.github

Miradi inayofuata mazoea bora hapa chini inaweza kujihakikisha kwa hiari na kuonyesha kuwa wamepata nishani ya mazoea bora ya Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa programu haitakuwa na kasoro au udhaifu; hata mbinu rasmi zinaweza kushindwa ikiwa vipimo au dhana ni sahihi. Wala hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa mradi utaendelea kuwa na jamii ya maendeleo yenye afya na inayofanya kazi vizuri. Hata hivyo, kufuata mazoea bora kunaweza kusaidia kuboresha matokeo ya miradi. Kwa mfano, baadhi ya mazoea huwezesha ukaguzi wa watu wengi kabla ya kutolewa, ambayo inaweza kusaidia kupata udhaifu wa kiufundi ambao vinginevyo ni vigumu kupata na kusaidia kujenga uaminifu na hamu ya mwingiliano wa kurudia kati ya wasanidi programu kutoka makampuni tofauti. Ili kupata nishani, vigezo vyote vya LAZIMA na LAZIMA WALA USIWAHI lazima vifuatwe, vigezo vyote vya INAPASWA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana na thibitisho, na vigezo vyote vya PENDEKEZA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana (tunataka vifikiwe angalau). Ikiwa unataka kuingiza maandishi ya thibitisho kama maoni ya jumla, badala ya kuwa maelezo ya busara kwamba hali ni inakubaliwa, anza kifungu cha maandishi na '//' ikifuatiwa na nafasi. Maoni ni karibu kupitia tovuti ya GitHub kama masuala au maombi ya kuvuta Kuna pia orodha ya barua pepe kwa majadiliano ya jumla.

Tunafuraha kutoa habari katika lugha nyingi, hata hivyo, ikiwa kuna mgongano au kutokuwa na usawa kati ya tafsiri, toleo la Kiingereza ni toleo lenye mamlaka.
Ikiwa huu ni mradi wako, tafadhali onyesha hali ya nishani yako ya msingi kwenye ukurasa wa mradi wako! Hali ya nishani ya msingi inaonekana kama hii: Kiwango cha nishani ya msingi kwa mradi 14058 ni baseline-2 Huu ndiyo jinsi ya kuweka nishani ya msingi:
Unaweza kuonyesha hali ya nishani yako ya msingi kwa kuweka hii katika faili yako ya markdown:
[![OpenSSF Baseline](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14058/baseline)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14058)
au kwa kuweka hii katika HTML yako:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14058"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/14058/baseline"></a>


Hizi ni vigezo vya Kiwango cha Msingi 3. Hizi ni vigezo vya toleo v2026.02.19.

Baseline Series: Kiwango cha Msingi 1 Kiwango cha Msingi 2 Kiwango cha Msingi 3

        

 Misingi

  • Jumla

    Kumbuka kwamba miradi mingine inaweza kutumia jina sawa.

    Shared workflows, community health files and org profile for Monumental Archive

    Tafadhali tumia muundo wa maneno ya leseni ya SPDX; mifano ni pamoja na "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", na "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Usitumie alama za nukuu za moja au mbili.
    Ikiwa kuna lugha zaidi ya moja, ziorodhe kama thamani zilizotengwa kwa koma (nafasi ni za hiari) na ziorodhe kuanzia iliyotumiwa zaidi hadi iliyotumiwa kidogo. Ikiwa kuna orodha ndefu, tafadhali orodhesha angalau tatu za kawaida zaidi. Ikiwa hakuna lugha (k.m., huu ni mradi wa nyaraka tu au wa majaribio tu), tumia herufi moja "-". Tafadhali tumia herufi kubwa za kawaida kwa kila lugha, k.m., "JavaScript".
    Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) ni mpango wa kuweka majina yenye muundo kwa mifumo ya teknolojia ya habari, programu, na vifurushi. Inatumika katika mifumo na hifadhidata nyingi wakati wa kuripoti udhaifu.

