hve-squad

Miradi inayofuata mazoea bora hapa chini inaweza kujihakikisha kwa hiari na kuonyesha kuwa wamepata nishani ya mazoea bora ya Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa programu haitakuwa na kasoro au udhaifu; hata mbinu rasmi zinaweza kushindwa ikiwa vipimo au dhana ni sahihi. Wala hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa mradi utaendelea kuwa na jamii ya maendeleo yenye afya na inayofanya kazi vizuri. Hata hivyo, kufuata mazoea bora kunaweza kusaidia kuboresha matokeo ya miradi. Kwa mfano, baadhi ya mazoea huwezesha ukaguzi wa watu wengi kabla ya kutolewa, ambayo inaweza kusaidia kupata udhaifu wa kiufundi ambao vinginevyo ni vigumu kupata na kusaidia kujenga uaminifu na hamu ya mwingiliano wa kurudia kati ya wasanidi programu kutoka makampuni tofauti. Ili kupata nishani, vigezo vyote vya LAZIMA na LAZIMA WALA USIWAHI lazima vifuatwe, vigezo vyote vya INAPASWA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana na thibitisho, na vigezo vyote vya PENDEKEZA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana (tunataka vifikiwe angalau). Ikiwa unataka kuingiza maandishi ya thibitisho kama maoni ya jumla, badala ya kuwa maelezo ya busara kwamba hali ni inakubaliwa, anza kifungu cha maandishi na '//' ikifuatiwa na nafasi. Maoni ni karibu kupitia tovuti ya GitHub kama masuala au maombi ya kuvuta Kuna pia orodha ya barua pepe kwa majadiliano ya jumla.

Tunafuraha kutoa habari katika lugha nyingi, hata hivyo, ikiwa kuna mgongano au kutokuwa na usawa kati ya tafsiri, toleo la Kiingereza ni toleo lenye mamlaka.
Ikiwa huu ni mradi wako, tafadhali onyesha hadhi ya nishani yako kwenye ukurasa wa mradi wako! Hadhi ya nishani inaonekana kama hii: Kiwango cha nishani kwa mradi 14231 ni passing Hapa ni jinsi ya kuiweka:
Unaweza kuonyesha hali ya nishani yako kwa kuweka hii katika faili yako ya markdown:
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14231/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14231)
au kwa kuweka hii katika HTML yako:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14231"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14231/badge"></a>


Hizi ni vigezo vya kiwango cha Kupita. Unaweza pia kuangalia vigezo vya kiwango cha Fedha au Dhahabu.

Baseline Series: Kiwango cha Msingi 1 Kiwango cha Msingi 2 Kiwango cha Msingi 3

        

 Misingi 13/13 ●

  • Jumla

    Kumbuka kwamba miradi mingine inaweza kutumia jina sawa.

    APM package that assembles HVE Core agents, prompts, instructions, and skills into one installable bundle for Copilot target environments, and ships a Squad Coordinator that routes your request to a cast of agents in parallel.

    Tafadhali tumia muundo wa maneno ya leseni ya SPDX; mifano ni pamoja na "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", na "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Usitumie alama za nukuu za moja au mbili.
    Ikiwa kuna lugha zaidi ya moja, ziorodhe kama thamani zilizotengwa kwa koma (nafasi ni za hiari) na ziorodhe kuanzia iliyotumiwa zaidi hadi iliyotumiwa kidogo. Ikiwa kuna orodha ndefu, tafadhali orodhesha angalau tatu za kawaida zaidi. Ikiwa hakuna lugha (k.m., huu ni mradi wa nyaraka tu au wa majaribio tu), tumia herufi moja "-". Tafadhali tumia herufi kubwa za kawaida kwa kila lugha, k.m., "JavaScript".
    Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) ni mpango wa kuweka majina yenye muundo kwa mifumo ya teknolojia ya habari, programu, na vifurushi. Inatumika katika mifumo na hifadhidata nyingi wakati wa kuripoti udhaifu.

  • Maudhui ya kimsingi ya tovuti ya mradi


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Tovuti ya mradi LAZIMA ieleze kwa ufupi programu inafanya nini (inasuluhu tatizo gani?). [description_good]
    Hii LAZIMA iwe katika lugha ambayo watumiaji watarajiwa wanaweza kuelewa (k.m., inatumia lugha ya kiufundi kidogo).

    In order not to have a really large readme. The documentation of the product and description were kept under a github pages site. Note that access to this documentation is linked to the github repo.

    https://peter-n91.github.io/hve-squad/index.html


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Tovuti ya mradi LAZIMA itoe habari juu ya jinsi ya: kupata, kutoa maoni (kama ripoti za hitilafu au maboresho), na kuchangia kwenye programu. [interact]

    There is a contributing page in the documentation website of the package that includes everything. Note that access to this documentation is linked to the github repo.

    https://peter-n91.github.io/hve-squad/contributing.html


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Habari juu ya jinsi ya kuchangia LAZIMA ieleze mchakato wa uchangiaji (kwa mfano, je! Maombi ya kuvuta yanatumika?) (URL inahitajika) [contribution]
    Tunafikiria kuwa miradi kwenye GitHub hutumia maswala na kuvuta maombi isipokuwa palipoonyeshwa vingine. Habari hii inaweza kuwa fupi, kwa mfano, ikisema kuwa mradi hutumia maombi ya kuvuta, msako wa suala, au machapisho kwenye orodha ya barua (ipi?)

    Non-trivial contribution file in repository: https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Habari juu ya jinsi ya kuchangia INAPASWA kujumuisha mahitaji ya michango inayokubalika (k.m., rejeleo la kiwango chochote kinachohitajika cha usimbaji). (URL inahitajika) [contribution_requirements]

    The contributing URLs will guide the user on how to properly contribute and we already have some examples where contributors followed the steps to apply their changes.

    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
    https://peter-n91.github.io/hve-squad/contributing.html


  • Leseni ya FLOSS


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA itolewa kama FLOSS. [floss_license]
    FLOSS ni programu iliyotolewa kwa njia inayokidhi Ufafanuzi wa Chanzo Wazi au Ufafanuzi wa Programu Huria. Mifano ya leseni kama hizo ni pamoja na CC0, MIT, BSD 2-clause, BSD 3-clause revised, Apache 2.0, Lesser GNU General Public License (LGPL), na GNU General Public License (GPL). Kwa madhumuni yetu, hii inamaanisha kuwa leseni LAZIMA iwe: Programu YAWEZA pia kupatiwa leseni kwa njia nyingine (k.m., "GPLv2 au ya kibinafsi" inakubaliwa).

    The MIT license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZA kwamba leseni yoyote inayohitajika kwa programu iliyozalishwa na mradi iwe imeidhinishwa na Open Source Initiative (OSI). [floss_license_osi]
    OSI inatumia mchakato mgumu wa uidhinishaji kuamua ni leseni zipi ni OSS.

    The MIT license is approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI).


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uweke leseni za matokeo yake mahali pa kawaida katika hazina yake ya chanzo. (URL inahitajika) [license_location]
    Desturi moja ni kuweka leseni kama faili ya ngazi ya juu inayoitwa LICENSE au COPYING, ambayo YAWEZA kufuatiwa na kiendelezi kama ".txt" au ".md". Desturi mbadala ni kuwa na saraka inayoitwa LICENSES inayohifadhi faili za leseni; faili hizi kwa kawaida zinaitwa kama kitambulisho chao cha leseni ya SPDX kikifuatiwa na kiendelezi kinachofaa, kama ilivyoelezwa katika Maelezo ya REUSE. Kumbuka kwamba kigezo hiki ni mahitaji tu kwenye hazina ya chanzo. Huhitaji kuingiza faili ya leseni wakati wa kuzalisha kitu kutoka kwenye msimbo wa chanzo (kama programu inayotekelezeka, kifurushi, au chombo). Kwa mfano, wakati wa kuzalisha kifurushi cha R kwa Mtandao wa Kumbukumbu Kamili wa R (CRAN), fuata mazoea ya kawaida ya CRAN: ikiwa leseni ni leseni ya kawaida, tumia maelezo mafupi ya kawaida ya leseni (ili kuepuka kusakinisha nakala nyingine ya maandishi) na orodhesha faili ya LICENSE katika faili ya kutengwa kama .Rbuildignore. Vivyo hivyo, wakati wa kuunda kifurushi cha Debian, unaweza kuweka kiungo katika faili ya hakimiliki kwa maandishi ya leseni katika /usr/share/common-licenses, na utenge faili ya leseni kutoka kwenye kifurushi kilichoundwa (k.m., kwa kufuta faili baada ya kuita dh_auto_install). Tunashauri jumuisha maelezo ya leseni yanayoweza kusomwa na mashine katika miundo iliyozalishwa mahali inapofaa.

    Non-trivial license location file in repository: https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/blob/main/LICENSE.


  • Nyaraka


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe nyaraka za msingi za programu iliyozalishwa na mradi. [documentation_basics]
    Nyaraka hizi lazima ziwe katika vyombo fulani (kama maandishi au video) vinavyojumuisha: jinsi ya kuisakinisha, jinsi ya kuianzisha, jinsi ya kuitumia (huenda ikijumuisha mafunzo kwa kutumia mifano), na jinsi ya kuitumia kwa usalama (k.m., nini cha kufanya na nini cha kutofanya) ikiwa hiyo ni mada inayofaa kwa programu. Nyaraka za usalama lazima zisiwe ndefu. Mradi YAWEZA kutumia viungo vya hypertext kwa nyenzo zisizo za mradi kama nyaraka. Ikiwa mradi hauzalishi programu, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A).

    Some documentation basics file contents found.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe nyaraka za marejeleo zinazofafanua kiolesura cha nje (ingizo na matokeo) cha programu iliyozalishwa na mradi. [documentation_interface]
    Nyaraka za kiolesura cha nje zinaeleza kwa mtumiaji wa mwisho au msanidi jinsi ya kuitumia. Hii itajumuisha kiolesura chake cha programu ya programu (API) ikiwa programu ina. Ikiwa ni maktaba, andika madarasa/aina kuu na mbinu/vitendakazi vinavyoweza kuitwa. Ikiwa ni programu ya wavuti, fafanua kiolesura chake cha URL (mara nyingi kiolesura chake cha REST). Ikiwa ni kiolesura cha mstari wa amri, andika vigezo na chaguo zinazosaidia. Katika hali nyingi ni bora ikiwa nyingi ya nyaraka hizi zinazalishwa kiotomatiki, ili nyaraka hizi zibaki zikisawazishwa na programu inavyobadilika, lakini hii haihitajiki. Mradi YAWEZA kutumia viungo vya hypertext kwa nyenzo zisizo za mradi kama nyaraka. Nyaraka ZIWEZA kuzalishwa kiotomatiki (ambapo ni vitendo hii mara nyingi ndiyo njia bora ya kufanya hivyo). Nyaraka za kiolesura cha REST zinaweza kuzalishwa kwa kutumia Swagger/OpenAPI. Nyaraka za kiolesura cha msimbo ZINAWEZA kuzalishwa kwa kutumia zana kama vile JSDoc (JavaScript), ESDoc (JavaScript), pydoc (Python), devtools (R), pkgdown (R), na Doxygen (nyingi). Kuwa na maoni tu katika msimbo wa utekelezaji haitoshi kutosheleza kigezo hiki; kunahitaji kuwa na njia rahisi ya kuona habari bila kusoma kupitia msimbo wote wa chanzo. Ikiwa mradi hauzalishi programu, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A).

