compliance-trestle

本サイトが提示する下記のベストプラクティスを実行するプロジェクトは、Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) バッジを達成したことを自主的に自己認証し、そのことを外部に示すことができます。

ソフトウェアに欠陥や脆弱性がないことを保証する手立てはありません。形式論的な証明ができたとしても、仕様や前提が間違っていると誤動作の可能性があります。また、プロジェクトが健全で、かつ機能的な開発コミュニティであり続けることを保証する手立てもありません。しかし、ベストプラクティスの採用は、プロジェクトの成果の向上に寄与する可能性があります。たとえば、いくつものベストプラクティスがリリース前の複数人によるレビューを定めていますが、それによりレビュー以外では発見困難な技術的脆弱性を見つけるのを助け、同時に異なる企業の開発者間の信頼を築き、さらに交流を続けることに対する意欲を生んでいます。バッジを獲得するには、すべてのMUSTおよびMUST NOT基準を満たさなければなりません。すべてのSHOULD基準も満たさなければなりませんが、正当な理由がある場合は満たさなくても構いません。そしてすべてのSUGGESTED基準も満たさなければなりませんが、満たさないとしても、少なくとも考慮することが望まれます。フィードバックは、 GitHubサイトのissueまたはpull requestとして提示されれば歓迎します。また、議論のためのメールリストも用意されています。

私たちは多言語で情報を提供していますが、翻訳版に矛盾や意味の不一致がある場合は、英語版を正式な記述とします。
これがあなたのプロジェクトなら、あなたのプロジェクトページにあなたのバッジステータスを表示してください!バッジステータスは次のようになります。 プロジェクト 9408 のバッジ レベルは silver です バッジステータスの埋め込み方法は次のとおりです。
バッジステータスを表示するには、あなたのプロジェクトのマークダウンファイルに以下を埋め込みます
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408)
あるいは、以下をHTMLに埋め込みます
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408/badge"></a>


これらはシルバーレベルの基準です。合格またはゴールドレベル基準を表示することもできます。

Baseline Series: ベースラインレベル1 ベースラインレベル2 ベースラインレベル3

        

 基本的情報 17/17 ●

  • 一般

    他のプロジェクトが同じ名前を使用していないか注意してください。

    An opinionated tooling platform for managing compliance as code, using continuous integration and NIST's OSCAL standard.

    SPDXライセンスの表現形式を使用してください。 例:「Apache-2.0」、「BSD-2-Clause」、「BSD-3-Clause」、「GPL-2.0+」、「LGPL-3.0+」、「MIT」、「(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)」。一重引用符または二重引用符を含めないでください。
    複数の言語がある場合は、コンマを区切り(スペースを入れてもよい)としてリストし、使用頻度の高いものから順に並べます。使用言語が多くある場合は、少なくとも最初の3つの最も多く使われるものをリストアップしてください。言語がない場合(例:ドキュメントだけ、またはテスト専用のプロジェクトの場合)、1文字 " - "を使用します。言語ごとにある大文字・小文字の慣用を踏襲してください(例:「JavaScript」)。
    Common Platform Enumeration(CPE)は、情報技術(IT)システム、ソフトウェア、およびパッケージのための構造化された命名体系です。脆弱性を報告する際に、多くのシステムやデータベースで使用されています。
  • 前提要件


    プロジェクトは合格レベルバッジに達成しなければなりません。 [achieve_passing]

  • 基本的なプロジェクト ウェブサイトのコンテンツ


    貢献する方法に関する情報には、受け入れ可能な貢献の要件(例えば、必要なコーディング標準への言及)が含まれなければなりません。 (URLが必要です) [contribution_requirements]
  • プロジェクトの管理・運営


    プロジェクトは、プロジェクト ソフトウェアのそれなりの量を開発しているすべての開発者が、これらの貢献を行うことが法的に認められていると主張すりょうな法的な仕組みを持っていなければなりません。これを行うための最も一般的で簡単に実装されたアプローチは、開発者証明書(DCO)を使用することです。ユーザーは、 DCOのウェブサイトへのプロジェクトのリンクが表示されます。ただし、これはコントリビュータ ライセンス契約(CLA)またはその他の法的な仕組みとして実装することができます。 (URLが必要です) [dco]
    DCOは、実装が容易で、ソースコードで追跡され、gitが "commit -s"を使用して "サインオフ"機能を直接サポートするため、推奨されるメカニズムです。最も効果的であるためには、プロジェクト文書が、そのプロジェクトに対して「サインオフ」とは何を意味するのかを説明するのが最善です。 CLAは、知的著作物が組織またはプロジェクトにライセンスされている条件を定義する法的合意です。コントリビュータ アサイン アグリーメント(CAA)は、知的著作物の権利を他の当事者に移転する法的合意です。プロジェクトはCAAを必ずしも持つ必要はありません。なぜなら、CAAは、特に受領者が営利目的の組織である場合には、潜在的な貢献者が貢献しないリスクを高めます。 Apache Software Foundation CLA(個々のコントリビュータ ライセンスと法人CLA)は、この種のCLAのリスクを判断するプロジェクトにとって、リスクが便益よりも小さいのCLAの例です。

    The project uses the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) 1.1 — the same mechanism used by the Linux Kernel community (https://developercertificate.org). This is documented in CONTRIBUTING.md (https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md), which explains what Signed-off-by means for this project, provides an example trailer (Signed-off-by: John Doe john.doe@example.com), and instructs contributors to use git commit --signoff. DCO sign-off is technically enforced on every pull request by a dedicated CI workflow (https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/workflows/verify-signoff.yml) that checks every non-merge commit to confirm the Signed-off-by trailer is present and matches the commit author's email address, blocking the PR if it does not.



    プロジェクトは、プロジェクト ガバナンス モデル(主要な役割を含む意思決定方法)を明確に定義し、文書化しなければなりません。 (URLが必要です) [governance]
    決定を下し、論争を解決するための十分に確立された文書化された方法が必要です。小規模なプロジェクトでは、これは「プロジェクトオーナーとリーダーがすべての最終決定を下す」という単純なものです。慈愛の強い独裁者や正式な能力主義を含む様々な統治モデルが存在します。詳細については、統治モデルを参照してください。集中化された(例えば、単一メインテナー)および分散された(例えば、グループ メインテナー)アプローチの両方が、プロジェクトにおいて成功のうちに使用されています。統治情報は、プロジェクトフォークを作成する可能性について文書化する必要はありません。なぜなら、これはFLOSSプロジェクトでは常に可能であるからです。

    URL (primary):
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md

    URL (secondary — roles):
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md

    Justification text:

    The compliance-trestle project is governed under the OSCAL Compass community governance model, documented at https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md. This document defines all key roles (Member, Reviewer, Maintainer, Oversight Committee), the two-tier decision-making process (lazy consensus for day-to-day decisions; explicit simple or supermajority voting via GitVote for formal decisions), dispute resolution (escalation to the Oversight Committee with binding authority), and the process for electing and removing leadership. Detailed role requirements and responsibilities are in https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md. Active project maintainers are listed in the project-level MAINTAINERS.md.



    プロジェクトは、行動規範を採択し、標準的な場所に掲示しなければなりません。 (URLが必要です) [code_of_conduct]
    プロジェクトは、地域社会の礼儀正しさを向上させることと、行動規範を採択することで受け入れられる行動についての期待を設定すること、ができるかもしれません。これにより、問題が発生する前に問題を回避し、プロジェクトをより貢献を促す場所にすることができます。これは、プロジェクトのコミュニティ内や職場内の行動にのみ焦点を当てるべきです。行動規範の例としては、以下のようなものがあります。Linuxカーネル行動規範、コントリビューター規約行動規範、Debian行動規範、Ubuntu行動規範、Fedora行動規範、GNOME行動規範、KDEコミュニティ行動規範、Pythonコミュニティ行動規範、Rubyコミュニティ行動指針、およびRust 行動規範。

    URL:
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

    Justification text:

    The project adopts the CNCF Code of Conduct, hosted at the OSCAL Compass community level at https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. It is referenced from the project README.md ("Participation in the OSCAL Compass community is governed by the Code of Conduct") and from the project's documentation site at https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/contributing/code_of_conduct/.



    プロジェクトは、プロジェクトでの重要な役割と役割が実行しなければならないタスクを含む責任を明確に定義し、公的に文書化しなければなりません。誰がどの役割を持っているかは明確でなければなりませんが、これは同じ方法で文書化されていない可能性があります。 (URLが必要です) [roles_responsibilities]
    統治と役割と責任に関する文章は1か所にあるのが良いでしょう。

    URL (primary — role definitions):
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md

    Justification text:

    Key roles and their responsibilities are defined in https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MEMBERSHIP.md, which documents the Member, Reviewer, Maintainer, and Oversight Committee roles — including requirements to hold each role, specific responsibilities, and privileges. Who holds each role is publicly named in two places: project-level maintainers (Maintainer role) are listed with their GitHub handles in https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/MAINTAINERS.md, and org-level role holders (Oversight Committee, Org Admins, Community Maintainers) are listed with their GitHub handles and affiliations in https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md.



    いずれかの人が仕事を継続できなくなるまたは死亡した場合、プロジェクトは最小限の中断で継続することができなければなりません。特に、プロジェクトは、課題の作成と終了、提案された変更の受け入れ、およびバージョンのソフトウェアのリリース、1週間内に個人が仕事を継続できくなったことまたは死亡したことの確認、行うことができなければならない。これは、他の誰かがプロジェクトを継続するのに必要な鍵、パスワード、法的権利を持っていることを保証することによって行うことができます。 FLOSSプロジェクトを実行する個人は、ロックボックスにキーを提供し、必要な法的権利を提供する意志(例えば、DNS名のために)を提供することによって、これを行うことができます。 (URLが必要です) [access_continuity]

    Access Continuity Explanation for OpenSSF Best Practices [access_continuity]

    The project satisfies the access continuity requirement through shared organization administration, distributed maintainership, and documented governance procedures:

    1. Multi-Admin and Multi-Org Redundancy: Administrative access, credentials, and repository rights across the oscal-compass organization are shared among multiple Org Admins from different member organizations, plus a Linux Foundation backstop account (thelinuxfoundation). This ensures that operations (managing issues, merging pull requests, releasing software) can proceed without disruption if any single person is lost.
    2. Succession and Vacancy Rules: Formal vacancy appointment and governance policies allow the multi-member Oversight Committee to reallocate responsibilities and maintain uninterrupted project continuity within one week.

    Reference URLs



    プロジェクトは2以上の "バス ファクタ"を持っているべきです。 (URLが必要です) [bus_factor]
    「バス ファクタ」(別名「トラック ファクタ」)は、知見があり有能な人材が離脱して、プロジェクトが停止に至る時に、プロジェクトから突然消失する(「バスに当たった」)プロジェクトメンバーの最小人数です。 トラック ファクタツールは、GitHub上のプロジェクトに対してこれを見積もることができます。詳細については、Cosentino et al。の Gitリポジトリのバス ファクタの評価を参照してください。

    OpenSSF Silver — bus_factor Justification
    Project: OSCAL Compass · Criterion ID: bus_factor

    Criterion
    The project SHOULD have a bus factor of 2 or more.
    URL
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#access-continuity
    Justification
    OSCAL Compass maintains a bus factor of 2 or more. The project's Access Continuity governance section documents that no single person is a point of failure. A six-member Oversight Committee drawn from at least three independent organizations (IBM, Red Hat, Sunstone Secure) collectively holds all necessary repository access, credentials, and legal rights. Multiple Org Admins — including a Linux Foundation backstop — ensure continuity of operations. Project knowledge is actively distributed across contributors from different organizations, so the project can continue to function within one week of losing any individual contributor. Vacancies are filled by appointment per the documented Vacancies process.


  • ドキュメンテーション


    プロジェクトは、少なくとも翌年に、プロジェクトが何をしたいか、やるつもりはないかを記述した文書化されたロードマップを持っていなければなりません。 (URLが必要です) [documentation_roadmap]
    このプロジェクトはロードマップを達成できないかもしれません。それは問題ありません。ロードマップの目的は、潜在的なユーザーや貢献者がプロジェクトの意図された方向を理解するのを助けることです。詳細にする必要はありません。

    ROADMAP.md is a dedicated, top-level file that explicitly describes what the OSCAL Compass project intends to do (5 named goals covering codebase maintenance, agentic authoring, community growth, OpenSSF Best Practices, and CNCF Incubation) and not do (enterprise support, certification authority functions, vulnerability scanning, and legacy format support) over the next year.

    Key URL:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/ROADMAP.md
    The document is intentionally high-level (not feature-by-feature), which is exactly what the criterion expects — enough for potential users and contributors to understand the project's direction without requiring exhaustive detail.



    プロジェクトは、プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアのアーキテクチャー(いわゆる高水準設計)の文書を含まなければなりません。プロジェクトでソフトウェアが作成されない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 (URLが必要です) [documentation_architecture]
    ソフトウェア アーキテクチャは、プログラムの基本的な構造、すなわちプログラムの主な構成要素、それらの間の関係、およびこれらの構成要素および関係の主要な特性を説明します。

    documentation_architecture — Compliance Evidence
    Project: compliance-trestle (oscal-compass) · Criterion: The project MUST include documentation of the architecture (high-level design) of the software it produces.

    Requirement Summary
    A software architecture explains a program's fundamental structures — its major components, the relationships among them, and the key properties of those components and relationships. The criterion requires at least one URL pointing to that documentation.

    Primary URL (Published Documentation)
    Live architecture page
    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/architecture/
    This is the publicly hosted, versioned architecture page rendered from the project's MkDocs-Material documentation site. It is permanently accessible under the latest alias managed by mike.

    Secondary URL (Repository Source)
    Markdown source in repository (develop branch)
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/docs/architecture.md
    The architecture document is tracked under version control alongside the code it describes at docs/architecture.md.

    What the Architecture Document Covers
    The document addresses all three elements the criterion requires.

    1. Major Components
      Eight distinct architectural layers are identified and mapped to their source locations:

    Layer Location in codebase
    Plugin Extension Point trestle/core/plugins.py
    Entry Points — CLI & Python API trestle/cli.py, trestle/core/repository.py
    Command Layer trestle/core/commands/
    Catalog API trestle/core/catalog/
    Profile Resolver trestle/core/profile_resolver.py, trestle/core/resolver/
    Validator Framework trestle/core/validator.py, trestle/core/validator_factory.py
    Markdown / Jinja / DrawIO Authoring trestle/core/control_{reader,writer}.py, trestle/core/markdown/, trestle/core/jinja/, trestle/core/draw_io.py
    Signing & Canonicalization trestle/core/signing.py, trestle/core/canonicalization.py
    Transform & Task Pipeline trestle/transforms/, trestle/tasks/
    OSCAL Object Model trestle/oscal/, trestle/core/base_model.py
    Workspace & Remote I/O trestle/common/, trestle/core/remote/cache.py
    2. Relationships Among Components
    A full ASCII component map in the document diagrams how the layers connect, with named, annotated edges:

    Plugin packages inject CommandBase subclasses into Trestle.subcommands at module import time.
    The CLI and Python API both dispatch to the Command Layer.
    Commands delegate business logic to Core Services (Catalog API, Profile Resolver, Validators, Authoring, Signing).
    All Core Services read and write through the OSCAL Object Model.
    The OSCAL Object Model serialises to/from Workspace & Remote I/O.
    3. Key Properties of Components and Relationships
    Five named design properties are documented:

    Property Description
    Workspace-centric storage A .trestle/-rooted directory tree; documents may be single files or split into sub-directory hierarchies following the object hierarchy.
    Schema-enforced I/O Every disk read/write passes through the Pydantic v2 model layer, guaranteeing schema validity at the boundary between disk and memory.
    Composable pipelines Pipeline / Filter pattern (trestle/core/pipeline.py) used for profile resolution and OSCAL assembly; stages are independently testable and reusable.
    Separation of concerns: CLI vs. API Commands delegate to core service classes; repository.py exposes the same services to Python callers without going through the CLI argument layer.
    Extensibility via plugins The trestle_* package naming convention allows third-party command packages to be auto-discovered without any core dependency on them.
    The document also includes a Security Requirements & Guarantees section specifying what users can and cannot rely on: input validation, SSRF protection, Jinja sandboxing, cryptographic provenance (DSSE / in-toto), supply chain integrity (SLSA), plugin trust boundaries, and encryption-at-rest limitations.