 Udhibiti 20/21 ●

  • Udhibiti


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ruhusa zinapopeana kwa kazi katika mfumo wa CI/CD, msimbo wa chanzo au usanidi LAZIMA upee tu ruhusa za chini zaidi zinazohitajika kwa shughuli zinazohusiana. [OSPS-AC-04.02]
    Sanidi mifumo ya CI/CD ya mradi ili kupea ruhusa za chini zinazopatikana kwa watumiaji na huduma kwa chaguomsingi, ukipandisha ruhusa tu inapohitajika kwa kazi maalum. Katika baadhi ya mifumo ya udhibiti wa toleo, hii inaweza kufanyika katika kiwango cha shirika au hifadhi. Ikiwa sivyo, weka ruhusa katika kiwango cha juu cha mfumo.

    Every workflow declares an explicit permissions: block scoped to what that job actually needs, on top of a read-only default set by the repository baseline. The strongest case is enforced by a lint: no workflow that runs caller-supplied code may hold id-token: write, and lint:capability-boundary fails the build if one ever does.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifuko ya CI/CD inayokubali pembejeo za mshirika anayeaminika LAZIMA isafishe na kuthibitisha pembejeo hiyo kabla ya kutumia katika mfuko. [OSPS-BR-01.04]
    Mifuko ya CI/CD inapaswa kusafisha (kunukuu, kutoroka au kutoka kwa maadili yanayotarajiwa) pembejeo zote za mshirika kwenye utekelezaji wa mtiririko wa kazi wa wazi. Ingawa washirika kwa ujumla wanaaminika, pembejeo za mwongozo kwa mtiririko wa kazi haiwezi kukaguliwa na inaweza kutumiwa vibaya na utekaji wa akaunti au tishio la ndani.

    Collaborator-supplied input is validated rather than trusted: workflow inputs are checked against allowlists (the artifact classes: set, the release-stub shape), and zizmor fails the gate on any pattern that would interpolate untrusted context into a shell.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Toleo rasmi linapobuniwa, mali zote ndani ya toleo hilo LAZIMA zihusianishwe wazi na kitambulisho cha toleo au kitambulisho kingine cha kipekee kwa mali hiyo. [OSPS-BR-02.02]
    Panga kitambulisho cha kipekee cha toleo kwa kila mali ya programu inayozalishwa na mradi, ukifuata kawaida ya uainishaji thabiti au mpango wa nambari. Mifano ni pamoja na SemVer, CalVer, au kitambulisho cha git commit.

    Verified on the published release: assets are named for the release identifier (github-1.22.2.tar.gz, github-1.22.2.spdx.json) and each is additionally bound by cryptographic digest in checksums.txt and in the attestations.intoto.jsonl evidence bundle, so the association survives a rename. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/releases/tag/v1.22.2


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA ufafanue sera ya kudhibiti siri na ushahidi unaotumika na mradi. Sera inapaswa kujumuisha mwongozo wa kuhifadhi, kufikia, na kuzungusha siri na ushahidi. [OSPS-BR-07.02]
    Eleza jinsi siri na ushahidi vinavyodhibitiwa na kutumika ndani ya mradi. Hii inapaswa kujumuisha maelezo ya jinsi siri zinavyohifadhiwa (k.m., kwa kutumia zana ya usimamizi wa siri), jinsi ufikiaji unavyodhibitiwa, na jinsi siri zinavyozungushwa au kusasishwa. Hakikisha kwamba habari nyeti haziingizwi kwa msimbo katika msimbo wa chanzo au kuhifadhiwa katika mifumo ya udhibiti wa toleo.