    A usage screen with some validated scenarios is present on the github pages documentation. Explanatory videos are also available for users. Note that access to this documentation is linked to the github repo.

    https://peter-n91.github.io/hve-squad/usage.html


  • Mengine


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Tovuti za mradi (tovuti, hifadhi, na URL za kupakua) LAZIMA zisaidie HTTPS kwa kutumia TLS. [sites_https]
    Hii inahitaji kwamba URL ya ukurasa wa nyumbani wa mradi na URL ya hifadhi ya udhibiti wa toleo vianze na "https:", si "http:". Unaweza kupata vyeti vya bure kutoka Let's Encrypt. Miradi YAWEZA kutekeleza kigezo hiki kwa kutumia (kwa mfano) GitHub pages, GitLab pages, au SourceForge project pages. Ikiwa unasaidia HTTP, tunakuhimiza uelekeze trafiki ya HTTP kwenda HTTPS.

    Given only https: URLs.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na taratibu moja au zaidi za majadiliano (ikiwa ni pamoja na mabadiliko yaliyopendekezwa na masuala) yenye utafutaji, inaruhusu ujumbe na mada kuelekezwa kwa URL, inaruhusu watu wapya kushiriki katika baadhi ya majadiliano, na haihitaji usakinishaji wa upande wa mteja wa programu ya kibinafsi. [discussion]
    Mifano ya taratibu zinazokubalika ni pamoja na orodha za barua pepe zilizohifadhiwa, majadiliano ya suala la GitHub na ombi la kuvuta, Bugzilla, Mantis, na Trac. Taratibu za majadiliano yasiyo ya wakati mmoja (kama IRC) zinakubaliwa ikiwa zinakidhi vigezo hivi; hakikisha kuna utaratibu wa kuhifadhi unaoelekezwa kwa URL. JavaScript ya kibinafsi, ingawa haikubalika, inaruhusiwa.

    GitHub supports discussions on issues and pull requests.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi UNAPASWA kutoa nyaraka kwa Kiingereza na uweze kukubali ripoti za hitilafu na maoni kuhusu msimbo kwa Kiingereza. [english]
    Kiingereza kwa sasa ni lingua franca ya teknolojia ya kompyuta; kusaidia Kiingereza huongeza idadi ya wasanidi na wakaguzi tofauti wa uwezekano duniani kote. Mradi unaweza kukidhi kigezo hiki hata ikiwa lugha ya msingi ya wasanidi wake wakuu si Kiingereza.

    The full documentation is under Github pages and in english

    https://peter-n91.github.io/hve-squad


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utunzwe. [maintained]
    Kama kiwango cha chini, mradi unapaswa kujaribu kujibu ripoti za tatizo muhimu na udhaifu. Mradi unaofuata kwa bidii nishani pengine unatengenezwa. Miradi yote na watu wana rasilimali zilizowekewa mipaka, na miradi ya kawaida lazima ikatae baadhi ya mabadiliko yaliyopendekezwa, hivyo rasilimali zilizowekewa mipaka na kukataa mapendekezo sio ishara ya mradi usiotekelezwa.

    Mradi unapojua kwamba hautatengenezwa tena, unapaswa kuweka kigezo hiki kama "Haikidhi" na utumie utaratibu sahihi ili kuwaonyesha wengine kwamba hautengenezwi. Kwa mfano, tumia "DEPRECATED" kama kichwa cha kwanza cha README yake, ongeza "DEPRECATED" karibu na mwanzo wa ukurasa wake wa nyumbani, ongeza "DEPRECATED" mwanzoni mwa maelezo ya mradi wa hifadhi ya msimbo, ongeza nishani isiyolindwa katika README yake na/au ukurasa wa nyumbani, iweke kama iliyolemewa katika hifadhi yoyote ya kifurushi (k.m., npm deprecate), na/au utumie mfumo wa alama wa hifadhi ya msimbo ili kuihifadhi (k.m., mpangilio wa "archive" wa GitHub, alama ya "archived" ya GitLab, hali ya "readonly" ya Gerrit, au hali ya mradi wa "abandoned" wa SourceForge). Majadiliano ya ziada yanaweza kupatikana hapa.

    There are several workflows used to make sure everything is maintained even some testing workflows that validate that what is being implemented and merged didn't break anything (Always called before official release)

    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/actions


 Udhibiti wa Mabadiliko 9/9 ●

  • Hifadhi ya chanzo ya kudhibiti toleo ya hadharani


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na hifadhi ya chanzo ya kudhibiti toleo ambayo inaweza kusomwa hadharani na ina URL. [repo_public]
    URL YAWEZA kuwa sawa na URL ya mradi. Mradi YAWEZA kutumia matawi ya faragha (yasiyo ya umma) katika hali maalum wakati mabadiliko hayajatolewa hadharani (k.m., kwa kurekebisha udhaifu kabla haujafichuliwa kwa umma).

    Repository on GitHub, which provides public git repositories with URLs.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Hifadhi ya chanzo ya mradi LAZIMA ifuatilie mabadiliko yaliyofanywa, nani alifanya mabadiliko, na mabadiliko yalifanywa lini. [repo_track]

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git can track the changes, who made them, and when they were made.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ili kuwezesha ukaguzi wa ushirikiano, hifadhi ya chanzo ya mradi LAZIMA ijumuishe matoleo ya kati kwa ukaguzi kati ya matoleo; HAIPASWA kujumuisha matoleo ya mwisho tu. [repo_interim]
    Miradi YAWEZA kuchagua kuondoa matoleo maalum ya kati kutoka hifadhi zao za chanzo za umma (k.m., zile zinazorekebi udhaifu maalum usiokuwa wa umma, huenda zisitolewe hadharani, au zijumuishe nyenzo ambazo haziwezi kuwekwa kisheria na haziko katika toleo la mwisho).

    There is a pre-release process that creates a pre-release tag of what is being merged to main but the official release stays intact. Like the current situation, we are at v0.16.1 but the pre-release is at v0.16.2-pre
    Users can always use the pre-release if they wish to but it is always better to use the latest one as it is tested.

    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/tags
    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/releases


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INASHAURIWA kwamba programu ya kawaida ya udhibiti wa toleo iliyosambazwa itumike (k.m., git) kwa hifadhi ya chanzo ya mradi. [repo_distributed]
    Git haihitajiki kihususa na miradi inaweza kutumia programu ya udhibiti wa toleo iliyokusanyika (kama subversion) na sababu.

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git is distributed.


  • Unambari wa toleo wa kipekee


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Matokeo ya mradi LAZIMA yawe na kitambulisho cha kipekee cha toleo kwa kila toleo linalokusudiwa kutumiwa na watumiaji. [version_unique]
    Hii YAWEZA kukidhi kwa njia mbalimbali ikiwa ni pamoja na vitambulisho vya kuwasilisha (kama kitambulisho cha kuwasilisha cha git au kitambulisho cha seti ya mabadiliko cha mercurial) au nambari ya toleo (ikiwa ni pamoja na nambari za toleo zinazotumia uainishaji wa maana au mipango ya tarehe kama YYYYMMDD).

    Releases and tags are unique for each release and changelog explains what changes.

    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/tags
    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/releases
    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INASHAURIWA kwamba muundo wa nambari ya toleo ya Semantic Versioning (SemVer) au Calendar Versioning (CalVer) itumike kwa matoleo. INASHAURIWA kwamba wale wanaotumia CalVer wajumuishe thamani ya kiwango cha mdogo. [version_semver]
    Miradi kwa ujumla inapaswa kupendelea muundo wowote unaotarajiwa na watumiaji wao, k.m., kwa sababu ni muundo wa kawaida unaotumiwa na ikolojia yao. Ikolojia nyingi zinapendelea SemVer, na SemVer kwa ujumla hupendelewa kwa kiolesura cha programu ya programu (API) na zana za maendeleo ya programu (SDK). CalVer hutumiwa na miradi ambayo ni kubwa, ina idadi kubwa ya utegemezi ulioundwa kwa uhuru, ina upeo wa mara kwa mara unaobadilika, au ni ya muda muhimu. INASHAURIWA kwamba wale wanaotumia CalVer wajumuishe thamani ya kiwango cha mdogo, kwa sababu kujumuisha kiwango cha mdogo kunasaidia matawi yaliyotunzwa kwa wakati mmoja wakati wowote hilo linakuwa lazima. Miundo mingine ya nambari ya toleo inaweza kutumiwa kama nambari za toleo, ikiwa ni pamoja na vitambulisho vya kuwasilisha cha git au vitambulisho vya seti ya mabadiliko cha mercurial, mradi tu vikitambulisha matoleo kwa kipekee. Hata hivyo, baadhi ya mbadala (kama vitambulisho vya kuwasilisha cha git) vinaweza kusababisha matatizo kama vitambulisho vya toleo, kwa sababu watumiaji huenda wasiwe na uwezo wa kuamua kwa urahisi ikiwa wako na toleo la hivi karibuni. Muundo wa kitambulisho cha toleo unaweza kutokuwa wa maana kwa kutambulisha matoleo ya programu ikiwa wapokeaji wote wanaendesha toleo la hivi karibuni tu (k.m., ni msimbo wa tovuti moja au huduma ya mtandao ambayo inasasishwa mara kwa mara kupitia utoaji wa kuendelea).

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INASHAURIWA kwamba miradi itambulishe kila toleo ndani ya mfumo wao wa udhibiti wa toleo. Kwa mfano, INASHAURIWA kwamba wale wanaotumia git watambulishe kila toleo kwa kutumia lebo za git. [version_tags]

    Tags are used https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/tags


  • Maelezo ya kutolewa


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe, katika kila toleo, maelezo ya toleo ambayo ni muhtasari unaosomeka na binadamu wa mabadiliko makuu katika toleo hilo ili kuwasaidia watumiaji kuamua ikiwa wanapaswa kusasisha na athari ya kusasisha itakuwa nini. Maelezo ya toleo LAZIMA yasiwe matokeo ghafi ya kumbukumbu ya udhibiti wa toleo (k.m., matokeo ya amri ya "git log" si maelezo ya toleo). Miradi ambayo matokeo yake hayakusudiwa kutumika tena katika maeneo mengi (kama programu kwa tovuti moja au huduma) NA wanaotumia utoaji wa kuendelea WAWEZA kuchagua "N/A". (URL inahitajika) [release_notes]
    Maelezo ya toleo YAWEZA kutekelezwa kwa njia mbalimbali. Miradi mingi hutoa katika faili inayoitwa "NEWS", "CHANGELOG", au "ChangeLog", kwa hiari na viendelezi kama ".txt", ".md", au ".html". Kihistoria neno "change log" lilimaanisha kumbukumbu ya kila mabadiliko, lakini ili kukidhi vigezo hivi kinachohitajika ni muhtasari unaosomeka na binadamu. Maelezo ya toleo YAWEZA badala yake kutolewa na taratibu za mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo kama mtiririko wa Matoleo ya GitHub.

