haggle

遵循以下最佳实践的项目将能够自愿的自我认证,并显示他们已经实现了核心基础设施计划(OpenSSF)徽章。

没有一套可以保证软件永远不会有缺陷或漏洞的做法;如果规范或假设是错误的,即使合适的方法也可能失败。也没有哪些做法可以保证一个项目能够维持健康和运作良好的开发者社区。但是,遵循最佳做法可以帮助改善项目的成果。例如,一些做法可以在发布之前进行多人评估,这可以帮助您找到其他难以找到的技术漏洞,并帮助建立信任,并希望不同公司的开发人员之间进行重复的交互。要获得徽章,必须满足所有“必须”和“禁止”的条款,满足所有“应该”条款或有合适的理由,所有“建议”条款必须满足或未满足(至少希望考虑)。欢迎通过 GitHub网站创建问题或提出请求进行反馈。另外还有一个一般讨论邮件列表

如果这是您的项目,请在您的项目页面上显示您的徽章状态!徽章状态如下所示: 项目13582的徽章级别为silver 这里是如何嵌入它:
您可以通过将其嵌入在您的Markdown文件中:
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13582/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13582)
或将其嵌入到HTML中来显示您的徽章状态:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13582"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13582/badge"></a>


这些是白银级别条款。您还可以查看通过黄金级别条款。

Baseline Series: 基准等级1 基准等级2 基准等级3

        

 基本 17/17

  • 常规

    请注意,其他项目可能使用相同的名称。

    AGL Australia smart meter -> Home Assistant Energy dashboard (Claude-generated custom integration)

    请使用 SPDX许可证表达格式;例子包括“Apache-2.0”,“BSD-2-Clause”,“BSD-3-Clause”,“GPL-2.0+”,“LGPL-3.0 +”,“MIT”和“(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)”。
    如果有多种语言,请将它们列为逗号分隔值(可选空格),并将它们从最多到最少使用。如果有长列表,请至少列出前三个最常见的列表。如果没有语言(例如,这是仅文档或仅测试项目),请使用单个字符“ - ”。请使用每种语言的常规大小写,例如“JavaScript”。
    通用平台枚举(CPE)是用于信息技术系统,软件和软件包的结构化命名方案。在报告漏洞时,它可用于多个系统和数据库。
  • 先决条件


    项目必须拥有通过徽章。 [achieve_passing]

  • 基本项目网站内容


    关于如何贡献的信息必须包括对可接受的贡献的要求(例如,引用任何所需的编码标准)。 (需要网址) [contribution_requirements]

    CONTRIBUTING.md (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) states the requirements for acceptable contributions: the mandatory dev loop (ruff lint/format, strict mypy, pytest, pre-commit) that CI re-runs and rejects failures on, enforced Conventional Commits with provenance trailers, a required PR checklist, and anonymisation rules for API fixtures. The referenced AGENTS.md carries the full coding-standard detail ("What NOT to Do", endpoint procedure).


  • 项目监督


    该项目应该有一个合法机制,所有对项目软件做出显著贡献的开发人员都声明他们有合法授权作出这些贡献。最常用且易于实施的方法是使用开发者原产地证书(DCO),用户可以在其提交中添加“signed-off-by”,另外,项目链接到DCO网站。本条款也可以使用贡献者许可协议(CLA)或其他法律机制实现。 (需要网址) [dco]
    DCO是推荐的机制,因为它易于实现,在源代码中进行跟踪,并且git使用“commit -s”直接支持“签名”功能。更有效的是,项目文件解释了该项目的“签名”手段。 CLA是一项法律协议,用于定义知识产权许可给组织或项目的条款。捐助者转让协议(CAA)是将知识产权权利转让给另一方的法律协议;项目不必具备CAA,因为CAA增加了潜在贡献者不愿贡献的风险,特别是如果接收者是一个营利性组织。 Apache Software Foundation CLA(个人贡献者许可证和公司CLA)是CLA的示例,用于确定项目的这些CLA的风险对项目的影响小于其获益。

    CONTRIBUTING.md contains an inbound=outbound licensing statement ("By contributing, you agree your work is licensed under the project's Apache-2.0 license") but no mechanism by which contributors assert they are legally authorized to make their contributions - there is no DCO sign-off requirement, no link to the Developer Certificate of Origin, and no CLA; commit history does not carry Signed-off-by trailers.



    该项目必须明确定义和记录其项目治理模式(决策方式,包括关键角色)。 (需要网址) [governance]
    需要有一些成熟的书面方式来作出决定和解决争端。在小项目中,这可能就像“项目拥有者和负责人做所有最终决定”一样简单。有各种治理模式,包括仁慈的独裁者和正式的精英统治;有关详细信息,请参阅治理模式。集中式(例如,单一维护者)和分散式(例如,组维护者)方法都已经在项目中成功使用。治理信息不需要记录创建项目分支的可能性,因为对于FLOSS项目来说总是可能的。

    The governance model is documented plainly as single-maintainer: CONTRIBUTING.md (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) states the single-maintainer model and the issue-first contribution process, .github/CODEOWNERS routes every change to the maintainer (* @naanyabiz), and SECURITY.md's risk-acceptance register states the key role explicitly: "the same person authors, triages, and accepts every exception in this project - self-acceptance is the operating model of a single-maintainer repository" (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md). AGENTS.md's "Human-approved boundary" section documents that every merge, tag, and release requires the maintainer's live decision.



    该项目必须采取行为守则,并将其发布在标准的位置。 (需要网址) [code_of_conduct]
    项目可能能够提高社区的文明程度,并通过采取行为守则来规定对可接受的行为的期望。这可以帮助在发生问题之前避免问题,并使项目成为更加欢迎的地方来鼓励贡献。这应该只关注项目社区/工作场所的行为。行为规范的示例是贡献者约定行为准则和Linux内核代码冲突

    The project has adopted the Contributor Covenant 2.1 as its code of conduct, posted at the standard location https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. It states scope and enforcement and includes a private reporting contact (security@naanya.biz) with a 5-business-day acknowledgement commitment.