    docs/continuity.md is the secrets policy in operational form: an asset table naming every credential the project uses, where it is stored, who can reach it, and how it is rotated or recreated — including the one standing token, whose expiry is designed to fail loudly rather than silently under-claim. The policy is short because the architecture removes most secrets: publishing is keyless via OIDC and trusted publishing, and no signing key exists to store. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/continuity.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi ulipotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na maelekezo ya kuthibitisha uadilifu na uhalali wa mali za toleo. [OSPS-DO-03.01]
    Maelekezo katika mradi yanapaswa kuwa na habari kuhusu teknolojia iliyotumika, amri za kuendesha, na matokeo yanayotarajiwa. Inapowezekana, epuka kuhifadhi nyaraka hizi katika mahali pamoja na mfumo wa ujenzi na utoaji wa toleo ili kuepuka ukiukaji mmoja kuhatarisha programu na nyaraka za kuthibitisha uadilifu wa programu.

    docs/runbook.md has a section written from the consumer's position — 'Verifying as a consumer would' — giving the commands to check a release's attestations and Sigstore evidence bundle against the published digests. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/runbook.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na maelekezo ya kuthibitisha utambulisho unaotarajiwa wa mtu au mchakato unaothibitisha toleo la programu. [OSPS-DO-03.02]
    Utambulisho unaotarajiwa unaweza kuwa katika muundo wa vitambulisho vya funguo vilivyotumika kusaini, mtoa na utambulisho kutoka cheti cha sigstore, au aina nyingine zinazofanana. Inapowezekana, epuka kuhifadhi nyaraka hii mahali palipo sawa na mirija ya kujenga na kutoa ili kuepuka ukiukaji mmoja kuhatarisha programu na nyaraka za kuthibitisha uadilifu wa programu.

    The same documentation covers authorship identity, which in a keyless design is the workflow identity: verification checks the signer's workflow ref in the certificate rather than a personal key, and the release tooling exposes an explicit signer-workflow flag so a consumer can assert which identity must have signed. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/runbook.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe kauli ya maelezo kuhusu wigo na muda wa msaada kwa kila toleo. [OSPS-DO-04.01]
    Ili kuwasilisha wigo na muda wa msaada kwa rasilimali za programu zilizotolewa za mradi, mradi unapaswa kuwa na faili ya SUPPORT.md, sehemu ya "Msaada" katika SECURITY.md, au nyaraka nyingine zinazoweka wazi mzunguko wa maisha wa msaada, ikijumuisha muda unaotarajiwa wa msaada kwa kila toleo, aina za msaada zinazotolewa (k.m., marekebisho ya hitilafu, sasisho za usalama), na sera au taratibu yoyote husika ya kupata msaada.

    SECURITY.md section 'Supported versions and end of life' states the scope and duration of support: only the latest release of each project receives security updates, fixes ship by rolling forward from main rather than by backporting, and a release is therefore supported exactly until the next release exists. There are no long-term support branches and no announced support windows. A repository with different needs states its own policy in its own SECURITY.md, which then replaces this one for that repository. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zitoe kauli ya maelezo ya wakati matoleo au matoleo hayatapokea tena sasisho za usalama. [OSPS-DO-05.01]
    Ili kuwasilisha wigo na muda wa msaada kwa marekebisho ya usalama, mradi unapaswa kuwa na SUPPORT.md au nyaraka nyingine zinazoweka wazi sera ya mradi ya sasisho za usalama.

    The same section states when a release stops receiving security updates: a release is end-of-life for security purposes at the point the next release exists, since fixes ship only by rolling forward from main. This is a deliberate consequence of the release design - every release stays reproducible and its evidence permanent, but maintenance effort goes to the tip. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Inapokuwa hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na sera kwamba washirikiano wa msimbo wanapimwa kabla ya kupewa ruhusa zilizopandishwa kwa rasilimali nyeti. [OSPS-GV-04.01]
    Chapisha sera inayoweza kutekelezwa katika nyaraka za mradi inayohitaji washirikiano wa msimbo kupimwa na kuidhinishwa kabla ya kupewa ruhusa zilizopandishwa kwa rasilimali nyeti, kama vile idhini ya kuunganisha au ufikiaji kwa siri. Inashauriwa kwamba upimaji ujumuishe kuanzisha mfululizo wa utambulisho unaoweza kuhalalishwa kama vile kuthibitisha ushirikiano wa mchangiaji na shirika linalojulikana na kuaminika.