    Non-trivial release notes file in repository: https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Maelezo ya toleo LAZIMA yatambulishe kila udhaifu wa muda wa kutekeleza uliojulikana hadharani uliorekebishwa katika toleo hili ambao tayari ulikuwa na mgawanyo wa CVE au sawa wakati toleo lilipobuniwa. Kigezo hiki kinaweza kuwekwa alama kama haihusiki (N/A) ikiwa watumiaji kwa kawaida hawawezi kwa vitendo kusasisha programu wao wenyewe (k.m., kama inavyokuwa kweli mara nyingi kwa masasisho ya kernel). Kigezo hiki kinatumika tu kwa matokeo ya mradi, si kwa utegemezi wake. Ikiwa hakuna maelezo ya toleo au hakujawa na udhaifu uliojulikana hadharani, chagua N/A. [release_notes_vulns]
    Kigezo hiki kinawasaidia watumiaji kuamua ikiwa sasisho fulani litarekebisha udhaifu ambao unajulikana hadharani, ili kuwasaidia watumiaji kufanya uamuzi wa habari kuhusu kusasisha. Ikiwa watumiaji kwa kawaida hawawezi kwa vitendo kusasisha programu wao wenyewe kwenye kompyuta zao, lakini badala yake lazima wategemee wapatanishi mmoja au zaidi kutekeleza sasisho (kama inavyokuwa mara nyingi kwa kernel na programu ya kiwango cha chini ambayo imefungwa na kernel), mradi unaweza kuchagua "haihusiki" (N/A) badala yake, kwani habari hii ya ziada haitakuwa ya msaada kwa watumiaji hao. Vivyo hivyo, mradi unaweza kuchagua N/A ikiwa wapokeaji wote wanaendesha toleo la hivi karibuni tu (k.m., ni msimbo wa tovuti moja au huduma ya mtandao ambayo inasasishwa mara kwa mara kupitia utoaji wa kuendelea). Kigezo hiki kinatumika tu kwa matokeo ya mradi, si kwa utegemezi wake. Kuorodhesha udhaifu wa utegemezi wote wa mpito wa mradi unakuwa mgumu kadiri utegemezi unavyoongezeka na kutofautiana, na haihitajiki kwani zana zinazochunguza na kufuatilia utegemezi zinaweza kufanya hivi kwa njia inayopanuka.

    release notes file in repository: https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md.


 Kuripoti 8/8 ●

  • Mchakato wa kuripoti hitilafu


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe mchakato kwa watumiaji kuwasilisha ripoti za hitilafu (k.m., kwa kutumia kifuatiliaji cha masuala au orodha ya barua pepe). (URL inahitajika) [report_process]

    Bug reports are submitted through the GitHub issue tracker at https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/issues, which is open to the public and requires only a GitHub account. A structured Bug report form at .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml collects the installed version, the Copilot host, expected against actual behaviour, reproduction steps, and optional squad state. The "Reporting a bug" section of CONTRIBUTING.md documents the process and the two exceptions: security vulnerabilities go privately through GitHub Security Advisories as described in SECURITY.md, and defects in upstream microsoft/hve-core assets are directed to that repository. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml surfaces both routes directly in the issue-creation chooser.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi UNAPASWA kutumia kifuatiliaji cha masuala kwa kufuatilia masuala ya mtu binafsi. [report_tracker]

    Some of the issues can be labeled to squad/auto and have the squad itself handle them. The history of the squad member will be saved under .copilot-tracking


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uthibitishe wengi wa ripoti za hitilafu zilizowasilishwa katika miezi 2-12 iliyopita (ikiwemo); jibu halihitaji kuwa na marekebisho. [report_responses]

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi UNAPASWA kujibu wengi (>50%) wa maombi ya maboresho katika miezi 2-12 iliyopita (ikiwemo). [enhancement_responses]
    Jibu LIWEZA kuwa 'hapana' au majadiliano kuhusu manufaa yake. Lengo ni kwamba kuwe na jibu fulani kwa baadhi ya maombi, ambayo inaonyesha kwamba mradi bado unaishi. Kwa madhumuni ya kigezo hiki, miradi haihitaji kuhesabu maombi ya bandia (k.m., kutoka kwa wafanyabiashara haramu au mifumo ya kiotomatiki). Ikiwa mradi hauendelei kufanya maboresho tena, tafadhali chagua "haijatimizwa" na jumuisha URL inayofanya hali hii kuwa wazi kwa watumiaji. Ikiwa mradi huwa na msongo wa maombi ya maboresho, tafadhali chagua "haijatimizwa" na eleza.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na kumbukumbu inayopatikana hadharani kwa ripoti na majibu kwa utaftaji wa baadaye. (URL inahitajika) [report_archive]

    Reports and responses are archived publicly in the GitHub issue tracker at https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/issues?q=is%3Aissue, which lists open and closed issues together. The archive is readable without a GitHub account, is indexed by GitHub's full-text search across titles, bodies, and comments, and every issue and comment has a stable, permanently addressable URL. It currently holds 16 issues, 15 of them closed with the discussion and resolution intact, alongside 82 pull requests at https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/pulls?q=is%3Apr, where most defect fixes are discussed and linked back to the issue they close. Nothing is deleted on closure, so the reasoning behind a past fix stays retrievable.


  • Mchakato wa kuripoti udhaifu


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uchapishe mchakato wa kuripoti udhaifu kwenye tovuti ya mradi. (URL inahitajika) [vulnerability_report_process]
    Miradi iliyohifadhiwa kwenye GitHub INAPASWA kuzingatia kuwezesha kuripoti udhaifu wa usalama kwa faragha. Miradi kwenye GitLab INAPASWA kuzingatia kutumia uwezo wake wa kuripoti udhaifu kwa faragha. Miradi YAWEZA kutambulisha anwani ya barua pepe kwenye https://PROJECTSITE/security, mara nyingi katika muundo wa security@example.org. Mchakato huu wa kuripoti udhaifu UWEZA kuwa sawa na mchakato wake wa kuripoti hitilafu. Ripoti za udhaifu ZIWEZA kuwa za umma kila wakati, lakini miradi mingi ina utaratibu wa kuripoti udhaifu wa faragha.

    All vulnerabilities will be shown under this tab and handled by contributors

    https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/security/code-scanning


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ikiwa ripoti za udhaifu wa faragha zinasaidiwa, mradi LAZIMA ujumuishe jinsi ya kutuma habari kwa njia ambayo inawekwa faragha. (URL inahitajika) [vulnerability_report_private]
    Mifano ni pamoja na ripoti ya kasoro ya faragha iliyowasilishwa kwenye wavuti kwa kutumia HTTPS (TLS) au barua pepe iliyosimbwa kwa kutumia OpenPGP. Ikiwa ripoti za udhaifu ni za umma kila wakati (kwa hiyo hakuna ripoti za udhaifu za faragha), chagua "haihusiki" (N/A).

    Private vulnerability reports are supported through GitHub Security Advisories at https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad/security/advisories/new. Private vulnerability reporting is enabled on the repository, so any GitHub user can open a report that is visible only to the reporter and the maintainer until an advisory is published. Submission is over HTTPS. The process is documented in SECURITY.md, which states explicitly that vulnerabilities must not be filed as public issues, lists what to include (affected version or commit, component, reproduction steps, observed impact, suggested mitigation), and commits to acknowledgement within 5 business days and a status update within 10. The same private route is surfaced in the issue-creation chooser through .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml and in the Bug report template, so a reporter who starts down the public path is redirected before disclosing anything.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Muda wa majibu ya awali ya mradi kwa ripoti yoyote ya udhaifu iliyopokelewa katika miezi 6 iliyopita LAZIMA uwe chini ya au sawa na siku 14. [vulnerability_report_response]
    Ikiwa hakujawa na udhaifu ulioripotiwa katika miezi 6 iliyopita, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A).

    All vulnerabilities were treated in a single day.


 Ubora 13/13 ●

  • Mfumo wa ujenzi unaofanya kazi


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ikiwa programu iliyotengenezwa na mradi inahitaji ujenzi wa matumizi, mradi LAZIMA utoe mfumo wa kujenga ambao unaweza kujenga programu kiotomatiki kutoka kwa chanzo-msimbo. [build]
    Mfumo wa kujenga huamua ni hatua gani zinahitaji kutendeka ili kujenga tena programu (na kwa mpangilio gani), na kisha kutekeleza hatua hizo. Kwa mfano, inaweza kuomba kikusanyaji kukusanya fumbo-chanzo. Ikiwa inayoweza kutekelezwa imeundwa kutoka kwa fumbo-chanzo, lazima iwezeshe marekebisho kwenye fumbo-chanzo ya mradi na kisha itengeneze msasisho inayoweza kutekelezwa na marekebisho hayo. Ikiwa programu iliyotolewa na mradi unategemea maktaba ya nje, mfumo wa kujenga haina haja ya kujenga maktaba hizo za nje. Ikiwa hakuna haja ya kujenga chochote kutumia programu baada ya fumbo-chanzo kubadilishwa, chagua "haitumiki" (N / A).

    The build is automated in PowerShell and driven from CI. scripts/Build-SquadPlugin.ps1 deterministically assembles the distributable Copilot CLI plugin from the squad-src/ tree and is invoked by .github/workflows/publish-plugin.yml on every release tag; it can also be run locally as a manual fallback. scripts/Update-ApmDependencies.ps1 regenerates the apm.yml dependency manifest and apm.lock.yaml from source, and .github/workflows/pr-validation.yml re-runs it on every pull request to verify the checked-in manifest matches what the build produces. Modifying source under squad-src/ and re-running either script yields updated artifacts with no manual steps. External dependencies (microsoft/hve-core) are fetched at install time by APM and are not rebuilt here.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kuwa zana za kawaida zitumike kujenga programu. [build_common_tools]
    Kwa mfano, Maven, Ant, cmake, autotools, make, rake (Ruby), au devtools (R).

    The build uses PowerShell 7 (pwsh), a widely adopted cross-platform build and automation tool, rather than a project-specific build system. Named build targets are declared in the scripts: section of apm.yml (sync-deps, install-sync, change, release-prep), which serves the same role as make targets and gives contributors a single documented entry point per task. The APM CLI performs dependency resolution and installation, and GitHub Actions orchestrates the build in CI. All of these are standard, off-the-shelf tools; the project defines no custom build engine or DSL.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi UNAPASWA kujengwa kwa kutumia zana za FLOSS pekee yake. [build_floss_tools]

    Every tool in the build chain is FLOSS. The build scripts run on PowerShell 7 (MIT), dependency resolution and installation use the APM CLI (microsoft/apm, MIT), source and ref handling uses Git (GPL-2.0), the plugin packaging path uses Node.js and npm (MIT / Artistic-2.0), and release automation uses the GitHub CLI (MIT). No proprietary compiler, SDK, or build tool is required. The build is not Windows-dependent: PowerShell 7 is cross-platform and CI executes the same scripts on Ubuntu runners, so a contributor can reproduce the full build on a Linux machine using only free/libre software.