    该项目必须明确定义和公开记录项目中的关键角色及其职责,包括这些角色必须执行的任务。必须清楚指出谁是什么角色,尽管这可能没有以相同的方式记录下来。 (需要网址) [roles_responsibilities]
    治理和角色和职责的文档可以在一个地方。

    The project publicly documents its role structure: .github/CODEOWNERS assigns ownership of everything to @naanyabiz, SECURITY.md states plainly that the same person authors, triages, releases, and accepts every exception ("self-acceptance is the operating model of a single-maintainer repository"), and AGENTS.md section Provenance enumerates every AI tool operating on the repo with its role and scope plus the human-approved boundary (merging, tagging, and releasing always require the maintainer). The committed conformance map (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/compliance/conformance.md) records under CO-1 that all role functions collapse into the named owner, so it is unambiguous who holds which role.



    如果任何一个开发者丧失工作能力或丧生,该项目必须能够继续保持最小的中断。特别是,在确认个人无行为能力或死亡的一周内,项目必须能够创建和关闭问题,接受提议的更改和发布软件版本。这可以通过确保其他人有任何必要的密钥,密码和合法权利来继续该项目。运行FLOSS项目的个人可以通过在锁箱中提供密钥,并提供任何所需的合法权利(例如DNS名称)来实现。 (需要网址) [access_continuity]

    The project documents a continuity and succession plan in SECURITY.md (section "Continuity and succession"): on the maintainer's death or permanent departure, ownership of the GitHub account/repository and the ed25519 release-signing key passes to next of kin per the maintainer's will, and a digital-legacy arrangement grants next of kin identity access to operate, wind down, or transfer the project. Risk-acceptance RA-04 records the residual (estate-administration latency; the living-incapacity gap). https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md



    项目必须具有2个或更多的“公交车因子”。 (需要网址) [bus_factor]
    “公交车系数”(又名“卡车因子”)是指最少数量的项目成员,如果突然离开项目(“被公交车撞了”),项目会由于缺乏具备知识的或有能力的人员而暂停。 卡车因子 工具可以对GitHub上的项目进行估计。有关详细信息,请参阅Cosentino等人的评估Git存储库的卡车因子

    The project has a bus factor of 1: a single maintainer authors, reviews, and releases everything. This is recorded openly as risk-acceptance RA-04 in SECURITY.md (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md), with the public Apache-2.0 licence, AGENTS.md as a succession document, and attested releases as the compensating controls.


  • 文档


    该项目必须有一个文档化的路线图,描述项目打算做什么,至少在下一年做什么。 (需要网址) [documentation_roadmap]
    项目可能没有实现路线图,没关系。路线图的目的是帮助潜在的用户和贡献者了解项目的预期方向。它不需要特别详细。

    ROADMAP.md documents the project's direction for roughly the next 12 months and its explicit non-goals (single-retailer AGL only; electricity and solar feed-in only; read-only Energy-dashboard import; no telemetry, device control, or portal scraping). https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/ROADMAP.md



    该项目必须包括项目生成的软件的架构(也称为高级别设计)的文档。如果项目不产生软件,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 (需要网址) [documentation_architecture]
    软件架构解释了程序的基本结构,即程序的主要组件,它们之间的关系以及这些组件和关系的关键属性。

    docs/threat-model.md section 1 "System description" (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/threat-model.md) documents the high-level design, including a core data-flow diagram (browser -> config flow -> AGL Auth0 -> coordinator/parser -> HA recorder -> diagnostics) and the trust boundaries between components. AGENTS.md's "Repo Map" (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/AGENTS.md) describes every major component (config_flow, coordinator, sensor, diagnostics, agl client/parser/pinning) with its role and relationships, and the "Energy Dashboard Contract" section documents the key statistics-interface properties.



    该项目必须书面记录用户从项目生成的软件的安全性上可以获得和不能指望的内容(其“安全需求”)。 (需要网址) [documentation_security]
    这些是软件意图满足的安全需求。

    https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md documents what users can and cannot expect: the data handled and impact assessment, token storage (including the explicit statement that the OAuth refresh token is plaintext at rest on the HA host, with host-FDE guidance), warn-only TLS SPKI pin-mismatch behaviour, supported versions, and what is in/out of scope. The full per-boundary security requirements, data classification, and resilience targets are in the committed threat model, https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/threat-model.md (sections 2, 3 and 8).



    该项目必须为新用户提供“快速启动”指南,以帮助他们快速使用该软件。 (需要网址) [documentation_quick_start]
    这个想法是向用户展示如何入门,使软件完全可以做事情。这对于潜在用户是至关重要的。

    The README's Install section (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/README.md) is a five-step quick start taking a new user from HACS install to a working configured integration, including the browser-based AGL login step, and is followed by an Energy-dashboard section telling users exactly which statistics to add; a full setup guide lives at docs/energy-dashboard.md.



    项目必须努力使文档与当前版本的项目结果(包括项目生成的软件)保持一致。任何已知的文档缺陷使其不一致必须修正。如果文档基本是最新的,但是错误地包括一些不再是真实的旧信息,那么将其视为缺陷,然后像往常一样进行跟踪和修复。 [documentation_current]
    该文档可以包括有关软件版本之间的差异或更改的信息,与/或链接到旧版本的文档。这个条款的意图在于努力保持文档的一致性,而不是文档必须完美。

    Documentation currency is enforced per-PR: AGENTS.md's "Documentation Checklist - Required on Every PR" mandates updating the CHANGELOG, repo map, API facts, and security docs with every code change (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/AGENTS.md). Known documentation defects are corrected when found - SECURITY.md's storage section explicitly retracts an earlier incorrect claim that HAOS encrypts data at rest, and a README version-rot defect was fixed by policy (no hardcoded version strings; a shields.io release badge instead).