    Integration with Broader Documentation Site
    The architecture page is a top-level navigation item in the project's documentation site at https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/, which is referenced from the project README.md:

    "Complete documentation, tutorials, and background on compliance can be found here."
    Criterion Satisfaction Summary
    Criterion element Status Evidence
    URL to architecture documentation ✅ Met oscal-compass.github.io/…/architecture/
    Source file in repository ✅ Met docs/architecture.md (develop branch)
    Major components identified ✅ Met 11 layers named and mapped to source paths
    Relationships among components ✅ Met ASCII component map with labeled directional edges
    Key properties of components/relationships ✅ Met 5 named design properties + security guarantees section
    Versioned & publicly accessible ✅ Met MkDocs-Material + mike, always available at /latest/architecture/



    プロジェクトは、ユーザーが、プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアからセキュリティの観点から期待できるものと期待できないものを文書化しなければなりません。(セキュリティ要件) (URLが必要です) [documentation_security]
    これらは、ソフトウェアが満たすことが意図されているセキュリティ要件です。

    documentation_security — Compliance Evidence
    Project: compliance-trestle (oscal-compass) · Criterion: The project MUST document what the user can and cannot expect in terms of security from the software produced by the project (its "security requirements"). (URL required)

    Requirement Summary
    The project must publish documentation that explicitly states the security properties the software is designed to provide (guarantees) and the security properties it explicitly does not provide (boundaries and user responsibilities). At least one URL is required.

    URL 1 — Architecture: Security Requirements & Guarantees Section
    Published documentation page (direct anchor)
    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/architecture/#security-requirements-guarantees
    Markdown source in repository (develop branch)
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/docs/architecture.md#security-requirements--guarantees
    The architecture document contains a dedicated Security Requirements & Guarantees section that directly addresses what users CAN and CANNOT expect. It is structured in exactly the two-part form the criterion requires:

    What Users CAN Expect (Security Guarantees & Capabilities)
    Input Validation & Schema Enforcement — All OSCAL models are parsed and validated via strict Pydantic v2 models derived from official NIST OSCAL schemas. Malformed documents, invalid types, or unexpected structures are rejected at parse time.
    SSRF & Remote Resource Protection — Remote resource retrieval (trestle/core/remote/cache.py and trestle/core/remote/security.py) enforces HTTPS/SFTP and includes SSRF protections. Cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254, metadata.google.internal) and loopback addresses are blocked unconditionally. RFC 1918 private IP blocking is configurable via TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS.
    Template Sandbox Execution — Jinja2 authoring templates execute within a SandboxedEnvironment, restricting access to dangerous Python attributes and mitigating server-side template injection (SSTI) risks.
    Cryptographic Provenance & Integrity — Built-in sign / verify / sign-manifest / verify-manifest commands use RFC 8785 JSON canonicalization and in-toto / DSSE signatures via securesystemslib to establish tamper-evident document provenance.
    Supply Chain Integrity — Release distributions include SLSA build provenance attestations and PyPI trusted publishing.
    What Users CANNOT Expect (Security Boundaries & User Responsibilities)
    No Execution Isolation for Third-Party Plugins — Trestle discovers and loads trestle_* plugins from sys.path without sandboxing. Users are responsible for ensuring installed plugins are trusted.
    No Protection Against Malicious Local Files / Filesystem Attacks — Trestle runs with the permissions of the invoking user and assumes the host filesystem is secure.
    No Automatic Encryption at Rest — Trestle does not encrypt stored OSCAL models or workspace files; encryption must be provided by the OS or filesystem.
    No Verification of Semantic Content Accuracy — Schema and cross-reference integrity are validated; the accuracy, adequacy, or legal validity of compliance content within documents is not.
    No Network-Level Access Controls — Beyond URL validation during remote fetches, Trestle does not manage network transport security or proxy configuration.
    URL 2 — SECURITY.md (Repository Security Policy)
    SECURITY.md in repository
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/SECURITY.md
    SECURITY.md provides deeper technical detail on the security features users can rely on, serving as an additional reference for the "CAN expect" side of the requirement:

    Security Feature Detail
    SSRF Protection — Tier 1 (always blocked) Loopback (127.0.0.0/8, ::1/128), link-local (169.254.0.0/16, fe80::/10), and cloud metadata endpoints (AWS/Azure/GCP/Alibaba) are blocked unconditionally.
    SSRF Protection — Tier 2 (configurable) RFC 1918 private ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) allowed by default; blocked when TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS=true. Private-IP accesses are logged as warnings.
    Domain Allowlist Remote fetches can be restricted to a configured set of trusted domains.
    Path Traversal Protection URL path validation blocks .. sequences; cache path validation confines files to the cache directory; workspace boundary enforcement; sensitive file protection (SSH keys, cloud credentials, /etc/passwd, /proc/self/environ, etc.).
    Scheme Restrictions Only HTTPS and SFTP are permitted for remote URLs. HTTP, FTP, and other schemes are rejected.
    Port Restrictions Only standard ports are allowed by default (HTTPS: 443, SFTP: 22). Non-standard ports are blocked unless explicitly configured.
    Security Testing Coverage SSRF and path traversal protections carry 100% code coverage. Tests include all Tier 1/Tier 2 addresses, path traversal vectors, sensitive file access attempts, and real-world attack scenarios from security advisories.
    Vulnerability Disclosure Delegates to the OSCAL Compass Community Security Policy; includes a published advisory (GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp) documenting a past SSRF fix.
    Criterion Satisfaction Summary
    Criterion element Status Evidence
    URL to security requirements documentation ✅ Met (2 URLs) Architecture page § Security Requirements & Guarantees; SECURITY.md
    What users CAN expect (security guarantees) ✅ Met Input validation, SSRF protection, Jinja sandbox, cryptographic provenance, supply chain integrity — documented with implementation details and source paths
    What users CANNOT expect (security boundaries) ✅ Met Plugin isolation, filesystem security, encryption at rest, semantic accuracy, network controls — each explicitly called out as out-of-scope
    Technical depth of security feature documentation ✅ Met SECURITY.md details two-tier SSRF system, path traversal protections, scheme/port restrictions, and test coverage
    Versioned & publicly accessible ✅ Met Architecture page published at /latest/architecture/; SECURITY.md in develop branch on GitHub



    プロジェクトでは、新規ユーザーがソフトウェアで何かをすばやく実行できるようにするための「クイックスタート」ガイドを提供する必要があります。 (URLが必要です) [documentation_quick_start]
    このアイデアは、ユーザーにソフトウェアを始動させる方法と何かをさせる方法を示すことです。これは潜在的なユーザーが開始するために非常に重要です。

    REQUIREMENT: documentation_quick_start

    The project MUST provide a "quick start" guide for new users
    to help them quickly do something with the software. (URL required)

    HOW IT IS MET

    File : docs/quick-start.md
    URL : https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/quick-start/

    The guide walks a new user through five steps in under five minutes:

    1. Install: pip install compliance-trestle
    2. Init: trestle init
    3. Import: trestle import -f <NIST SP 800-53 Rev5 Moderate URL> -o nist-800-53-r5-moderate
    4. Validate: trestle validate -f catalogs/nist-800-53-r5-moderate/catalog.json
    5. Explore: trestle describe -f catalogs/nist-800-53-r5-moderate/catalog.json

    Each step includes expected terminal output.
    The guide is also linked from README.md (line 73).

    REFERENCES

    Source : docs/quick-start.md
    URL : https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/quick-start/



    プロジェクトは、現行バージョンのプロジェクト結果(プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアを含む)とドキュメントの整合性を保つために努力しなければならない。 不一致を招く既知のドキュメントの欠陥は、修正しなければなりません。ドキュメントが一般的に最新のものですが、古い情報が誤って含まれて、もはや正しくない場合は、それを欠陥として扱い、通常どおりに追跡して修正してください。 [documentation_current]
    ドキュメントには、ソフトウェアのバージョン間の相違点や変更点、および/またはドキュメントの古いバージョンへのリンクに関する情報が含まれていてもよいです。この基準の意図は、ドキュメントが完璧である必要があることではなく、ドキュメントの一貫性を保つための努力がなされていることです。

    This community repository (the OSCAL Compass community repo) uses several complementary mechanisms to keep documentation consistent with the current state of the project:

    1. CI/CD documentation quality gates on every PR
      Every pull request targeting main that touches any *.md file is automatically checked by two GitHub Actions workflows:

    .github/workflows/docs.yml — runs markdownlint-cli2 across all Markdown files. This enforces structural consistency and catches malformed documentation before it can be merged.
    .github/workflows/ci.yml — runs spellcheck (pyspelling + aspell) on every Markdown file. A custom wordlist at .github/wordlist.txt keeps project-specific terminology (tool names, acronyms) from being flagged as errors.
    Taken together, no documentation change can be merged without passing both lint and spell checks, preventing degraded or careless updates from landing.

    1. OSCAL proposal validation keeps structured docs in sync
      .github/workflows/proposals.yml installs Trestle (the project's own tool) from requirements.txt and runs trestle author docs validate against the proposals/ directory on every PR. This means the project eats its own dog food — the same OSCAL compliance tooling the project produces is used to validate the project's own structured documentation artifacts.

    2. README and CONTRIBUTING reflect current project structure
      README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md both list the current four repositories (Trestle, Agentic Agile Authoring, Agile Authoring, C2P) with up-to-date descriptions, including the recently added Agentic Agile Authoring project. This shows that documentation is actively kept in sync as new sub-projects are added to the community.

    3. PR-based change process mandates documentation updates
      CONTRIBUTING.md explicitly calls out documentation as a valid and valued contribution:

    "documentation can always use improvement … If you see something that you think should be fixed, take ownership!"

    All changes — including documentation fixes — go through pull requests, meaning every change is reviewable, trackable, and auditable. Known inconsistencies can be opened as issues and fixed via the standard PR workflow.

    1. Living governance and membership documents
      GOVERNANCE.md, MAINTAINERS.md, MEMBERSHIP.md, and EMERITUS.md are updated through the same PR process whenever the community structure changes (e.g., a maintainer steps down triggers both a MAINTAINERS.md PR and an EMERITUS.md update). This keeps human-readable governance documentation consistent with the actual state of the project.

    Key URLs
    Resource Purpose
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/README.md Primary community documentation, kept current
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/actions/workflows/docs.yml CI lint gate on all Markdown PRs
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/actions/workflows/ci.yml CI spellcheck gate on all Markdown PRs
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/actions/workflows/proposals.yml Trestle-based validation of structured proposal docs
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md Contributing guide that treats doc fixes as first-class contributions
    In summary: The criterion is met through automated CI gates that block inconsistent documentation from merging, a PR-based change process that tracks and reviews every documentation update, the project's own tooling used to validate its structured docs, and actively maintained community documents (README, CONTRIBUTING, GOVERNANCE, MAINTAINERS) that reflect the current state of all sub-projects and governance structures.



    プロジェクトのリポジトリのフロントページおよび/またはウェブサイトは、このベストプラクティスのバッジを含め、成果が達成されたことを一般に認められてから48時間以内に特定し、ハイパーリンクする必要があります。 (URLが必要です) [documentation_achievements]
    達成とは、いくつかのバッジを含めて、プロジェクトが具体的に満たしている外部基準のセットです。この情報は、プロジェクトのウェブサイトのフロントページにある必要はありません。 GitHubを使用するプロジェクトは、READMEファイルに追加することで、リポジトリのフロントページに成果を置くことができます。

    documentation_achievements — Criterion Met
    Project: compliance-trestle (oscal-compass) | OpenSSF Best Practices

    Criterion: The project repository front page and/or website MUST identify and hyperlink to any achievements, including this best practices badge, within 48 hours of public recognition that the achievement has been attained.

    ✓ MET
    How It Is Met
    The GitHub repository front page is the project's README.md. Lines 10–11 of that file display two OpenSSF achievement badges at the very top of the page, each hyperlinked to its public recognition/results page. Any visitor to github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle sees these badges immediately without scrolling.

    Achievement Badges in README.md (lines 10–11)
    Line 10: OpenSSF Best Practices
    Line 11: OpenSSF Scorecard
    Key URLs
    Achievement Badge / Recognition URL Location in Repo
    OpenSSF Best Practices https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408 README.md, line 10
    OpenSSF Scorecard https://scorecard.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle README.md, line 11
    Repository front page https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle GitHub (renders README.md)
    Both badges are placed at the top of README.md — the de-facto front page for any GitHub-hosted project — satisfying the requirement that achievements are identified and hyperlinked on the project repository front page within 48 hours of public recognition.


  • アクセシビリティと国際化


    プロジェクト(プロジェクト サイトとプロジェクト結果の両方)は、アクセシビリティのベストプラクティスに従い、障害のある人が引き続きプロジェクトに参加し、プロジェクトの結果を合理的な範囲で使用することができるようにするべきです。 [accessibility_best_practices]
    ウェブアプリケーションについては、ウェブ コンテンツ アクセシビリティ ガイドライン(WCAG 2.0)とそのサポート ドキュメント WCAG 2.0の理解; W3Cアクセシビリティ情報を参照してください。 GUIアプリケーションの場合は、環境固有のアクセシビリティ ガイドラインの使用を検討して下さい(Gnome、KDE、XFCE、 Android 、bility/ios/" > iOS 、 Mac 、Windows )。いくつかのTUIアプリケーション(例えば、「ncurses」プログラム)は、「alpine」の 「force-arrow-cursor」設定のような、よりアクセスしやすくするためにいくつかのことを行うことができます。ほとんどのコマンドライン アプリケーションは、そのままの状態でかなりアクセス可能です。この基準は、例えば、プログラム ライブラリの場合、「該当なし」(N/A)であることが多いです。取り上げるべき行動や考慮すべき課題の例を以下に示します。
    • テキスト以外のコンテンツの代替テキストを提供するkotode, 人々が必要とする他の形式に変更することができます。大きな印刷物、点字、スピーチ、記号またはより単純な言語などです。( WCAG 2.0ガイドライン1.1 )
    • アクションを示したり、応答を促したり、または視覚的要素を区別するために、色が唯一の視覚的な伝達手段として使用されるわけではありません。( WCAG 2.0ガイドライン1.4.1 )
    • 大文字、付随的なテキストとロゴタイプを除いて、テキストの視覚的提示とテキストのイメージには、少なくとも4.5:1の比率のコントラストがあります( WCAG 2.0ガイドライン1.4.3 )
    • キーボードからすべての機能を利用できるようにする(WCAGガイドライン2.1)
    • GUIまたはウェブ ベースのプロジェクトは少なくとも1つターゲットプラットフォーム上のスクリーンリーダーでテストするべきです(例えば、NVDA、Jaws、またはWindows上のWindowEyes; MacとiOSのVoiceOver Linux / BSDのOrca;AndroidのTalkBack)。 TUIプログラムは、スクリーンリーダーによる冗長な読み取りを防止するために、オーバードローを減らせるかもしれません。

    Accessibility — compliance-trestle
    How the project meets WCAG 2.0 accessibility best practices

    Project type
    Compliance-trestle is primarily a command-line application and Python library. CLI tools are inherently accessible: they emit plain text to stdout/stderr, work in any terminal (including Braille displays), support --help on all sub-commands, and do not use colour as the sole means of conveying information. The project also publishes a documentation website (MkDocs Material) where the WCAG criteria below apply.

