zetetic-team-subagents

Miradi inayofuata mazoea bora hapa chini inaweza kujihakikisha kwa hiari na kuonyesha kuwa wamepata nishani ya mazoea bora ya Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa programu haitakuwa na kasoro au udhaifu; hata mbinu rasmi zinaweza kushindwa ikiwa vipimo au dhana ni sahihi. Wala hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa mradi utaendelea kuwa na jamii ya maendeleo yenye afya na inayofanya kazi vizuri. Hata hivyo, kufuata mazoea bora kunaweza kusaidia kuboresha matokeo ya miradi. Kwa mfano, baadhi ya mazoea huwezesha ukaguzi wa watu wengi kabla ya kutolewa, ambayo inaweza kusaidia kupata udhaifu wa kiufundi ambao vinginevyo ni vigumu kupata na kusaidia kujenga uaminifu na hamu ya mwingiliano wa kurudia kati ya wasanidi programu kutoka makampuni tofauti. Ili kupata nishani, vigezo vyote vya LAZIMA na LAZIMA WALA USIWAHI lazima vifuatwe, vigezo vyote vya INAPASWA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana na thibitisho, na vigezo vyote vya PENDEKEZA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana (tunataka vifikiwe angalau). Ikiwa unataka kuingiza maandishi ya thibitisho kama maoni ya jumla, badala ya kuwa maelezo ya busara kwamba hali ni inakubaliwa, anza kifungu cha maandishi na '//' ikifuatiwa na nafasi. Maoni ni karibu kupitia tovuti ya GitHub kama masuala au maombi ya kuvuta Kuna pia orodha ya barua pepe kwa majadiliano ya jumla.

Tunafuraha kutoa habari katika lugha nyingi, hata hivyo, ikiwa kuna mgongano au kutokuwa na usawa kati ya tafsiri, toleo la Kiingereza ni toleo lenye mamlaka.
Ikiwa huu ni mradi wako, tafadhali onyesha hadhi ya nishani yako kwenye ukurasa wa mradi wako! Hadhi ya nishani inaonekana kama hii: Kiwango cha nishani kwa mradi 13847 ni passing Hapa ni jinsi ya kuiweka:
Unaweza kuonyesha hali ya nishani yako kwa kuweka hii katika faili yako ya markdown:
[![OpenSSF Best Practices](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13847/badge)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13847)
au kwa kuweka hii katika HTML yako:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13847"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13847/badge"></a>


Hizi ni vigezo vya kiwango cha Fedha. Unaweza pia kuangalia vigezo vya kiwango cha Kupita au Dhahabu.

Baseline Series: Kiwango cha Msingi 1 Kiwango cha Msingi 2 Kiwango cha Msingi 3

        

 Misingi 12/17 ●

  • Jumla

    Kumbuka kwamba miradi mingine inaweza kutumia jina sawa.

    11 problem-shaped skills backed by 97 sourced reasoning patterns — Curie to Toulmin, as Claude Code agents. Every claim cites its source; a pre-commit gate blocks unsourced constants. Install the gates alone in 30s (zetetic-gates). The only agent system where "I don't know" is a feature.

    Tafadhali tumia muundo wa maneno ya leseni ya SPDX; mifano ni pamoja na "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", na "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Usitumie alama za nukuu za moja au mbili.
    Ikiwa kuna lugha zaidi ya moja, ziorodhe kama thamani zilizotengwa kwa koma (nafasi ni za hiari) na ziorodhe kuanzia iliyotumiwa zaidi hadi iliyotumiwa kidogo. Ikiwa kuna orodha ndefu, tafadhali orodhesha angalau tatu za kawaida zaidi. Ikiwa hakuna lugha (k.m., huu ni mradi wa nyaraka tu au wa majaribio tu), tumia herufi moja "-". Tafadhali tumia herufi kubwa za kawaida kwa kila lugha, k.m., "JavaScript".
    Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) ni mpango wa kuweka majina yenye muundo kwa mifumo ya teknolojia ya habari, programu, na vifurushi. Inatumika katika mifumo na hifadhidata nyingi wakati wa kuripoti udhaifu.

  • Mahitaji ya awali


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA ufikie nishani ya kiwango cha kuhitimu. [achieve_passing]

  • Maudhui ya kimsingi ya tovuti ya mradi


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Habari juu ya jinsi ya kuchangia LAZIMA ijumuishe mahitaji ya michango inayokubalika (k.m., rejea kwa kiwango chochote kinachohitajika cha msimbo). (URL inahitajika) [contribution_requirements]

    CONTRIBUTING.md states the requirements a contribution must meet: the coding standard it is held to (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/rules/coding-standards.md), the five sections every new agent definition must answer, the hook rules, and the testing expectation. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md