    项目存储代码库首页和/或网站必须在获得成就的48小时内标识并超链接任何成就,包括此最佳实践徽章。 (需要网址) [documentation_achievements]
    一个成就是项目致力于满足的任何外部条款,包括徽章。该信息不需要在项目网站首页上。使用GitHub的项目可以通过将其添加到README文件中,将成果放在存储代码库首页。

    The repository front page README (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/README.md) displays hyperlinked achievement badges at the top: the OpenSSF Best Practices badge (project 13582, linking to bestpractices.dev), the OpenSSF Scorecard badge (linking to the scorecard.dev viewer), and the latest-release badge. The Best Practices badge was added the same day the passing badge was earned (2026-07-12, PR #172).


  • 无障碍和国际化


    该项目(项目网站和项目成果)都应遵循无障碍最佳做法,使残疾人仍然可以参与项目,并在合理的情况下使用项目成果。 [accessibility_best_practices]
    对于Web应用程序,请参阅 Web 内容无障碍指导 (WCAG 2.0,英文) 以及其支持文档 理解 WCAG 2.0(英文);或者 W3C 无障碍信息(英文). 图形界面(GUI)应用考虑使用环境特定的无障碍指导(例如 Gnome, KDE, XFCE, Android, iOS, Mac, 以及 Windows). 一些TUI应用 (例如,`ncurses` 程序) 可以做一些特定的工作,增强可访问性(例如,`alpine` 的 `force-arrow-cursor` 设置)。多数命令行应用没有特别的无障碍设置。本条款经常是不涉及(N/A),例如,对于组件库。以下是一些要采取的行动或需要考虑的问题的例子:
    • 提供非文字内容的文字替代,以便于转换为其他需要的格式,如大字体、盲文、语音、符号或者简单文字( WCAG 2.0 指导 1.1 (英文))
    • 颜色不被用作传达信息,指示动作,提示响应或区分视觉元素的唯一视觉方式。 ( WCAG 2.0 指导 1.4.1(英文))
    • 文本和文字图像的视觉呈现对比度至少为4.5:1,除了大文本,次要文本和标识符之外。 ( WCAG 2.0 指导 1.4.3(英文))
    • 使用键盘可访问所有功能 (WCAG 指导 2.1)
    • 图形界面应用(GUI)或者Web应用在目标平台上,应该至少使用一种屏幕阅读器测试(例如,NVDA;Jaws;Windows上的WindowEyes;Mac & iOS上的VoiceOver;Linux/BSD上的Orca;Android上的TalkBack)。TUI程序可以减少过度渲染以防止屏幕阅读器的冗余读取。

    The project ships no user interface of its own: it is a headless Home Assistant integration whose config flow, sensors, and Energy-dashboard statistics are all rendered by Home Assistant's standard frontend (the integration contributes only strings.json/translations, no HTML/JS/frontend assets), and accessibility of that UI is owned upstream by Home Assistant. Project documentation is plain Markdown rendered by GitHub.



    该项目产生的软件应该被国际化,以便为目标受众的文化,地区或语言进行简单的本地化。如果国际化(i18n)不适用(例如,该软件不会生成针对最终用户的文本,并且不排序可读文本),请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [internationalization]
    本地化“是指适应产品,应用或文档内容以满足特定目标市场(语言环境)的语言,文化和其他要求。国际化是“设计和开发产品,应用或文档内容,使不同文化,地区或语言的目标受众更容易本地化”。 (请参阅 W3C的“本地化与国际化”)。软件只需通过国际化即可达到此标准。不需要另一种特定语言的本地化,因为一旦软件已被国际化,其他人就可以从事本地化。

    User-facing text is externalized through Home Assistant's standard translation framework: custom_components/haggle/strings.json (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/strings.json) holds all config-flow, error, and entity strings, mirrored in translations/en.json - localizing to another language is a matter of adding a translations/<lang>.json file. Only English is currently provided.


  • 其他


    如果项目站点(网站,存储库和下载URL)存储用于外部用户认证的密码,则必须使用密钥拉伸(迭代)算法将密码存储为具有每用户盐值的迭代散列(例如,PBKDF2,Bcrypt或Scrypt)。如果项目站点不存储密码,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [sites_password_security]
    请注意,使用 GitHub 符合此条款。此条款仅适用于用于外部用户认证到项目站点的密码。如果项目站点必须登录到其他站点,则可能需要为此目的存储密码(因为使用像Bcrypt这样的算法会使这些密码无效)。本条款将 crypto_password_storage 条款应用于项目站点,类似于sites_https条款。

    All project sites (repository, issue tracker, releases, security advisories) are hosted on GitHub, which handles external-user authentication and stores passwords per this criterion; the project operates no site of its own that stores passwords.


 变更控制 1/1

  • 之前的版本


    该项目必须维护最常用的旧版本的产品提供较新版本的升级路径。如果升级路径很困难,项目必须记录如何执行升级(例如,给出更改的接口描述和详细的建议步骤以帮助升级)。 [maintenance_or_update]

    SECURITY.md section Supported Versions states the latest tagged release on main is the only supported version, with upgrades surfaced to users automatically via HACS. The README's "Rollback / downgrade" section (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/README.md) documents that any prior release can be reinstalled via HACS, that config entries are downgrade-safe and statistics survive in both directions, and docs/releasing.md requires a recorded manual downgrade test with each stable release.


 报告 3/3

  • 错误报告流程


    项目必须使用问题跟踪器来跟踪每个问题。 [report_tracker]

    The project tracks individual issues on the GitHub issue tracker at https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/issues, declared machine-readably in the integration manifest ("issue_tracker" in https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/manifest.json) and in pyproject.toml project URLs. CONTRIBUTING.md requires an issue-first workflow and AGENTS.md defines a triaged label taxonomy (P1-P3 priority, sev:high/med/low, escaped) consumed by the release flow and quarterly delivery metrics.


  • 漏洞报告流程


    除了要求匿名的报告者外,该项目必须对过去12个月内解决的所有漏洞报告的报告者表示感谢。如果过去12个月没有修复漏洞,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 (需要网址) [vulnerability_report_credit]

    No vulnerability reports have been received or resolved in the last 12 months (the project is only a few months old); SECURITY.md's "Hall of Fame" section explicitly reads "(none yet - be the first.)". SECURITY.md commits to crediting reporters in release notes and the Hall of Fame unless anonymity is requested (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md). The one CVE fix in CHANGELOG (idna, dev-only lockfile) came via automated Dependabot monitoring, not an external report to this project.