    GOVERNANCE.md section 'Escalation and permissions' carries the policy: a collaborator is reviewed before being granted any escalated permission. Concretely, before an account joins @monumental-archive/owners or receives write access anywhere, the maintainer reviews who they are, why the access is needed and what the smallest sufficient grant is - and the grant is then recorded in the settings-as-code baseline so drift is auditable. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#escalation-and-permissions


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, rasilimali zote za programu zilizotolewa na zilizokusanywa LAZIMA zikabidhi pamoja na orodha ya bili ya programu. [OSPS-QA-02.02]
    Inashauriwa kuzalisha SBOM kiotomatiki wakati wa kujenga kwa kutumia zana ambayo imepimwa kwa usahihi. Hii huwezesha watumiaji kuingiza data hii kwa njia ya kiwango pamoja na miradi mingine katika mazingira yao.

    Every release ships an SPDX software bill of materials as a release asset — verified on v1.22.2: github-1.22.2.spdx.json, alongside github-1.22.2.tar.gz, checksums.txt and the attestations.intoto.jsonl evidence bundle. The SBOM is generated by the release pipeline (release/generate-sbom.sh) rather than hand-maintained. Previously answered N/A on the grounds that this repository compiles nothing; that was technically available but less true than the facts — the SBOM is published regardless. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/releases/tag/v1.22.2


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo linalojumuisha hifadhi nyingi za chanzo cha msimbo, miradi yote midogo LAZIMA ilazimishe mahitaji ya usalama ambayo ni kali au kali zaidi kuliko msimbo wa msingi. [OSPS-QA-04.02]
    Hifadhi yoyote ya ziada ya msimbo wa miradi midogo iliyozalishwa na mradi na kukusanywa katika toleo lazima ilazimishe mahitaji ya usalama kama inavyolingana na hali na nia ya msimbo husika. Kwa kuongeza kufuata mahitaji ya msingi wa OSPS yanayolingana, hii inaweza kujumuisha kuhitaji ukaguzi wa usalama, kuhakikisha kuwa haina udhaifu, na kuhakikisha kuwa haina masuala ya usalama yanayojulikana.

    A release of this project comprises this single source repository; there are no subprojects releasing alongside it. Other repositories in the organisation consume this one's governance, which is by construction as strict or stricter.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Inapokuwa hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziweke wazi lini na jinsi majaribio yanavyotekelezwa. [OSPS-QA-06.02]
    Ongeza sehemu kwenye nyaraka za kuchangia inayoweka wazi jinsi ya kutekeleza majaribio kienyeji na jinsi ya kutekeleza majaribio katika mirija ya CI/CD. Nyaraka zinapaswa kuweka wazi majaribio yanajaribu nini na jinsi ya kutafsiri matokeo.

    Documented in both places a reader would look: README.md states that mise run ci locally is exactly what CI runs, and CONTRIBUTING.md makes a green gate a requirement for every change. When they run is equally explicit — on every pull request and every push to main, with the network-bound checks on a Monday schedule. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Inapokuwa hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera kwamba mabadiliko yote makubwa kwa programu inayozalishwa na mradi yanapaswa kuongeza au kusasisha majaribio ya utendaji katika seti ya majaribio ya kiatomati. [OSPS-QA-06.03]
    Ongeza sehemu kwenye nyaraka za kuchangia inayoweka wazi sera ya kuongeza au kusasisha majaribio. Sera inapaswa kuweka wazi ni nini kinachojumuisha mabadiliko makubwa na majaribio yapi yanapaswa kuongezwa au kusasishwa.