  • Usimamizi wa mradi


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi UNAPASWA kuwa na utaratibu wa kisheria ambapo wasanidi wote wa kiasi kisicho kidogo cha programu ya mradi wanathibitisha kwamba wameruhusiwa kisheria kufanya michango hii. Mbinu ya kawaida na rahisi ya kutekeleza hii ni kwa kutumia Cheti cha Msanidi cha Asili (DCO), ambapo watumiaji huongeza "signed-off-by" katika ahadi zao na mradi unaunganisha kwenye tovuti ya DCO. Hata hivyo, hii YAWEZA kutekelezwa kama Makubaliano ya Leseni ya Mchangiaji (CLA), au utaratibu mwingine wa kisheria. (URL inahitajika) [dco]
    DCO ni utaratibu unaopendekeza kwa sababu ni rahisi kutekeleza, kufuatilia katika msimbo wa chanzo, na git inasaidia moja kwa moja kipengele cha "signed-off" kwa kutumia "commit -s". Ili kuwa na ufanisi zaidi ni bora ikiwa nyaraka za mradi zinaeleza maana ya "signed-off" kwa mradi huo. CLA ni makubaliano ya kisheria yanayofafanua masharti ambayo kazi za kiakili zimetolewa leseni kwa shirika au mradi. Makubaliano ya mgawo wa mchangiaji (CAA) ni makubaliano ya kisheria yanayohamisha haki katika kazi ya kiakili kwa chama kingine; miradi haihitajiki kuwa na CAA, kwa kuwa kuwa na CAA huongeza hatari kwamba wachangiaji watarajiwa hawatachangia, hasa ikiwa mpokeaji ni shirika la faida. Apache Software Foundation CLAs (leseni ya mchangiaji wa mtu binafsi na CLA ya kampuni) ni mifano ya CLA, kwa miradi ambayo inaamua kwamba hatari za aina hizi za CLA kwa mradi ni chini ya manufaa yao.

    There is no DCO or CLA requirement today. All non-trivial code is written by the sole maintainer, who owns the copyright and licenses it under MIT; the authorship statement is at https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#license. A DCO sign-off requirement is the intended mechanism once outside contributors start submitting non-trivial changes.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA ufafanue kwa uwazi na kuandika muundo wake wa utawala wa mradi (njia ya kufanya maamuzi, ikiwa ni pamoja na majukumu muhimu). (URL inahitajika) [governance]
    Kunahitaji kuwa na njia fulani iliyowekwa vyema ya kuandikwa ya kufanya maamuzi na kutatua migogoro. Katika miradi midogo, hii inaweza kuwa rahisi kama "mmiliki wa mradi na kiongozi hufanya maamuzi yote ya mwisho". Kuna miundo mbalimbali ya utawala, ikiwa ni pamoja na dictator wa wema na meritocracy rasmi; kwa maelezo zaidi, angalia Miundo ya utawala. Mbinu zote mbili za kati (k.m., mtunzaji mmoja) na zisizo za kati (k.m., watunzaji wa kikundi) zimetumika kwa mafanikio katika miradi. Habari za utawala hazihitajiki kuandika uwezekano wa kuunda uma wa mradi, kwa kuwa hiyo ni iwezekanavyo kila wakati kwa miradi ya FLOSS.

    There is no GOVERNANCE.md. CONTRIBUTING.md documents how to submit a change and CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md documents how to behave, but neither states who decides, what a change needs to land, or how disagreements resolve. Tracked with acceptance criteria in issue #68.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA upitishe kanuni ya mwenendo na kuiweka mahali pa kawaida. (URL inahitajika) [code_of_conduct]
    Miradi inaweza kuweza kuboresha uadilifu wa jamii yao na kuweka matarajio kuhusu tabia inayokubalika kwa kupitisha kanuni ya mwenendo. Hii inaweza kusaidia kuepuka matatizo kabla hayajatokea na kufanya mradi kuwa mahali pa kukaribishwa zaidi ili kuhimiza michango. Hii inapaswa kuzingatia tu tabia ndani ya jamii/mahali pa kazi pa mradi. Mifano ya kanuni za mwenendo ni kanuni ya mwenendo ya kernel ya Linux, Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya Agano la Mchangiaji, Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya Debian, Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya Ubuntu, Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya Fedora, Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya GNOME, Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya Jamii ya KDE, Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya Jamii ya Python, Mwongozo wa Mwenendo wa Jamii ya Ruby, na Kanuni ya Mwenendo ya Rust.

    https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, at the standard repository location, with reporting and enforcement sections. The reporting sentence points at a package.json that does not exist in this repository; that broken pointer is tracked in issue #73, and the private channel in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md works today.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA ufafanue kwa uwazi na kuandika hadharani majukumu muhimu katika mradi na wajibu wao, ikiwa ni pamoja na kazi zozote ambazo majukumu hayo lazima yafanywe. Lazima iwe wazi ni nani ana jukumu lipi, ingawa hii haiwezi kuandikwa kwa njia ile ile. (URL inahitajika) [roles_responsibilities]
    Nyaraka kwa utawala na majukumu na wajibu zinaweza kuwa mahali pamoja.

    The key roles and who holds them are not publicly documented. In practice there is one maintainer who reviews, merges and releases, but the criterion asks for that to be written down, and it is not. Tracked in issue #68.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uweze kuendelea kwa usumbufu mdogo ikiwa mtu yeyote anakufa, anakuwa katika hali ya kudhoofika, au vinginevyo hawezi au hataki kuendelea kusaidia mradi. Hasa, mradi LAZIMA uweze kuunda na kufunga masuala, kukubali mabadiliko yaliyopendekezwa, na kutoa matoleo ya programu, ndani ya wiki moja ya uthibitishaji wa upotevu wa msaada kutoka kwa mtu yeyote mmoja. Hii INAWEZA kufanywa kwa kuhakikisha mtu mwingine ana funguo zozote zinazohitajika, nywila, na haki za kisheria ili kuendelea mradi. Watu binafsi wanaoendesha mradi wa FLOSS WANAWEZA kufanya hii kwa kuweka funguo katika sanduku la kufungia na wosia unaowezesha haki zozote zinazohitajika za kisheria (k.m., kwa majina ya DNS). (URL inahitajika) [access_continuity]

    Not documented. Some continuity properties hold by construction (the source is public under MIT, every release is tagged and Sigstore-verifiable, so anyone can fork and continue), but issue creation, change acceptance and release publication all depend on one account today and no succession arrangement is recorded. Tracked in issue #68.