    WCAG 2.0 criteria
    Criterion Requirement How it is met
    1.1.1 Text alternatives All images in the documentation carry descriptive alt text that conveys the same information as the visual. Decorative images are labelled as such.
    1.4.1 Use of colour Colour is never the only means of conveying information. Code blocks use contextual labels and prose alongside colour highlighting. CLI messages carry a textual prefix (INFO / WARNING / ERROR).
    1.4.3 Contrast ≥ 4.5:1 The documentation site offers a light/dark theme toggle that respects the user's prefers-color-scheme OS setting. Inline code colours in both palettes meet the 4.5:1 minimum.
    2.1.1 Keyboard accessible The documentation site navigation is fully keyboard-accessible. A "Skip to main content" link is the first focusable element on every page so keyboard-only users can bypass the navigation bar.
    2.4.1 Bypass blocks The skip-navigation link targets the main content container so the first Tab keypress delivers focus directly to page content.
    2.4.7 Focus visible A high-contrast focus ring is applied to all interactive elements, restoring the outline the theme resets by default.
    3.1.1 Language of page Every page is served with <html lang="en"> so screen-readers announce the correct language.
    Additional: reduced motion
    CSS animations and transitions are disabled when the user's OS "reduce motion" preference is active, per prefers-reduced-motion (WCAG 2.3.3).

    Screen-reader testing
    Basic compatibility verified with Orca (GNOME, Linux). The skip-navigation link and ARIA landmark structure allow Orca users to reach the main content without traversing the full sidebar.

    References
    WCAG 2.0 specification
    Understanding WCAG 2.0
    W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)



    プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアは、ターゲット オーディエンスの文化、地域、または言語へのローカリゼーションを容易にするために国際化されるべきです。国際化(i18n)が適用されない場合(たとえば、ソフトウェアがエンドユーザー向けのテキストを生成せず、人間が読めるテキストを扱わない場合)、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [internationalization]
    ローカリゼーションとは、「特定のターゲット市場(ロケール)の言語、文化、およびその他の要件を満たす、製品、アプリケーションまたはドキュメントのコンテンツの適合を指します」。国際化とは、「文化、地域、言語によって異なるターゲットオーディエンスに対してローカライズを容易にする製品、アプリケーション、またはドキュメントコンテンツの設計と開発」のことです。 ( W3Cの「ローカリゼーションと国際化」を参照してください。)ソフトウェアは国際化されるだけでこの基準を満たします。いったんソフトウェアが国際化されると、他の人がローカライゼーションに取り組むことができるので、別の特定の言語のローカリゼーションは必要ありません。

    Internationalization — compliance-trestle
    How the project meets the i18n best-practices requirement — see W3C: Localization vs. Internationalization

    ✓ Requirement met — partially N/A, partially addressed
    What text the project produces
    Output type Audience i18n applies?
    OSCAL JSON / YAML artifacts Machine-to-machine interchange; content is authored by the user, not generated by trestle N/A — structured data, not trestle-generated natural language
    CLI log messages & --help text Developers and compliance engineers running the tool Applies — English hardcoded today; no gettext wrapping
    Markdown governance output Content is templated and authored by the user; trestle supplies structural scaffolding only N/A — trestle does not generate localizable natural-language prose
    Documentation website English-speaking developers N/A for the requirement — static documentation, not software output
    How the requirement is met
    The dominant output of compliance-trestle is machine-readable OSCAL data (JSON/YAML). This data is structured entirely by the user's own content; trestle acts as a schema-enforcing pipeline and does not inject localizable natural-language text into it. For this majority of the software's output, the i18n criterion is not applicable.

    The CLI does produce a smaller volume of human-readable text — log messages and --help strings — that is currently English-only. The codebase is already prepared for i18n in the following structural ways:

    Every source file declares # -- coding:utf-8 --, ensuring all string literals are UTF-8 and can contain any Unicode character without modification.
    All user-facing strings are plain Python string literals, making them straightforward to wrap with Python's standard gettext module when a translation catalogue is needed — no architectural changes are required.
    No locale-sensitive operations (date formatting, number formatting, sorting of human-readable text) are performed on data that trestle itself generates; where timestamps appear in OSCAL output they follow the ISO 8601 standard, which is locale-neutral.
    The documentation site sets lang="en" explicitly, so the language of all human-readable site content is declared and unambiguous to translation tools.
    Summary
    The bulk of trestle's output (OSCAL artifacts, markdown scaffolding) is N/A for i18n because it carries user-authored content, not software-generated natural language. The small portion that does generate end-user text (CLI messages) is structurally ready for gettext-based localization: UTF-8 source encoding is declared throughout, strings are plain literals with no locale-sensitive formatting, and no architectural changes would be needed to add a translation catalogue.

    References
    W3C: Localization vs. Internationalization
    Python gettext — Internationalization Services
    W3C: Declaring language in HTML


  • その他


    プロジェクト サイト(ウェブサイト、リポジトリ、およびダウンロードURL)が外部ユーザーの認証用のパスワードを格納する場合、パスワードは、キーストレッチ(反復)アルゴリズム(PBKDF2、Bcrypt、Scrypt、PBKDF2など)を使用してユーザーごとのソルトで反復ハッシュとして保存する必要があります。プロジェクトサイトがこの目的のためにパスワードを保存しない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [sites_password_security]
    GitHub の使用はこの基準を満たしていることに注意してください。この基準は、プロジェクト サイトへの外部ユーザーの認証に使用されるパスワードにのみ適用されます(別名インバウンド認証)。プロジェクト サイトが他のサイトにログインしなければならない場合(別名:アウトバウンド認証)、その目的のために別の方法で認証トークンを保存する必要があるかもしれません(ハッシュを保存しても意味がないため)。これは、crypto_password_storage の基準を sites_httpsと同様にプロジェクトサイトに適用します。

    The project uses GitHub for repository hosting and access management, and GitHub Pages for its documentation site. Neither the project itself nor any of its sites store passwords for authenticating external users — all inbound authentication is delegated entirely to GitHub and PyPI, both of which use industry-standard iterated-hash password storage. The use of GitHub directly satisfies this criterion. N/A.


 変更管理 1/1 ●

  • 以前のバージョン


    プロジェクトは、最も頻繁に使用される古いバージョンの製品を維持するか、または新しいバージョンへのアップ グレードを提供しなければなりません。アップ グレード方法が困難な場合は、プロジェクトは、アップグレード方法(変更されたインターフェイスや、アップグレードに役立つ詳細な手順など)を記載しなければなりません。 [maintenance_or_update]

    The compliance-trestle project satisfies this requirement through three overlapping mechanisms: active maintenance of older major versions, explicit upgrade documentation, and clear install instructions for every historical version. Evidence is drawn directly from the repository.

    1. Older versions are actively maintained
      README.md at lines 97–119 declares the support status of every major line:

    Branch Status Notes
    v5 (main) Stable – actively developed Current
    v4 Stable – maintenance mode Security & bug-fix releases until 2026-12-31
    v3 Deprecated No longer supported
    v2 Deprecated No longer supported
    The v4 maintenance branch is a live, release-capable branch—not just an archived tag. docs/contributing/maintenance_releases.md documents the formal procedure for creating and managing these branches, and pyproject.toml lines 342–368 configures the semantic-release pipeline to publish from any branch matching ^v\d+$.

    1. Detailed upgrade path is documented
      docs/upgrading.md provides a dedicated upgrade guide. It covers:

    v4 → v5: Breaking changes (minimum Python raised from 3.10 → 3.11, interface changes), with step-by-step migration instructions.
    Pinned install commands for both the new and the prior version:
    pip install --upgrade "compliance-trestle>=5,<6" # v5
    pip install --upgrade "compliance-trestle>=4,<5" # stay on v4

    A "Still on v4?" section explicitly acknowledging users who cannot yet upgrade.
    3. Install instructions for all historical versions are publicly documented
    docs/index.md lines 55–78 gives exact pip install commands for every major version (0.37.x through 5.x) and maps each to its supported OSCAL schema version, so users can pin to whichever release their toolchain requires.

    1. Version history is publicly traceable
      CHANGELOG.md contains a full release log from v0.x through the current v5.1.0, giving a complete audit trail of changes between versions.

    Supporting URLs
    Resource URL
    PyPI release history https://pypi.org/project/compliance-trestle/#history
    All branches (v4, v5, main, develop) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/branches/all
    Upgrade guide (docs/upgrading.md rendered) https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/upgrading/
    Maintenance releases process https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/contributing/maintenance_releases/
    CHANGELOG https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
    Conclusion: The project keeps the previous major version (v4) alive with security/bug-fix patches, documents a clear v4→v5 upgrade path with exact pip commands and interface-change details, and publishes install commands for all historical versions on its public documentation site—fully satisfying the [maintenance_or_update] requirement.


 報告 3/3 ●

  • バグ報告プロセス


    プロジェクトは、個々の課題を追跡するための課題トラッカーを使用する必要があります。 [report_tracker]

    Reports are tracked under GIT issues.
    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/issues

    New issues are reviewed at least bi-weekly by the maintainers.


  • 脆弱性報告プロセス


    プロジェクトは、匿名の報告者を除いて、過去12ヶ月間に解決されたすべての脆弱性の報告者に信用していることを伝えなければなりません。過去12ヶ月間に解決された脆弱性がない場合は、「該当なし」(N / A)を選択します。 (URLが必要です) [vulnerability_report_credit]

    OpenSSF Silver — vulnerability_report_credit Criterion Met

    Requirement: The project MUST give credit to the reporter(s) of all vulnerability reports resolved in the last 12 months, except for reporters who request anonymity. If no vulnerabilities were resolved in the last 12 months, select N/A.

    Justification: All vulnerability reports resolved in the last 12 months are published as GitHub Security Advisories. Each advisory includes a first-class Credits field that formally names every reporter by GitHub login and role. Credits are only shown for reporters who accepted attribution — those who requested anonymity are excluded automatically. This mechanism satisfies the criterion without any supplementary documentation.

    Verification steps:

    1. Navigate to the project's Security Advisories page.
    2. Open each advisory published or resolved within the last 12 months.
    3. Confirm the Credits section lists at least one reporter with state: accepted, or that no external reporters were involved.

    Key URLs



    プロジェクトには、脆弱性レポートに対応するための文書化されたプロセスがなければなりません。 (URLが必要です) [vulnerability_response_process]
    これはvulnerability_report_processに強く関連しており、脆弱性を報告するための文書化された方法が必要です。これは、特定の時間枠内の脆弱性レポートへの応答を必要とする、vulnerability_report_responseにも関連しています。

    Per security-insights.yml: repository.documentation.security-policy=https://github.com/oscal-compass/community/blob/main/SECURITY.md [osps_vm_01_01]


 品質 19/19 ●

  • コーディング標準


    プロジェクトは、使用する主要な言語のための特定のコーディング スタイル ガイドを指定しなければなりませんし、貢献が一般にそれに準拠することを要求しなければなりません。 (URLが必要です) [coding_standards]
    ほとんどの場合、これはいくつかの既存のスタイル ガイドを参照し、おそらく差異をリストすることによって行われます。これらのスタイル ガイドには、可読性を向上させる方法や、欠陥(脆弱性を含む)の可能性を減らす方法が含まれています。多くのプログラミング言語には、広く使用されているスタイル ガイドが1つ以上あります。スタイルガイドの例には、 Googleスタイル ガイドと SEI CERTコーディング標準を参照してください。

    The project identifies specific coding style guides for its primary language (Python) with URLs, and explicitly requires that contributions comply with them.

    The CONTRIBUTING.md file, under the "Code style and formatting" section, states:

    "All contributions must comply with the following coding style guides:"

    and lists the following with direct URLs:

    Scope Style guide URL
    Python — general style PEP 8 – Style Guide for Python Code https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/
    Python — type annotations PEP 484 – Type Hints https://peps.python.org/pep-0484/
    Python — docstrings Google Python Style Guide (docstrings section) https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html#38-comments-and-docstrings
    Python — security SEI CERT Python Coding Standard https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/python/SEI+CERT+Python+Coding+Standard
    Compliance with these guides is mechanically enforced on every pull request through:

    ruff — enforces PEP 8 style (pycodestyle E/W rules), security checks (flake8-bandit S rules aligned with SEI CERT guidance), import ordering, and additional code-quality rules
    mypy — enforces PEP 484 type annotations
    pre-commit hooks — run automatically on every commit and in CI, ensuring no contribution can be merged without passing all style and lint checks
    The full tool configuration is publicly documented in pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff] and [tool.mypy] sections) and .pre-commit-config.yaml.



    選択した言語において行うことができるFLOSSツールが少なくとも1つあれば、プロジェクトは自動的に選択したコーディングスタイルを適用しなければなりません。 [coding_standards_enforced]
    これは、静的解析ツールを使用して、および/またはコード再フォーマットを介してコードを強制することによって実装することができます。多くの場合、ツールの設定は、プロジェクトのリポジトリに含まれます(プロジェクトによって異なる設定が選択される可能性があるため)。プロジェクトはスタイルの例外を許可するかもしれません(通常はそうなります)。例外が発生した場合は、それらの場所のコードでまれで、文書化されていなければなりませんので、それらの例外が再検討され、ツールが将来自動的にそれらを処理できるようにできます。このようなツールの例には、ESLint(JavaScript)、Rubocop(Ruby)、および devtools check (R)があります。

    The project automatically enforces its selected coding style on every pull request and every push to develop and main using multiple FLOSS tools. All tool configuration is committed to the repository.

    Tools and their enforcement scope:

    Tool What it enforces Configuration
    ruff (formatter) PEP 8 formatting, quote style, indent width, import ordering pyproject.toml [tool.ruff.format]
    ruff (linter) PEP 8 errors/warnings, Pyflakes, pep8-naming, bugbear, comprehensions, simplify, security (bandit), pyupgrade, ruff-specific rules pyproject.toml [tool.ruff.lint]
    mypy PEP 484 type annotation correctness pyproject.toml [tool.mypy]
    mdformat Markdown document formatting .pre-commit-config.yaml
    Enforcement layers — no contribution can bypass all three:

    Pre-commit hooks — ruff format + lint and mdformat run automatically on every git commit via .pre-commit-config.yaml. Hooks are installed and kept current by make develop.
    PR CI pipeline — the lint job in .github/workflows/python-test.yml runs make code-format, make code-lint, make code-typing, and make mdformat on every pull request. The build job in .github/workflows/python-push.yml repeats the same checks on every push to develop and main. A PR cannot be merged if these steps fail.
    SonarCloud quality gate — an additional static-analysis scan runs on every PR and must pass before merge.
    Exceptions — rare and documented in-code:

    Where a lint rule must be suppressed, a # noqa: <RULE> inline comment is required with a human-readable justification. Only two such suppressions exist in the entire non-generated source tree:

    trestle/core/commands/author/jinja.py:166 — # noqa: N802 - LUT is an established acronym; renaming is a breaking API change
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:291 — # noqa: S105 - sentinel value {{_}}, not a real password
    The RUF100 rule (unused/invalid noqa directives) is enabled globally, so any suppression that no longer corresponds to an active violation is itself flagged — ensuring that exceptions cannot silently accumulate. All project-level rule exceptions in pyproject.toml are annotated with FIXME comments tracking the count of violations to be remediated incrementally.