    CONTRIBUTING.md, item 3 of 'Requirements for acceptable contributions', is the policy and it sits in the contributor-facing documentation: a change that adds or changes behaviour adds the check that holds it - a test that fails without the change where a test suite exists, or a lint, audit task or workflow assertion where the product is configuration and policy - and a bug fix adds the case that reproduced the bug. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati kuruhusu kumefanywa kwa tawi kuu, mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo la mradi LAZIMA uhitaji angalau idhini moja ya binadamu asiye mwandishi ya mabadiliko kabla ya kuunganisha. [OSPS-QA-07.01]
    Sanidi mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo la mradi kuhitaji angalau idhini moja ya binadamu asiye mwandishi ya mabadiliko kabla ya kuunganisha katika toleo au tawi kuu. Hii inaweza kupatikana kwa kuhitaji ombi la kuvuta kupimwa na kuidhinishwa na angalau mshirikiano mmoja mwingine kabla ya kunaweza kuunganishwa.

    With a single maintainer there is no non-author human approval available, so this is not enforced. It is the headcount wall this project records rather than works around: the same boundary as Gold's two_person_review and SLSA Source L4, tracked as an open issue rather than quietly claimed. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/slsa-reference.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, mradi LAZIMA ufanye ufuatiliaji wa tisho na uchambuzi wa uso wa shambulio ili kuelewa na kulinda dhidi ya mashambulizi kwenye njia za msimbo muhimu, majukumu, na mwingiliano ndani ya mfumo. [OSPS-SA-03.02]
    Ufuatiliaji wa tisho ni shughuli ambapo mradi unaangalia msimbo, michakato na miundombinu inayohusiana, viunganishi, vipengele muhimu na "kufikiria kama kibogoyo" na kufanya mapendekezo ya jinsi mfumo unaweza kuvunjwa au kuhatarisha. Kila tisho iliyotambuliwa imeorodheshwa ili mradi uweze kufikiria jinsi ya kuepuka au kufunga pengo/udhaifu wowote unaoweza kutokea kwa kujihadhari. Hakikisha hii imesasishwa kwa vipengele vipya au mabadiliko ya kuvunja.

    docs/build-assessment.md and docs/source-assessment.md carry the threat model and attack-surface analysis: the critical paths are named (caller code reaching a privileged signing identity, unpinned supply-chain substitution, silent settings drift, forged signer identities in the transparency log), each with the control that protects it and the residual risk accepted. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/build-assessment.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Wakati uko hai, udhaifu wowote katika vipengele vya programu visivyoathiri mradi LAZIMA viwe vimeainishwa katika hati ya VEX, ikiendeleza ripoti ya udhaifu na maelezo ya kutokutumiwa vibaya. [OSPS-VM-04.02]
    Weka mfumo wa mlisho wa VEX unaowasiliana hali ya utumiaji vibaya wa udhaifu unaojulikana, ikiwa ni pamoja na maelezo ya tathmini au marekebisho yoyote yaliyowekwa kusimamisha msimbo ulio na udhaifu usiotekelezwa.

    Exactly this: the dependency track emits VEX documents keyed by package@version recording non-exploitability decisions for advisories that do not affect the project, with coverage derived rather than asserted, and the release path refuses to publish while an advisory in the SBOM is undecided. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/dependency-track.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Wakati uko hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya SCA yanayohusiana na udhaifu na leseni. [OSPS-VM-05.01]
    Andika sera katika mradi inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya SCA yanayohusiana na udhaifu na leseni. Jumuisha mchakato wa kutambua, kutanguliza, na kurekebisha matokeo haya.

    docs/dependency-track.md defines the thresholds: cargo-deny bans and licence rules are deterministic and fail the gate, sources are restricted to a single registry with unknown-registry and unknown-git denied, and every advisory must exit through an explicit decision rather than being left open. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/dependency-track.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Wakati uko hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera ya kushughulikia ukiukaji wa SCA kabla ya toleo lolote. [OSPS-VM-05.02]
    Andika sera katika mradi wa kushughulikia matokeo ya Uchambuzi wa Muundo wa Programu yanayotumika kabla ya toleo lolote, na ongeza ukaguzi wa hali unaothibitisha kufuata sera hiyo kabla ya toleo.