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi INAPASWA kuwa na "bus factor" ya 2 au zaidi. (URL inahitajika) [bus_factor]
    "Bus factor" (pia inajulikana kama "truck factor") ni idadi ya chini ya washiriki wa mradi ambao wanapaswa kutoweka ghafla kutoka kwenye mradi ("kupigwa na basi") kabla ya mradi kusimama kwa sababu ya ukosefu wa wafanyakazi wenye elimu au wenye uwezo. Zana ya truck-factor inaweza kukadiria hii kwa miradi kwenye GitHub. Kwa maelezo zaidi, angalia Kutathmini Bus Factor ya Hifadhi za Git na Cosentino et al.

    The bus factor is 1. This is a single-maintainer project, stated plainly rather than papered over. The same constraint is already recorded in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/docs/SCORECARD.md, which explains why the Scorecard Code-Review and Branch-Protection checks are structurally unreachable here: GitHub does not permit self-approval, so requiring reviews would deadlock every merge. Review rigor is carried instead by the always-on hard CI gates.


  • Nyaraka


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na ramani ya barabara iliyoandikwa inayoeleza kile mradi unakusudia kufanya na kutofanya kwa angalau mwaka unaofuata. (URL inahitajika) [documentation_roadmap]
    Mradi huenda usitimiza ramani ya barabara, na hiyo ni sawa; kusudi la ramani ya barabara ni kusaidia watumiaji na wachangiaji watarajiwa kuelewa mwelekeo unaokusudiwa wa mradi. Haihitaji kuwa na maelezo mengi.

    There is no roadmap document. The README's "What this system does not do" section states current limits, which is not a forward plan, and the CHANGELOG is backward-looking by construction. Tracked with acceptance criteria in issue #69.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA ujumuishe nyaraka za muundo (pia inajulikana kama muundo wa kiwango cha juu) wa programu inayozalishwa na mradi. Ikiwa mradi hauzalishi programu, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). (URL inahitajika) [documentation_architecture]
    Muundo wa programu unaeleza miundo ya msingi ya programu, yaani, vipengele vikuu vya programu, uhusiano kati yao, na mali muhimu za vipengele na uhusiano hivi.

    The architecture is documented at two levels. The component model and how the pieces compose is in the README (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#what-you-actually-get and https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#knowledge-ingestion--a-query-indexed-semantic-layer, which gives the web_ingest to manifest_gate to semantic_layer pipeline and states that the three tools import none of each other, with the skill as the single wiring point). The agent file shape, frontmatter contract and routing mechanism are specified in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/docs/AGENT-INTERNALS.md, and the memory subsystem's scopes, ACL and MCP surface in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/docs/MEMORY-MCP.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uandike kile mtumiaji anaweza na asiweze kutarajia kwa suala la usalama kutoka kwa programu inayozalishwa na mradi ("mahitaji yake ya usalama"). (URL inahitajika) [documentation_security]
    Haya ni mahitaji ya usalama ambayo programu inakusudiwa kukidhi.

    https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md states what the user can and cannot expect. It opens by naming what installing the plugin grants (session-execution rights, no sandbox between a modified file and the machine), lists the supply-chain assurances and how to verify each, and closes with an explicit "What this does NOT claim" paragraph: provenance proves who built the bundle and from which commit, not that the scripts are free of defects, and it is worth nothing to a user who never runs the verification.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe mwongozo wa "kuanza haraka" kwa watumiaji wapya kuwasaidia kufanya kitu haraka na programu. (URL inahitajika) [documentation_quick_start]
    Wazo ni kuonyesha watumiaji jinsi ya kuanza na kufanya programu ifanye chochote. Hii ni muhimu sana kwa watumiaji watarajiwa kuanza.

    Two commands and the system is installed: https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#install. A narrower quick start for the gates alone (claude plugin install zetetic-gates) is on the same page, and the first thing to do with it is the reproducible one-liner at https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#the-system-enforcing-its-own-standard


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA ufanye jitihada ya kuweka nyaraka kulingana na toleo la sasa la matokeo ya mradi (ikiwa ni pamoja na programu inayozalishwa na mradi). Kasoro yoyote inayojulikana ya nyaraka inayofanya isilingane LAZIMA irekebishwe. Ikiwa nyaraka kwa ujumla ni za sasa, lakini kwa makosa inajumuisha baadhi ya maelezo ya zamani ambayo sio ya kweli tena, ichukue tu kama kasoro, kisha ifuatilie na urekebishe kama kawaida. [documentation_current]
    Nyaraka ZINAWEZA kujumuisha habari kuhusu tofauti au mabadiliko kati ya matoleo ya programu na/au kuunganisha kwa matoleo ya zamani ya nyaraka. Kusudi la kigezo hiki ni kwamba jitihada inafanywa ili kuweka nyaraka kulingana, siyo kwamba nyaraka lazima ziwe kamili.