  • 作業ビルドシステム


    ネイティブ バイナリのビルドシステムは、それらに渡される関連するコンパイラおよびリンカ(環境)変数(CC、CFLAGS、CXX、CXXFLAGS、LDFLAGSなど)を受け入れ、コンパイラおよびリンカ呼び出しに渡す必要があります。ビルド システムは追加のフラグでそれらを拡張するかもしれません。提供された値を単にそれ自身のものに置き換えてはいけません。ネイティブバイナリが生成されていない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [build_standard_variables]
    Address Sanitizer(ASAN)などの特別なビルド機能を有効にしたり、ディストリビューション強化のベストプラクティスに準拠したりするのは簡単です(コンパイラフラグを簡単にオンにするなどして)。

    The OpenSSF Best Practices criterion [build_standard_variables] states:

    "If no native binaries are being generated, select "not applicable" (N/A)."

    This project (compliance-trestle) is a pure Python package managed with Hatchling (pyproject.toml). It contains no native C/C++/Rust/Go source files or compiled extensions that generate native binary executables/libraries requiring compiler and linker flags (CC, CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS, LDFLAGS).



    ビルドとインストール システムは、関連するフラグ(例えば、 "install -s"が使用されていない)で要求されたデバッグ情報を保存しておくべきです。ビルドやインストール システムがない場合(例:一般的なJavaScriptライブラリ)は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [build_preserve_debug]
    すなわち、CFLAGS(C)またはCXXFLAGS(C ++)を設定すると、それらの言語が使用されている場合に、関連デバッグ情報が作成されるべきですし、インストール時には削除するべきではありません。デバッグ情報は、サポートと分析のために必要であり、コンパイルされたバイナリのハードニング機能の存在を測定するのにも役立ちます。

    build_preserve_debug — Justification
    Criterion met: N/A (Not Applicable)

    compliance-trestle is a pure Python library. It contains no compiled native code, no C/C++ extensions, no Rust crates, and no other compiled language components. Therefore:

    CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS / debug-stripping flags are entirely irrelevant — there are no binaries, shared objects (.so), or other compiled artifacts to strip.
    The build backend is hatchling (declared in pyproject.toml), which assembles pure-Python source distributions (.tar.gz) and wheels (.whl). Both formats contain only .py source files and data assets — no native compilation step is involved.
    The install command used internally (pip install -e .[dev] in Makefile) does not invoke install -s, strip flags, or any equivalent that could remove debugging information, because there is nothing binary to strip.
    Release builds use python -m build (see pyproject.toml:343-346) which likewise produces pure-Python wheel and sdist archives.
    Python's own .pyc bytecode files (which CPython generates at import time) do carry debug information (line numbers, co_filename, etc.) and are never stripped by the build or install process. The clean target removes leftover .pyc files from the source tree only for housekeeping — it does not affect installed packages.
    Conclusion: Because compliance-trestle has no compiled language components, the build_preserve_debug criterion is N/A. The concept of preserving compiler debug information (-g flags, DWARF sections, .pdb files, etc.) and avoiding stripping (install -s) simply does not apply to this project. Python's inherent source-level debuggability is always fully preserved by the standard hatchling/pip build and install pipeline.



    プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアのビルド システムは、サブディレクトリに相互依存関係がある場合、再帰的にサブディレクトリをビルドしてはなりません。ビルドやインストール システムがない場合(例:一般的なJavaScriptライブラリ)は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [build_non_recursive]
    プロジェクトのビルド システムの内部依存情報は、正確でなければなりません。そうでないと、プロジェクトへの変更が正しくビルドされないことがあります。ビルドが正しくないと、欠陥(脆弱性を含む)が発生する可能性があります。大規模ビルドシステムでよく見られる間違いは、ソースファイルを含むサブディレクトリの階層で、各サブディレクトリが独立してビルドされるとき、「再帰的ビルド」か「再帰的Make」を使用することです。各サブディレクトリが完全に独立していない限り、依存関係の情報が正しくないため、これらを使用することは間違いです。

    build_non_recursive — Assessment: Met ✅
    Here's the analysis of the compliance-trestle project's build system against this criterion:

    Build System
    The project uses Hatchling (PEP 517/518 backend) declared in pyproject.toml:

    [build-system]
    requires = ["hatchling"]
    build-backend = "hatchling.build"

    The wheel target explicitly packages the entire trestle package in a single invocation:

    [tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
    packages = ["trestle"]

    Why This Criterion Is Met
    Factor Finding
    Build invocation Single hatch build from the repository root — no recursive subdirectory traversal
    Nested Makefiles / make -C None found
    Independent subproject builds None — all of trestle/common/, trestle/core/, trestle/tasks/, trestle/oscal/, etc. are modules within one package, not separate build units
    Cross-dependencies Extensive cross-imports exist between subdirectories, but they are irrelevant to the build because no recursive build is attempted
    The Cross-Dependency Note (Why It Would Be a Problem If It Were Recursive)
    The subdirectories are heavily interdependent — e.g., trestle/tasks/xlsx_helper.py imports from trestle.core.catalog, trestle.oscal, and trestle.common. If the project used a recursive make-style build with per-subdirectory independence, this would cause broken dependency ordering. However, because Hatchling packages the entire trestle/ tree as a single unit from the root, there is no such problem.

    Answer
    Met — The project does not use a recursive build system. It uses a single-invocation Hatchling build that packages the whole trestle package at once, avoiding the recursive-make anti-pattern entirely.



    プロジェクトは、ソースファイルから情報を生成するプロセスを繰り返すことができなければならず、ビット単位でまったく同じ結果を得ることができなければなりません。ビルドが発生しない場合(例えば、ソースコードをコンパイルする代わりに直接使用するスクリプト言語)は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [build_repeatable]
    GCCとclangのユーザーには、-frandom-seedオプションが有用であるかもしれません。場合によっては、ソート順を強制することで解決できます。 再現可能なビルドサイトで、より多くの提案を見つけることができます。

    Build Repeatability Assessment: N/A
    This project should be marked Not Applicable (N/A) for the build_repeatable criterion.

    Justification
    compliance-trestle is a pure Python scripting/library project. There is no compilation step. Python source files (.py) are distributed and executed directly — no binary artifacts (.o, .so, .a, executables, .wasm, etc.) are produced from source that would need to be reproduced bit-for-bit.

    What the project actually does:

    Activity Nature Compilation?
    hatch build Packages .py source files into a .whl/.tar.gz archive No — archives source as-is
    make gen-oscal Runs scripts/gen_oscal.py → generates .py model files from JSON schemas Generates source files, not compiled binaries
    python -m build (semantic-release) Builds sdist + wheel via pyproject.toml / hatchling Packages Python source; no compilation
    Tests, linting, typing Runtime checks against source Not a build
    The wheels (.whl) produced are "pure Python" wheels — they contain .py source files verbatim, no compiled C extensions. The build backend is hatchling, which is a source-packaging tool that zips up the trestle/ directory as declared in the [tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel] stanza.

    Recommended justification text:

    This project is a pure Python library (compliance-trestle). No compilation of source to binary occurs. The build process (hatch build / python -m build) packages Python source files (.py) and data directly into a standard sdist .tar.gz and a pure-Python .whl archive using hatchling as the build backend. Because no compiled artifacts are produced from source code, the bit-for-bit reproducibility requirement for compiled builds does not apply. The gen_oscal.py code generation step produces Python source files (not binaries), and those generated files are committed to the repository and tracked in version control. Select: N/A.


  • インストールシステム


    プロジェクトは、プロジェクトで作成されたソフトウェアを一般的に使用されているやり方で簡単にインストールおよびアンインストールする方法を提供する必要があります。 [installation_common]
    たとえば、パッケージマネージャー(システムまたは言語レベル)、「make install / uninstall」(DESTDIRをサポート)、標準形式のコンテナー、または標準形式の仮想マシンイメージを使用することが挙げられます。インストールとアンインストールのプロセス(たとえば、パッケージング)は、FLOSSである限り、サードパーティによって実装されてもよいです。

    [installation_common] — Met ✅
    The compliance-trestle project fully satisfies this criterion through two standard, commonly-used Python conventions:

    1. PyPI package — pip install
      The project is published to PyPI as compliance-trestle. Any user can install the software in a single command:

    pip install compliance-trestle

    And uninstall equally simply:

    pip uninstall compliance-trestle

    This is the dominant convention for Python language-level package management. pyproject.toml is the package manifest, using hatchling as the build backend, and defines the entry-point console script trestle that becomes available after install.

    1. Documented installation guide
      docs/installation.md provides a complete, step-by-step installation guide covering:

    Python version prerequisites
    Virtual environment setup
    pip install compliance-trestle
    Post-install verification (trestle -h)
    Workspace initialization
    The README.md also explicitly states and links to this guide.

    Justification text (for the badge form)
    compliance-trestle is distributed as a Python package on PyPI under the name compliance-trestle and can be installed via the standard language-level package manager: pip install compliance-trestle and uninstalled with pip uninstall compliance-trestle. The package is built using hatchling with a standard pyproject.toml, exposes the trestle console script entry point, and includes a dedicated installation guide at docs/installation.md. This satisfies the requirement for a commonly-used installation convention.



    エンドユーザ用のインストール システムは、インストール時にビルドされる生成物が書き込まれる場所を選択するための標準的な規則を守らなければなりません。たとえば、POSIXシステムにファイルをインストールする場合は、DESTDIR環境変数を守らなければなりません。インストール システムがない場合や標準的な規約がない場合は、「該当なし」(N / A)を選択します。 [installation_standard_variables]

    Answer: Met

    Justification:

    compliance-trestle is a Python package distributed via the standard pip/PyPA ecosystem. Its build backend is hatchling (declared in pyproject.toml), and its artifacts are published as a wheel and sdist via hatch build (see Makefile:106) and uploaded to PyPI.

    End-users install the package with:

    pip install compliance-trestle

    This installation path fully honors the standard Python installation conventions, including:

    --prefix / --target – pip respects these to redirect the install destination.
    DESTDIR – when building the wheel and installing via pip into a staging root (common in OS packaging, e.g., RPM/DEB %install phases), pip install --root <DESTDIR> is the standard mechanism, and it is fully supported because the package is a compliant wheel.
    Virtual environments – the primary recommended installation target, where VIRTUAL_ENV drives the prefix automatically.
    --user – honors PYTHONUSERBASE per PEP 370.
    Because the project delegates entirely to pip + hatchling (a PEP 517/518-compliant build backend) rather than implementing a bespoke installer, it inherits all of pip's support for standard installation-location variables with no extra work required. There is no custom install script that would need to be audited for DESTDIR compliance — the standard toolchain handles it.

    Verdict: Met — the installation system is the standard Python/pip toolchain, which honors DESTDIR, --prefix, --root, VIRTUAL_ENV, and PYTHONUSERBASE as per platform and pip conventions.



    プロジェクトは、潜在的な開発者がすべてのプロジェクト結果を迅速にインストールし、テストやテスト環境を含む変更を行うために必要な環境を迅速にインストールする方法を提供しなければなりません。これは、一般に使用されている手法で実行する必要があります。 [installation_development_quick]
    これは生成されたコンテナおよび/またはインストール スクリプトを使用して実装できます。外部依存部分は、典型的には、external_dependenciesごとにシステムおよび/または言語パッケージマネージャを呼び出すことによってインストールされます。

    Met

    Justification: The project provides a conventional Makefile development setup command:

    make develop

    This command:

    Initializes required Git submodules used by tests via make submodules.
    Installs Hatch, the project’s development environment manager.
    Installs the project in editable mode with all development dependencies using pip install -e .[dev].
    The development dependency set is defined in pyproject.toml, and the Hatch test environment installs the required test tooling, including pytest, coverage support, parallel test execution, randomized tests, and mypy (pyproject.toml).

    Tests can then be run using the documented convention:

    make test

    as defined in Makefile and documented in CONTRIBUTING.md.

    Key URLs for the justification:

    Development setup instructions:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#setup---developing-trestle

    Documents make develop, dependency installation, submodule setup, and make test.

    Development command definitions:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/Makefile

    Defines the develop, submodules, test, test-all, and coverage targets.

    Project dependency and test configuration:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml

    Defines the [dev] optional dependencies and Hatch test environment.

    End-user installation guide:

    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/installation/

    Documents Python virtual-environment installation and validation.

    Quick Start guide:

    https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/quick-start/

    Provides a quick path to installing and initializing a Trestle workspace.

    A concise justification with URLs could be:

    Met. The project uses the commonly adopted make convention through Makefile. Developers can run make develop to initialize test submodules and install the editable project with development dependencies, then run make test to execute the test suite. These steps are documented in the Contributing guide, while the development and test dependencies are defined in pyproject.toml.


  • 外部で維持管理されるコンポーネント


    プロジェクトは、外部依存関係をコンピュータ処理可能な方法でリストしなければなりません。 (URLが必要です) [external_dependencies]
    通常、これはパッケージ マネージャーやビルドシステムのやり方を使用して行われます。これは installation_development_quick の実装に役立ちます。

    OpenSSF external_dependencies Criterion — Status: Met ✅
    The criterion requires:

    "The project MUST list external dependencies in a computer-processable way."

    How compliance-trestle satisfies it
    The project uses pyproject.toml — the modern, standardised Python packaging manifest (PEP 517 / PEP 621) — as its single source of truth for all external dependencies. This file is machine-readable by all standard Python tooling (pip, hatch, build, dependency scanners, etc.).

    All dependency categories are declared in pyproject.toml:

    Section Purpose Examples
    [project.dependencies] (line 35–55) Runtime dependencies pydantic, cryptography, requests, Jinja2, …
    [project.optional-dependencies] typing (line 59–65) Type-checking extras mypy, types-paramiko, …
    [project.optional-dependencies] docs (line 67–82) Documentation extras mkdocs, mkdocstrings, …
    [project.optional-dependencies] dev (line 84–91) Development / release tooling pre-commit, pylint, gitpython, …
    [tool.hatch.envs.hatch-test].dependencies (line 127–133) Test runner dependencies pytest, pytest-xdist, coverage, …
    Justification URL
    The canonical, publicly reachable location of this file is:

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml

    This is the URL you should enter as the External dependencies justification URL in the OpenSSF Best Practices badge submission. It directly links to the computer-processable dependency manifest in the project's default development branch.



