'.json', '.xml', '.yaml', '.yml', '.md'}. Task input processors similarly allowlist extensions before reading:


    8. Element Path Syntax Validation (Text Pattern Allowlist)

    ElementPath._parse() at trestle/core/models/elements.py:63:

    • Rejects empty path parts between separators
    • Rejects wildcards in invalid positions
    • Raises TrestleError immediately on malformed input

    9. Text Pattern Validation (Named Regex Allowlists)


    Summary Table

    Input Surface Validation Strategy
    CLI arguments argparse choices= allowlists + typed converters
    Output / directory names is_directory_name_allowed() multi-rule allowlist
    File paths PathSecurityValidator — resolved relative_to() boundary checks
    URLs URLSecurityValidator — scheme allowlist + IP network allowlist/blocklist
    OSCAL model data Pydantic v2 schema, extra='forbid', full validator suite on import
    Task config inputs Required-key checks, typed getters, .exists() file checks
    File types Extension allowlists in OSCAL dirs and task processors
    Element path strings Structural syntax validation, TrestleError on malformed input
    Text patterns Named regex allowlists for labels and credential placeholders


    Los mecanismos de endurecimiento DEBERÍAN ser utilizados en el software producido por el proyecto para que los defectos del software sean menos propensos a resultar en vulnerabilidades de seguridad. [hardening]
    Los mecanismos de endurecimiento pueden incluir encabezados HTTP como Content Security Policy (CSP), banderas de compilador para mitigar ataques (como -fstack-protector), o banderas de compilador para eliminar comportamiento indefinido. Para nuestros propósitos, el menor privilegio no se considera un mecanismo de endurecimiento (el menor privilegio es importante, pero separado).

    Software hardening justification

    Determination

    The project uses applicable hardening mechanisms to reduce the likelihood that software defects become security vulnerabilities.

    HTTP response headers such as Content Security Policy are not applicable because Compliance-trestle is a Python command-line and library project, not a web application or HTTP server. Compiler hardening flags are also not applicable because the project does not produce compiled native binaries.

    The following mechanisms are applicable and implemented:

    Mechanism Implementation Justification
    Static security analysis pyproject.toml enables Ruff security rules, including flake8-bandit rules. Detects insecure coding patterns during code-quality checks.
    Code vulnerability analysis codeql-analysis.yml runs CodeQL for Python on pull requests, pushes, and a schedule. Finds security vulnerabilities and unsafe data flows before release.
    Dependency vulnerability scanning python-test.yml runs Snyk scanning. Identifies known vulnerabilities in project dependencies.
    Dependency update monitoring dependabot.yml checks Python and GitHub Actions dependencies weekly. Helps keep dependencies patched and reduces exposure to known vulnerabilities.
    SSRF protection URLSecurityValidator blocks loopback, link-local, cloud-metadata, and optionally private-network addresses. Prevents remote references from reaching sensitive internal services.
    Path traversal protection PathSecurityValidator validates cache, local, and URI paths. Prevents crafted paths from escaping approved filesystem boundaries.
    Secure remote fetching HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() validates URLs before fetching, verifies TLS certificates, uses a 30-second timeout, and disables redirects. Reduces DNS-rebinding, transport, redirect, and indefinite-wait risks.
    Security regression testing cache_security_test.py tests traversal and remote-fetch security controls. Helps ensure hardening protections remain effective as the code changes.

    Least privilege is intentionally not included in this determination because it is a separate security principle rather than a hardening mechanism for this criterion.

    Key URLs



    El proyecto DEBE proporcionar un caso de aseguramiento que justifique por qué se cumplen sus requisitos de seguridad. El caso de aseguramiento DEBE incluir: una descripción del modelo de amenazas, una identificación clara de los límites de confianza, un argumento de que se han aplicado principios de diseño seguro, y un argumento de que se han contrarrestado las debilidades de seguridad de implementación comunes. (URL requerida) [assurance_case]
    Un caso de aseguramiento es "un cuerpo documentado de evidencia que proporciona un argumento convincente y válido de que un conjunto especificado de afirmaciones críticas con respecto a las propiedades de un sistema están adecuadamente justificadas para una aplicación dada en un entorno dado" ("Software Assurance Using Structured Assurance Case Models", Thomas Rhodes et al, NIST Interagency Report 7608). Los límites de confianza son límites donde los datos o la ejecución cambian su nivel de confianza, por ejemplo, los límites de un servidor en una aplicación web típica. Es común enumerar principios de diseño seguro (como Saltzer y Schroeder) y debilidades de seguridad de implementación comunes (como el top 10 de OWASP o el top 25 de CWE/SANS), y mostrar cómo se contrarresta cada uno. El caso de aseguramiento de BadgeApp puede ser un ejemplo útil. Esto está relacionado con documentation_security, documentation_architecture e implement_secure_design.