    该项目必须有一个书面的流程来响应漏洞报告。 (需要网址) [vulnerability_response_process]
    这与security_report_process有很强的相关性,它需要有一个书面的流程来报告漏洞。它还涉及到spam_report_response,它需要在一定时间内响应漏洞报告。

    https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md documents the full response process: private reporting via GitHub Private Security Advisories or security@naanya.biz, acknowledgement within 5 business days, graduated response targets by severity (critical 72 h / high 7 days / moderate-low 30 days), a self-escalation forcing function honest about the single-maintainer bound, a coordinated-disclosure window (14 days), and the known-vulnerable-release procedure (GHSA advisory, superseding release, HACS delisting).


 质量 19/19

  • 编码标准


    该项目必须确定其使用的主要语言的具体编码风格指南,并要求贡献一般情况下符合此要求。 (需要网址) [coding_standards]
    在大多数情况下,这是通过参考一些现有的风格指南来完成的,可能列出差异。这些风格指南可以包括提高可读性的方法和减少缺陷可能性(包括漏洞)的方法。许多编程语言有一个或多个广泛使用的风格指南。样式指南的示例包括 Google风格指南(英文) SEI CERT编码标准(英文)

    CONTRIBUTING.md requires contributions to pass the documented dev loop - ruff check, ruff format, and strict mypy - before pushing (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md). The specific style configuration is committed in pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff] with 17 rule families, line-length 88, isort ordering; [tool.mypy] strict = true) (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/pyproject.toml), and .github/workflows/ci.yml enforces ruff check, ruff format --check, and mypy as part of a required PR status check.



    如果至少有一个FLOSS工具可以应用于所选择的语言,项目必须自动执行其选定的编码风格。 [coding_standards_enforced]
    这可以使用静态分析工具和/或通过代码重新格式化强制代码实现。在许多情况下,工具配置包含在项目的存储库中(因为不同的项目可能会选择不同的配置)。项目可以允许风格例外(通常会);在发生例外的情况下(应该很少),它们必须在其位置的代码中记录在案,以便可以对这些例外进行检视,并使工具能够在将来自动处理它们。这些工具的例子包括ESLint(JavaScript)和Rubocop(Ruby)。

    Coding style is enforced automatically by FLOSS tools: ruff lint, ruff format --check, and mypy run on every push and pull request in CI (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml, steps at lines 41-48), and the containing 'Test (Python 3.14)' job is one of eight required status checks under the zero-bypass protect-main ruleset, so a style violation blocks merge. The selected style is committed in pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]) and also enforced locally via pre-commit hooks.


  • 可工作的构建系统


    本地二进制文件的构建系统必须遵守传递给它们的相关编译器和链接器(环境)变量(例如CC,CFLAGS,CXX,CXXFLAGS和LDFLAGS),并将它们传递给编译器和链接器。构建系统可以使用附加标志来扩展它们,但不能简单地用自己的替换提供的值。如果没有生成本地二进制文件,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [build_standard_variables]
    应该很容易启用特殊的构建功能,如地址消毒剂(Address Sanitizer,ASAN),或符合发布加固最佳实践(例如,通过轻松打开编译器标志来实现)。

    The project is a pure-Python Home Assistant custom integration: manifest.json declares "requirements": [] and the hatchling build backend produces no native binaries, so no compiler or linker is ever invoked and CC/CFLAGS-style variables have no referent.



    构建和安装系统在在相关标志中要求时,应该保留调试信息(例如,“install -s”未被使用)。如果没有构建或安装系统(例如典型的JavaScript库),请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [build_preserve_debug]
    例如,如果使用这些语言,则应该设置CFLAGS(C)或CXXFLAGS(C ++)创建相关的调试信息,并且在安装过程中不应该剥离它们。支持和分析时,需要调试信息,也可用于测量编译二进制文件中加固特性的存在。

    The release build (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/release.yml, "Build release artifact" step) zips the unmodified Python source of custom_components/haggle, excluding only pycache/.pyc; HACS installs that zip as-is. Nothing is stripped, minified, or compiled, so full source-level debugging information (readable source, tracebacks with line numbers) is always preserved in what users install.



    如果子目录中存在交叉依赖关系,则由项目生成的软件的构建系统必须不能递归地构建子目录。如果没有构建或安装系统(例如典型的JavaScript库),请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [build_non_recursive]
    项目构建系统的内部依赖关系信息需要准确,否则,对项目的更改可能无法正确构建。不正确的构建可能会导致缺陷(包括漏洞)。大型构建系统中的常见错误是使用“递归构建”或“递归生成”,即包含源文件的子目录的层次结构,其中每个子目录都是独立构建的。除非每个子目录完全独立,否则这是一个错误,因为依赖关系信息不正确。

    The only build step is a single, flat packaging step in the release workflow: release.yml zips the contents of custom_components/haggle/ into haggle.zip in one command, then generates SBOMs and attestations from that artifact (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/release.yml). There are no subdirectory builds, no Makefile recursion, and no cross-directory build dependencies; the integration is pure Python with zero compiled components.



    该项目必须能够重复从源代码文件生成的过程,并获得完全相同的比特位结果。如果没有发生构建(例如,直接使用源代码而不是编译使用的脚本语言),请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [build_repeatable]
    GCC和clang用户可能会发现-frandom-seed选项有用;在某些情况下,这可以通过强制某种排序来解决。更多建议可以在可重复构建(英文)站点找到。

    Not applicable: haggle is a pure-Python Home Assistant custom integration whose source is used directly - HACS extracts the release archive and Home Assistant imports the .py files unchanged, so there is no compilation or build step to reproduce bit-for-bit. The criterion explicitly permits N/A where source is used directly rather than compiled.