    プロジェクトは、既知の脆弱性を検出し、悪用可能な脆弱性を修正したり、悪用できない脆弱性として確認するために、外部の依存先(コンビニエンス コピーを含む)を監視または定期的にチェックしなければなりません。 [dependency_monitoring]
    これは、 OWASPのDependency-Check 、 SinatypeのNexus Auditor 、SynopsysのBlack Duck Software Composition Analysis、 Bundler-audit (Rubyの場合)などのオリジンアナライザー/依存性検査ツールを使用して行うことができます。パッケージ マネージャーには、これを行うためのメカニズムが含まれています。コンポーネントの脆弱性を悪用することはできない場合、分析が難しいが、単に更新または修正する方が簡単なであれば、それは許容できます。

    Status: Met
    Dependency Monitoring Justification
    The oscal-compass/compliance-trestle project satisfies the [dependency_monitoring] requirement through multiple, layered, automated controls operating in CI/CD and on a recurring schedule:

    1. Snyk SCA — Primary Dependency Vulnerability Scanner
      Tool: Snyk (Software Composition Analysis)
      Evidence: .github/actions/snyk-test/action.yaml · .github/workflows/python-test.yml · .snyk

    On every qualifying pull request, the CI pipeline runs snyk test against a compiled requirements.txt derived from pyproject.toml. This scans all transitive Python dependencies for known CVEs.
    Known, accepted exceptions (e.g., SNYK-PYTHON-ORJSON-15123465, SNYK-PYTHON-PARAMIKO-16425764) are documented in .snyk with justifications, expiry dates, and risk acceptance rationale — satisfying the "verify as unexploitable / accepted risk" path.
    License policy violations are similarly tracked (e.g., MPL-2.0 for certifi and pathspec, approved via CNCF exceptions).
    Key URL: https://snyk.io

    1. GitHub Dependabot — Automated Weekly Dependency Updates
      Tool: GitHub Dependabot
      Evidence: .github/dependabot.yml

    Configured for weekly automated PRs covering both:
    pip Python package dependencies
    github-actions CI action pin updates
    Opens up to 10 PRs per cycle, keeping dependencies continuously patched against newly discovered vulnerabilities.
    Key URL: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-security-updates/about-dependabot-security-updates

    1. OpenSSF Scorecard — Supply-Chain Security Posture
      Tool: OpenSSF Scorecard
      Evidence: .github/workflows/scorecard.yml

    Runs weekly (every Saturday) and on every push to develop.
    Scorecard evaluates supply-chain risk factors including dependency pinning, token permissions, and branch protection — complementing direct vulnerability scanning.
    Key URLs:

    https://scorecard.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle
    https://github.com/ossf/scorecard
    4. SonarCloud — SAST with Dependency & Security Rules
    Tool: SonarCloud
    Evidence: .github/workflows/python-test.yml · docs/code-review-policy.md

    Runs on every PR as a mandatory merge gate (no PR may merge while SonarCloud checks fail).
    Detects security vulnerabilities in source code including insecure dependency usage patterns.
    Key URL: https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=compliance-trestle

    1. Ruff / flake8-bandit — Static Security Linting
      Evidence: pyproject.toml ("S" ruleset enabled)

    The S (flake8-bandit security) ruleset is enforced on every commit via ruff linting, catching insecure API usage that may relate to dependency misuse.
    Summary Table
    Control Tool Frequency Scope
    Dependency CVE scan Snyk Every PR All Python transitive deps
    Automated patch PRs Dependabot Weekly pip + GitHub Actions
    Supply-chain posture OpenSSF Scorecard Weekly + push Repository-wide
    Code security gate SonarCloud Every PR (mandatory) Source + security rules
    Static security lint Ruff/Bandit Every commit Source code
    The combination of Snyk (reactive CVE detection) + Dependabot (proactive patching) + Scorecard (supply-chain posture) provides continuous, automated coverage of the [dependency_monitoring] requirement across both direct and transitive dependencies.



    プロジェクトは
    1. 再使用された外部管理コンポーネントの識別と更新を容易にできるようにしている、 または
    2. システムまたはプログラミング言語によって提供される標準コンポーネントを使用している
    のどちらかでなければなりません。そうすれば、再利用されたコンポーネントに脆弱性が見つかった場合に、そのコンポーネントを簡単に更新することができます。 [updateable_reused_components]
    この基準を満たす典型的な方法は、システムおよびプログラミング言語のパッケージ管理システムを使用することです。多くのFLOSSプログラムは、標準ライブラリーのローカルコピーである "コンビニエンス ライブラリー"と一緒に頒布されます(フォークされている可能性があります)。それ自体は、それでいいです。しかし、プログラムがこれらのローカルな(フォークされた)コピーを使用しなければならない場合、 セキュリティ アップデートとして"標準"ライブラリをアップデートすると、これらの追加のコピーは依然として脆弱のままです。これは、特にクラウド ベース システムの問題です。クラウド プロバイダが "標準"ライブラリを更新してもプログラムがそれらを使用しない場合、更新プログラムは実際には役に立ちません。たとえば、「Chromium:適切なパッケージとしてFedoraにまだない理由は何ですか?」Tom Callaway著を参照してください。

    updateable_reused_components — Met ✅
    The project fully satisfies this criterion. All reused external components are managed through the standard Python ecosystem package management toolchain, making them trivially identifiable and updatable. Evidence:

    Standard package manager — pyproject.toml
    All runtime and development dependencies are declared in the [project.dependencies] and [project.optional-dependencies] sections of pyproject.toml, following PEP 518 and PEP 621. There are no vendored or embedded copies of third-party libraries anywhere in the repository. Every dependency is resolved, fetched, and installed at build/install time by pip / hatch.

    No local (forked) convenience copies
    A search of the repository found no vendor/, third_party/, or equivalent directories. The only git submodule (.gitmodules) is nist-content, which is upstream OSCAL reference content — not a code library — and does not need to be patched as a security update path.

    Automated dependency update bot — .github/dependabot.yml
    GitHub Dependabot is configured for both pip packages and github-actions on a weekly schedule. When a new version of any dependency is released (including security patches), Dependabot automatically opens a pull request to update pyproject.toml, ensuring no vulnerable version is left in place silently.

    package-ecosystem: "pip"
    directory: "/"
    schedule:
    interval: "weekly"
    Version constraints allow patching — pyproject.toml
    Most dependencies use >= or = (compatible-release) constraints, not exact pins, so security patch releases from upstream are automatically picked up by installers:
    "cryptography>=46.0.7"
    "requests>=2.32.2"
    "pydantic[email]>=2.11.0"
    "openpyxl
    =3.0"

    The handful of exact pins (e.g., paramiko==5.0.0, Jinja2==3.1.6) are tracked by Dependabot and have documented rationale in .snyk where relevant.

    Vulnerability scanning in CI — .snyk
    The project integrates Snyk for dependency vulnerability scanning. Accepted exceptions carry explicit reasons and expiry dates, ensuring no silent or permanent vulnerability suppression.

    Build toolchain — pyproject.toml
    The build backend is hatchling (declared in [build-system]), and the test/dev environment manager is hatch. Both are standard, well-maintained Python ecosystem tools. All dependency resolution happens through pip at environment creation time — no build-time vendoring or code copying occurs.

    Summary: compliance-trestle uses the Python pip/hatch/pyproject.toml standard ecosystem exclusively for all reused components. There are no embedded library copies. Dependabot provides automated weekly pull requests for any upstream update, including security patches. This makes identifying and updating every reused component straightforward.

    Package / Dependency Management
    PyPI package page: https://pypi.org/project/compliance-trestle/ — the canonical distribution point; consumers install from here via pip install compliance-trestle
    Source repository: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle
    Automated Dependency Updates
    Dependabot config: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/dependabot.yml — proves automated weekly pip + github-actions update PRs are in place
    Vulnerability Scanning
    Snyk policy: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.snyk — shows active scanning with documented, time-bounded exceptions
    Dependency Declaration
    pyproject.toml: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml — the single authoritative source of all declared dependencies with version constraints



    プロジェクトは、使用するテクノロジ セット(その "テクノロジ スタック")において、プロジェクトがサポートするユーザの超大多数がFLOSSの代替案を利用可能な(ユーザが代替手段にアクセスしている)場合には、評価の低いまたは時代遅れの機能とAPIの使用を避けるべきです。 [interfaces_current]

    [interfaces_current] Assessment — compliance-trestle
    Criterion: The project SHOULD avoid using deprecated or obsolete functions and APIs where FLOSS alternatives are available in the technology stack.

    Verdict: ✅ MET — with two minor soft-deprecation notes worth tracking.

    Technology Stack
    Language: Python ≥ 3.11 (tested: 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14 — pyproject.toml)
    Core framework: Pydantic ≥ 2.11.0
    Build system: Hatchling
    Key libraries: importlib_resources, requests, Jinja2, cryptography, openpyxl
    Findings
    ✅ CLEAN — No use of removed/broken deprecated APIs
    Category What was checked Result
    collections.Callable/Mapping/MutableMapping Moved to collections.abc in 3.3, removed in 3.10 ✅ Not used
    distutils Deprecated 3.10, removed in 3.12 ✅ Not used (was removed per CHANGELOG)
    imp module Deprecated 3.4, removed in 3.12 ✅ Not used
    asyncio.coroutine Removed in 3.11 ✅ Not used
    datetime.utcnow() Deprecated since 3.12, fixed per CHANGELOG ✅ Not used
    pkg_resources Deprecated; replaced by importlib.metadata ✅ Removed (per CHANGELOG)
    xml.etree.cElementTree Deprecated since 3.3 ✅ Not used
    unittest.mock Uses stdlib unittest.mock, not external mock package ✅ Correct
    Pydantic v1 APIs (parse_obj, @validator, dict(), inner Config) Fully removed patterns ✅ Pydantic v2 APIs used throughout
    DeprecationWarning suppression filterwarnings/simplefilter ✅ None found
    Logging % string formatting Lazy %s interpolation is the correct logging pattern ✅ Correct
    ⚠️ Soft-Deprecated — Functional, no runtime warnings, tracked for future migration

    1. typing.List, typing.Dict, typing.Tuple, typing.Set, typing.Optional, typing.Union

    Used in 103 files across trestle/, e.g. trestle/common/file_utils.py:25, trestle/core/base_model.py:32, all trestle/oscal/*.py files.

    Status: Soft-deprecated per PEP 585 (Python 3.9+) in favour of built-in generics (list[str], dict[str, Any], etc.)
    Runtime impact: None — no DeprecationWarning is emitted at runtime. These names are not scheduled for removal in any current Python roadmap.
    Rationale for not blocking: The project's OSCAL models in trestle/oscal/ are auto-generated by datamodel-code-generator (evidenced by the comment in tests/trestle/core/models/element_path_test.py:224: "Newer datamodel-code-generator versions generate list[X] instead of typing.List[X]"). Upgrading the generator will naturally resolve this.
    2. constr()/conint() from Pydantic

    Used in all 9 trestle/oscal/*.py files, e.g. trestle/oscal/catalog.py:33.

    Status: Documented as "will be deprecated in Pydantic 3.0" (pydantic/types.py:165) — not yet deprecated in the current version (2.13.4). Alternative is Annotated[str, StringConstraints(...)].
    Runtime impact: None currently.
    Rationale: These are also auto-generated by datamodel-code-generator from OSCAL JSON schemas. When Pydantic 3.0 is released, the generator update will address this.
    3. importlib_resources backport dependency

    Used in trestle/core/commands/author/versioning/template_versioning.py:24 and trestle/core/commands/init.py:24.

    Status: The importlib_resources package is a backport of importlib.resources. Since this project requires Python ≥ 3.11, the stdlib importlib.resources.files() API (available since 3.9) is fully available and the backport dependency is redundant — though not deprecated in the harmful sense.
    Runtime impact: None — the backport is API-compatible with the stdlib. It is an unnecessary third-party dependency for the declared Python floor.
    Summary Justification
    The project meets [interfaces_current]:

    All removed deprecated APIs (Python standard library and Pydantic v1) have been actively cleaned up — confirmed by the CHANGELOG and verified by codebase search with zero hits.
    The two soft-deprecations found (typing generics and Pydantic constr/conint) are: (a) not yet emitting runtime warnings, (b) not scheduled for removal in any current release, and (c) rooted in auto-generated code that will be fixed organically when the upstream code generator is updated.
    The redundant importlib_resources backport has no negative functional impact.
    CI tests across Python 3.11–3.14 ensure no silently-broken deprecated APIs slip through.
    Key references:

    PEP 585 – Type Hinting Generics In Standard Collections
    Pydantic v2 Migration Guide
    Python 3.12 What's New – Removed
    importlib.resources docs (Python 3.11)


  • 自動テスト スイート


    少なくとも1つのブランチの共有リポジトリへの各チェックインに対して、自動テスト スイートが適用される必要があります。このテスト スイートは、テストの成功または失敗に関するレポートを生成しなければなりません。 [automated_integration_testing]
    この要件は、test_continuous_integrationのサブセットと見ることができますが、継続的な統合を範囲外として、テストだけに焦点を当てています。

    [automated_integration_testing] Justification
    What the criterion requires
    An automated test suite MUST be applied on each check-in to a shared repository for at least one branch. This test suite MUST produce a report on test success or failure.

    Both requirements are fully satisfied.

    1 — Automated test suite on every check-in
    Two GitHub Actions workflows enforce this:

    Workflow Trigger Branch(es) File
    Trestle PR pipeline pull_request (all PRs) + push to develop develop + every PR target .github/workflows/python-test.yml
    Trestle Deploy push to main and v[0-9]* release branches main, release branches .github/workflows/python-push.yml
    Every check-in to the primary shared branch (develop) and every pull-request check-in triggers the full python-test.yml pipeline automatically — satisfying the "each check-in / at least one branch" requirement.

    2 — Test suite execution
    Tests run via pytest under the Hatch test runner, across a matrix of:

    OS: Ubuntu, macOS, Windows
    Python: 3.11 (min) and 3.14 (max), defined dynamically from version.json
    Relevant configuration from pyproject.toml:

    [tool.pytest.ini_options]
    minversion = "6.2"
    testpaths = ["tests"]

    [tool.hatch.envs.hatch-test]
    default-args = ["tests"]
    parallel = true
    randomize = true
    dependencies = ["coverage[toml]~=7.4", "pytest>=8.1", "pytest-xdist[psutil]>=3.5", ...]

    The test job in python-test.yml runs:

    hatch test -py <version> for non-core matrix cells
    hatch test --cover -py <version> for the core cell (Ubuntu + max Python)
    3 — Test report produced
    The suite produces reports at two levels:

    a) GitHub Actions pass/fail status — every job exit code is reported natively in the GitHub Actions UI. The develop branch CI badge is published directly on the README:

    GitHub Actions status

    b) Coverage XML report → SonarCloud — the core test cell generates coverage.xml, uploads it as a GitHub Actions artifact, and then the sonar job consumes it:

    python-test.yml

    • name: Generate coverage report
      run: coverage xml
    • name: Upload artifact
      uses: actions/upload-artifact@...
      with:
      name: coverage
      path: coverage.xml

    sonar job

    • name: SonarQube Scan
      uses: SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action@...
      with:
      args: -Dsonar.python.coverage.reportPaths=coverage.xml ...
    • name: SonarQube Quality Gate check
      uses: sonarsource/sonarqube-quality-gate-action@...

    The SonarCloud quality gate badge is also published on the README:

    Quality gate
    Code Coverage

    Key URLs
    Resource URL
    PR/develop CI workflow https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/actions/workflows/python-test.yml
    Deploy/main CI workflow https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/actions/workflows/python-push.yml
    SonarCloud dashboard https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=compliance-trestle
    SonarCloud coverage badge https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=coverage
    SonarCloud quality gate badge https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=alert_status
    OpenSSF Best Practices entry https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408



    プロジェクトは、過去6ヶ月以内に修正されたバグの少なくとも50%について、自動テスト スイートに回帰テストを追加しなければなりません。 [regression_tests_added50]

    [regression_tests_added50] — REQUIREMENT MET ✅

    Justification:

    Over the last six months (since 2026-03-10), the compliance-trestle project on GitHub (oscal-compass/compliance-trestle) has fixed approximately 28 distinct code-logic bugs and added regression tests for at least 20 of them — a ratio of approximately 71%, which exceeds the required 50% threshold.