  • Seti ya majaribio otomatiki


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utumie angalau seti moja ya majaribio ya kiotomatiki ambayo imetolewa hadharani kama FLOSS (seti hii ya majaribio inaweza kutunzwa kama mradi tofauti wa FLOSS). Mradi LAZIMA uonyeshe wazi au uandike jinsi ya kuendesha seti za majaribio (k.m., kupitia hati ya uingizaji wa kuendelea (CI) au kupitia nyaraka katika faili kama BUILD.md, README.md, au CONTRIBUTING.md). [test]
    Mradi YAWEZA kutumia seti nyingi za majaribio ya kiotomatiki (k.m., moja inayoendesha haraka, dhidi ya nyingine ambayo ni ya kina zaidi lakini inahitaji vifaa maalum). Kuna mifumo mingi ya majaribio na mifumo ya kusaidia majaribio inayopatikana, ikiwemo Selenium (uendeshaji kiotomatiki wa kivinjari cha wavuti), Junit (JVM, Java), RUnit (R), testthat (R).

    The project uses Pester 5.7.1 (Apache-2.0), a FLOSS test framework for PowerShell, across three automated suites in tests/: Tier 0 conformance (tests/tier0/) validates the package manifest and shipped asset structure, Tier 1 behavior (tests/tier1/) validates the squad state contract and coordinator assertions against recorded scenarios, and Tier 2 semantic (tests/tier2/) compares live squad runs against stored baselines. Each tier has a runner script (Invoke-Tier0Tests.ps1, Invoke-Tier1Tests.ps1, Invoke-Tier2Tests.ps1) that can be executed locally with pwsh. All three run in CI on every pull request via .github/workflows/tier0-conformance.yml, tier1-behavior.yml, and tier2-semantic.yml, which document the exact install and invocation steps. The test suites and their fixtures are MIT-licensed as part of this repository.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Seti ya majaribio INAPASWA kuwa inaweza kuitwa kwa njia ya kawaida kwa lugha hiyo. [test_invocation]
    Kwa mfano, "make check", "mvn test", au "rake test" (Ruby).

    Tests are invoked in the standard way for PowerShell. Each suite is executed through Invoke-Pester with New-PesterConfiguration, the conventional Pester entry point, wrapped in a per-tier runner script (tests/tier0/Invoke-Tier0Tests.ps1 and equivalents for Tier 1 and Tier 2). The wrappers are required because the suites are parameterised through New-PesterContainer -Data, so they cannot be discovered by a bare Invoke-Pester call. A single-command entry point is also declared as the test target in the scripts: section of apm.yml, so apm run test runs the fast conformance suite in the same way make check would. CI invokes the same runner scripts, so local and CI invocation are identical.


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba seti ya majaribio ifuate wengi (au kwa kawaida wote) matawi ya msimbo, sehemu za kuingiza, na utendakazi. [test_most]

    Coverage is substantial for the shipped asset package but not yet comprehensive, and it is not measured. The suite implements 122 assertions across three tiers, each traced to a numbered case in tests/squad-behavior-contract.md that cites the source file stating the rule, spanning package conformance, routing, gates, state contract, governance, and semantic comparison. Two known gaps remain and are documented in that contract rather than glossed over: no Tier 1 scenario exercises autopilot mode, and the PowerShell build and release scripts under scripts/ have no unit tests. Code coverage is not currently instrumented via Pester's CodeCoverage configuration, so no percentage can be cited. Planned improvements are an autopilot scenario, Pester unit tests for the build scripts, and enabling coverage reporting in CI.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba mradi utekeleze ujumuishaji wendeleo (ambapo msimbo mpya au uliobadiishwa unajumuishwa mara kwa mara katika hifadhi ya msimbo ya kati na majaribio otomatiki hufanyika kwenye matokeo). [test_continuous_integration]

    The project practises continuous integration against a single central repository. All changes land on main through squash-merged pull requests, with 103 commits integrated in the last 30 days, and branches are short-lived. Every pull request triggers automated validation in GitHub Actions: .github/workflows/tier0-conformance.yml installs the package the branch would deliver and runs the Pester static conformance suite against it, and .github/workflows/pr-validation.yml verifies release state and change-fragment hygiene. Security analysis runs on the same trigger through CodeQL, Zizmor, Checkov, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The same Tier 0 workflow is reused as the release gate via workflow_call, so the check that guards a merge is the check that guards a tag. Merged work is rebuilt onto a rolling pre-release tag within minutes, keeping the integrated state continuously installable and testable.


  • Upimaji wa utendaji mpya


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na sera ya jumla (rasmi au la) kwamba utendakazi mkubwa mpya unavyoongezwa kwenye programu inayotengenezwa na mradi, majaribio ya utendakazi huo unapaswa kuongezwa kwenye seti ya majaribio otomatiki. [test_policy]
    Mradi uwe na sera tu, hata kwa maneno ya mdomo, inayosema wasanidi programu wanapaswa kuongeza majaribio kwenye seti ya majaribio otomatiki kwa utendakazi mkubwa mpya, chagua "Kukidhi."

    The policy is documented in the "Automated tests" section of CONTRIBUTING.md: major new functionality must come with tests. A pull request adding a new agent, routing rule, gate, or any consumer-observable behavior is expected to add or extend a case in the automated suite. Documentation, wording fixes, and behavior-preserving refactors are exempt, and a maintainer may waive the requirement for behavior that cannot be asserted without a live model run, stating so on the pull request. The policy is enforced at review time through a Tests checklist in the pull request template, which asks the contributor to confirm the case was added, declared in tests/squad-behavior-contract.md with a citation to the source file stating the rule, and that apm run test passed locally.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na ushahidi kwamba test_policy ya kuongeza majaribio imefuatwa katika mabadiliko makubwa ya hivi karibuni kwenye programu inayotengenezwa na mradi. [tests_are_added]
    Utendakazi mkubwa kawaida ungetajwa katika maelezo ya toleo. Ukamilifu hauhitajiki, ni ushahidi tu kwamba majaribio kawaida huongezwa kimakosa kwenye seti ya majaribio otomatiki utendakazi mkubwa mpya unavyoongezwa kwenye programu inayotengenezwa na mradi.

    The automated suite was introduced on 2026-08-20 and the policy has been followed since. Of the sixteen changes merged after that date, ten added or extended test cases. Every change to squad behavior shipped a regression case traced to a numbered entry in tests/squad-behavior-contract.md: PR #79 (state records survive on every host, 5 test files), #81 (Scribe line-number leakage, 3), #82 (Deliverable Root binding, 5), #83 (deliverable path truncation, 4), #84 and #85 (ledger arithmetic and turn accumulation, 3 and 4), #87 (Init floor record, 2), and #89 (dispatch-backed ledger rows, 3). The most recent feature work, PR #86, added four test files alongside the behavior change. Changes merged without tests are confined to build and release workflow fixes (#92, #93, #94), which sit outside the suite's scope of asserting the shipped asset package.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba sera hii ya kuongeza majaribio (angalia test_policy) iwe imeandikwa katika maelekezo ya mapendekezo ya mabadiliko. [tests_documented_added]
    Hata hivyo, hata sheria isiyo rasmi inakubaliwa mradi majaribio yaongezwe kimakosa.

    The policy is documented in the instructions for change proposals in two places. CONTRIBUTING.md carries an "Automated tests" section stating that major new functionality must come with tests, naming the exemptions (documentation, wording fixes, behavior-preserving refactors) and the maintainer waiver for behavior that cannot be asserted without a live model run. It also explains the three test tiers, how to run each locally, and the required Pester version. The pull request template at .github/pull_request_template.md is injected into every pull request description and includes a Tests checklist asking the contributor to confirm that a case was added or extended, that it was declared in tests/squad-behavior-contract.md with a citation to the source file stating the rule, and that apm run test passed locally. Contributors therefore see the policy both before and during change proposal.


  • Bendera za maonyo


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwashe bendera moja au zaidi za onyo la mkusanyaji, hali ya lugha "salama", au tumia zana tofauti ya "linter" kutafuta makosa ya ubora wa msimbo au makosa rahisi ya kawaida, ikiwa kuna angalau zana moja ya FLOSS inaweza kutekeleza kigezo hiki katika lugha iliyochaguliwa. [warnings]
    Mifano ya bendera za onyo la mkusanyaji ni pamoja na gcc/clang "-Wall". Mifano ya hali ya lugha "salama" ni pamoja na JavaScript "use strict" na perl5's "use warnings". Zana tofauti ya "linter" ni zana tu inayoangalia msimbo wa chanzo kutafuta makosa ya ubora wa msimbo au makosa rahisi ya kawaida. Hizi kawaida huwashwa ndani ya msimbo wa chanzo au maelekezo ya ujenzi.

    The project uses PSScriptAnalyzer, the standard FLOSS linter for PowerShell, over scripts/ and tests/, which together contain all executable code the repository authors. It runs on every pull request and push to main via .github/workflows/lint-powershell.yml, blocks the build on Error-severity findings, and publishes all findings as SARIF to the GitHub Security tab. Rule configuration lives in PSScriptAnalyzerSettings.psd1 at the repository root, so contributors get identical results in VS Code and in CI; the two excluded rules each carry a written justification in that file. In addition, the build scripts and test runners set Set-StrictMode -Version Latest and $ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop', PowerShell's equivalent of a safe language mode. Three further FLOSS analysers run on the same trigger: CodeQL for Python, Zizmor for GitHub Actions workflows, and Checkov for infrastructure-as-code.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA ukabiliane na maonyo. [warnings_fixed]
    Haya ni maonyo yaliyotambuliwa na utekelezaji wa kigezo cha warnings. Mradi unapaswa kurekebisha maonyo au kuyaweka alama katika msimbo wa chanzo kama hasi za uwongo. Kwa kawaida pasingeweza kuwa na maonyo, lakini mradi YAWEZA kukubali baadhi ya maonyo (kawaida chini ya onyo 1 kwa mistari 100 au chini ya maonyo 10).

