docker-net-dhcp

Miradi inayofuata mazoea bora hapa chini inaweza kujihakikisha kwa hiari na kuonyesha kuwa wamepata nishani ya mazoea bora ya Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa programu haitakuwa na kasoro au udhaifu; hata mbinu rasmi zinaweza kushindwa ikiwa vipimo au dhana ni sahihi. Wala hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa mradi utaendelea kuwa na jamii ya maendeleo yenye afya na inayofanya kazi vizuri. Hata hivyo, kufuata mazoea bora kunaweza kusaidia kuboresha matokeo ya miradi. Kwa mfano, baadhi ya mazoea huwezesha ukaguzi wa watu wengi kabla ya kutolewa, ambayo inaweza kusaidia kupata udhaifu wa kiufundi ambao vinginevyo ni vigumu kupata na kusaidia kujenga uaminifu na hamu ya mwingiliano wa kurudia kati ya wasanidi programu kutoka makampuni tofauti. Ili kupata nishani, vigezo vyote vya LAZIMA na LAZIMA WALA USIWAHI lazima vifuatwe, vigezo vyote vya INAPASWA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana na thibitisho, na vigezo vyote vya PENDEKEZA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana (tunataka vifikiwe angalau). Ikiwa unataka kuingiza maandishi ya thibitisho kama maoni ya jumla, badala ya kuwa maelezo ya busara kwamba hali ni inakubaliwa, anza kifungu cha maandishi na '//' ikifuatiwa na nafasi. Maoni ni karibu kupitia tovuti ya GitHub kama masuala au maombi ya kuvuta Kuna pia orodha ya barua pepe kwa majadiliano ya jumla.

Tunafuraha kutoa habari katika lugha nyingi, hata hivyo, ikiwa kuna mgongano au kutokuwa na usawa kati ya tafsiri, toleo la Kiingereza ni toleo lenye mamlaka.
Ikiwa huu ni mradi wako, tafadhali onyesha hadhi ya nishani yako kwenye ukurasa wa mradi wako! Hadhi ya nishani inaonekana kama hii: Kiwango cha nishani kwa mradi 13229 ni passing Hapa ni jinsi ya kuiweka:
Unaweza kuonyesha hali ya nishani yako kwa kuweka hii katika faili yako ya markdown:
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13229/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13229)
au kwa kuweka hii katika HTML yako:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13229"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13229/badge"></a>


Hizi ni vigezo vya kiwango cha Dhahabu. Unaweza pia kuangalia vigezo vya kiwango cha Kupita au Fedha.

Baseline Series: Kiwango cha Msingi 1 Kiwango cha Msingi 2 Kiwango cha Msingi 3

        

 Misingi 2/5 ●

  • Jumla

    Kumbuka kwamba miradi mingine inaweza kutumia jina sawa.

    Docker network plugin: containers get DHCP leases from the LAN. Modernized fork of devplayer0/docker-net-dhcp with macvlan attachment mode.

    Tafadhali tumia muundo wa maneno ya leseni ya SPDX; mifano ni pamoja na "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", na "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Usitumie alama za nukuu za moja au mbili.
    Ikiwa kuna lugha zaidi ya moja, ziorodhe kama thamani zilizotengwa kwa koma (nafasi ni za hiari) na ziorodhe kuanzia iliyotumiwa zaidi hadi iliyotumiwa kidogo. Ikiwa kuna orodha ndefu, tafadhali orodhesha angalau tatu za kawaida zaidi. Ikiwa hakuna lugha (k.m., huu ni mradi wa nyaraka tu au wa majaribio tu), tumia herufi moja "-". Tafadhali tumia herufi kubwa za kawaida kwa kila lugha, k.m., "JavaScript".
    Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) ni mpango wa kuweka majina yenye muundo kwa mifumo ya teknolojia ya habari, programu, na vifurushi. Inatumika katika mifumo na hifadhidata nyingi wakati wa kuripoti udhaifu.