    Known inconsistencies exist, so the honest answer is unmet until they are fixed. Measured on 2026-07-28 the tree holds 97 genius agents plus 23 team agents, 76 skill files and 19 hook registrations, while README claims 119 agents in its badge and body and 118 in its footer, CONTRIBUTING claims 22 team agents, 64 skills and 18 hooks, and .claude-plugin/marketplace.json claims 78 skills and 20 hooks. Separately, all five test commands in CONTRIBUTING.md name files that do not exist, and CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md routes conduct reports to a package.json this repository does not have. Tracked in issue #72 (counts, with a claim gate so it stops recurring) and issue #73 (broken pointers).


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ukurasa wa mbele wa hifadhi ya mradi na/au tovuti LAZIMA utambulishe na kuunganisha kiungo kwa mafanikio yoyote, ikiwa ni pamoja na nishani hii ya mazoea bora, ndani ya masaa 48 ya kutambua hadharani kwamba ufanikio umepatikana. (URL inahitajika) [documentation_achievements]
    Ufanikio ni seti yoyote ya vigezo vya nje ambavyo mradi umefanya kazi mahususi kukidhi, ikiwa ni pamoja na nishani fulani. Habari hii haihitaji kuwa kwenye ukurasa wa mbele wa tovuti ya mradi. Mradi unaotumia GitHub unaweza kuweka mafanikio kwenye ukurasa wa mbele wa hifadhi kwa kuyaongeza kwenye faili ya README.

    The repository front page carries a badge row that identifies and hyperlinks the project's achievements: the live OpenSSF Best Practices badge for this project (https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13847), live CI status, the test, agent, skill and hook counts, and the MIT license (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#readme). The badge is dynamic, so the level it displays tracks this questionnaire without a further edit. Per-release achievements are recorded in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md and the security posture in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/docs/SCORECARD.md


  • Ufikiaji na kimataifa


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi (tovuti zote za mradi na matokeo ya mradi) INAPASWA kufuata mazoea bora ya ufikiaji ili watu wenye ulemavu bado waweze kushiriki katika mradi na kutumia matokeo ya mradi ambapo ni busara kufanya hivyo. [accessibility_best_practices]
    Kwa programu za wavuti, angalia Miongozo ya Ufikiaji wa Maudhui ya Wavuti (WCAG 2.0) na hati yake inayosaidia Kuelewa WCAG 2.0; angalia pia habari za ufikiaji za W3C. Kwa programu za GUI, zingatia kutumia miongozo ya ufikiaji ya mazingira maalum (kama vile Gnome, KDE, XFCE, Android, iOS, Mac, na Windows). Baadhi ya programu za TUI (k.m., programu za `ncurses`) zinaweza kufanya mambo fulani ili kuzifanya kufikika zaidi (kama mpangilio wa `force-arrow-cursor` wa `alpine`). Programu nyingi za mstari wa amri zinafikika vizuri kama zilivyo. Kigezo hiki mara nyingi ni N/A, k.m., kwa maktaba za programu. Hapa kuna baadhi ya mifano ya hatua za kuchukua au masuala ya kuzingatia:
    • Toa mbadala za maandishi kwa maudhui yoyote yasiyo ya maandishi ili yaweze kubadilishwa kuwa aina nyingine watu wanahitaji, kama vile chapa kubwa, braille, hotuba, alama au lugha rahisi zaidi ( mwongozo wa WCAG 2.0 1.1)
    • Rangi haitumiwi kama njia pekee ya kuona ya kuwasilisha habari, kuashiria kitendo, kuchochea jibu, au kutofautisha kipengele cha kuona. ( mwongozo wa WCAG 2.0 1.4.1)
    • Uwasilishaji wa kuona wa maandishi na picha za maandishi una uwiano wa tofauti wa angalau 4.5:1, isipokuwa kwa maandishi makubwa, maandishi ya bahati mbaya, na nembo ( mwongozo wa WCAG 2.0 1.4.3)
    • Fanya kazi zote zipatikane kutoka kwenye kibodi (mwongozo wa WCAG 2.1)
    • Mradi wa GUI au wa wavuti INAPASWA kupima na angalau kipaza sauti kimoja cha skrini kwenye jukwaa la lengo (k.m., NVDA, Jaws, au WindowEyes kwenye Windows; VoiceOver kwenye Mac & iOS; Orca kwenye Linux/BSD; TalkBack kwenye Android). Programu za TUI ZINAWEZA kufanya kazi kupunguza uchanganyiko wa ziada ili kuzuia usomaji wa ziada na vipaza sauti vya skrini.

    The project results have no graphical interface: they are Markdown definitions and command-line scripts whose output is plain text rendered by the host terminal. The project site is GitHub and the documentation is Markdown; the one image on the front page, the banner, carries a text alternative (alt="Zetetic Agents: 97 reasoning patterns, one epistemic standard").