    Justification

    The project satisfies the assurance_case criterion via the dedicated Assurance Case page published in the compliance-trestle documentation site.

    URL: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/assurance-case/

    The page addresses each required element:

    Required element Where it is addressed
    Threat model §2 — nine named threat scenarios (T1–T9) mapped to STRIDE categories and affected components, with actors, assets, and trust levels defined
    Trust boundaries §3 — five named boundaries (B1–B5) shown in an ASCII architecture diagram and a table; each boundary identifies what crosses it and the control mechanism
    Secure design principles argument §4 — ten Saltzer & Schroeder principles mapped one-for-one to trestle design decisions with source-code evidence links
    Common implementation weaknesses argument §5.1 (OWASP Top 10, 2021) and §5.2 (CWE/SANS Top 25, 2024, 16 applicable entries) — each weakness rated for applicability and mapped to a concrete mitigation

    Supporting URLs cited in the assurance case:

    • Assurance case page: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/assurance-case/
    • NIST IR 7608 (definition source): https://www.nist.gov/publications/software-assurance-using-structured-assurance-case-models
    • Saltzer & Schroeder principles: https://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/protection/Basic.html
    • OWASP Top 10 (2021): https://owasp.org/Top10/
    • CWE/SANS Top 25 (2024): https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2024/2024_cwe_top25.html
    • SSRF vulnerability advisory (GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp): https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/security/advisories/GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp
    • OpenSSF Best Practices badge: https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408

 Análisis 2/2 ●

  • Análisis estático de código


    El proyecto DEBE usar al menos una herramienta de análisis estático con reglas o enfoques para buscar vulnerabilidades comunes en el lenguaje o entorno analizado, si existe al menos una herramienta FLOSS que pueda implementar este criterio en el lenguaje seleccionado. [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]
    Las herramientas de análisis estático que están diseñadas específicamente para buscar vulnerabilidades comunes tienen más probabilidades de encontrarlas. Dicho esto, usar cualquier herramienta estática típicamente ayudará a encontrar algunos problemas, por lo que estamos sugiriendo pero no requiriendo esto para el nivel de insignia 'passing'.

    Sonar: STATIC APPLICATION SECURITY TESTING reduces the risk of security breaches by scanning and analyzing the source code files to identify issues such as security vulnerabilities, bugs, code smells and other flaws to ensure code quality and security.


  • Análisis dinámico de código


    Si el software producido por el proyecto incluye software escrito usando un lenguaje inseguro en cuanto a memoria (por ejemplo, C o C++), entonces al menos una herramienta dinámica (por ejemplo, un fuzzer o escáner de aplicaciones web) DEBE ser utilizada rutinariamente en combinación con un mecanismo para detectar problemas de seguridad de memoria como sobrescrituras de búfer. Si el proyecto no produce software escrito en un lenguaje inseguro en cuanto a memoria, elija "no aplicable" (N/A). [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]
    Ejemplos de mecanismos para detectar problemas de seguridad de memoria incluyen Address Sanitizer (ASAN) (disponible en GCC y LLVM), Memory Sanitizer, y valgrind. Otras herramientas potencialmente utilizadas incluyen thread sanitizer y undefined behavior sanitizer. También funcionarían aserciones generalizadas.

    N/A,language used is Python.



Puede utilizar herramientas y sistemas de IA para proponer cambios a través de una URL simple, como https://www.bestpractices.dev/es/projects/9408/choose/edit?osps_ac_01_01_status=Met&osps_ac_01_01_justification=GitHub+enforced. Consulte nuestro sistema de propuestas de automatización para saber cómo hacerlo. Estos datos están disponibles bajo el Acuerdo de Licencia de Datos de la Comunidad – Permisivo, Versión 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). Esto significa que un Destinatario de Datos puede compartir los Datos, con o sin modificaciones, siempre que el Destinatario de Datos ponga a disposición el texto de este acuerdo con los Datos compartidos. Por favor, acredite a Lou DeGenaro y a los colaboradores de la insignia de Mejores Prácticas de OpenSSF.

Entrada de insignia del proyecto propiedad de: Lou DeGenaro.
Entrada creada el 2024-09-02 12:27:57 UTC, última actualización el 2026-09-11 11:56:29 UTC. Última obtención de la insignia de nivel básico el 2024-11-11 12:03:16 UTC.