  • 安装系统


    该项目必须提供一种使用常用惯例轻松安装和卸载由项目生成的软件的方法。 [installation_common]
    示例包括使用软件包管理器(在系统或语言级别),“make install/uninstall”(支持DESTDIR),标准格式的容器或标准格式的虚拟机映像。安装和卸载过程(例如,打包)可以由第三方FLOSS软件实现。

    The integration is distributed via HACS (the Home Assistant community package manager) and is in the HACS default store; README section Install documents the install (HACS -> search Haggle -> Download -> restart) and section Removing documents uninstall via HA's Settings -> Devices & Services, including a best-effort revocation of the stored OAuth grant on removal (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/README.md). hacs.json configures the attested zip_release asset that HACS installs.



    最终用户的安装系统必须遵守用于在安装时选择构建工件写入位置的标准约定。例如,如果在POSIX系统上安装文件,它必须遵守DESTDIR环境变量。如果没有安装系统或没有标准惯例,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [installation_standard_variables]

    The installation system is HACS, which installs the integration into Home Assistant's standard custom_components/ location inside the user-chosen HA configuration directory - the platform's standard convention for install location (install and rollback steps documented at https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/README.md#install). Nothing is compiled, so no DESTDIR-style build-time relocation applies to this artifact type; the install location follows the ecosystem convention exactly.



    该项目必须为潜在开发人员提供一种快速安装所有项目成果和支持环境所必需的环境,包括测试套件和测试环境。必须通过常规惯例执行。 [installation_development_quick]
    可以使用生成的容器和/或安装脚本来实现。外部依赖关系一般通过调用系统和/或语言包管理器(根据 external_dependencies 条款)进行安装。

    CONTRIBUTING.md section Dev loop (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) documents a one-command setup - uv sync installs the complete dev and test environment from the hash-pinned uv.lock - followed by uv run pytest / ruff / mypy / pre-commit, matching what CI runs. A committed .devcontainer/devcontainer.json additionally provides a ready-made containerized dev environment with uv preinstalled.


  • 外部维护的组件


    项目必须以计算机可处理的方式列出外部依赖关系。 (需要网址) [external_dependencies]
    通常这是使用包管理器和/或构建系统的约定完成的。请注意,这有助于实施 installation_development_quick

    Runtime dependencies are declared machine-readably in https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/manifest.json ("requirements": [] - the integration deliberately ships zero packages; everything it imports is vendored and pinned by Home Assistant core, as documented in SECURITY.md's supply-chain section). Development/test dependencies are declared in https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/pyproject.toml and hash-pinned in uv.lock; Dependabot processes both the pip and github-actions ecosystems weekly.



    项目必须监视或定期检查其外部依赖(包括便利副本)以检测已知的漏洞,并修复可利用的漏洞或将其验证为不可利用的漏洞。 [dependency_monitoring]
    这可以使用源分析器/依赖项检查工具/软件组成分析工具(例如OWASP的Dependency-CheckSonatype的Nexus AuditorSynopsys的Black Duck软件组成分析Bundler-audit(针对Ruby))来完成。一些程序包管理器包括执行此操作的机制。如果无法利用组件的漏洞,这是可以接受的,但是这种分析是困难的,有时简单地更新或修复零件就更容易。

    Dependabot runs weekly on both the pip lockfile and github-actions ecosystems (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/dependabot.yml), and every PR is gated by a required "Dependency review" check (actions/dependency-review-action, fail-on-severity: moderate, vulnerability-check: true) in ci.yml. SECURITY.md documents the triage ladder for alerts (critical 72 h / high 7 d / rest 30 d) and the exploitability analysis: manifest.json ships zero runtime requirements, so lockfile CVEs are dev/CI-only and are triaged on that recorded basis.



    该项目必须满足下述情况之一:
    1. 可以轻松识别和更新重用的外部维护组件;
    2. 使用系统或编程语言提供的标准组件。
    这样,如果在重用的组件中发现了一个漏洞,将容易更新该组件。 [updateable_reused_components]
    符合这一条款的典型方法是使用系统和编程语言的包管理系统。许多FLOSS程序与“便利库”一起分发,这些库是标准库的本地副本(可能是分支)。一般没问题。但是,如果程序*必须*使用这些本地(分支)副本,则“标准”库的安全更新将使这些附加副本仍然易受攻击。这对于基于云的系统尤其是一个问题;如果云提供商更新他们的“标准”库,但程序不会使用它们,那么这些更新实际上不会有帮助。参见,例如,“Chromium:为什么它不在Fedora中作为适当的包”(Tom Callaway)

    The shipped integration reuses only components vendored and version-pinned by Home Assistant core - https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/manifest.json declares "requirements": [] - so users receive standard platform-provided components. Development dependencies are enumerated in pyproject.toml and hash-locked per artifact in uv.lock, and https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/dependabot.yml runs weekly grouped update PRs for both the pip and github-actions ecosystems.



    该项目应避免使用已弃用或过时的功能和API,如果FLOSS替代品在其使用的技术集合(“技术堆栈”)中以及项目支持的大多数用户中可用(以便用户可以随时访问该替代品)。 [interfaces_current]

    Ruff's pyupgrade (UP), flake8-async (ASYNC), and bugbear (B) rule families are enabled in pyproject.toml and gate every PR, flagging obsolete Python idioms and deprecated patterns (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/pyproject.toml); pytest runs with filterwarnings = "error" so deprecation warnings from the project's own code fail the suite (upstream homeassistant DeprecationWarnings are the only scoped exception). A weekly compat workflow additionally runs the full suite against the latest Home Assistant releases including betas to catch upcoming upstream deprecations early (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/compat.yml).


  • 自动测试套件


    必须将自动测试套件应用于至少一个分支的共享代码库的每次签入。该测试套件必须生成关于测试成功或失败的报告。 [automated_integration_testing]
    这个要求可以被视为test_continuous_integration的一个子集,但是仅仅是测试,而不需要持续集成。

    The full automated test suite (pytest, with a combined line+branch coverage floor of 89% enforced via --cov-fail-under) runs on every push to main and every pull request via https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml, producing a success/failure report as a GitHub check run on each commit; the check is required for merge by the protect-main ruleset.