    All PSScriptAnalyzer findings are addressed. Actionable findings were fixed rather than suppressed: five empty catch blocks now record why the failure is deliberately ignored, seven inconsistent pipeline continuations were realigned, and a line-numbering loop that relied on a cross-scriptblock counter was rewritten. Findings that are genuine false positives are marked in the source with [Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.SuppressMessageAttribute] carrying a written justification; these cover parameters PSScriptAnalyzer cannot resolve across Pester's separate discovery and run scopes, and a parameter-set selector consumed through $PSCmdlet.ParameterSetName. Two rules are excluded repository-wide in PSScriptAnalyzerSettings.psd1, each with a documented reason: PSAvoidUsingWriteHost, because these are interactive CLI scripts whose console output is the intended behaviour, and PSUseBOMForUnicodeEncodedFile, because every script begins with a #!/usr/bin/env pwsh shebang that a byte-order mark would break on the Linux runners CI uses. The remaining 22 findings are all Warning or Information severity across 5,506 lines of PowerShell, a rate of 0.40 per 100 lines, and none is Error severity. The CI gate blocks the build on Error severity.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba miradi iwe na ukali mkubwa sana na maonyo katika programu inayotengenezwa na mradi, ambapo ni ya vitendo. [warnings_strict]
    Baadhi ya maonyo hayawezi kuwashwa kwa ufanisi kwenye miradi fulani. Kinachohitajika ni ushahidi kwamba mradi unajitahidi kuwasha bendera za onyo ambapo inaweza, ili makosa yagundulika mapema.

    The project enables strict checking wherever it is practical. PSScriptAnalyzer runs with IncludeDefaultRules = $true and reports at all three severities (Error, Warning, Information) rather than errors alone, so nothing is filtered out before a human sees it. Only two rules are excluded repository-wide, each with a written justification in PSScriptAnalyzerSettings.psd1, and individual false positives are marked at the call site rather than by broadening those exclusions. Every script and module additionally runs under Set-StrictMode -Version Latest, PowerShell's strictest language mode, which turns references to uninitialized variables, non-existent properties, and malformed method calls into terminating errors, combined with $ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop' so no error is silently swallowed. Three further analysers run at their default full rule sets on every pull request: CodeQL for Python, Zizmor for GitHub Actions workflows, and Checkov for infrastructure-as-code, with Checkov configured as blocking and accepted findings requiring a justified inline checkov:skip.


 Usalama 16/16 ●

  • Maarifa ya maendeleo yenye usalama


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na angalau msanidi mmoja mkuu anayejua jinsi ya kuunda programu salama. (Angalia 'maelezo' kwa mahitaji halisi.) [know_secure_design]
    Hii inahitaji kuelewa kanuni zifuatazo za muundo, ikiwa ni pamoja na kanuni 8 kutoka Saltzer na Schroeder:
    • uchumi wa utaratibu (weka muundo kuwa rahisi na mdogo iwezekanavyo, k.m., kwa kupitisha urahisishaji wa kufunga)
    • mipangilio ya kuzuia makosa (maamuzi ya kuingia yanapaswa kukataa kwa chaguo-msingi, na usakinishaji wa miradi unapaswa kuwa salama kwa chaguo-msingi)
    • kikuu cha kati kikamilifu (kuingia kote kunaweza kuwekwa kikomo lazima kufanyiwa ukaguzi wa mamlaka na kutowezesha kuvukwa)
    • muundo wazi (taratibu za usalama hazipaswi kutegemea ujinga wa mshambuliaji wa muundo wake, lakini badala yake kwenye habari iliyolindwa na kubadilishwa kwa urahisi kama funguo na nywila)
    • kutenganisha kwa upendeleo (kwa kawaida, ufikiaji kwa vitu muhimu unapaswa kutegemea zaidi ya sharti moja, ili kushinda mfumo mmoja wa ulinzi hautawasha ufikiaji kamili. K.m., uthibitishaji wa vipengele vingi, kama vile kuhitaji nywila na ishara za vifaa, ni imara zaidi kuliko uthibitishaji wa kipengele kimoja)
    • upendeleo mdogo zaidi (michakato inapaswa kufanya kazi na upendeleo mdogo zaidi unaohitajika)
    • utaratibu wa kawaida mdogo zaidi (muundo unapaswa kupunguza utaratibu wa kawaida kwa zaidi ya mtumiaji mmoja na kutegemewa na watumiaji wote, k.m., saraka za mafaili ya muda)
    • kukubalika kwa kisaikolojia (kiolesura cha binadamu lazima kiwe kimeundwa kwa urahisi wa matumizi - kuunda kwa "mshangao mdogo" kunaweza kusaidia)
    • uso wa shambulio uliowekewa mipaka (uso wa shambulio - seti ya sehemu tofauti ambapo mshambuliaji anaweza kujaribu kuingia au kutoa data - unapaswa kuwekwa mipaka)
    • uthibitishaji wa ingizo na orodha zinazokubalika (pembejeo kawaida zinapaswa kuangaliwa ili kuamua kama ni halali kabla ya kukubalika; uthibitishaji huu unapaswa kutumia orodha zinazokubalika (zinazokubali tu thamani zinazojulikana-nzuri), siyo orodha zinazokana (zinaozojaribu kuorodhesha thamani zinazojulikana-mbaya)).
    "Msanidi mkuu" katika mradi ni mtu yeyote ambaye anajua msingi wa msimbo wa mradi, ana faraja kufanya mabadiliko kwake, na anatambuliwa hivyo na washiriki wengine wengi katika mradi. Msanidi mkuu kawaida atafanya michango mingi kwa mwaka uliopita (kupitia msimbo, nyaraka, au kujibu maswali). Wasanidi kawaida wangeweza kuchukuliwa wasanidi wakuu ikiwa walianzisha mradi (na hawajatoka kwenye mradi zaidi ya miaka mitatu iliyopita), wana chaguo la kupokea habari kwenye kituo cha kuripoti udhaifu wa kibinafsi (ikiwa kuna), wanaweza kukubali ahadi kwa niaba ya mradi, au kufanya matoleo ya mwisho ya programu ya mradi. Ikiwa kuna msanidi mmoja tu, mtu huyo ndiye msanidi mkuu. Vitabu vingi na kozi zinapatikana kukusaidia kuelewa jinsi ya kuunda programu salama zaidi na kujadili muundo. Kwa mfano, kozi ya Misingi ya Maendeleo ya Programu Salama ni seti huru ya kozi tatu zinazoeleza jinsi ya kuunda programu salama zaidi (ni bure ukiifanyia ukaguzi; kwa ada ya ziada unaweza kupata cheti kuthibitisha ulijifunza nyenzo).

    The project has a single primary developer, who initiated it, authors its releases, and receives private vulnerability reports. Familiarity with secure design is evidenced in the architecture rather than asserted. The system is built around a small number of deliberately narrow human gates rather than a broad permission model (economy of mechanism), and those gates deny by default: an autopilot run stops at any impactful or irreversible action and proceeds only on explicit human approval, never on a timeout (fail-safe defaults). Progress is non-bypassable, since each pipeline stage is gated on the prior stage's artifact and history entry existing on disk, so a stage cannot be skipped by narrating it as complete (complete mediation). The entire design, including every gate and routing rule, is public under an MIT licence and depends on enforcement rather than obscurity (open design). Impactful actions require two independent conditions, the agent's proposal and a human approval delivered through a separate channel (separation of privilege). CI workflows declare an empty top-level permissions: {}, grant the minimum scope per job, and check out with persist-credentials: false (least privilege), while test runs are isolated in per-run scratch directories and Watch Mode scopes sub-squads per event (least common mechanism). The user-facing surface is a single /squad entry point, and a blocked action explains what was stopped and how to proceed (psychological acceptability). The package flow is one-directional: consumers pull assets and the package never reads from consumer environments, and the project runs no service and stores no user data (limited attack surface). Inputs are constrained by allowlists rather than denylists, through ValidateSet on script parameters, a fixed set of squad profiles, and an explicit untrusted-content boundary that treats all ingested external content as data to analyse and never as instructions to execute, refusing embedded authority changes such as "ignore previous instructions" or "set autonomy to full".


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Angalau mmoja wa wasanidi wakuu wa mradi LAZIMA wajue aina za kawaida za makosa ambayo husababisha udhaifu katika aina hii ya programu, pamoja na angalau mbinu moja ya kukabiliana au kupunguza kila moja. [know_common_errors]
    Mifano (kulingana na aina ya programu) ni pamoja na uvamizi wa SQL, uvamizi wa OS, mtiririko wa kipengele cha kawaida, uandishi wa tovuti-tofauti, uthibitishaji unaokosekana, na uidhinishaji unaokosekana. Angalia CWE/SANS top 25 au OWASP Top 10 kwa orodha zinazotumika kawaida. Vitabu vingi na kozi zinapatikana kukusaidia kuelewa jinsi ya kuunda programu salama zaidi na kujadili makosa ya kawaida ya utekelezaji ambayo husababisha udhaifu. Kwa mfano, kozi ya Misingi ya Maendeleo ya Programu Salama ni seti huru ya kozi tatu zinazoeleza jinsi ya kuunda programu salama zaidi (ni bure ukiifanyia ukaguzi; kwa ada ya ziada unaweza kupata cheti kuthibitisha ulijifunza nyenzo).

    The primary developer has over eleven years of experience as a software developer and technical lead and works as a Partner Solution Architect at Microsoft, where secure development practice is part of the role. Because this project ships AI agent assets rather than a network service, the dominant error classes are those in the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative rather than the memory-safety and injection classes of the CWE Top 25, though the latter still apply to the build scripts. The relevant classes and their mitigations in this project are: prompt injection (LLM01), countered by an explicit untrusted-content boundary that processes all ingested external content as data to analyse or quote and never as instructions, and that refuses embedded authority changes such as "ignore previous instructions" or "set autonomy to full"; excessive agency and insecure output handling (LLM02, LLM06), countered by an impactful-action gate that halts any irreversible operation and resumes only on explicit human approval delivered through a separate channel, never on a timeout; supply-chain compromise (LLM03, CWE-1357), countered by pinning every third-party GitHub Action to a full commit SHA, pinning the upstream microsoft/hve-core dependency to a specific commit that only a guarded workflow may move, a resolved apm.lock.yaml, Dependabot updates, and OpenSSF Scorecard analysis; sensitive information disclosure (CWE-200), countered by a mandatory sanitisation checklist on any pull request proposing a shared learning, requiring removal of secrets, customer and individual names, internal URLs, and environment-specific paths, backed by GitHub secret scanning with push protection; CI script injection (CWE-94, CWE-78), countered by Zizmor static analysis of every workflow and by passing untrusted inputs through environment variables rather than interpolating them into shell blocks; path traversal (CWE-22), countered by consistent use of -LiteralPath in file operations; and missing authorization (CWE-862), countered by gates that persist in state.json and advance only on an authorised approval. Familiarity with these classes is further evidenced by the assessment tooling the project ships: security-review-llm.prompt.md drives owasp-llm and owasp-agentic assessments, and the package includes dedicated CVE analysis, dependency review, supply-chain review, and VEX generation agents.