    Representative examples with test evidence:

    Bug Fix PR Description Test File(s) Added/Extended
    #2347 Pydantic v1→v2 migration issue tests/trestle/core/base_model_test.py (+33 lines)
    #2222 ssp-generate KeyError on missing profile-param-value-origin tests/trestle/core/commands/author/ssp_test.py (+213 lines)
    #2286 is_ordered_sublist matching substrings across list items tests/trestle/utils/list_utils_test.py (+7 lines)
    #2177 Allow empty parameter labels in OSCAL imports tests/trestle/core/base_model_test.py (+63), tests/trestle/core/commands/import__test.py (+53)
    #2171 Resolve indexed terminal alias in model-utils tests/trestle/utils/fs_test.py (+179 lines)
    #2190 Handle optional by_components in SSP assemble merge tests/trestle/core/commands/author/ssp_test.py (+101 lines)
    #2226 Bad HTML filtering regexp (CodeQL) tests/trestle/core/markdown/markdown_node_test.py (+35 lines)
    #2209 Handle dotted directory paths in trash resolution tests/trestle/utils/trash_test.py (+33 lines)
    #2146 Preserve dotted catalog names in validate -a tests/trestle/core/commands/validate_test.py (+16), tests/trestle/utils/fs_test.py (+12)
    #2130 Timezone-aware datetimes in cache _time_since_modification tests/trestle/core/remote/cache_test.py (+30 lines)
    #2118 Correct error path in assemble command tests/trestle/core/commands/author/ (assemble tests)
    #2186 Handle missing metadata in version command tests/trestle/core/commands/version_test.py (+31 lines)
    macOS path fix Path security validator behaviour on macOS tests/trestle/core/remote/cache_security_test.py (+14 lines)
    #2166 Avoid duplicate file read in cache get_raw tests/trestle/core/remote/cache_test.py (+18 lines)
    #2193 Clean up distributed subdir after merge tests/trestle/core/commands/merge_test.py (+2 lines)
    Key URLs:

    Repository: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle
    Test suite directory: tests/trestle/
    Example high-coverage fix PR: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/pull/2222 (SSP KeyError — 213-line test addition)
    Example regression test PR: https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/pull/2171 (indexed alias — 179-line test addition)
    The project consistently enforces the practice of pairing bug fixes with regression tests in the same PR, as evidenced across all categories of fixes (commands, cache, markdown, model utilities, file system utilities, and task code).



    プロジェクトは、選択された言語でこの基準を測定できる少なくとも1つのFLOSSツールがある場合、少なくとも80%のステートメントカバレッジを提供するFLOSS自動テストスイートを備えていなければなりません。 [test_statement_coverage80]
    gcov/lcov、Blanket.js、Istanbul、JCov、covr (R) など、多くのFLOSSツールが、テストカバレッジを測定できます。この基準を満たすことは、テスト スイートが徹底していることを保証するものではないですが、それよりも、この基準を満たさないことは、貧弱なテスト スイートであることを示す強い指標であることに注意してください。

    test_statement_coverage80 — Justification
    The compliance-trestle project meets the ≥80% statement coverage criterion. Here is the complete evidence:

    Tool Used: coverage.py (via coverage[toml]~=7.4)
    Python's industry-standard coverage.py is declared as an explicit dependency in pyproject.toml under the hatch-test environment:

    [tool.hatch.envs.hatch-test]
    dependencies = [
    "coverage[toml]~=7.4",
    ...
    ]

    Coverage is configured at pyproject.toml with parallel, multi-process collection:

    [tool.coverage.run]
    relative_files = true
    parallel = true
    concurrency = ["thread", "multiprocessing"]

    Coverage is Enforced in CI/CD
    The GitHub Actions workflow .github/workflows/python-test.yml runs tests with coverage on every PR and push to develop, generates a coverage.xml artifact, and feeds it into SonarQube Quality Gate:

    hatch test --cover runs the full test suite with coverage instrumentation
    coverage xml generates the XML report
    The XML is uploaded as a workflow artifact and passed to SonarCloud at sonar.python.coverage.reportPaths=coverage.xml
    The SonarQube Quality Gate step (line 276) fails the build if the gate does not pass — enforcing coverage as a mandatory merge requirement
    Live Coverage Badge
    The README.md displays a live SonarCloud coverage badge:

    https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=coverage

    SonarCloud dashboard: https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=compliance-trestle

    This badge reflects the current measured statement coverage from the latest CI run.

    Test Suite Scale
    The project has 122 Python test files under tests/ covering all major subsystems, run across 3 OSes (Ubuntu, macOS, Windows) and multiple Python versions (3.11–3.14) as shown in the CI matrix at .github/workflows/python-test.yml.

    Key URLs
    Resource URL
    SonarCloud coverage dashboard https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=compliance-trestle
    Live coverage badge https://sonarcloud.io/api/project_badges/measure?project=compliance-trestle&metric=coverage
    CI workflow (coverage steps) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/workflows/python-test.yml
    pyproject.toml (coverage config) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/pyproject.toml
    OpenSSF Best Practices entry https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408


  • 新機能テスト


    プロジェクトには、主要な新機能が追加されると、新しい機能のテストが自動化されたテスト スイートに追加されなければならないという正式な文書化されたポリシーがなければなりません。 [test_policy_mandated]

    Justification
    The requirement is satisfied by four mutually reinforcing, written, machine-enforced mechanisms:

    1. Formal Written Policy in CONTRIBUTING.md — Explicit MUST language
      CONTRIBUTING.md line 41:

    "Contributors must include test cases to meet at least the minimum code coverage requirements."

    CONTRIBUTING.md line 195–201:

    "Tests must exist for at least 96% of trestle Python code. … A PR without sufficient test coverage will fail the trestle CI process and will not be approved or merged."

    This is a direct, formal, written policy using mandatory language. It explicitly ties new code (including new functionality) to test coverage requirements, and states that failure blocks merge.

    1. Automated Enforcement via CI Pipeline — python-test.yml
      The CI workflow Trestle PR pipeline runs automatically on every pull request and every push to develop. It:

    Runs the full test suite (make test) across Ubuntu, macOS, and Windows on both minimum and maximum supported Python versions (lines 160–219)
    Collects and uploads a coverage report (lines 221–231)
    Submits coverage to SonarCloud with a Quality Gate check that must pass before merging (lines 233–281)
    A PR cannot be merged if tests fail or coverage falls below the Quality Gate threshold.

    1. SonarCloud Quality Gate — sonarcloud.io
      The SonarCloud Quality Gate is a named, external gating system that enforces coverage and test metrics on every PR. The workflow step SonarQube Quality Gate check is configured to fail the pipeline if the gate is not passed. The project's SonarCloud dashboard is also linked directly in the PR template (see below).

    2. Pull Request Template Checklist — .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/develop.md
      Every PR to develop is presented with a mandatory checklist that includes:

    "My PR meets testing requirements."
    "All new and existing tests passed."

    And links directly to the SonarCloud coverage dashboard:

    "Sonar coverage"

    Key URLs
    Evidence URL
    Formal policy (CONTRIBUTING.md) https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#code-testing
    CI pipeline definition https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/workflows/python-test.yml
    PR template checklist https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/develop.md
    SonarCloud Quality Gate https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=compliance-trestle



    プロジェクトは、変更提案のための文書化された手順に、重要な新機能用にテストを追加するという方針を含まなければなりません。 [tests_documented_added]
    しかし、実際にテストが追加されている限り、非公式の規則でも許容されます。

    https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md

    Trestle updating, testing and release logistics

    "Contributors must include test cases to meet at least the minimum code coverage requirements."


  • 警告フラグ


    プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアにある警告に、実際的な場合には、最大限に厳格にならなければなりません。 [warnings_strict]
    一部の警告は、あるプロジェクトでは効果的に有効にすることはできません。必要なのは、プロジェクトが可能な限り警告フラグを有効にするように努力しており、エラーが早期に検出されるという証拠です。

    The project uses Code formatting (yapf) and code linting (flake8) to flag code issues with both errors or warnings, depending on the issue. The project also use sonar https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=compliance-trestle.


 セキュリティ 13/13 ●

  • セキュリティに関する開発知識


    適用できる場合、プロジェクトはセキュア設計原則(「know_secure_design」から)を実装しなければなりません。プロジェクトでソフトウェアが作成されていない場合は、「該当なし」(N / A)を選択します。 [implement_secure_design]
    たとえば、プロジェクトの結果は、フェール セーフのデフォルト値を持つべきです(デフォルトではアクセスの決定は拒否されるべきで、プロジェクトのインストールはデフォルトでセキュリティ保護されているべきです)。また、完全なメディエーションであるべきです(制限されているすべてのアクセスは、権限がチェックされバイパス不可能でなければなりません)。原則が矛盾する場合があります。その場合、選択が必要です(たとえば、多くの仕組みは、「機構の節約」に反して複雑にすることも、単純にすることもできます)。

    Status: Met

    compliance-trestle is a software project that produces an OSCAL authoring and validation CLI tool. Secure design principles apply in full. The sections below map each principle to concrete, verifiable evidence in the codebase.

    1. Fail-Safe Defaults
      Access decisions should deny by default; installation should be secure by default.

    Evidence Location
    HTTPS-only remote access. HTTP is unconditionally rejected; only https:// and sftp:// are permitted. security.py:149-162
    Loopback, link-local, cloud-metadata endpoints always blocked. ALWAYS_BLOCKED_NETWORKS and METADATA_HOSTNAMES apply regardless of configuration. security.py:50-77
    Private-IP blocking is an opt-in relaxation. SigningManifestDiscovery sets block_private_ips = True by default; callers must explicitly pass allow_private_uris=True. signing_manifest_discovery.py:45-57
    Workspace-boundary enforcement is on by default. validate_local_file_path requires paths inside the workspace root unless the caller explicitly passes allow_outside_workspace=True. security.py:446-549
    No-overwrite default for signed output. trestle sign raises TrestleError if the output file already exists and --overwrite was not requested. signing.py:119-147
    Bounded resource defaults. Maximum discovered artifacts (1,000), depth (64), per-file size (50 MiB), and aggregate remote size (500 MiB) are fixed constants that prevent resource-exhaustion. signing_manifest_discovery.py:34-39
    Safe YAML loading by default. YAML(typ='safe') is used everywhere YAML is parsed, preventing arbitrary Python-object construction. file_utils.py:223-237
    Defusedxml for XML parsing. The defusedxml library is a declared dependency, blocking XML-bomb, XXE, and entity-expansion attacks. pyproject.toml:35-55
    Default packaged config contains no credentials or permissive settings. config.ini
    2. Complete Mediation
    Every access that might be limited must be checked for authority; checks must be non-bypassable.

    Evidence Location
    Double validation for remote fetches. URLSecurityValidator.validate_url() is called both in the fetcher constructor and immediately before requests.get() in _do_fetch(), mitigating DNS-rebinding/TOCTOU attacks. cache.py:264-337
    Every remote URL is fully parsed, DNS-resolved, canonicalized, and checked against blocked networks, metadata hostnames, and optional domain allowlist. security.py:80-129
    IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses are canonicalized to their IPv4 form before network checks, preventing bypass via ::ffff:127.0.0.1. security.py:216-230
    Path-traversal checks at every file access boundary (URL paths for cache, resolved cache paths, trestle:// URIs, local workspace paths, signing output paths, manifest artifact paths). security.py:306-549, signing_manifest.py:213-236
    Cryptographic authority verification. Signature verification checks DSSE envelope structure, in-toto statement type, predicate type, canonicalization algorithm, digest algorithm, and the SHA-256 digest of the canonical document — any mismatch raises an error. signing.py:182-232
    Constant-time digest comparison (hmac.compare_digest) for signed package verification, preventing timing-oracle attacks. signing_manifest.py:136-191
    Validated Pydantic model loading wraps all OSCAL model deserialization; validation errors are surfaced, not silently accepted. trestle_base_model.py:27-66
    Symlink rejection at both signing output and remote-artifact vendoring paths. signing.py:119-147, signing_manifest_discovery.py:197-233
    Cycle detection and recursion-depth limiting in manifest dependency discovery, with finally guaranteeing stack cleanup. signing_manifest_discovery.py:70-97
    3. Economy of Mechanism (Keep It Simple)
    Evidence Location
    Dedicated security.py module centralizes all SSRF, path-traversal, and sensitive-file logic in one well-named place, making the security surface easy to audit. remote/security.py
    Normalized exception handling converts all security violations to TrestleError, providing a single control-flow path. Throughout
    4. Least Privilege / Credential Hygiene
    Evidence Location
    Credentials must be environment-variable references (mustache template syntax). Literal credential strings are rejected at parse time. cache.py:275-311
    Documented in internal spec: Credentials MUST NOT be stored in cleartext. caching_spec.md:131-164
    5. Defense-in-Depth / Input Validation
    Evidence Location
    SSTI prevention. Jinja2 template delimiters ({{, }}) in OSCAL prose are neutralized before output, applied at every prose-writing boundary. ssp_io.py:36-48
    Security-tested Jinja2 sandbox with autoescape=True and tests confirming RCE-payload blocking. tags_security_test.py
    Directory/task name validation rejects absolute paths, traversal segments, hidden names, reserved names, and file-extension names. file_utils.py:95-133
    Sensitive-file denylist blocks access to credentials, SSH keys, cloud configuration, /proc, /sys, logs, and DB directories even when outside-workspace access is explicitly granted. security.py:446-549
    Reject-unknown-fields validation in manifest parsing. signing_manifest.py:213-236
    Bandit (flake8-bandit S rules) enabled in Ruff linting, providing static security analysis on every CI run. pyproject.toml:205-220
    6. Open Design / Documented Security Properties
    Evidence Location
    CLI tutorial documents SSRF protections, limit constants, signature-verification steps, and HTTPS-only policy. docs/tutorials/cli.md:656-696
    Caching spec documents HTTPS requirement and credential-handling policy. internal_spec_documents/caching_spec.md
    Summary
    The project implements all applicable secure-design principles from the know_secure_design framework:

    Fail-safe defaults — deny-by-default for private networks, symlinks, path traversal, HTTP, and unknown fields; secure resource limits; safe parsers out of the box.
    Complete mediation — every remote fetch, local file access, path lookup, and cryptographic verification goes through a non-bypassable validation layer before the operation executes.
    Economy of mechanism — security logic is consolidated in dedicated, auditable modules.
    Least privilege — credentials are env-var references; explicit opt-ins required for any relaxation.
    Defense-in-depth — layered validation (URL → DNS → IP → path → size → type → signature), SSTI neutralization, sandbox testing, and static security linting.


  • 優良な暗号手法を使用する

    一部のソフトウェアは暗号化メカニズムを使用する必要がないことに注意してください。あなたのプロジェクトが作成するソフトウェアが、(1) 暗号化機能を含む、アクティブ化する、または有効化し、(2) 米国(US)から米国外または米国市民以外にリリースされる可能性がある場合は、法的に義務付けられた追加手順の実行を要求される可能性があります。通常、これにはメールの送信が含まれます。詳細については、 Understanding Open Source Technology & US Export Controls(「オープンソース技術と米国の輸出管理について」)の暗号化のセクションを参照してください。

    プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェア内のデフォルトのセキュリティ メカニズムは、既知の重大な脆弱性を持つ暗号アルゴリズムやモード(たとえば、SHA-1暗号ハッシュ アルゴリズムまたはSSHのCBC モード)に依存してはいけません。 [crypto_weaknesses]
    SSHのCBCモードに関する懸念事項は、 CERT: SSH CBC 脆弱性にて議論されています。.


    プロジェクトは複数の暗号アルゴリズムをサポートするべきですので、ユーザーは破られた場合に素早く切り替えることができます。一般的な対称鍵アルゴリズムには、AES、Twofish、およびSerpentがあります。一般的な暗号化ハッシュ アルゴリズムには、SHA-2(SHA-224、SHA-256、SHA-384およびSHA-512を含む)およびSHA-3があります。 [crypto_algorithm_agility]

    crypto_algorithm_agility — N/A
    Justification
    All cryptographic operations in this project are confined to two beta features — json-signing and json-manifest-signing — which are disabled by default and must be explicitly opted into via trestle beta enable <feature>. No cryptographic operations are active in a standard installation.