  • Mahitaji ya awali


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA ufikie kiwango cha nishani ya fedha. [achieve_silver]

  • Usimamizi wa mradi


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na "bus factor" ya 2 au zaidi. (URL inahitajika) [bus_factor]
    "Bus factor" (pia inajulikana kama "truck factor") ni idadi ya chini ya washiriki wa mradi ambao wanapaswa kutoweka ghafla kutoka kwenye mradi ("kupigwa na basi") kabla ya mradi kusimama kwa sababu ya ukosefu wa wafanyakazi wenye elimu au wenye uwezo. Zana ya truck-factor inaweza kukadiria hii kwa miradi kwenye GitHub. Kwa maelezo zaidi, angalia Kutathmini Bus Factor ya Hifadhi za Git na Cosentino et al.

    The bus factor is 1. This is stated openly rather than glossed at https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md — the project is single-maintainer today and explicitly invites co-maintainers.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na angalau wachangiaji wawili wasiohusika. (URL inahitajika) [contributors_unassociated]
    Wachangiaji wanahusianishwa ikiwa wanalipwa kufanya kazi na shirika moja (kama mwajiriwa au mkandarasi) na shirika lile linapata faida kutokana na matokeo ya mradi. Misaada ya kifedha haihesabiwi kuwa kutoka shirika sawa ikiwa inapitia mashirika mengine (k.m., misaada ya sayansi inayolipwa kwa mashirika tofauti kutoka serikali ya kawaida au chanzo cha NGO haifanyi wachangiaji kuhusianishwa). Mtu ni mchangiaji muhimu ikiwa amefanya michango isiyojulikana kwa mradi katika mwaka uliopita. Mifano ya viashiria vizuri vya mchangiaji muhimu ni: ameandika angalau mistari 1,000 ya msimbo, amechangia commits 50, au amechangia angalau kurasa 20 za nyaraka.

    The fork has one significant contributor. Outside contributions arrive as issues and occasional pull requests, but not at the level of two significant unassociated contributors.


  • Mengine


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA ujumuishe tamko la leseni katika kila faili ya chanzo. Hii YAWEZA kufanyika kwa kujumuisha yafuatayo ndani ya maoni karibu na mwanzo wa kila faili: SPDX-License-Identifier: [maneno ya leseni ya SPDX kwa mradi]. [license_per_file]
    Hii pia YAWEZA kufanyika kwa kujumuisha tamko katika lugha asilia ikitambulisha leseni. Mradi pia YAWEZA kujumuisha URL thabiti inayoelekeza kwenye maandishi ya leseni, au maandishi kamili ya leseni. Kumbuka kwamba kigezo cha license_location kinahitaji leseni ya mradi iwe mahali pa kawaida. Angalia mafunzo haya ya SPDX kwa maelezo zaidi kuhusu maneno ya leseni ya SPDX. Kumbuka uhusiano na copyright_per_file, ambayo yaliyomo yake kwa kawaida yangetangulia maelezo ya leseni.

    Every source file in the repository carries "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-only" as its second comment line. The same gate, scripts/check-license-headers.sh, enforces it over the same set of files and rejects any other SPDX expression. The expression is GPL-3.0-only and not GPL-3.0-or-later because neither LICENSE.md here nor in devplayer0/docker-net-dhcp, the project this one succeeds, says "or any later version"; under GPLv3 section 14 that silence means only version 3 applies, and adopting -or-later would extend a permission the original authors never granted.


 Udhibiti wa Mabadiliko 3/4 ●

  • Hifadhi ya chanzo ya kudhibiti toleo ya hadharani


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Hifadhi ya chanzo ya mradi LAZIMA itumie programu ya kawaida ya kudhibiti toleo linalosambazwa (k.m., git au mercurial). [repo_distributed]
    Git haihitajiki kihususa na miradi inaweza kutumia programu ya udhibiti wa toleo iliyokusanyika (kama subversion) na sababu.