  • Tumia mazoea mazuri ya msingi ya usimbuaji

    Kumbuka kwamba programu fulani haihitaji kutumia taratibu za usimbuaji. Ikiwa mradi wako unazalisha programu ambayo (1) inajumuisha, inaamilisha, au inafanya usimbuaji kuwa hai, na (2) inaweza kutolewa kutoka Marekani (US) kwenda nje ya Marekani au kwa raia asiye wa Marekani, inaweza kuwa ni lazima kisheria kuchukua hatua chache za ziada. Kawaida hii inahusisha tu kutuma barua pepe. Kwa maelezo zaidi, tazama sehemu ya usimbuaji ya Kuelewa Teknolojia ya Chanzo Wazi & Udhibiti wa Usafirishaji wa Marekani.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Programu iliyotengenezwa na mradi LAZIMA itumie, kwa chaguo-msingi, tu itifaki za kriptografia na mifumbo ambazo zimechapishwa hadharani na kukaguliwa na wataalam (ikiwa itifaki za kriptografia na mafumbo imetumika). [crypto_published]
    Vigezo hivi vya kriptografia mara mingi havitumiki kwa sababu programu zingine hazina haja ya kutumia moja kwa moja uwezo wa kriptografia.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ikiwa programu iliyotengenezwa na mradi ni programu au maktaba, na kusudi lake la msingi sio kutekeleza usimbuaji, basi INAPASWA tu kuita programu iliyoundwa kihususa kutekeleza kazi za kielelezo; HAIPASWI kutekeleza-upya shughuli hiyo. [crypto_call]

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Utendaji wote katika programu iliyotengenezwa na mradi ambayo inategemea usimbuaji LAZIMA iweze kutekelezwa kwa kutumia FLOSS. [crypto_floss]
    Tazama Mahitaji ya Viwango wazi ya Programu kupitia Open Source Initiative.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifumo ya usalama ndani ya programu inayozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA itumie kwa msingi keylengths ambazo angalau zinakidhi mahitaji ya chini ya NIST kufikia mwaka wa 2030 (kama ilivyoelezwa mnamo 2012). LAZIMA iwe rahisi kusanidi programu ili keylengths ndogo zimezimwa kabisa. [crypto_keylength]
    Vipimo hivi vya urefu wa charaza ni: symmetric key 112, factoring modulus 2048, discrete logarithm key 224, discrete logarithmic group 2048, elliptic curve 224, na hash 224 (ufichuzi wa nywila haujashughulikiwa kwenye urefu wa charaza hii, maelezo zaidi ya ufichuzi wa nywila yanapatikana ndani ya kigezo cha crypto_password_storage). Ona https://www.keylength.com kwa mliganisho wa mapendekezo ya funguo-refu kutoka mashirika mbali mbali. Programu YAWEZA kubali funguo-refu ndogo katika usanidi (haifai kukubali, maana hii huwacha mashambulizi ya kushusha, lakini funguo-refu fupi wakati mwingine ina manufaa ya upatanifu).

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifumo ya usalama ya chaguo-msingi ndani ya programu inayozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA ISITEGEMEE algoriti zilizovunjika za kriptologia (k.m., MD4, MD5, DES moja, RC4, Dual_EC_DRBG), au kutumia hali za cipher ambazo si sahihi kwa muktadha, isipokuwa ni muhimu kutekeleza itifaki inayoweza kushirikiana (ambapo itifaki iliyotekelezwa ni toleo la hivi karibuni zaidi la kiwango hicho kinachotegemeana sana na mfumo wa mtandao, mfumo huo unahitaji matumizi ya algoriti au hali hiyo, na mfumo huo haupatii chaguo lolote salama zaidi). Nyaraka LAZIMA zieleze hatari zozote za usalama husika na upungufu wowote unaojulikana ikiwa algoriti hizi zilizovunjika au hali ni muhimu kwa itifaki inayoweza kushirikiana. [crypto_working]
    Hali ya ECB ni karibu kamwe haifai kwa sababu inaonyesha block zinazofanana ndani ya ciphertext kama ilivyoonyeshwa na penguin wa ECB, na hali ya CTR mara nyingi si sahihi kwa sababu haifanyi uthibitishaji na husababisha nakala ikiwa hali ya ingizo inarudiwa. Katika hali nyingi ni bora kuchagua hali ya algoriti ya block cipher iliyoundwa kuchanganya siri na uthibitishaji, k.m., Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) na EAX. Miradi YAWEZA kuwaruhusu watumiaji kuwasha taratibu zilizovunjika (k.m., wakati wa usanidi) ambapo ni muhimu kwa upatanifu, lakini hapo watumiaji wanajua wanafanya hivyo.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifumo ya usalama ya chaguo-msingi ndani ya programu inayozalishwa na mradi INAPASWA ISITEGEMEE algoriti za kriptologia au hali zenye udhaifu mkubwa unaojulikana (k.m., algoriti ya hash ya kriptologia ya SHA-1 au hali ya CBC katika SSH). [crypto_weaknesses]
    Wasiwasi kuhusu hali ya CBC katika SSH unajadiliwa katika CERT: SSH CBC vulnerability.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifumo ya usalama ndani ya programu iliyotengenezwa na mradi INAPASWA kutekeleza kwa ukamilifu usiri wa umbele ya itifaki za makubaliano ya funguo ili funguo la kipindi kilicho tokana na kikao cha vifungo muda-mrefu haziwezi kuridhi mabaya ikiwa mojawapo ya vifunguo vya muda-mrefu imeridhi mabaya katika usoni. [crypto_pfs]

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ikiwa programu iliyotengenezwa na mradi imesababisha uhifadhi wa nywila kwa minajili ya uthibitishaji ya watumiaji wa kutoka nje, nywila LAZIMA zihifadhiwe kwa mficho uliorudiarudia na chumvi kwa kila-mtumiaji kwa kutumia kanuni ya upanuaji (rudiarudia) wa funguo (k.m., Argon2id, Bcrypt, Scrypt, or PBKDF2). Ona pia Kurasadogo ya Uhifadhi wa Nywila la OWASP). [crypto_password_storage]
    Kigezo hili linatumika tu wakati programu linatekeleza uthibitishaji wa watumiaji kutumia nywila kwa watumiaji wa nje (ambayo pia ni uthibitishaji unaelekezwa ndani), kama vile programu za tovuti zinazobakia seva). Haitumiki katika visa ambavyo programu inahifadhi nywila ili kudhibitisha ndani ya mifumo mingine (ambayo pia ni ithibitishaji unaelekezwa nje, k.m., programu inatekeleza teja la mfumo lingineyo), maana angalau sehemu za programu lazima ziwe na njia ya kupata hiyo nywila isigalifichwa.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifumo ya usalama ndani ya programu iliyotengenezwa na mradi LAZIMA itoe funguo zote za kriptologia na nonces kwa kutumia kitengeneza cha nambari za bahati kuptia kriptologia salama, na ISIWEZE kufanya hivo kutumia vitengenezi zisizo salama kikriptologia. [crypto_random]
    Kitengeneza cha nambari za bahati nasibu za kriptologia salama kinaweza kuwa kitengeneza cha nambari za bahati nasibu za vifaa, au kinaweza kuwa kitengeneza cha nambari za bahati nasibu za kriptologia salama (CSPRNG) kwa kutumia algoriti kama vile Hash_DRBG, HMAC_DRBG, CTR_DRBG, Yarrow, au Fortuna. Mifano ya simu kwa vitengeneza cha nambari za bahati nasibu salama ni pamoja na java.security.SecureRandom ya Java na window.crypto.getRandomValues ya JavaScript. Mifano ya simu kwa vitengeneza cha nambari za bahati nasibu zisizo salama ni pamoja na java.util.Random ya Java na Math.random ya JavaScript.

  • Utoaji salama dhidi ya mashambulizi ya mtu-katikati (MITM)


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utumie utaratibu wa utoaji ambao unakabiliana na mashambulizi ya MITM. Kutumia https au ssh+scp ni inakubaliwa. [delivery_mitm]
    Utaratibu wenye nguvu zaidi ni kutoa programu na vifurushi vilivyosainiwa kidigitali, kwa kuwa hiyo inapunguza mashambulizi kwenye mfumo wa usambazaji, lakini hii inafanya kazi tu ikiwa watumiaji wanaweza kuwa na uhakika kwamba funguo za umma kwa saini ni sahihi na ikiwa watumiaji watakagua saini kweli kweli.

    Distribution channels use HTTPS exclusively. [osps_br_03_02]


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Hash ya kriptologia (k.m., sha1sum) LAZIMA ISICHUKULIWE kupitia http na kutumika bila kuangalia saini ya kriptologia. [delivery_unsigned]
    Hash hizi zinaweza kurekebishwa wakati wa usafiri.

    The project never retrieves a cryptographic hash, over HTTP or otherwise, so there is no hash whose integrity could depend on an unauthenticated channel. No file in the repository contains an http:// URL, and no build script or workflow invokes curl, wget, Invoke-WebRequest, Invoke-RestMethod, or any other direct download mechanism. All external content is fetched by established tools over HTTPS: git for source, the APM CLI for package dependencies, npm for the Copilot CLI, and the GitHub CLI for release automation. Integrity is enforced through immutable identifiers rather than separately published checksums. Every third-party GitHub Action is pinned to a full commit SHA, the upstream microsoft/hve-core dependency is pinned to a specific commit that only a guarded workflow is permitted to advance, apm.lock.yaml records the resolved dependency set, and build-time tooling such as Pester and PSScriptAnalyzer is installed at an exact -RequiredVersion.


  • Udhaifu uliofahamika hadharani umeshughulikiwa


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    LAZIMA kuwe hakuna udhaifu usiorekebishwa wa kiwango cha kati au juu zaidi ambao umejulikana hadharani kwa zaidi ya siku 60. [vulnerabilities_fixed_60_days]
    Udhaifu lazima urekebishwe na kutolewa na mradi wenyewe (rekebisho zinaweza kutengenezwa mahali pengine). Udhaifu unakuwa unajulikana hadharani (kwa kusudi hili) mara tu unapata CVE yenye taarifa zilizotolewa hadharani zisizolipwa (zilizoripotiwa, kwa mfano, katika Hifadhidata ya Taifa ya Udhaifu) au wakati mradi umefahamishwa na taarifa imetolewa kwa umma (labda na mradi). Udhaifu unazingatiwa kuwa wa kiwango cha kati au juu ikiwa alama yake ya Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) ya msingi ya ubora ni kati au juu. Katika matoleo ya CVSS 2.0 hadi 3.1, hii ni sawa na alama ya CVSS ya 4.0 au zaidi. Miradi inaweza kutumia alama ya CVSS kama ilivyochapishwa katika hifadhidata ya udhaifu inayotumika sana (kama vile Hifadhidata ya Taifa ya Udhaifu) kwa kutumia toleo la hivi karibuni la CVSS lililoripotiwa katika hifadhidata hiyo. Miradi badala yake inaweza kuhesabu ukali wao wenyewe kwa kutumia toleo la hivi karibuni la CVSS wakati wa ufunuzi wa udhaifu, ikiwa ingizo la hesabu linatangazwa hadharani mara tu udhaifu unajulikana hadharani. Kumbuka: hii inamaanisha kwamba watumiaji wanaweza kuachwa katika hatari kwa washambuliaji wote duniani kwa siku hadi 60. Kigezo hiki ni rahisi zaidi kukidhi kuliko yale Google inapendekeza katika Rebooting responsible disclosure, kwa sababu Google inapendekeza kwamba kipindi cha siku 60 kianze wakati mradi unafahamishwa hata ikiwa ripoti si ya umma. Pia kumbuka kwamba kigezo hiki cha nishani, kama vigezo vingine, kinatumika kwa mradi wa mtu binafsi. Baadhi ya miradi ni sehemu ya mashirika makubwa ya mwavuli au miradi mikubwa, labda katika safu nyingi, na miradi mingi inatoa matokeo yao kwa mashirika mengine na miradi kama sehemu ya mnyororo wa usambazaji wenye utata. Mradi wa mtu binafsi mara nyingi hauwezi kudhibiti wengine, lakini mradi wa mtu binafsi unaweza kufanya kazi kutoa rekebisho ya udhaifu kwa wakati. Kwa hiyo, tunazingatia tu muda wa jibu wa mradi wa mtu binafsi. Mara tu rekebisho inapatikana kutoka kwa mradi wa mtu binafsi, wengine wanaweza kuamua jinsi ya kushughulikia rekebisho (k.m., wanaweza kusasisha kwenye toleo jipya au wanaweza kutumia rekebisho tu kama suluhisho lililochaguliwa-cherry).