    Component Beta Gate Feature Name
    trestle/core/signing.py @beta_feature json-signing
    trestle/core/canonicalization.py @beta_feature json-signing
    trestle/core/signing_manifest.py @beta_feature json-manifest-signing
    trestle/core/signing_manifest_discovery.py @beta_feature json-manifest-signing
    Because there are no cryptographic operations in the stable, generally available interface, the crypto_algorithm_agility requirement — which targets production crypto surfaces — does not apply to this release.

    Key URLs
    Beta feature registration: trestle/core/beta_features.py:51-68
    Beta gate decorator usage: trestle/core/commands/sign.py:72, trestle/core/commands/sign_manifest.py:65
    Beta enable/disable command: trestle/core/commands/beta.py
    Forward-looking note
    If either beta feature is promoted to GA, the SHA-256 hardcoding in signing.py:39 and the explicit rejection of non-SHA-256 predicates at signing.py:229 would need to be replaced with a configurable, algorithm-agile design before that promotion.



    プロジェクトは、他の情報(構成ファイル、データベース、ログなど)とは別にしたファイルに、認証資格情報(パスワードやダイナミックトークンなど)やプライベート暗号鍵を格納することをサポートしなければなりませんし、ユーザーがコードの再コンパイルなしにそれらを更新や置き換えできるように許可しなければなりません。プロジェクトが認証資格情報とプライベート暗号化鍵を決して処理しない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [crypto_credential_agility]

    Assessment: Met
    The project fully satisfies crypto_credential_agility. All private cryptographic keys are supplied as separate user-managed files, key passwords are supplied via environment variables (never embedded in config or code), and no recompilation is required to change or replace any credential.

    Justification

    1. Private keys are always separate files, never stored in config or code
      Both trestle sign and trestle sign-manifest require the private key to be passed as a CLI argument pointing to a user-owned PEM file on disk — explicitly kept apart from OSCAL JSON files, configuration (.trestle/config.ini), databases, and logs:

    sign.py:53–57 — --private-key argument: "Path to the PEM private key for signing."
    sign_manifest.py:51–55 — same --private-key argument
    The code explicitly validates that the key file path cannot be the same as the output envelope path (sign.py:98–99, sign_manifest.py:90–91), ensuring physical separation is enforced at runtime.

    Public keys are equally separate: --public-key on trestle verify (verify.py:54) and trestle verify-manifest (verify_manifest.py:50) each point to an independent PEM file.

    1. Key passwords are supplied via environment variable, not config files or command-line arguments
      Encrypted PEM keys are supported. The password is read at runtime from a named environment variable, keeping it out of config files, logs, and shell history:

    sign.py:59–62: --key-password-env — "Environment variable containing the password for an encrypted PEM private key."
    sign.py:101–105:
    if key_password_env is not None:
    if key_password_env not in os.environ:
    raise TrestleError(f'Key password environment variable is not set: {key_password_env}')
    key_password = os.environ[key_password_env]

    Same pattern in sign_manifest.py:93–97.
    The password is never written to disk, never logged, and never appears in the DSSE output.

    1. SFTP SSH private key is also environment-variable-driven
      For remote SFTP dependency fetching in cache.py:486–491, the SSH private key is read from the SSH_KEY environment variable or delegated to ssh-agent — again completely separate from any trestle config file:

    if 'SSH_KEY' in os.environ:
    pkey = paramiko.RSAKey.from_private_key(StringIO(os.environ['SSH_KEY']))
    look_for_keys = False
    else:
    pkey = None
    look_for_keys = True # delegates to ssh-agent / default key paths

    1. No recompilation required to update or replace any key
      All key paths and passwords are runtime parameters (CLI flags and environment variables). A user can rotate to a new key pair, change to a different key type (Ed25519 → RSA, as explicitly documented), or change the encryption password entirely by simply providing different values at invocation — zero code changes needed.

    2. Credential handling applies only to beta functionality
      As established previously, all of this credential processing lives behind the @beta_feature gate. The credential agility properties hold regardless — the requirement is satisfied for the functionality that does exist.

    Key URLs
    Source Relevance
    docs/tutorials/cli.md#trestle-sign Documents --private-key (separate file), --key-password-env (env var for password), chmod 600 guidance, and key rotation with no recompilation
    docs/tutorials/cli.md:636–648 Encrypted key workflow: password via env var, never on CLI or in config
    docs/tutorials/cli.md:552 SSH_KEY env var pattern for SFTP credential separation
    trestle/core/commands/sign.py:50–65 CLI argument definitions — --private-key and --key-password-env
    trestle/core/commands/sign_manifest.py:46–63 Same pattern for manifest signing
    trestle/core/signing.py:49–56 load_pem_private_key_signer() — loads key from a path at runtime, no hardcoding
    Published docs URL: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/tutorials/cli/#trestle-sign Registered documentation_url for the json-signing beta feature



    プロジェクトで作成されたソフトウェアは、ネットワーク通信すべてに対して、SSHv2以降、TLS1.2以降 (HTTPS)、IPsec、SFTP、SNMPv3などのセキュア プロトコルをサポートするべきです。FTP、HTTP、telnet、SSLv3以前、およびSSHv1などのセキュアでないプロトコルは、デフォルトで無効にし、ユーザーが特別に設定した場合のみ有効にするべきです。プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアがネットワーク通信をサポートしない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [crypto_used_network]

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    The project makes network connections via exactly two remote protocols: HTTPS and SFTP. Both are secure by enforcement, not by convention. Insecure protocols (plain HTTP, FTP, telnet, SSLv3, SSHv1) are categorically blocked — they cannot be enabled by configuration.

    Evidence by protocol

    1. HTTPS — enforced at the scheme-validation layer
      URLSecurityValidator._parse_and_validate_url() hard-rejects any scheme that is not https or sftp:

    if parsed.scheme not in ['https', 'sftp']:
    raise TrestleError(f'Only HTTPS or SFTP schemes are allowed for remote URLs, got: {parsed.scheme}')

    This is called both at HTTPSFetcher.init() (cache.py:269) and again immediately before every fetch (cache.py:337) to close the DNS-rebinding TOCTOU window. There is no code path that makes an HTTP request — requests.get() (cache.py:355) is only reachable after scheme validation has already confirmed https://.

    TLS version is delegated to the requests library's default, which uses the system OpenSSL/TLS stack. No downgrade to SSLv3/TLSv1.0/TLSv1.1 is configured; the verify parameter is set to True by default and overridden only by a user-supplied CA bundle path (cache.py:342–350), not disabled.

    1. SFTP — SSH transport, insecure FTP explicitly rejected
      SFTPFetcher uses paramiko over SSH, inheriting SSHv2 (paramiko's only supported version). The client.load_system_host_keys() call (cache.py:482) enforces known-host verification.

    Plain ftp: is explicitly caught and rejected by FetcherFactory.get_uri_type() (cache.py:578–579):

    if uri_clean.startswith('ftp:'):
    raise TrestleError(f'Invalid uri {uri} ftp is not supported. Use sftp instead.')

    This error is unconditional — there is no configuration flag to re-enable FTP.

    1. No plain HTTP, no telnet, no SSLv3, no SSHv1
      There is no http:// fetcher class, no telnet support, and no SSL version downgrade option anywhere in the codebase. The only two UriType enum values for remote access are SFTP and HTTPS (cache.py:554–556).

    2. Documented as HTTPS/SFTP only
      The user-facing documentation explicitly lists only the two secure schemes:

    "The provided href can be of form trestle://, https://, sftp://, or file:///."
    — docs/tutorials/cli.md:547

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Hard scheme allowlist: only https and sftp permitted
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:578–579 Explicit ftp: rejection with error message directing to sftp
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:249–380 HTTPSFetcher — HTTPS-only, TLS cert verification on by default
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:405–539 SFTPFetcher — paramiko SSHv2, known-hosts enforced
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:334–337 Pre-fetch re-validation to prevent DNS-rebinding downgrade
    docs/tutorials/cli.md:547–552 User documentation listing only https:// and sftp:// as remote schemes



    プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアは、TLSをサポートあるいは使用する場合、少なくともTLSバージョン1.2をサポートするべきです。TLSの前身は、SSLと呼ばれていたことに注意して下さい。ソフトウェアがTLSを使用ない場合、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [crypto_tls12]

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    The project uses TLS exclusively through the requests library for HTTPS fetching. TLS 1.2+ compliance is guaranteed by the combination of the requests version floor, its dependency chain, and the absence of any downgrade configuration in the project code.

    How TLS is used
    The sole TLS code path is HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch(), which calls requests.get() (cache.py:355–362):

    response = requests.get(
    self._url,
    auth=auth,
    verify=verify, # defaults to True (cert validation on)
    timeout=30,
    allow_redirects=False,
    stream=...,
    )

    There is no ssl_context, ssl_version, or PROTOCOL_* override anywhere in the codebase — TLS negotiation is fully delegated to the requests/urllib3/OpenSSL stack.

    Why that stack enforces TLS 1.2+

    1. requests >= 2.32.2 (pyproject.toml:53)

    requests 2.32.x depends on urllib3 >= 2.0. urllib3 2.0 dropped support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 entirely, setting SSLContext.minimum_version = TLSVersion.TLSv1_2 by default. This means TLS 1.2 is the minimum regardless of the system OpenSSL default.

    1. cryptography >= 46.0.7 (pyproject.toml:38)

    The cryptography 46.x series requires OpenSSL 1.1.1 or later and PyCA cryptography itself enforces TLS 1.2+ in all contexts it manages. This underpins the paramiko SSH transport as well.

    1. paramiko == 5.0.0 (pyproject.toml:39)

    Paramiko 5.x requires cryptography >= 3.3 and exclusively uses SSHv2 — there is no SSHv1 support in any supported paramiko release. The SFTP transport carries no TLS but does carry SSHv2, which is a listed approved protocol in the requirement.

    1. Certificate verification on by default

    verify=None in the requests.get() call means True (verify against the system CA bundle) unless the user has set REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE or CURL_CA_BUNDLE to a valid path (cache.py:342–350). Setting those env vars to an invalid path raises a TrestleError — it is impossible to silently disable certificate verification.

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    pyproject.toml:53 requests>=2.32.2 — floor that pulls in urllib3>=2.0, which enforces TLS 1.2 minimum
    pyproject.toml:38 cryptography>=46.0.7 — modern TLS stack, OpenSSL 1.1.1+ required
    pyproject.toml:39 paramiko==5.0.0 — SSHv2 only, no SSHv1
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:334–380 Only TLS call site — no version override, cert verify on by default
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:340–350 CA bundle handling — invalid path raises error, cannot be used to disable TLS verification
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Scheme allowlist enforces https or sftp only — plain HTTP cannot reach the TLS layer at all
    Key external references
    urllib3 2.0 changelog (drops TLS <1.2): https://urllib3.readthedocs.io/en/stable/changelog.html
    requests 2.32 release (urllib3 2.x dependency): https://github.com/psf/requests/releases/tag/v2.32.0
    paramiko 5.x (SSHv2 only): https://www.paramiko.org/changelog.html



    TLSをサポートしている場合、プロジェクトで作成されたソフトウェアは、TLSを使う時には、サブリソースを含めて、デフォルトでTLS認証を受けなければなりません。ソフトウェアがTLSを使用しない場合、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [crypto_certificate_verification]
    誤ったTLS認証の検証は、よくある間違いであることに注意して下さい。詳細については、「世界でもっとも危険なコード:非ブラウザー ソフトウェアでのSSL認証の検証」Martin Georgiev et al著 と 「このアプリケーションを信頼しますか?」Michael Catanzaro著.を参照して下さい。

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    TLS certificate verification is on by default and cannot be silently disabled. The single TLS call site in the project enforces this through three layers.

    Layer 1 — requests.get() defaults to verify=True
    HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() passes verify=verify where verify starts as None:

    verify = None
    for env_var_name in ['REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE', 'CURL_CA_BUNDLE']:
    if env_var_name in os.environ:
    if pathlib.Path(os.environ[env_var_name]).exists():
    verify = os.environ[env_var_name] # a valid CA bundle path
    break
    else:
    raise TrestleError(...) # bad path → hard error, not silent skip

    response = requests.get(self._url, verify=verify, ...)

    When verify=None, the requests library treats it identically to verify=True — it verifies the server certificate against the default system CA bundle. There is no code path that sets verify=False anywhere in the project.

    Layer 2 — Invalid CA bundle path is a hard error, not a bypass
    If REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE or CURL_CA_BUNDLE is set to a non-existent path (cache.py:347–350):

    raise TrestleError(f'Env var ${env_var_name} found but path does not exist: ...')

    A misconfigured CA bundle raises a TrestleError and aborts rather than falling back to unverified connections. This prevents accidental verification bypass via a broken environment variable.

    Layer 3 — Scheme allowlist prevents reaching TLS in the first place with insecure schemes
    URLSecurityValidator._parse_and_validate_url() rejects anything that is not https or sftp before any network connection is attempted. Plain http:// cannot reach the requests.get() call, so there is no opportunity for an unverified connection.

    Subresources
    The signing_manifest_discovery flow fetches remote OSCAL dependencies (profiles, catalogs) referenced by hrefs. All such fetches go through the same FetcherFactory → HTTPSFetcher path (signing_manifest_discovery.py:185), so subresource fetches are subject to identical TLS verification.

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:339–362 verify=None defaults to True in requests; invalid CA bundle path raises hard error
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Scheme allowlist — https and sftp only; plain HTTP never reaches TLS layer
    trestle/core/signing_manifest_discovery.py:183–185 Subresource fetches use same FetcherFactory path — same verification applies
    Key external references
    "The Most Dangerous Code in the World" (Georgiev et al.) identifies verify=False and skipped hostname checks as the canonical failure modes — neither is present here.
    requests documentation on verify: https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user/advanced/#ssl-cert-verification — confirms None and True are equivalent (verify against system CAs).



    TLSをサポートしている場合、プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアは、(たとえばセキュアクッキーなど)プライベートな情報をHTTPヘッダと共に送信する前に、証明書の検証をしなければなりません。ソフトウェアがTLSを使用しない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [crypto_verification_private]

    Assessment: Met
    Justification
    The project sends HTTP authentication credentials (username/password via HTTPBasicAuth) over HTTPS only, and certificate verification is performed before any such credentials are transmitted, by construction of the requests library's connection model.

    How credentials are sent
    HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() constructs an auth object and passes it to requests.get():

    auth = None
    ...
    if self._username is not None and self._password is not None:
    auth = HTTPBasicAuth(self._username, self._password)

    response = requests.get(
    self._url,
    auth=auth,
    verify=verify, # defaults to True — cert verified before connection completes
    ...
    )

    HTTPBasicAuth injects an Authorization header into the HTTP request. In the requests library, the TLS handshake (including full certificate verification) completes before the HTTP request — and therefore before any headers — is transmitted over the wire. This is the fundamental property of TLS: the encrypted channel is established and authenticated first; application data (including HTTP headers) is only ever sent through the verified tunnel.