    Repository on GitHub, which uses git. git is distributed.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA utambulishe kazi ndogo ambazo zinaweza kufanywa na wachangiaji wapya au wa mara kwa mara. (URL inahitajika) [small_tasks]
    Utambulisho huu kwa kawaida unafanyika kwa kuweka alama masuala yaliyochaguliwa katika kifuatiliaji cha masuala kwa lebo moja au zaidi ambazo mradi unatumia kwa madhumuni hayo, k.m., up-for-grabs, first-timers-only, "Marekebisho madogo", microtask, au IdealFirstBug. Kazi hizi mpya hazihitaji kujumuisha kuongeza utendaji; zinaweza kuwa kuboresha nyaraka, kuongeza hali za majaribio, au chochote kingine kinachosaidia mradi na kusaidia mchangiaji kuelewa zaidi kuhusu mradi.

    Unmet today. The tracker carries a good first issue label and it was seeded with self-contained starter tasks, each stating the gap, the file to look at and the command that verifies the fix. Those were closed as the work they described landed, and no unclaimed work currently qualifies: the project's own standard is that a starter task is a real gap found during ordinary work, not one invented to carry the label, and inventing three would satisfy this criterion by making the claim false in a different way. The README's Contributing section says so plainly and, instead of linking a filter that returns nothing, sends a newcomer to the repository's Q&A discussions, which is a route that exists: it is published as a contact link on the new-issue chooser, and neither issue form fits the request because each stamps a type label that would be wrong for it. This answer is enforced, not remembered: scripts/check-good-first-issues.sh binds the status, the README's promise, the ask route and the label's open count to each other in both directions, so it goes red the day a genuine starter task is filed and this answer becomes Met again, and red too if the route the README names stops being one the repository offers.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uhitaji uthibitishaji wa mambo mawili (2FA) kwa wasanidi programu ili kubadilisha hifadhi ya kati au kupata data nyeti (kama ripoti za faragha za udhaifu). Utaratibu huu wa 2FA YAWEZA kutumia taratibu bila taratibu za usimbuaji kama SMS, ingawa hii hairuhusiwi. [require_2FA]

    Two-factor authentication is enabled and enforced on the only account with write access to the repository and with access to private vulnerability reports; the GitHub API reports two_factor_authentication as true. Two factors are registered: a WebAuthn passkey and a TOTP application. No bot or machine account bypasses it.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Uthibitishaji wa mambo mawili (2FA) ya mradi INAPASWA kutumia taratibu za usimbuaji ili kuzuia ujigeuzi. Uthibitishaji wa 2FA unaotegemea Huduma ya Ujumbe Mfupi (SMS), peke yake, HAUKIDHI kigezo hiki, kwa kuwa haufichui. [secure_2FA]
    Utaratibu wa 2FA unaokidhi kigezo hiki unaweza kuwa programu ya Nywila ya Mara Moja Inayotegemea Muda (TOTP) ambayo inazalisha kiotomatiki msimbo wa uthibitishaji unaobadilika baada ya muda fulani. Kumbuka kwamba GitHub inasaidia TOTP.

    Both registered factors use cryptographic mechanisms. The primary is a WebAuthn passkey, which is public-key based and phishing-resistant; a TOTP application is registered as the fallback, which the criterion also accepts. SMS-based 2FA is not used.


 Ubora 4/7 ●

  • Viwango vya msimbo


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uandike mahitaji yake ya kukagua msimbo, pamoja na jinsi ukaguzi wa nambari unafanywa, nini lazima ichunguzwe, na nini kinachohitajika ili ikubalike. (URL inahitajika) [code_review_standards]
    Angalia pia two_person_review na contribution_requirements.

    What a change must satisfy to be acceptable is documented for contributors — target branch, coding standard, test expectations, authorship rule, and the full set of checks that must be green before merge — at https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp#contributing, with a pull request template that restates the checklist. Branch protection enforces the mechanical half of that review on every pull request.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na angalau 50% ya marekebisho yote yaliyopendekezwa kupitishwa kabla ya kutolewa na mtu mwingine isipokuwa mwandishi, ili kuamua ikiwa ni marekebisho ya manufaa na huru ya masuala yaliyojulikana ambayo yangepingana na ujumuishaji wake [two_person_review]

    Honestly unmet: with a single maintainer, changes cannot be reviewed before release by a person other than the author. Automated review substitutes as far as it can — required unit, staticcheck, live integration, govulncheck, actionlint, and attribution checks on every pull request, plus CodeQL — but that is not a second human reviewer.