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi INAPASWA kuwa kimataifa ili kuwezesha upatanifu wa lugha wa rahisi kwa utamaduni, eneo, au lugha ya hadhira lengo. Ikiwa kimataifa (i18n) haihusiki (k.m., programu haizalishi maandishi yanayokusudiwa kwa watumiaji wa mwisho na haipangi maandishi yanayosomeka na binadamu), chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [internationalization]
    Upatanifu wa lugha "unarejelea upatanifu wa bidhaa, programu au maudhui ya hati ili kukidhi lugha, utamaduni na mahitaji mengine ya soko mahususi la lengo (eneo)." Kimataifa ni "muundo na maendeleo ya bidhaa, programu au maudhui ya hati ambayo huwezesha upatanifu wa lugha wa rahisi kwa hadhira lengo zinazotofautiana katika utamaduni, eneo, au lugha." (Ona "Upatanifu wa Lugha dhidi ya Kimataifa" ya W3C.) Programu inakidhi kigezo hiki kwa kuwa kimataifa tu. Hakuna upatanifu wa lugha kwa lugha nyingine mahususi unaohitajika, kwa kuwa mara tu programu imekuwa kimataifa inawezekana kwa wengine kufanya kazi kwenye upatanifu wa lugha.

    The tools' user-facing strings (checker findings, hook notices, setup output) are English literals and are not externalized for localization, and the agent and skill definitions are English prose. Externalizing them has not been done, so this is reported unmet rather than claimed.


  • Mengine


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ikiwa tovuti za mradi (tovuti, hifadhi, na URL za kupakua) zinahifadhi nywila kwa ajili ya uthibitishaji wa watumiaji wa nje, nywila LAZIMA zihifadhiwe kama mificho iliyorudiwa na chumvi kwa-mtumiaji kwa kutumia kanuni ya upanuaji (iliyorudiarudia) wa funguo (k.m., Argon2id, Bcrypt, Scrypt, au PBKDF2). Ikiwa tovuti za mradi hazihifadhi nywila kwa kusudi hili, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [sites_password_security]
    Kumbuka kwamba matumizi ya GitHub yanakidhi kigezo hiki. Kigezo hiki kinatumika tu kwa nywila zinazotumika kwa ajili ya uthibitishaji wa watumiaji wa nje kwenye tovuti za mradi (pia inaitwa uthibitishaji wa ndani). Ikiwa tovuti za mradi lazima ziingie kwenye tovuti zingine (pia inaitwa uthibitishaji wa nje), zinaweza kuhitaji kuhifadhi ishara za uidhinishaji kwa kusudi hilo kwa njia tofauti (kwa kuwa kuhifadhi mficho hakuna maana). Hii inatumia kigezo cha crypto_password_storage kwa tovuti za mradi, sawa na sites_https.

    The project operates no site of its own that authenticates external users. The repository and the download URLs are GitHub, and no password is stored by this project.


 Udhibiti wa Mabadiliko 1/1 ●

 Kuripoti 3/3 ●

  • Mchakato wa kuripoti hitilafu


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utumie kifuatiliaji cha masuala kwa ajili ya kufuatilia masuala ya mtu binafsi. [report_tracker]

    GitHub Issues: https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/issues


  • Mchakato wa kuripoti udhaifu


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe sifa kwa waripoti wa ripoti zote za udhaifu zilizotatuliwa katika miezi 12 iliyopita, isipokuwa kwa waripoti wanaoomba kutojulikana. Ikiwa hakuna udhaifu uliotatuliwa katika miezi 12 iliyopita, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). (URL inahitajika) [vulnerability_report_credit]

    No vulnerability has been resolved in the last 12 months, so there is no reporter to credit. The commitment is documented: reporters are credited in the release notes for the patched version unless they request anonymity. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na mchakato ulioandikwa kwa ajili ya kujibu ripoti za udhaifu. (URL inahitajika) [vulnerability_response_process]
    Hii ina uhusiano mkubwa na vulnerability_report_process, ambayo inahitaji kuwa kuna njia iliyoandikwa ya kuripoti udhaifu. Pia inahusiana na vulnerability_report_response, ambayo inahitaji majibu kwa ripoti za udhaifu ndani ya kipindi fulani cha muda.

    https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md documents the whole response process: the private advisory channel, what a report must contain, a per-severity SLA table (24 hours first response and 7 days to patch for critical, 3 and 14 days for high), a five-step disclosure timeline with a 30-day default coordinated date, and what is out of scope.


 Ubora 18/19 ●

  • Viwango vya msimbo


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utambulishe miongozo mahususi ya mtindo wa kuandika msimbo kwa lugha kuu inazotumia, na uhitaji kwamba michango kwa ujumla ikidhi. (URL inahitajika) [coding_standards]
    Katika hali nyingi hii inafanywa kwa kurejelea baadhi ya miongozo ya mtindo iliyopo, huenda ikiorodhesha tofauti. Miongozo hii ya mtindo inaweza kujumuisha njia za kuboresha usomaji na njia za kupunguza uwezekano wa kasoro (ikiwa ni pamoja na udhaifu). Lugha nyingi za programu zina miongozo moja au zaidi ya mtindo inayotumika sana. Mifano ya miongozo ya mtindo ni pamoja na miongozo ya mtindo ya Google na Viwango vya Kuandika Msimbo wa SEI CERT.