    The project has never had a vulnerability reported against it. There are no published GitHub security advisories, no open Dependabot alerts, and no known CVEs affecting the software this project produces. Dependabot alerts, Dependabot security updates, secret scanning, and push protection are enabled on the repository, and CodeQL, Zizmor, Checkov, and OpenSSF Scorecard run on every pull request with findings published to the GitHub Security tab. One code-scanning alert is currently open, a zizmor/artipacked warning raised on 2026-08-24 against a workflow. It is a static-analysis hygiene finding rather than a disclosed vulnerability, it carries no CVE or CVSS score, and it has been open for less than 60 days.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Miradi INAPASWA kurekebisha udhaifu wote muhimu haraka baada ya kuripotiwa. [vulnerabilities_critical_fixed]

    No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities have been reported against this project, and none are outstanding. The project is nonetheless set up to ship a fix quickly rather than relying on a promise to do so. SECURITY.md commits to acknowledging a report within 5 business days and providing a status update within 10, with the fix shipping in the next release and the advisory published once it is available. Releases are cut on demand when pending work is judged ready rather than on a fixed schedule, so a fix does not wait for a release window. CONTRIBUTING.md documents a hotfix procedure for the case where the default branch holds work that must not ship yet: a hotfix branch is cut from the last release tag, the fix is applied there, and Release Prep assembles and tags a patch release from that branch alone, leaving unshippable pending work untouched. The hotfix is then merged back so the fix survives the next release. Separately, every merge rebuilds a rolling pre-release tag within minutes, so a fix is installable for verification as soon as it lands, before a formal release is cut. Automated detection runs continuously through Dependabot alerts and security updates, CodeQL, Zizmor, Checkov, and OpenSSF Scorecard, with findings published to the GitHub Security tab.


  • Masuala mengine ya usalama


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Hazina za umma LAZIMA ZISIVUJE uthibitisho halali wa faragha (k.m., nywila inayofanya kazi au funguo ya faragha) ambayo imekusudiwa kupunguza upatikanaji wa umma. [no_leaked_credentials]
    Mradi UNAWEZA kuvuja uthibitisho wa "sampuli" kwa majaribio na hifadhidata zisizo muhimu, mradi tu hazikusudiwa kupunguza upatikanaji wa umma.

    The repository contains no credentials. All secrets consumed by CI are referenced exclusively through the GitHub Actions secrets context (GITHUB_TOKEN, COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN, HVE_SQUAD_PLUGIN_PUSH_TOKEN, SYNC_DEPS_TOKEN) and are stored as encrypted repository secrets, never as literals in tracked files. No private key material, keystore, or .env file is tracked. A pattern scan for GitHub tokens, AWS access keys, PEM private key blocks, Slack tokens, OpenAI keys, and JWTs found nothing across the 184 tracked files, and the same scan across the full 305-commit history on all branches likewise found nothing, so no credential was committed and later removed. GitHub secret scanning is enabled with push protection, currently reporting zero open alerts, which blocks a supported credential type from being pushed in the first place. The project runs no service and provisions no accounts, so there is no credential intended to limit public access that could be leaked.


 Uchanganuzi 8/8 ●

  • Uchambuzi tuli wa msimbo


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Angalau zana moja ya uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli (zaidi ya maonyo ya mkusanyaji na hali za lugha "salama") LAZIMA itumike kwa toleo lolote lililopendekezwa kubwa la uzalishaji wa programu kabla ya toleo lake, ikiwa kuna angalau zana moja ya FLOSS inayotekeleza kigezo hiki katika lugha iliyochaguliwa. [static_analysis]
    Zana ya uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli inachunguza msimbo wa programu (kama msimbo wa chanzo, msimbo wa kati, au utekelezaji) bila kuutekeleza na ingizo maalum. Kwa madhumuni ya kigezo hiki, maonyo ya mkusanyaji na hali za lugha "salama" hazihesabiwi kama zana za uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli (hizi kwa kawaida huepuka uchambuzi wa kina kwa sababu kasi ni muhimu). Baadhi ya zana za uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli zinazingatia kugundua hitilafu za jumla, nyingine zinazingatia kupata aina fulani za hitilafu (kama vile udhaifu), na baadhi hufanya mchanganyiko. Mifano ya zana hizo za uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli ni pamoja na cppcheck (C, C++), clang static analyzer (C, C++), SpotBugs (Java), FindBugs (Java) (ikiwa ni pamoja na FindSecurityBugs), PMD (Java), Brakeman (Ruby on Rails), lintr (R), goodpractice (R), Coverity Quality Analyzer, SonarQube, Codacy, na HP Enterprise Fortify Static Code Analyzer. Orodha kubwa za zana zinaweza kupatikana katika maeneo kama vile orodha ya Wikipedia ya zana za uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli, taarifa za OWASP kuhusu uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli, orodha ya NIST ya vichambua usalama wa msimbo wa chanzo, na orodha ya Wheeler ya zana za uchambuzi tuli. Ikiwa hakuna zana za uchambuzi tuli za FLOSS zinazopatikana kwa lugha za utekelezaji zilizotumika, unaweza kuchagua 'N/A'.

    Four FLOSS static analysis tools run in CI, all beyond compiler warnings and safe language modes. Checkov 3.2.533 scans infrastructure-as-code and workflow definitions and is configured as blocking, with any accepted finding requiring a justified inline checkov:skip. Zizmor 1.29.0 performs security analysis of GitHub Actions workflows, targeting supply-chain and privilege weaknesses such as credential persistence and template injection. CodeQL analyses the Python surface. PSScriptAnalyzer 1.25.0 analyses the PowerShell build scripts and test suites. All four publish SARIF results to the GitHub Security tab under distinct categories. Checkov and Zizmor are triggered on every pull request targeting the default branch with no path filter, and pull requests are the only route by which a change can reach that branch. Because a release is a tag cut from the head of the default branch, the tree that is released is exactly the tree those analysers have already passed, so static analysis is applied to every proposed release by construction rather than as a separate step that could be omitted. CodeQL additionally runs on a weekly schedule, and Zizmor on a weekly schedule, so newly published rules are applied to released code even when no change is proposed.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba angalau moja ya zana za uchambuzi tuli zilizotumika kwa kigezo cha static_analysis ijumuishe sheria au njia za kutafuta udhaifu wa kawaida katika lugha au mazingira yaliyochambuliwa. [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]
    Zana za uchambuzi tuli ambazo zimeundwa hasa kutafuta udhaifu wa kawaida zina uwezekano mkubwa wa kuzipata. Hata hivyo, kutumia zana zozote za tuli kwa kawaida itasaidia kupata baadhi ya matatizo, kwa hivyo tunashauri lakini hatunahitaji hii kwa kiwango cha nishani ya 'kupita'.

    Three of the four static analysis tools are purpose-built vulnerability scanners rather than general-purpose quality linters. Zizmor exists specifically to find security vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions workflows, covering template injection, credential persistence, artifact poisoning, and excessive token permissions, which is the dominant vulnerability class for a project whose executable surface is largely CI automation. CodeQL applies semantic queries mapped to CWE categories such as injection, path traversal, and unsafe deserialization against the Python surface. Checkov scans infrastructure-as-code and workflow definitions for security misconfiguration and runs in blocking mode, with any accepted finding requiring a justified inline checkov:skip annotation. PSScriptAnalyzer additionally carries security-specific rules including PSAvoidUsingPlainTextForPassword, PSAvoidUsingConvertToSecureStringWithPlainText, PSAvoidUsingInvokeExpression, and PSUsePSCredentialType. All four publish SARIF to the GitHub Security tab under distinct categories. These tools find real issues rather than hypothetical ones: Zizmor currently reports an open artipacked finding against a workflow that persists a repository push token into the git configuration for the remainder of a job, which is being tracked for remediation.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Udhaifu wote wenye ukali wa kati na juu zaidi unaoweza kudhoofishwa uliogundulika kupitia uchambuzi wa msimbo tuli LAZIMA urekebishwe kwa wakati baada ya kuthibitishwa. [static_analysis_fixed]
    Udhaifu unazingatiwa kuwa wa kiwango cha kati au juu zaidi ikiwa alama yake ya Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) ya msingi ya ubora ni kati au juu. Katika matoleo ya CVSS 2.0 hadi 3.1, hii ni sawa na alama ya CVSS ya 4.0 au zaidi. Miradi inaweza kutumia alama ya CVSS kama ilivyochapishwa katika hifadhidata ya udhaifu inayotumika sana (kama vile Hifadhidata ya Taifa ya Udhaifu) kwa kutumia toleo la hivi karibuni la CVSS lililoripotiwa katika hifadhidata hiyo. Miradi badala yake inaweza kuhesabu ukali wao wenyewe kwa kutumia toleo la hivi karibuni la CVSS wakati wa ufunuzi wa udhaifu, ikiwa ingizo la hesabu linatangazwa hadharani mara tu udhaifu unajulikana hadharani. Kumbuka kwamba kigezo cha vulnerabilities_fixed_60_days kinahitaji kwamba udhaifu wote kama huo urekebishwe ndani ya siku 60 baada ya kuwa wa umma.