  • Mfumo wa ujenzi unaofanya kazi


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na ujenzi unaorudiwa. Ikiwa hakuna ujenzi unaofanyika (k.m., lugha za uandishi ambapo msimbo wa chanzo unatumika moja kwa moja badala ya kukusanywa), chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). (URL inahitajika) [build_reproducible]
    Ujenzi unaorudiwa unamaanisha kwamba pande nyingi zinaweza kwa uhuru kurudia mchakato wa kuzalisha taarifa kutoka faili za chanzo na kupata matokeo sawa ya biti-kwa-biti. Katika hali fulani, hii inaweza kutatuliwa kwa kulazimisha mpangilio fulani wa aina. Wasanidi wa JavaScript wanaweza kuzingatia kutumia npm shrinkwrap na webpack OccurrenceOrderPlugin. Watumiaji wa GCC na clang wanaweza kupata chaguo la -frandom-seed kuwa na manufaa. Mazingira ya ujenzi (ikijumuisha zana) kwa kawaida yanaweza kufafanuliwa kwa pande za nje kwa kubainisha hash ya usimbuaji ya chombo maalum au mashine ya kawaida ambayo wanaweza kutumia kwa kujenga upya. Mradi wa majengo yanayorudiwa una nyaraka za jinsi ya kufanya hivi.

    A published procedure lets anyone reproduce the build and check a release against it: https://claymore666.github.io/docker-net-dhcp/verifying-releases/#rebuilding-the-binaries-yourself . Verified end to end rather than self-checked: rebuilding the v1.4.0 tag from a clean git archive, on a BuildKit builder created fresh so no cache mount could be shared, produced binaries whose SHA-256 exactly match the ones inside the published v1.4.0 release tarball (net-dhcp 0ac36b87391c5bd5ea7a4b268183ca3fd86c686bf9b5d0505b97c4e0780d710b, dhcp-handler 0eb5b698698f2d8f4e997062c77f295726915c9ba31125db1800e602edfa4bf8). Determinism rests on digest-pinned base images, version-pinned Alpine packages, a fixed in-container build path, and no timestamp or VCS stamping. It is enforced, not asserted: the Reproducible build workflow builds the same commit twice on two cold builders and fails if the binaries differ, weekly and on any pull request touching the Dockerfile or the Go module files. Scope, stated plainly: the reproducible outputs are the compiled binaries. The release tarball itself is not byte-reproducible because tar and gzip record modification times, so the documented procedure compares the binaries extracted from that tarball rather than the tarball digest.


  • Seti ya majaribio otomatiki


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Seti ya majaribio LAZIMA iweze kuitwa kwa njia ya kawaida kwa lugha hiyo. (URL inahitajika) [test_invocation]
    Kwa mfano, "make check", "mvn test", au "rake test" (Ruby).

    The unit suite is invoked the standard Go way: go test ./.... That is literally what CI runs (as go test -race -count=1 ./...); see the test job in https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp/blob/main/.github/workflows/test.yaml . The live integration suites cannot be invoked that way, because they need root and a real Docker daemon to install the plugin against; they are invoked as sudo make integration-local, which rebuilds the plugin, installs it and runs both the main and the failure suite; see the integration-local target in https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp/blob/main/Makefile . Both invocations are documented for contributors under "Running the tests": https://claymore666.github.io/docker-net-dhcp/latest/internals/#running-the-tests .


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utekeleze ujumuishaji wa kuendelea, ambapo msimbo mpya au uliobadilishwa unajumuishwa mara kwa mara katika hifadhi ya msimbo ya kati na majaribio ya kiotomatiki yanafanywa kwenye matokeo. (URL inahitajika) [test_continuous_integration]
    Katika hali nyingi hii inamaanisha kwamba kila msanidi programu anayefanya kazi kikamilifu kwenye mradi anajumuisha angalau kila siku.