    The standard is a document in the tree, not a preference: https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/rules/coding-standards.md covers SOLID, the layer dependency rule, size limits, dependency injection, local reasoning, source discipline, mutation testing, the definition of done and the boy-scout rule, each with its primary source. CONTRIBUTING.md names it as binding and excerpts the load-bearing rules: https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utekeleze kiotomatiki mtindo wake wa kuandika msimbo uliochaguliwa ikiwa kuna angalau zana moja ya FLOSS inayoweza kufanya hivyo katika lugha zilizochaguliwa. [coding_standards_enforced]
    Hii INAWEZA kutekelezwa kwa kutumia zana za uchambuzi mkako na/au kwa kulazimisha msimbo kupitia vifaa vya kurekebisha msimbo. Katika hali nyingi usanidi wa zana umejumuishwa katika hifadhi ya mradi (kwa kuwa miradi tofauti inaweza kuchagua usanidi tofauti). Miradi INAWEZA kuruhusu vighairi vya mtindo (na kwa kawaida itaruhusu); ambapo vighairi vinatokea, LAZIMA viwe nadra na viandikwe katika msimbo katika maeneo yao, ili vighairi hivi viweze kukaguliwa na ili zana ziweze kuzishughulikia kiotomatiki baadaye. Mifano ya zana kama hizo ni pamoja na ESLint (JavaScript), Rubocop (Ruby), na devtools check (R).

    Enforced automatically at two points. At commit time https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/hooks/pre-commit-zetetic.sh runs tools/zetetic-checker.sh on the staged diff and returns exit 2 on a violation. In CI four hard gates block the merge (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml): the craftsmanship checker on newly added files, the redaction sweep on the full tree under ZETETIC_PROFILE=strict, the tools regression suite, and shellcheck at error severity. The ratchet shape (new files gated, legacy debt reported) is documented in the workflow itself.


  • Mfumo wa ujenzi unaofanya kazi


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifumo ya kujenga kwa binari za asili LAZIMA iheshimu vigezo (vya mazingira) vya mkusanyaji na vya kiunganishi vilivyopitishwa kwao (k.m., CC, CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS, na LDFLAGS) na kuvipitisha kwenye viito vya mkusanyaji na vya kiunganishi. Mfumo wa kujenga UNAWEZA kuvipanua na bendera za ziada; LAZIMA USIBADILISHE thamani zilizotolewa na zake mwenyewe. Ikiwa hakuna binari za asili zinazozalishwa, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [build_standard_variables]
    Inapaswa kuwa rahisi kuwezesha vipengele maalum vya kujenga kama Address Sanitizer (ASAN), au kutii mazoea bora ya ugumu wa usambazaji (k.m., kwa kuwezesha kwa urahisi bendera za mkusanyaji kufanya hivyo).

    No native binaries are generated. There is no compiler or linker invocation anywhere in the project, so CC, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS have nothing to apply to.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mfumo wa kujenga na usakinishaji UNAPASWA kuhifadhi taarifa za utatuzi ikiwa zimeombwa katika bendera husika (k.m., "install -s" haitumiwa). Ikiwa hakuna mfumo wa kujenga au usakinishaji (k.m., maktaba za kawaida za JavaScript), chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [build_preserve_debug]
    K.m., kuweka CFLAGS (C) au CXXFLAGS (C++) inapaswa kuunda taarifa husika za utatuzi ikiwa lugha hizo zinatumika, na hazipaswi kuondolewa wakati wa usakinishaji. Taarifa za utatuzi zinahitajika kwa msaada na uchambuzi, na pia ni muhimu kwa kupima uwepo wa vipengele vya ugumu katika binari zilizokusanywa.

    There is no build or installation system that strips anything. The software is Markdown and scripts, installed by copying, and the source on disk is what runs.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mfumo wa kujenga kwa programu iliyozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA USIJENGA kwa njia ya kujirudia saraka ndogo ikiwa kuna utegemezi wa kukatana katika saraka ndogo. Ikiwa hakuna mfumo wa kujenga au usakinishaji (k.m., maktaba za kawaida za JavaScript), chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [build_non_recursive]
    Taarifa ya utegemezi wa ndani ya mfumo wa kujenga wa mradi inahitaji kuwa sahihi, vinginevyo, mabadiliko ya mradi huenda yasijenge vizuri. Mijengo isiyo sahihi inaweza kusababisha kasoro (ikiwa ni pamoja na udhaifu). Kosa la kawaida katika mifumo mikubwa ya kujenga ni kutumia "ujenzi wa kujirudia" au "make ya kujirudia", yaani, mlingano wa saraka ndogo zinazojumuisha faili za chanzo, ambapo kila saraka ndogo inajengwa kwa uhuru. Isipokuwa kila saraka ndogo ni huru kabisa, hii ni kosa, kwa sababu taarifa ya utegemezi si sahihi.

    There is no build system, so there are no subdirectory builds to make recursive or otherwise.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uweze kurudia mchakato wa kuzalisha taarifa kutoka faili za chanzo na kupata matokeo sawa ya biti-kwa-biti. Ikiwa hakuna ujenzi unaofanyika (k.m., lugha za uandishi ambapo msimbo wa chanzo unatumika moja kwa moja badala ya kukusanywa), chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [build_repeatable]
    Watumiaji wa GCC na clang wanaweza kupata chaguo la -frandom-seed kuwa na manufaa; katika hali fulani, hii inaweza kutatuliwa kwa kulazimisha aina fulani ya mpangilio. Mapendekezo zaidi yanaweza kupatikana kwenye tovuti ya ujenzi unaorudiwa.

    Although nothing is compiled, the one thing that is generated is bit-for-bit reproducible by construction. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/tools/build-release-bundle.sh creates the release tarball with --sort=name --mtime=@0 --owner=0 --group=0 --numeric-owner, so the archive does not depend on filesystem order, timestamps or the building user. The script says why: an attestation over a non-deterministic archive proves nothing a second builder can check.