    该项目必须为过去六个月内修复的至少50%的错误,在自动化测试套件中添加回归测试。 [regression_tests_added50]

    The committed test strategy (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/testing.md) requires that every escaped defect gets a named, pinned regression test and lists the existing pins (e.g. test_uses_outer_consumption_quantity_not_inner_values, test_baseline_looked_up_at_earliest_fetched_hour, test_band_reachback_baseline_after_long_absence). Verified in git history: 14 of the 16 integration-code bug-fix commits in the last six months (~87%) included automated-test additions or changes in the same commit, well above the 50% threshold.



    如果有至少一个FLOSS工具可以以所选语言度量此条款,该项目的FLOSS自动测试套件必须具有至少80%语句覆盖率。 [test_statement_coverage80]
    许多FLOSS工具可用于度量测试覆盖范围,包括gcov / lcov,Blanket.js,Istanbul和JCov。请注意,满足这个条款并不能保证测试套件是完备的,而不满足该条款则意味着测试套件很差。

    The FLOSS test suite (pytest + coverage.py, ~254 tests including recorder-backed integration tests) is gated in CI at a combined line+branch coverage floor of 89% via --cov-fail-under=89 in https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml, part of the required "Test (Python 3.14)" status check enforced by the zero-bypass protect-main ruleset. Current statement (line) coverage is 91.6% (local coverage.xml line-rate 0.9162; https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/testing.md records 90.0% combined at floor-setting time and defines the floor as an upward-only ratchet).


  • 新功能测试


    该项目必须具有正式的书面策略,一旦添加了主要的新功能,新功能的测试必须被添加到自动测试套件中。 [test_policy_mandated]

    docs/testing.md (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/testing.md) is the formal written test policy: its "Required depth per change type" section mandates automated tests for every functional change class (new endpoint => new fixture + parser tests; coordinator/statistics change => harness-integration tests, with real-recorder tests for sum-chain changes; every escaped defect => a named pinned regression test), enforced by the required CI check with a ratcheting coverage floor (--cov-fail-under=89). CONTRIBUTING.md and AGENTS.md's "Adding a New Endpoint" procedure repeat the tests-required rule for contributors.



    该项目必须在其关于变更建议的书面指导中包括要为主要新功能添加测试的策略。 [tests_documented_added]
    但是,只要在实践中添加了测试,即使是非正式规则也是可以接受的。

    https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md requires new-endpoint contributions to "Add an anonymised fixture, parser, client method, and tests", and https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/testing.md section "Required depth per change type" mandates the specific test layer for every class of change (new endpoint => new fixture + parser tests; cumulative-sum changes => recorder-backed tests in test_recorder_statistics.py; escaped defects => a named pinned regression test), enforced by CI's ratcheting 89% coverage floor.


  • 警告标志


    在实际允许时,项目必须最大限度地严格修复项目生成的软件中的警告。 [warnings_strict]
    某些项目无法有效启用某些警告。需要证明的是,项目正在努力的启用警告标志,以便早期发现错误。

    Warnings are maximally strict and enforced in CI: mypy runs with strict = true plus warn_unreachable, warn_unused_ignores, and warn_redundant_casts; ruff enables 17 rule families including security (flake8-bandit), pylint, bugbear, and a max-complexity 12 gate; and pytest converts warnings to errors (filterwarnings = "error" with narrowly scoped upstream exceptions) - all configured in pyproject.toml (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/pyproject.toml) and run as part of the required "Test (Python 3.14)" PR check in .github/workflows/ci.yml.


 安全 13/13

  • 安全开发知识


    该项目必须实施安全设计原则(来自“know_secure_design”)(如适用)。如果项目不生产软件,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [implement_secure_design]
    例如,项目结果应该具有故障安全默认值(默认情况下,访问决策应该拒绝,默认情况下项目的安装应该是安全的),也应该有完全的仲裁(每一个可能被限制的访问权限必须被检查,不可绕过)。请注意,在某些情况下,原则会发生冲突,在这种情况下必须做出选择(例如,许多机制使事情更复杂,违反“机制经济”/“保持最简化”的原则)。

    Secure design principles are applied and documented per trust boundary in the committed threat model (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/threat-model.md section 3): all untrusted AGL JSON passes allowlist parsing with numeric clamping to finite non-negative values (complete mediation / input validation, fuzz-enforced); least privilege governs OAuth scopes (read-only, with a documented re-assessment tripwire on any write scope) and CI tokens (read-only default, job-scoped writes); fail-safe defaults appear as fail-closed release gates (tag ancestry + signature verification) and a fail-closed secret-scanner self-test; secret exposure is minimised (memory-only 15-minute access token, rotate-on-use refresh token, hash-only fallback unique_id).


  • 使用基础的良好加密实践

    请注意,某些软件不需要使用加密机制。

    由项目产生的软件中的默认安全机制不得取决于具有已知严重弱点(例如,SHA-1密码散列算法或SSH中的CBC模式)的加密算法或模式。 [crypto_weaknesses]
    CERT:SSH CBC漏洞中讨论了SSH中CBC模式的问题。

    All cryptographic mechanisms in the integration use SHA-256 or stronger: the OAuth PKCE challenge is S256 (config_flow.py), TLS pins are SHA-256 SPKI hashes (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/agl/pinning.py), diagnostics anonymisation is HMAC-SHA256 (diagnostics.py), and the fallback unique_id is a SHA-256 digest. A search of the integration code finds no MD5 or SHA-1 usage; TLS itself is provided by the host Python/aiohttp stack with modern defaults.



    该项目应该支持多种加密算法,如果一个被破解,用户可以快速切换。普通的对称密钥算法包括AES,Twofish和Serpent。通用密码散列算法的选择包括SHA-2(包括SHA-224,SHA-256,SHA-384和SHA-512)和SHA-3。 [crypto_algorithm_agility]

    All transport cryptography is delegated to the platform TLS stack (Python ssl/OpenSSL via aiohttp), which negotiates among multiple cipher suites and inherits new/updated algorithms from platform updates - the project hard-codes no protocol cryptography. The only project-level primitive is SHA-256, used for the Trust-On-First-Use SPKI pin comparison (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/agl/pinning.py) and a fallback hashed unique_id; the pin check is deliberately warn-only (SECURITY.md), so a break in that hash degrades a defence-in-depth signal without blocking traffic, and the algorithm is swappable in a single helper.