    Every push and every pull request to the integration branches runs the full gate on GitHub Actions: unit tests with the race detector, staticcheck, actionlint, govulncheck, CodeQL, a dependency review, and the live integration suites against a real DHCP server on a self-hosted runner. Workflow definitions: https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp/tree/main/.github/workflows ; run history: https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp/actions . The checks are required by branch protection on both integration branches, so a change cannot merge without them, and release pull requests additionally run a coverage ratchet that fails on any per-package regression. A weekly scheduled run repeats the gate so vulnerabilities published between commits surface without waiting for the next push.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na seti ya majaribio ya kiotomatiki ya FLOSS ambayo inatoa angalau 90% ya ufikio wa tamko ikiwa kuna angalau zana moja ya FLOSS ambayo inaweza kupima kigezo hiki katika lugha iliyochaguliwa. [test_statement_coverage90]

    Measured merged unit-plus-integration statement coverage is 85.8 percent as a statement-weighted total over the shipped packages (pkg/plugin 85.0 percent of 1811 statements, pkg/dhcp 89.9 of 338, pkg/util 98.5 of 78, cmd/net-dhcp 76.4 of 72, cmd/dhcp-handler 75.0 of 16). That clears the silver threshold of 80 percent but not the gold threshold of 90. Per-package floors are enforced by a coverage ratchet at release time and are raised as error-path tests land.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na seti ya jaribio zilizofanywa kiotomatiki za FLOSS ambazo zinatoa angalau asilimia 80 ya uangaliaji wa tawi ikiwa kuna angalau zana moja ya FLOSS inayoweza kupima kigezo hiki katika lugha iliyochaguliwa. [test_branch_coverage80]

    Branch coverage is not measured. The Go toolchain's coverage support reports statement coverage, which is what the project's ratchet gate enforces; no branch-coverage figure is available to substantiate this criterion.


 Usalama 3/5 ●

  • Tumia mazoea mazuri ya msingi ya usimbuaji

    Kumbuka kwamba programu fulani haihitaji kutumia taratibu za usimbuaji. Ikiwa mradi wako unazalisha programu ambayo (1) inajumuisha, inaamilisha, au inafanya usimbuaji kuwa hai, na (2) inaweza kutolewa kutoka Marekani (US) kwenda nje ya Marekani au kwa raia asiye wa Marekani, inaweza kuwa ni lazima kisheria kuchukua hatua chache za ziada. Kawaida hii inahusisha tu kutuma barua pepe. Kwa maelezo zaidi, tazama sehemu ya usimbuaji ya Kuelewa Teknolojia ya Chanzo Wazi & Udhibiti wa Usafirishaji wa Marekani.

    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA isaidie itifaki salama kwa mawasiliano yake yote ya mtandao, kama vile SSHv2 au zaidi, TLS1.2 au zaidi (HTTPS), IPsec, SFTP, na SNMPv3. Itifaki zisizo salama kama vile FTP, HTTP, telnet, SSLv3 au mapema zaidi, na SSHv1 LAZIMA zizimwe kwa chaguo-msingi, na kuzimwa tu ikiwa mtumiaji anaisanidi mahususi. Ikiwa programu iliyozalishwa na mradi haiesaidii mawasiliano ya mtandao, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [crypto_used_network]

    Honestly unmet, and structurally so: the plugin's purpose is to obtain addresses from the LAN's existing DHCP server, and DHCP (v4 and v6) has no encrypted variant to prefer or fall back to. Its other communication channel is the local Docker Unix socket, which does not traverse a network. SECURITY.md documents the resulting residual risk — a hostile DHCP server can hand out bad addressing — as accepted and outside the plugin's control.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA, ikiwa inasaidia au inatumia TLS, isaidie angalau toleo la TLS 1.2. Kumbuka kwamba kabla ya TLS kuitwa SSL. Ikiwa programu haitumii TLS, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [crypto_tls12]

    The software neither supports nor uses TLS.