  • Mfumo wa usakinishaji


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe njia ya kusakinisha na kuondoa kwa urahisi programu iliyozalishwa na mradi kwa kutumia mkataba unaotumika sana. [installation_common]
    Mifano ni pamoja na kutumia meneja wa kifurushi (kwa mfumo au kiwango cha lugha), "make install/uninstall" (inasaidia DESTDIR), chombo katika muundo wa kawaida, au picha ya mashine pepe katika muundo wa kawaida. Mchakato wa usakinishaji na uondoaji (k.m., kifurushi chake) UNAWEZA kutekelezwa na mtu wa tatu mradi tu ni FLOSS.

    Installed and uninstalled through the ecosystem's package manager: "claude plugin marketplace add cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents" then "claude plugin install zetetic-team-subagents" (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#install). The manual path is https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/scripts/setup.sh with install, update, uninstall and configure verbs, and the installer writes a manifest so that uninstall removes exactly what it added.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mfumo wa usakinishaji kwa watumiaji wa mwisho LAZIMA uheshimu mkataba wa kawaida kwa kuchagua eneo ambapo vitu vilivyojengwa vinaandikwa kwa wakati wa usakinishaji. Kwa mfano, ikiwa inasakinisha faili kwenye mfumo wa POSIX lazima iheshimu kigezo cha mazingira cha DESTDIR. Ikiwa hakuna mfumo wa usakinishaji au hakuna mkataba wa kawaida, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [installation_standard_variables]

    There is no installation system that writes built artifacts to a configurable prefix. Installation copies agents, skills, hooks and tools into the host's own plugin directory under ~/.claude, which is the convention the host defines, so DESTDIR and similar variables have nothing to select.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe njia kwa wasanidi programu wanaoweza kusakinisha haraka matokeo yote ya mradi na mazingira ya msaada yanayohitajika kufanya mabadiliko, ikiwa ni pamoja na majaribio na mazingira ya majaribio. Hii LAZIMA ifanywe kwa kutumia mkataba unaotumika sana. [installation_development_quick]
    Hii INAWEZA kutekelezwa kwa kutumia chombo kilichozalishwa na/au hati za usakinishaji. Utegemezi wa nje kwa kawaida utasakinishwa kwa kuita mfumo na/au meneja wa kifurushi cha lugha, kwa external_dependencies.

    git clone and the software is complete: nothing is compiled and there are no dependencies to resolve. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md lists the prerequisites (bash 4+, GNU coreutils, ripgrep, python3) and https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml gives the exact command for every suite, which is the same command a developer runs locally. The stale command list inside CONTRIBUTING is being corrected under issue #73.


  • Vipengee vilivyotunzwa nje


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uorodheshe utegemezi wa nje kwa njia inayoweza kuchakatwa na kompyuta. (URL inahitajika) [external_dependencies]
    Kwa kawaida hii inafanywa kwa kutumia mkataba wa meneja wa kifurushi na/au mfumo wa ujenzi. Kumbuka kwamba hii inasaidia kutekeleza installation_development_quick.

    Listed in two computer-processable forms. Every release publishes a CycloneDX SBOM (zetetic-team-subagents.cdx.json) inventorying every bundled file with its hash, including the vendored third-party skill material, alongside an EXECUTABLE-MANIFEST.sha256 that enumerates every hook and tool that will run on the user's machine (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md). The only external supply-chain surface, the GitHub Actions, is declared in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/dependabot.yml and each action is pinned to a full commit SHA in the workflows.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Miradi LAZIMA ifuatilie au kwa muda mrefu iangalie utegemezi wao wa nje (ikiwa ni pamoja na nakala za urahisi) kugundua udhaifu unaojulikana, na kurekebisha udhaifu unaoweza kutumiwa vibaya au kuthibitisha kuwa hauwezi kutumiwa vibaya. [dependency_monitoring]
    Hii inaweza kufanywa kwa kutumia zana ya kichambua chanzo / zana ya kuangalia utegemezi / zana ya uchambuzi wa muundo wa programu kama OWASP's Dependency-Check, Sonatype's Nexus Auditor, Synopsys' Black Duck Software Composition Analysis, na Bundler-audit (kwa Ruby). Baadhi ya waendesha kifurushi wanajumuisha taratibu za kufanya hii. Ni kubaliwa ikiwa udhaifu wa vipengele hauwezi kutumiwa vibaya, lakini uchambuzi huu ni mgumu na wakati mwingine ni rahisi kusasisha au kurekebisha sehemu.