    The policy is enforced at the release boundary, not merely stated: the release path refuses to publish with an undecided advisory in its SBOM. It has already blocked a real release in the lab rather than being theoretical. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/dependency-track.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Wakati uko hai, mabadiliko yote kwenye msingi wa msimbo wa mradi LAZIMA yaangaliwe kiatomati dhidi ya sera iliyoandikwa ya utegemezi mbaya na udhaifu unaojulikana katika utegemezi, kisha yazuiliwe katika hali ya ukiukaji, isipokuwa inapotangazwa na kuzuiliwa kama isiyotumiwa vibaya. [OSPS-VM-05.03]
    Unda ukaguzi wa hali katika mfumo wa kudhibiti toleo la mradi unaoendesha zana ya Uchambuzi wa Muundo wa Programu kwenye mabadiliko yote ya msingi wa msimbo. Hitaji kwamba ukaguzi wa hali upite kabla mabadiliko kusanywa.

    Automatically, on every change: cargo-deny runs deterministically in the gate over the lockfile and the committed deny.toml, dependency-review runs on every pull request, and Renovate and Dependabot raise updates as advisories land. The policy those checks enforce is written in docs/dependency-track.md. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/docs/dependency-track.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Wakati uko hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya SAST. [OSPS-VM-06.01]
    Andika sera katika mradi inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya Upimaji wa Usalama wa Programu Tuli (SAST). Jumuisha mchakato wa kutambua, kutanguliza, na kurekebisha matokeo haya.

    SECURITY.md section 'Static analysis policy' defines the remediation threshold, and it is zero: any SAST finding - CodeQL, the lint belt, zizmor and peers - fails the CI gate, and a red gate cannot merge, so findings are remediated or explicitly and reviewably suppressed with a written reason before the change lands. There is no severity triage queue for static findings because there is no state in which one is outstanding on a default branch. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Wakati uko hai, mabadiliko yote kwenye msingi wa msimbo wa mradi LAZIMA yaangaliwe kiatomati dhidi ya sera iliyoandikwa ya udhaifu wa usalama na kuzuiliwa katika hali ya ukiukaji isipokuwa inapotangazwa na kuzuiliwa kama isiyotumiwa vibaya. [OSPS-VM-06.02]
    Unda ukaguzi wa hali katika mfumo wa kudhibiti toleo la mradi unaoendesha zana ya Upimaji wa Usalama wa Programu Tuli (SAST) kwenye mabadiliko yote ya msingi wa msimbo. Hitaji kwamba ukaguzi wa hali upite kabla mabadiliko kusanywa.

    Every change is automatically evaluated and blocked on violation: CodeQL default setup is enforced organisation-wide, and shellcheck, actionlint, zizmor and trivy run in the gate, which is a required status check that a pull request cannot merge past. The requirement that the gate pass is documented in CONTRIBUTING.md; what is missing is only a stated severity threshold, recorded honestly under osps_vm_06_01. https://github.com/monumental-archive/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md



Data hii inapatikana chini ya Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). Hii inamaanisha kuwa Mpokeaji wa Data anaweza kushiriki Data, na au bila marekebisho, mradi Mpokeaji wa Data anapatanisha maandishi ya mkataba huu na Data iliyoshirikiwa. Tafadhali tambua Carl Allen na wachangiaji wa nishani ya Mazoea Bora ya OpenSSF.

Ingizo la nishani ya mradi linamilikiwa na: Carl Allen.
Ingizo liliundwa siku 2026-08-13 07:47:41 UTC, iliyosasishwa mara ya mwisho siku 2026-08-13 19:08:33 UTC. Ilipata mara ya mwisho nishani ya kupita siku 2026-08-13 08:01:08 UTC.