  • Utoaji salama dhidi ya mashambulizi ya mtu-katikati (MITM)


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Tovuti ya mradi, hifadhi (ikiwa inapatikana kupitia wavuti), na tovuti ya kupakua (ikiwa ni tofauti) LAZIMA ijumuishe vichwa muhimu vya kuimarisha na thamani zisizo na ruhusa. (URL inahitajika) [hardened_site]
    Kumbuka kwamba GitHub na GitLab zinajulikana kukidhi hii. Tovuti kama vile https://securityheaders.com/ zinaweza kuangalia hii haraka. Vichwa muhimu vya kuimarisha ni: Sera ya Usalama wa Maudhui (CSP), Usalama wa Usafiri wa HTTP Mkali (HSTS), X-Content-Type-Options (kama "nosniff"), na X-Frame-Options. Tovuti za wavuti zilizo za tuli kabisa bila uwezo wa kuingia kupitia kurasa za wavuti zinaweza kuacha baadhi ya vichwa vya kuimarisha na hatari ndogo, lakini hakuna njia ya kuaminika ya kugundua tovuti kama hizo, kwa hivyo tunahitaji vichwa hivi hata kama ni tovuti za tuli kabisa.

    The repository and release download sites are GitHub and GHCR, which do send hardening headers including CSP and HSTS. The project documentation site is GitHub Pages, which serves static content without configurable response headers, so the project cannot add hardening headers there. Unmet rather than N/A, because the shortfall is real even though it is not fixable on the current hosting.


  • Masuala mengine ya usalama


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe umefanya ukaguzi wa usalama ndani ya miaka 5 iliyopita. Ukaguzi huu LAZIMA uzingatie mahitaji ya usalama na mpaka wa usalama. [security_review]
    Hii YAWEZA kufanywa na wanachama wa mradi na/au tathmini huru. Tathmini hii YAWEZA kusaidiwa na zana za uchambuzi za tuli na zenye nguvu, lakini lazima pia kuwe na ukaguzi wa binadamu ili kutambua matatizo (hasa katika muundo) ambayo zana haziwezi kugundua.

    A security review of this fork was performed and written up as the assurance case in https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp/blob/main/SECURITY.md#security-assurance-case — it states the security goals, enumerates the adversaries (malicious container, hostile LAN DHCP server, supply-chain tampering), identifies the trust boundary around DHCP-server-supplied bytes and the privileged plugin process, and argues why the mitigations suffice, closing with the accepted residual risk. It is re-read as part of the release documentation review. Continuous automated review runs alongside it: CodeQL, govulncheck, staticcheck, and Dependency Review on every pull request.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Taratibu za kuimarisha LAZIMA zitumike katika programu iliyozalishwa na mradi ili kasoro za programu ziwe na uwezekano mdogo wa kusababisha udhaifu wa usalama. (URL inahitajika) [hardening]
    Taratibu za kuimarisha zinaweza kujumuisha vichwa vya HTTP kama Sera ya Usalama wa Maudhui (CSP), bendera za mkusanyaji ili kupunguza mashambulizi (kama vile -fstack-protector), au bendera za mkusanyaji ili kuondoa tabia isiyofafanuliwa. Kwa madhumuni yetu upendeleo mdogo hauhesabiwi kuwa utaratibu wa kuimarisha (upendeleo mdogo ni muhimu, lakini tofauti).

    The plugin is written in Go, a memory-safe language, and imports the unsafe package in zero source files, so entire classes of memory-corruption defects cannot occur. The race detector runs over the unit suite in CI, the untrusted parsers are fuzzed on every pull request, and the plugin requests an explicit, minimal capability set in config.json rather than running fully privileged — the daemon shows that set to the user before installation. See https://github.com/claymore666/docker-net-dhcp/blob/main/SECURITY.md#security-assurance-case