    No medium or higher severity exploitable vulnerability has been discovered by static analysis. CodeQL and Checkov currently report zero open alerts. PSScriptAnalyzer reports 22 findings, all Warning or Information severity and all code-quality in nature (naming conventions, comment-based help, ShouldProcess on internal helper functions), with no Error-severity findings and none carrying security impact; the CI gate blocks the build on Error severity. One Zizmor finding is open, artipacked, which reports that a checkout step in publish-plugin.yml persists a repository token into the git configuration for the remainder of the job. It was assessed and is not exploitable: that workflow is triggered solely by workflow_dispatch, which requires write access to the repository, and has no pull_request, pull_request_target, or fork-triggered path, so injecting a step to read the persisted credential requires privileges that already confer access to the token. Zizmor rates it Warning and GitHub assigns it no security severity level, placing it below the medium threshold. It is nonetheless tracked as a hardening item and will be addressed rather than dismissed. Findings that are accepted rather than fixed carry a justified inline annotation (# zizmor: ignore[...] or # checkov:skip=...) recording the reasoning, so no finding is silently suppressed.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba uchambuzi wa msimbo wa chanzo tuli ufanyike kwenye kila ahadi au angalau kila siku. [static_analysis_often]

    Static analysis runs on every commit. Checkov and Zizmor are both triggered on every pull request targeting the default branch with no path filter, and pull requests are the only route by which a change can reach that branch, so no commit lands without being analysed regardless of which files it touches. Checkov additionally runs on every push to the default branch. CodeQL analyses the Python surface and PSScriptAnalyzer the PowerShell surface on any pull request or push touching those file types. Beyond change-triggered runs, three scheduled scans re-analyse the released code so that newly published rules are applied even when nothing has changed: Zizmor weekly on Mondays, OpenSSF Scorecard weekly on Tuesdays, and CodeQL weekly on Thursdays. All results are published to the GitHub Security tab under distinct categories, so a finding introduced by a rule update surfaces without a code change.


  • Uchambuzi wa msimbo wa nguvu za ziada


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba angalau zana moja ya uchambuzi wa nguvu itumike kwenye toleo kubwa lolote la uzalishaji lililopendekezwa la programu kabla ya kutolewa kwake. [dynamic_analysis]
    Zana ya uchambuzi wa nguvu inachunguza programu kwa kuitekeleza na ingizo maalum. Kwa mfano, mradi YAWEZA kutumia zana ya fuzzing (k.m., American Fuzzy Lop) au kitafutaji cha programu ya wavuti (k.m., OWASP ZAP au w3af). Katika hali fulani mradi wa OSS-Fuzz unaweza kuwa tayari kutumia majaribio ya fuzz kwenye mradi wako. Kwa madhumuni ya kigezo hiki zana ya uchambuzi wa nguvu inahitaji kubadilisha ingizo kwa njia fulani kutafuta aina mbalimbali za matatizo au kuwa seti kiotomatiki ya majaribio yenye angalau asilimia 80 ya ukaguzi wa tawi. Ukurasa wa Wikipedia kuhusu uchambuzi wa nguvu na ukurasa wa OWASP kuhusu fuzzing hutambulisha baadhi ya zana za uchambuzi wa nguvu. Zana za uchambuzi ZINAWEZA kuzingatia kutafuta udhaifu wa usalama, lakini hii haihitajiki.

    The project applies automated testing before release but does not currently meet the specific bar this criterion sets. The release gate is the Tier 0 conformance suite, which installs the package exactly as a consumer receives it and executes 575 Pester assertions against the installed tree. Tier 1 additionally performs live behavioural runs against fixture repositories, executing the squad end to end and asserting on the state artifacts left on disk, and Tier 2 compares a live run against stored semantic baselines. However, none of these vary their inputs in the manner of a fuzzer or scanner: Tier 1 exercises a fixed set of recorded scenarios. Branch coverage is also not instrumented, since none of the tier runners enable Pester's CodeCoverage configuration, so the project cannot demonstrate the 80% threshold this criterion offers as an alternative. Coverage of the PowerShell build scripts would in any case be low, because Tier 0 asserts against an installed package tree rather than executing those scripts. Planned improvements are to enable Pester code coverage reporting in CI to establish a measured baseline, and to add unit tests for the build and release scripts, which are currently the least-covered executable surface.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba ikiwa programu iliyozalishwa na mradi inajumuisha programu iliyoandikwa kwa kutumia lugha isiyosalama ya kumbukumbu (k.m., C au C++), basi angalau zana moja ya nguvu (k.m., fuzzer au kitafutaji cha programu ya wavuti) itumike kwa kawaida kwa pamoja na utaratibu wa kugundua matatizo ya usalama wa kumbukumbu kama vile uandikaji zaidi wa kipengele. Ikiwa mradi hauzalishi programu iliyoandikwa katika lugha isiyosalama ya kumbukumbu, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]
    Mifano ya taratibu za kugundua matatizo ya usalama wa kumbukumbu ni pamoja na Address Sanitizer (ASAN) (inapatikana katika GCC na LLVM), Memory Sanitizer, na valgrind. Zana nyingine zinazoweza kutumika ni pamoja na thread sanitizer na undefined behavior sanitizer. Madai ya kila mahali pia yaweza kufanya kazi.

    The project produces no software written in a memory-unsafe language. Its output is a package of markdown assets (agents, prompts, instructions, and skills) together with PowerShell 7 build scripts, Pester test suites, and YAML workflow definitions. There is no C, C++, or unsafe Rust in the repository and nothing is compiled to native code, so there is no memory-safety surface for a sanitizer or memory-error detector to examine. PowerShell runs on the .NET managed runtime, which provides memory safety by construction.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    INAPENDEKEZWA kwamba mradi utumie usanidi wa angalau baadhi ya uchambuzi wa nguvu (kama vile majaribio au fuzzing) ambao huwezesha madai mengi. Katika hali nyingi madai haya yasipaswi kuwa yamewezeshwa katika mijengo ya uzalishaji. [dynamic_analysis_enable_assertions]
    Kigezo hiki hakipendekezi kuwezesha madai wakati wa uzalishaji; hilo ni kabisa kwa mradi na watumiaji wake kuamua. Lengo la kigezo hiki ni badala yake kuboresha ugunduzaji wa hitilafu wakati wa uchambuzi wa nguvu kabla ya kusambazwa. Kuwezesha madai katika matumizi ya uzalishaji ni tofauti kabisa na kuwezesha madai wakati wa uchambuzi wa nguvu (kama vile majaribio). Katika hali fulani kuwezesha madai katika matumizi ya uzalishaji ni busara sana (hasa katika vipengele vya uadilifu wa juu). Kuna hoja nyingi dhidi ya kuwezesha madai katika uzalishaji, k.m., maktaba hazipaswi kuvuruga waita, uwepo wao unaweza kusababisha kukataliwa na maduka ya programu, na/au kuamilisha madai katika uzalishaji kunaweza kufunua data za faragha kama vile funguo za faragha. Kumbuka kwamba katika usambazaji mwingi wa Linux NDEBUG haijafafanuliwa, hivyo C/C++ assert() kwa chaguo-msingi itawezeshwa kwa uzalishaji katika mazingira hayo. Inaweza kuwa muhimu kutumia utaratibu tofauti wa madai au kufafanua NDEBUG kwa uzalishaji katika mazingira hayo.

    The test configuration deliberately enables more assertions than a normal run. The suites are assertion-based throughout, with 575 Pester assertions executing in the Tier 0 conformance run alone, and every case traces to a numbered entry in tests/squad-behavior-contract.md. Two switches exist specifically to widen assertion coverage during analysis. Tier 1's -Strict promotes consumption findings, which are advisory during a live run, to blocking during the self-check, on the reasoning that a mutation the contract merely mentions is a mutation it does not catch. Tier 0's -IncludeAdvisory enables additional assertion cases that are otherwise reported without gating. Tier 1 also ships mutation controls invoked with -SelfCheck, where each case breaks exactly one rule and requires the contract to detect it, which is the evidence that the assertions can fail rather than passing vacuously. All PowerShell scripts, modules, and test runners execute under Set-StrictMode -Version Latest with $ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop', turning uninitialised variable references, non-existent property access, and malformed method calls into terminating errors during analysis. Tier 0 additionally treats a run that produces zero tests as a failure, so a discovery error cannot be mistaken for success. None of this carries into what consumers receive: the shipped package is markdown assets with no runtime assertion machinery, so there is no production assertion cost or disclosure risk.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Udhaifu wote wenye ukali wa kati na juu zaidi unaoweza kudhoofishwa uliogundulika kupitia uchambuzi wa msimbo wa nguvu LAZIMA urekebishwe kwa wakati baada ya kuthibitishwa. [dynamic_analysis_fixed]
    Ikiwa haujafanya uchambuzi wa msimbo wa nguvu na kwa hivyo hukupata udhaifu wowote kwa njia hii, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). Udhaifu unazingatiwa kuwa wa kiwango cha kati au juu zaidi ikiwa alama yake ya Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) ya msingi ya ubora ni kati au juu. Katika matoleo ya CVSS 2.0 hadi 3.1, hii ni sawa na alama ya CVSS ya 4.0 au zaidi. Miradi inaweza kutumia alama ya CVSS kama ilivyochapishwa katika hifadhidata ya udhaifu inayotumika sana (kama vile Hifadhidata ya Taifa ya Udhaifu) kwa kutumia toleo la hivi karibuni la CVSS lililoripotiwa katika hifadhidata hiyo. Miradi badala yake inaweza kuhesabu ukali wao wenyewe kwa kutumia toleo la hivi karibuni la CVSS wakati wa ufunuzi wa udhaifu, ikiwa ingizo la hesabu linatangazwa hadharani mara tu udhaifu unajulikana hadharani.

    The project does not perform dynamic code analysis as this criterion defines it, consistent with the answer given for dynamic_analysis: it uses no fuzzer or scanner that varies inputs, and branch coverage is not instrumented, so the 80% alternative threshold cannot be demonstrated. No vulnerability has therefore been discovered by dynamic analysis, and none is outstanding. The project does run automated Pester test suites across three tiers, including live behavioural runs against fixture repositories, and these have found functional defects that were fixed and covered by regression cases, but they have surfaced no security vulnerability. Should dynamic analysis be introduced and a medium or higher severity exploitable vulnerability be confirmed, it would be handled under the process documented in SECURITY.md, which commits to acknowledgement within 5 business days, a status update within 10, and a fix in the next release, with a hotfix path documented in CONTRIBUTING.md for shipping a patch without releasing unrelated pending work.



Unaweza kutumia zana na mifumo ya AI kupendekeza mabadiliko kupitia URL rahisi, kama vile https://www.bestpractices.dev/sw/projects/14231/choose/edit?osps_ac_01_01_status=Met&osps_ac_01_01_justification=GitHub+enforced. Angalia mfumo wetu wa mapendekezo ya otomatiki kwa jinsi ya kufanya hivyo. Data hii inapatikana chini ya Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). Hii inamaanisha kuwa Mpokeaji wa Data anaweza kushiriki Data, na au bila marekebisho, mradi Mpokeaji wa Data anapatanisha maandishi ya mkataba huu na Data iliyoshirikiwa. Tafadhali tambua Peter Nehme na wachangiaji wa nishani ya Mazoea Bora ya OpenSSF.

Ingizo la nishani ya mradi linamilikiwa na: Peter Nehme.
Ingizo liliundwa siku 2026-08-25 06:53:21 UTC, iliyosasishwa mara ya mwisho siku 2026-10-19 21:45:30 UTC. Ilipata mara ya mwisho nishani ya kupita siku 2026-08-25 08:33:58 UTC.