    该项目必须支持在与其他信息(如配置文件,数据库和日志)分离的文件中存储身份验证凭据(如密码和动态令牌)以及私有加密密钥,并允许用户更新和替换它们,而无需重新编译代码。如果项目从不处理身份验证凭据和私有加密密钥,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [crypto_credential_agility]

    The only credential the project processes is the user's own AGL OAuth refresh token, which is stored in Home Assistant's config-entry store (.storage/core.config_entries) - a data file entirely separate from the integration code - alongside the TOFU TLS pin hashes; SECURITY.md section Storage documents this (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md). Credentials are replaced at any time via the standard HA Reconfigure/reauth flow with no code change (pure Python, nothing is compiled), and no credentials or keys are embedded in the source (enforced by the layered gitleaks scanning).



    该项目产生的软件应该支持所有网络通信的安全协议,如SSHv2或更高版本,TLS1.2或更高版本(HTTPS),IPsec,SFTP和SNMPv3。默认情况下,FTP,HTTP,Telnet,SSLv3或更早版本和SSHv1等不安全协议将被禁用,只有在用户专门配置时才启用。如果项目生成的软件不支持网络通信,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [crypto_used_network]

    All network communication is HTTPS: the only outbound endpoints are https://secure.agl.com.au and https://api.platform.agl.com.au, defined in https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/const.py, with no plaintext-protocol code path. TLS is additionally hardened with Trust-On-First-Use SPKI pinning of both hosts (custom_components/haggle/agl/pinning.py; documented in SECURITY.md section Trust-On-First-Use TLS pinning).



    项目生成的软件(如果支持或使用TLS)应该至少支持TLS版本1.2。请注意,TLS的前身称为SSL。如果软件不使用TLS,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [crypto_tls12]

    All upstream communication is HTTPS-only to secure.agl.com.au and api.platform.agl.com.au (const.py) via aiohttp on Python >=3.14, whose default TLS context negotiates a minimum of TLS 1.2 and supports TLS 1.3; no code in the repository lowers the TLS minimum or constructs a weakened SSL context. On top of transport TLS, both hosts are Trust-On-First-Use SPKI-pinned, with mismatches surfaced to the user (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/agl/pinning.py).



    由项目生成的软件必须,如果它支持TLS,则在使用TLS(包括子资源)时默认执行TLS证书验证。如果软件不使用TLS,请选择“不适用”(N / A)。 [crypto_certificate_verification]

    All upstream communication is HTTPS via aiohttp, whose default TLS certificate verification is never disabled anywhere in the shipped code (no ssl=False, verify overrides, or CERT_NONE exist in custom_components/), and the integration additionally layers Trust-On-First-Use SPKI pinning of both AGL endpoints on top of standard verification (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/agl/pinning.py; behaviour documented in SECURITY.md, 'Trust-On-First-Use TLS pinning').



    项目生成的软件(如果支持TLS)必须在发送具有私有信息(如安全Cookie)的HTTP头之前执行证书验证。如果软件不使用TLS,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [crypto_verification_private]

    All upstream endpoints are HTTPS (const.py: secure.agl.com.au, api.platform.agl.com.au) and every request goes through aiohttp with default certificate and hostname verification - no ssl=False, CERT_NONE, or check_hostname override exists anywhere in the tree - so verification completes during the TLS handshake before any HTTP headers carrying bearer tokens are sent. On top of WebPKI verification, a Trust-On-First-Use SHA-256 SPKI pin is checked on every new connection (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/agl/pinning.py); the pin layer is warn-only by documented design, but standard certificate verification always applies.


  • 安全发布


    该项目必须加密签名旨在广泛使用的项目结果的发布,并且必须有一个书面流程,向用户解释如何获取公共签名密钥并验证签名。这些签名的私钥不得在项目网站上直接向公众发布。如果发行版本不适用于广泛使用,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [signed_releases]
    项目结果包括源代码和适用的任何生成的可交付成果(例如,可执行文件,包和容器)。生成的交付项可以单独签名源代码。可以用签名的git标签实现(使用加密数字签名)。项目可以从git类似的工具分别提供生成的结果,但在这些情况下,单独的结果必须单独签署。

    Releases are cryptographically signed twice over: release tags are ed25519-SSH-signed by the maintainer's offline key and the release workflow refuses fail-closed any tag whose signature does not verify against the committed public key file https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/allowed_signers (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/release.yml, "Verify tag signature"); the installed artifact haggle.zip is Sigstore-attested via actions/attest-build-provenance with the .sigstore bundles and attested SPDX/CycloneDX SBOMs attached to every GitHub Release. The user verification process is documented in https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md (gh attestation verify haggle.zip --repo NaanyaBiz/haggle). No private key is on any distribution site - the tag key is held offline and Sigstore signing is keyless (ephemeral OIDC). Historical honesty: releases <= v0.4.0-beta.4 predate attestation and pre-2026-07-13 tags render Unverified, recorded as accepted risk RA-10; all releases from 2026-07 onward are signed and attested.



    建议在版本控制系统中,每个重要版本标签(作为主要版本的一部分的标签,次要版本或修复公开提到的漏洞)都按照signed_releases中的要求进行加密签名,并可验证。 [version_tags_signed]

    Release tags are cryptographically signed: each v* tag is SSH-signed (ed25519) with the maintainer's release identity, whose public key is committed at .github/allowed_signers (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/allowed_signers), and release.yml refuses fail-closed to build any tag whose signature does not verify against that file. I verified the latest tag (v0.4.0-beta.6) locally with git tag -v against the committed allowed_signers. Tags cut before 2026-07-13 predate the registered signing identity and are recorded as a historical exception (SECURITY.md RA-10).