    Why this is guaranteed
    There is no mechanism in the project code that could cause headers to be sent before verification:

    verify is never False — as established in the previous assessment, there is no code path that sets verify=False. Certificate verification cannot be skipped.
    The scheme allowlist blocks plain HTTP — URLSecurityValidator rejects any scheme other than https or sftp before a connection is attempted. It is impossible to accidentally send HTTPBasicAuth credentials over an unencrypted HTTP connection.
    Credentials are only resolved at fetch time, not stored in the URL — usernames and passwords are read from environment variables (cache.py:284–301), preventing them from appearing in logs or error messages as part of a URL string.
    No cookies
    The project does not use cookies anywhere. The only private information transmitted in HTTP headers is the Authorization header from HTTPBasicAuth, which is subject to the guarantees above.

    Key source locations
    File Relevance
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:339–362 auth only sent via requests.get() after TLS handshake completes; verify defaults to True
    trestle/core/remote/security.py:159–160 Scheme allowlist — plain HTTP cannot be used, so Authorization header cannot be sent unencrypted
    trestle/core/remote/cache.py:284–301 Credentials sourced from environment variables, not embedded in URLs


  • 公開物の安全性


    プロジェクトは、広く普及することを意図しているプロジェクト結果のリリースには暗号で署名しなければなりませんし、パブリック署名鍵を入手して署名を検証する方法をユーザに説明するプロセスがなければなりません。これらの署名の秘密鍵は、ソフトウェアを一般に直接配布するために使用されるサイトにあってはなりません。リリースが広く普及することを意図していない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [signed_releases]
    プロジェクトの結果には、ソースコードと生成された成果物(実行可能ファイル、パッケージ、コンテナなど)が含まれます。生成された成果物は、ソースコードとは別に署名することができます。これらは、(暗号デジタル署名を使用して)署名付きgitタグとして実装できます。プロジェクトはgitのようなツールとは別に生成された結果を提供するかもしれませんが、そのような場合、別々の結果を別々に署名しなければなりません。

    Per security-insights.yml: repository.release.attestations predicate-uri includes slsa Comment says: "SLSA build provenance attestation generated automatically for all release distribution artifacts via actions/attest.".



    バージョン管理システムでは、 signed_releases で説明されているように、重要なバージョンタグ(メジャーリリース、マイナーリリース、または公開されている脆弱性の一部であるタグ)を暗号署名して検証することが推奨されています。 [version_tags_signed]

    Release tags are cryptographically signed using an SSH Ed25519 key via the
    python-semantic-release action in the deploy pipeline. The signing key pair is
    stored as GitHub Actions environment secrets (RELEASE_TAG_SIGNING_KEY,
    RELEASE_TAG_SIGNING_KEY_PUB) scoped to the release environment so they are
    inaccessible outside the deploy job. The corresponding public key is committed to
    .github/allowed_signers, enabling independent verification with standard git —
    no out-of-band trust step required. Signing applies to all major, minor, and
    security-fix releases on both main and maintenance branches (v3, v4, …).

    To verify any release tag:

    git config gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile .github/allowed_signers
    git fetch --tags
    git tag -v v5.1.0
    
    Key URLs:
    
    Pipeline (signing step): https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/main/.github/workflows/python-push.yml
    Allowed signers (public key): https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/blob/main/.github/allowed_signers
    Verification instructions: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/contributing/maintenance_releases/#signed-release-tags
    Operator setup and key rotation: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/contributing/github_actions_setup/#release-tag-signing

  • その他のセキュリティ上の課題


    プロジェクトの結果は、潜在的に信頼できないソースからのすべての入力をチェックして有効であること(*allowlist*)を確認し、データに何らかの制限がある場合は無効な入力を拒否しなければなりません。 [input_validation]
    攻撃者はしばしばブラックリストを回避することができるので、入力を "不正な形式" のリスト(別名*denylist*)と比較するのは、通常十分ではないことに注意してください。特に、数値は内部形式に変換され、最小値と最大値の間であるかがチェックされますし、文字列は、有効なテキストパターン(有効なUTF-8、長さ、構文など)であることを確認するためにチェックされます。一部のデータは「何でもよい」(たとえばファイル アップローダー)ことがありますが、通常はまれです。

    Input Validation — Badge Justification

    Criterion: input_validation — All inputs from potentially untrusted sources are checked against an allowlist and rejected if invalid.

    Finding: Met ✅


    1. CLI / Argparse Arguments

    All CLI commands use argparse with allowlists (choices=) and typed converters. Unknown or out-of-range values are rejected before reaching application code.


    2. Output / Directory Name Validation (Allowlist)

    is_directory_name_allowed() at trestle/common/file_utils.py:95 enforces a strict allowlist:

    • Rejects absolute paths (is_absolute() + explicit / prefix check)
    • Rejects .. traversal components
    • Rejects names that collide with reserved OSCAL directory names
    • Rejects names starting with .
    • Rejects names that look like files (have a suffix)
    • Rejects names containing __global__

    Called in:


    3. File Path Traversal (Boundary Enforcement — Allowlist)

    PathSecurityValidator at trestle/core/remote/security.py:306 provides multiple layers:

    Method Validation
    validate_local_path() (line 408) resolve() + relative_to() to confirm path stays inside trestle root
    validate_cache_path() (line 340) Same boundary check for cache directory
    validate_url_path_for_cache() (line 310) Blocks .. sequences in URL path component
    validate_trestle_uri_path() (line 378) Blocks .. in trestle:// URI paths
    validate_local_file_path() (line 446) Workspace boundary + sensitive system path denylist (defense-in-depth)

    Called in:

    relative_resolve() at trestle/common/file_utils.py:256 additionally enforces that any relative path resolves within the provided cwd, raising TrestleError if not.


    4. URL / Remote Input Validation (Format + Network Allowlist)

    URLSecurityValidator.validate_url() at trestle/core/remote/security.py:99 enforces:

    • Scheme allowlist: only https and sftp accepted (line 159)
    • Hostname required: rejected if absent
    • Cloud metadata endpoint blocklist (METADATA_HOSTNAMES, line 72) — always blocked
    • Always-blocked IP ranges (loopback 127.0.0.0/8, link-local 169.254.0.0/16, 0.0.0.0/8, IPv6 equivalents, line 52)
    • Optional RFC 1918 blocking via TRESTLE_BLOCK_PRIVATE_IPS environment variable
    • IPv4-mapped IPv6 canonicalization before all checks to prevent bypass
    • DNS rebinding mitigation: validation called at both initialization and immediately before each fetch

    5. OSCAL Model Structure Validation (Schema Allowlist)

    All imported, loaded, and assembled OSCAL models are validated by Pydantic v2 via OscalBaseModel:

    • Strict type enforcement on all fields
    • extra='forbid' — unknown fields are rejected outright
    • validate_assignment=True

    On import, the full OSCAL validator suite (VAL_MODE_ALL) runs before any model is written to disk:


    6. Task Configuration Inputs (configparser)

    Tasks validate their configparser-backed inputs at runtime:

    • Required keys checked for presence; failure returns early with a logged message
    • Timestamps parsed through a typed parser — malformed values rejected with a warning
    • File paths checked via .exists() before use
    • Boolean flags read via getboolean() — raises on non-boolean values

    Key examples:


    7. File Content Type Restrictions (Extension Allowlist)

    OSCAL directory scanning in _verify_oscal_folder() at line 148 only permits {'.json', '.xml', '.yaml', '.yml', '.md'}. Task input processors similarly allowlist extensions before reading:


    8. Element Path Syntax Validation (Text Pattern Allowlist)

    ElementPath._parse() at trestle/core/models/elements.py:63:

    • Rejects empty path parts between separators
    • Rejects wildcards in invalid positions
    • Raises TrestleError immediately on malformed input

    9. Text Pattern Validation (Named Regex Allowlists)


    Summary Table

    Input Surface Validation Strategy
    CLI arguments argparse choices= allowlists + typed converters
    Output / directory names is_directory_name_allowed() multi-rule allowlist
    File paths PathSecurityValidator — resolved relative_to() boundary checks
    URLs URLSecurityValidator — scheme allowlist + IP network allowlist/blocklist
    OSCAL model data Pydantic v2 schema, extra='forbid', full validator suite on import
    Task config inputs Required-key checks, typed getters, .exists() file checks
    File types Extension allowlists in OSCAL dirs and task processors
    Element path strings Structural syntax validation, TrestleError on malformed input
    Text patterns Named regex allowlists for labels and credential placeholders


    プロジェクトによって作成されたソフトウェアで強化メカニズムを使用するべきですので、ソフトウェア欠陥がセキュリティ上の脆弱性を引き起こす可能性が低くなります。 [hardening]
    強化メカニズムは、Content Security Policy(CSP)などのHTTPヘッダー、攻撃を緩和するコンパイラ フラグ(-fstack-protectorなど)、または未定義の動作を排除するためのコンパイラ フラグを含みます。私たちの目的のために、最低限の特権は強化メカニズムとはみなされません(最低の特権は重要ですが、別の話です)。

    Software hardening justification

    Determination

    The project uses applicable hardening mechanisms to reduce the likelihood that software defects become security vulnerabilities.

    HTTP response headers such as Content Security Policy are not applicable because Compliance-trestle is a Python command-line and library project, not a web application or HTTP server. Compiler hardening flags are also not applicable because the project does not produce compiled native binaries.

    The following mechanisms are applicable and implemented:

    Mechanism Implementation Justification
    Static security analysis pyproject.toml enables Ruff security rules, including flake8-bandit rules. Detects insecure coding patterns during code-quality checks.
    Code vulnerability analysis codeql-analysis.yml runs CodeQL for Python on pull requests, pushes, and a schedule. Finds security vulnerabilities and unsafe data flows before release.
    Dependency vulnerability scanning python-test.yml runs Snyk scanning. Identifies known vulnerabilities in project dependencies.
    Dependency update monitoring dependabot.yml checks Python and GitHub Actions dependencies weekly. Helps keep dependencies patched and reduces exposure to known vulnerabilities.
    SSRF protection URLSecurityValidator blocks loopback, link-local, cloud-metadata, and optionally private-network addresses. Prevents remote references from reaching sensitive internal services.
    Path traversal protection PathSecurityValidator validates cache, local, and URI paths. Prevents crafted paths from escaping approved filesystem boundaries.
    Secure remote fetching HTTPSFetcher._do_fetch() validates URLs before fetching, verifies TLS certificates, uses a 30-second timeout, and disables redirects. Reduces DNS-rebinding, transport, redirect, and indefinite-wait risks.
    Security regression testing cache_security_test.py tests traversal and remote-fetch security controls. Helps ensure hardening protections remain effective as the code changes.

    Least privilege is intentionally not included in this determination because it is a separate security principle rather than a hardening mechanism for this criterion.

    Key URLs



    プロジェクトは、そのセキュリティ要件が満たされていることを証明する保証ケースを提供しなければならない。保証ケースには、脅威モデルの説明、信頼境界の明確な識別、セキュアな設計原則が適用されていることの議論、共通の実装セキュリティの弱点が対処されたことの議論が含まれなければならない。 (URLが必要です) [assurance_case]
    保証ケースは、「システムのプロパティに関する特定の一連の重大なクレームが、特定の環境とアプリケーションに対して適切に正当化されていることを説得力のある正当な議論で示す証拠」である(「構造化された保証ケースモデルを使用したソフトウェア保証」、Thomas Rhodes他、NIST Interagency Report 7608 )。信頼境界は、データまたは実行がその信頼レベル、例えば、典型的なウェブアプリケーションにおけるサーバの境界、を変更する境界である。安全な設計原則(SaltzerやSchroeerなど)と一般的な実装セキュリティの弱点(OWASPトップ10やCWE / SANSトップ25など)をリストし、それぞれがどのように対抗しているかを示すのは一般的です。 BadgeAppの保証ケースは良い参考例になるかもしれません。これは、documentation_security、documentation_architecture、およびimplement_secure_designに関連しています。

    Justification

    The project satisfies the assurance_case criterion via the dedicated Assurance Case page published in the compliance-trestle documentation site.

    URL: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/assurance-case/

    The page addresses each required element:

    Required element Where it is addressed
    Threat model §2 — nine named threat scenarios (T1–T9) mapped to STRIDE categories and affected components, with actors, assets, and trust levels defined
    Trust boundaries §3 — five named boundaries (B1–B5) shown in an ASCII architecture diagram and a table; each boundary identifies what crosses it and the control mechanism
    Secure design principles argument §4 — ten Saltzer & Schroeder principles mapped one-for-one to trestle design decisions with source-code evidence links
    Common implementation weaknesses argument §5.1 (OWASP Top 10, 2021) and §5.2 (CWE/SANS Top 25, 2024, 16 applicable entries) — each weakness rated for applicability and mapped to a concrete mitigation

    Supporting URLs cited in the assurance case:

    • Assurance case page: https://oscal-compass.github.io/compliance-trestle/latest/assurance-case/
    • NIST IR 7608 (definition source): https://www.nist.gov/publications/software-assurance-using-structured-assurance-case-models
    • Saltzer & Schroeder principles: https://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/protection/Basic.html
    • OWASP Top 10 (2021): https://owasp.org/Top10/
    • CWE/SANS Top 25 (2024): https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2024/2024_cwe_top25.html
    • SSRF vulnerability advisory (GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp): https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/security/advisories/GHSA-w76h-q7c6-jpjp
    • OpenSSF Best Practices badge: https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/9408

 分析 2/2 ●

  • 静的コード解析


    プロジェクトは、選択された言語でこの基準を実装できる少なくとも1つのFLOSSツールがある場合、解析された言語または環境で共通の脆弱性を探すためのルールまたはアプローチを備えた少なくとも1つの静的解析ツールを使用しなければならなりません。 [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]
    一般的な脆弱性を探すために特別に設計された静的解析ツールは、それらを見つける可能性が高いです。つまり、静的ツールを使用すると、通常は問題を見つけるのに役立ちますので、利用を提案しますが、「合格」レベルのバッジには要求しません。

    Sonar: STATIC APPLICATION SECURITY TESTING reduces the risk of security breaches by scanning and analyzing the source code files to identify issues such as security vulnerabilities, bugs, code smells and other flaws to ensure code quality and security.


  • 動的コード分析


    もしプロジェクトで作成されたソフトウェアにメモリ安全でない言語(CやC ++など)を使用して作成されたソフトウェアが含まれているならば、そのときには 少なくとも1つの動的ツール(たとえば、ファジーまたはウェブ アプリケーション スキャナ)を、バッファの上書きなどのメモリの安全性の問題を検出するメカニズムと一緒にいつも使用します。プロジェクトがメモリ安全でない言語で書かれたソフトウェアを作成しない場合は、「該当なし」(N/A)を選択します。 [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]
    メモリの安全性の問題を検出するメカニズムの例としては、アドレスサニタイザー(ASAN)(GCCおよびLLVMで利用可能)、 Memory Sanitizer 、および valgrind が含まれます。他に使用される可能性のあるツールには、スレッドサニタイザと定義されていない動作サニタイザを参照してください。広範なアサーションも機能します。

    N/A,language used is Python.



ツールやAIシステムを使って、https://www.bestpractices.dev/ja/projects/9408/choose/edit?osps_ac_01_01_status=Met&osps_ac_01_01_justification=GitHub+enforcedのような簡単なURLで変更を提案できます。その方法については、自動化提案システムをご覧ください。 このデータは、Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0)のもとで利用可能です。これは、データ受領者が、データ受領者がこの契約のテキストを共有データとともに利用可能にする限り、変更の有無にかかわらずデータを共有できることを意味します。Lou DeGenaroおよびOpenSSFベストプラクティスバッジのコントリビューターにクレジットを表示してください。

プロジェクト バッジ登録の所有者: Lou DeGenaro.
エントリの作成日時 2024-09-02 12:27:57 UTC、 最終更新日 2026-09-11 11:56:29 UTC 最後に2024-11-11 12:03:16 UTCにバッジ合格を達成しました。