 Uchanganuzi 2/2 ●

  • Uchambuzi wa msimbo wa nguvu za ziada


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utumie angalau zana moja ya uchambuzi wenye nguvu kwa toleo lolote lililopendekezwa kuu la uzalishaji wa programu iliyozalishwa na mradi kabla ya kutolewa kwake. [dynamic_analysis]
    Zana ya uchambuzi wa nguvu inachunguza programu kwa kuitekeleza na ingizo maalum. Kwa mfano, mradi YAWEZA kutumia zana ya fuzzing (k.m., American Fuzzy Lop) au kitafutaji cha programu ya wavuti (k.m., OWASP ZAP au w3af). Katika hali fulani mradi wa OSS-Fuzz unaweza kuwa tayari kutumia majaribio ya fuzz kwenye mradi wako. Kwa madhumuni ya kigezo hiki zana ya uchambuzi wa nguvu inahitaji kubadilisha ingizo kwa njia fulani kutafuta aina mbalimbali za matatizo au kuwa seti kiotomatiki ya majaribio yenye angalau asilimia 80 ya ukaguzi wa tawi. Ukurasa wa Wikipedia kuhusu uchambuzi wa nguvu na ukurasa wa OWASP kuhusu fuzzing hutambulisha baadhi ya zana za uchambuzi wa nguvu. Zana za uchambuzi ZINAWEZA kuzingatia kutafuta udhaifu wa usalama, lakini hii haihitajiki.

    live integration suite + -race + native fuzzing


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi INAPASWA kujumuisha madai mengi ya muda wa kutekeleza katika programu inayozalisha na kuangalia madai hayo wakati wa uchambuzi wenye nguvu. [dynamic_analysis_enable_assertions]
    Kigezo hiki hakipendekezi kuwezesha madai wakati wa uzalishaji; hilo ni kabisa kwa mradi na watumiaji wake kuamua. Lengo la kigezo hiki ni badala yake kuboresha ugunduzaji wa hitilafu wakati wa uchambuzi wa nguvu kabla ya kusambazwa. Kuwezesha madai katika matumizi ya uzalishaji ni tofauti kabisa na kuwezesha madai wakati wa uchambuzi wa nguvu (kama vile majaribio). Katika hali fulani kuwezesha madai katika matumizi ya uzalishaji ni busara sana (hasa katika vipengele vya uadilifu wa juu). Kuna hoja nyingi dhidi ya kuwezesha madai katika uzalishaji, k.m., maktaba hazipaswi kuvuruga waita, uwepo wao unaweza kusababisha kukataliwa na maduka ya programu, na/au kuamilisha madai katika uzalishaji kunaweza kufunua data za faragha kama vile funguo za faragha. Kumbuka kwamba katika usambazaji mwingi wa Linux NDEBUG haijafafanuliwa, hivyo C/C++ assert() kwa chaguo-msingi itawezeshwa kwa uzalishaji katika mazingira hayo. Inaweza kuwa muhimu kutumia utaratibu tofauti wa madai au kufafanua NDEBUG kwa uzalishaji katika mazingira hayo.

    -race detector + fuzz targets are runtime-assertion mechanisms



Unaweza kutumia zana na mifumo ya AI kupendekeza mabadiliko kupitia URL rahisi, kama vile https://www.bestpractices.dev/sw/projects/13229/choose/edit?osps_ac_01_01_status=Met&osps_ac_01_01_justification=GitHub+enforced. Angalia mfumo wetu wa mapendekezo ya otomatiki kwa jinsi ya kufanya hivyo. Data hii inapatikana chini ya Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). Hii inamaanisha kuwa Mpokeaji wa Data anaweza kushiriki Data, na au bila marekebisho, mradi Mpokeaji wa Data anapatanisha maandishi ya mkataba huu na Data iliyoshirikiwa. Tafadhali tambua Chris na wachangiaji wa nishani ya Mazoea Bora ya OpenSSF.

Ingizo la nishani ya mradi linamilikiwa na: Chris.
Ingizo liliundwa siku 2026-06-14 12:10:55 UTC, iliyosasishwa mara ya mwisho siku 2026-09-28 18:09:32 UTC. Ilipata mara ya mwisho nishani ya kupita siku 2026-06-14 13:17:33 UTC.