  • 其他安全问题


    项目结果必须检查来自潜在不受信任来源的所有输入,以确保它们有效( *白名单*),如果对数据有限制,则拒绝无效输入。 [input_validation]
    请注意,将输入与“不良格式”(*黑名单*)的列表进行比较通常是不够的,因为攻击者通常可以绕过黑名单。例如,数字被转换成内部格式,然后检查它们是否在最小和最大(包括)之间,并且检查文本字符串以确保它们是有效的文本模式(例如,有效的UTF-8,长度,语法等)。一些数据可能需要是“任何东西”(例如,文件上传器),但这些数据通常是罕见的。

    The untrusted input surface - AGL API JSON (attacker-influenceable, since TLS pin mismatch is warn-only by design) - is processed by allowlist-style parsers in https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/agl/parser.py that are total over arbitrary JSON: only named fields are extracted (open-schema dict passthrough is prohibited in AGENTS.md), interval types are checked against a known set, and every numeric is clamped to a non-negative finite float via _safe_float before it can reach recorder statistics. The property is enforced by the atheris fuzz harness (tests/fuzz/fuzz_parser.py, a required PR check via fuzz.yml) and TestParserTotality in tests/test_parser.py.



    加固机制应该用于项目生产的软件,以便软件缺陷不太可能导致安全漏洞。 [hardening]
    加固机制可能包括HTTP头,如内容安全策略(CSP),用于减轻攻击的编译器标志(如-fstack-protector)或用以消除未定义行为的编译器标志。对于此条款的目的,最小权限不被认为是一种加固机制(最少权限是重要的,但是另有条款)。

    Multiple hardening layers make defects less likely to become vulnerabilities: both AGL endpoints are SPKI-pinned (TOFU) yet their JSON is still treated as attacker-influenceable - parsing is allowlist-style (no open-schema passthrough), numeric values are clamped through _safe_float so inf/NaN/negatives can never reach the recorder (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/custom_components/haggle/agl/parser.py), and the parser boundary is fuzz-tested with atheris on every PR plus a weekly deep run (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/fuzz.yml). Ruff's flake8-bandit security rules gate CI, diagnostics pass a scrub layer backed by leak tests, and upstream error bodies are stripped before exceptions propagate (docs/threat-model.md sections 2-3).



    该项目必须提供一个保证案例,证明其满足安全要求。保证案例必须包括:对威胁模型的描述,明确确定信任边界,确定设计原则得到适用,以及常见安全弱点已经被消减。 (需要网址) [assurance_case]
    一个保证案例是“一个文献记录的证据体系,提供了一个有说服力和有效的论据,指出一组关于系统属性的关键权利要求在给定环境中给定应用程序是充分合理的”(使用结构化保证案例模型的软件保证,Thomas Rhodes等人,NIST机构间报告7608)。信任边界是数据或执行改变其信任级别的边界,例如,典型Web应用程序中的服务器边界。常见做法是列出安全设计原则(例如Saltzer和Schroeer)和常见的实施安全漏洞(例如OWASP前10名或CWE / SANS前25名),并显示每个方案如何抵御。 BadgeApp保证案例可能是一个有用的例子。本条款与documentation_security,documentation_architecture和implement_secure_design等条款有关。

    The committed living threat model is the assurance case: it describes the system and threat model (an 18-threat STRIDE register, each threat tracked to a disposition with cited evidence), identifies five trust boundaries and the controls at each (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/threat-model.md sections 1-5), and argues how secure design principles are applied and common implementation weaknesses countered (allowlist parsing, numeric clamping, fuzz-enforced parser totality, secret redaction backed by leak tests, plus CodeQL SAST and atheris fuzzing as required merge gates - https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/SECURITY.md, 'Gating Policy'). The statement-level conformance map extends the argument control-by-control against the committed secure-SDLC standard (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/docs/compliance/conformance.md).


 分析 2/2

  • 静态代码分析


    如果至少有一个FLOSS工具能够以所选择的语言实现此条款,则该项目必须至少使用一个具有规则或方式的静态分析工具来查找分析语言或环境中的常见漏洞。 [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]
    专门设计用于寻找常见漏洞的静态分析工具更有可能找到它们。也就是说,使用任何静态工具通常会帮助找到一些问题,所以我们“通过”级别的徽章建议,但不要求这个条款。

    CodeQL Python analysis runs weekly and on every PR (https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/codeql.yml) and is one of the eight required status checks enforced by the zero-bypass protect-main ruleset. CI additionally runs ruff with the flake8-bandit security rule set ("S") enabled in pyproject.toml on every PR, so two FLOSS vulnerability-oriented static analyzers gate every change.


  • 动态代码分析


    如果由项目生成的软件包含使用内存不安全语言编写的软件(例如,C或C ++),项目必须至少使用一个动态工具(例如,fuzzer或web应用扫描程序)与一种检测缓冲区覆写等内存安全问题的机制组合例行使用。如果项目不生成以内存不安全语言编写的软件,请选择“不适用”(N/A)。 [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]
    检测内存安全问题的机制的示例包括AddressSanitizer(ASAN)(可在GCC和LLVM中使用),“Memory Sanitizer” valgrind 。其他可能使用的工具包括ThreadSanitizerUndefinedBehaviorSanitizer。广泛的断言也将起作用。

    The shipped software is written entirely in Python, a memory-safe managed language; the tree contains no C/C++/assembly and the integration declares zero compiled runtime requirements (manifest.json "requirements": []), so no memory-unsafe code exists to instrument. (Dynamic hostile-input testing runs regardless: atheris fuzzing of the parser trust boundary on every PR plus weekly deep runs, https://github.com/NaanyaBiz/haggle/blob/main/.github/workflows/fuzz.yml.)



该数据可在社区数据许可协议 – 许可性,版本 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0)下获取。这意味着数据接收方可以共享数据,无论是否经过修改,只要数据接收方在共享数据时提供本协议文本。请注明NaanyaBiz和OpenSSF最佳实践徽章贡献者。

项目徽章条目拥有者: NaanyaBiz.
最后更新于 2026-07-12 09:21:52 UTC, 最后更新于 2026-07-14 20:21:06 UTC。 最后在 2026-07-12 09:34:54 UTC 获得通过徽章。