    https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/dependabot.yml runs weekly against the github-actions ecosystem, which is this project's only external dependency surface: there is no runtime package to install, so there is no pip or npm manifest to watch, and the config states that reasoning rather than declaring an empty ecosystem. Dependabot updates the pinned SHA and rewrites the version comment in place, so pinning discipline is preserved automatically. OpenSSF Scorecard runs on a schedule on top of it (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/scorecard.yml), with each finding's disposition recorded in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/docs/SCORECARD.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA au:
    1. fanya iwe rahisi kutambua na kusasisha vipengele vinavyotumiwa tena vilivyotunzwa nje; au
    2. tumia vipengele vya kawaida vinavyotolewa na mfumo au lugha ya programu.
    Kisha, ikiwa udhaifu unapatikana katika kipengele kilichotumiwa tena, itakuwa rahisi kusasisha kipengele hicho. [updateable_reused_components]
    Njia ya kawaida ya kutimiza kigezo hiki ni kutumia mifumo ya usimamizi wa kifurushi ya mfumo na lugha ya programu. Programu nyingi za FLOSS zinasambazwa na "maktaba za urahisi" ambazo ni nakala za ndani za maktaba za kawaida (labda zilizoachana). Kwa yenyewe, hiyo ni sawa. Hata hivyo, ikiwa programu *lazima* itumie nakala hizi za ndani (zilizoachanishwa), basi kusasisha maktaba za "kawaida" kama sasisho la usalama litaacha nakala hizi za ziada bado zenye udhaifu. Hii ni suala hasa kwa mifumo ya wingu; ikiwa mtoa huduma ya wingu anasasisha maktaba zao za "kawaida" lakini programu haitazitumia, basi masasisho hayasaidii kweli. Angalia, k.m., "Chromium: Kwa nini bado haiko katika Fedora kama kifurushi sahihi" na Tom Callaway.

    Reused components are identifiable and updateable. The GitHub Actions are pinned by full commit SHA with a version comment and updated by Dependabot weekly. The Python code imports only the standard library, so there is no vendored runtime dependency to go stale. The one convenience copy, the vendored writing and redaction rule material, carries its provenance in the file and is inventoried in the per-release CycloneDX SBOM.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi UNAPASWA kuepuka kutumia vitendakazi na API zilizokubaliwa kuwa hazitumiki tena au zilizopitwa na wakati ambapo mbadala wa FLOSS zinapatikana katika seti ya teknolojia inayotumia ("kifurushi cha teknolojia" yake) na kwa wengi wa watumiaji ambao mradi unasaidia (ili watumiaji wawe na ufikiaji wa haraka wa mbadala). [interfaces_current]

    The technology stack is current and nothing deprecated is relied on. The Python is standard library only (argparse, hashlib, json, ssl, subprocess, urllib, xml.etree, tempfile) with no deprecated or removed module, and CI pins Python 3.12. The shell targets bash 4+ with POSIX coreutils, and shellcheck at error severity would flag obsolete constructs on every push.


  • Seti ya majaribio otomatiki


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Seti ya majaribio ya kiotomatiki LAZIMA itumike kwenye kila ukaguzi wa kuingia kwenye hifadhi iliyoshirikiwa kwa angalau tawi moja. Seti hii ya majaribio LAZIMA itoe ripoti ya mafanikio au kushindwa kwa majaribio. [automated_integration_testing]
    Mahitaji haya yanaweza kuonekana kama sehemu ndogo ya test_continuous_integration, lakini yanazingatia majaribio tu, bila kuhitaji uunganisho wa kuendelea.

    Every push to main and every pull request runs the full gate set and reports pass or fail per job: seven jobs in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml (memory suites, agent auditor, worktree tests, zetetic checker, craftsmanship checker, redaction sweep, tools regression suite covering 16 suites), plus shellcheck and CodeQL in their own workflows. Four of them are hard gates that block the merge. The Python pytest suites are the one part not yet wired into CI, tracked in issue #71.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uongeze majaribio ya kurudi nyuma kwa seti ya majaribio ya kiotomatiki kwa angalau 50% ya hitilafu zilizorekebisha ndani ya miezi sita iliyopita. [regression_tests_added50]

    Well above 50 percent, because the standard makes it mandatory: rules/coding-standards.md section 13.1 G2 requires every bug fixed in a pull request to carry a regression test that fails on the pre-fix code. Recent fixes follow it: issue #64 (redaction-checker missing untracked files) shipped with the test that reproduces the false local pass, and issue #60's CodeQL fix was made structural so the checker itself is the regression guard. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/rules/coding-standards.md


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na seti ya majaribio ya kiotomatiki ya FLOSS inayotoa angalau 80% ya usakinishaji wa taarifa ikiwa kuna angalau zana moja ya FLOSS inayoweza kupima kigezo hiki katika lugha iliyochaguliwa. [test_statement_coverage80]
    Zana nyingi za FLOSS zinapatikana kupima usakinishaji wa majaribio, ikiwa ni pamoja na gcov/lcov, Blanket.js, Istanbul, JCov, na covr (R). Kumbuka kwamba kutimiza kigezo hiki sio uhakika kwamba seti ya majaribio ni ya kina, badala yake, kushindwa kutimiza kigezo hiki ni kiashiria kizito cha seti ya majaribio mbaya.

    Measured, not estimated. coverage.py 7.13.5 with pytest 9.0.2 on 2026-07-28 over tools/, hooks/ and scripts/: 2090 statements, 1628 missed, 22 percent, with 334 tests passing. Restricting the source set to the shipped surface of hooks/ plus tools/ and dropping the one-shot scripts/patch_*.py migrations gives 30 percent, so the answer does not change under a friendlier scoping. Three gate cores are near-complete (acceptance_gate 98 percent, manifest_gate 99 percent, semantic_layer 99 percent) while six files are at zero, including hooks/pre-tool-secret-shield.py and tools/memory-mcp-server.py. N/A is not available here: coverage.py is a FLOSS tool that measures Python, which is one of this project's languages. The full per-file measurement and the acceptance criteria are in issue #71.


  • Upimaji wa utendaji mpya


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uwe na sera rasmi iliyoandikwa kwamba kadri utendakazi mkubwa mpya unaongezwa, majaribio ya utendakazi mpya LAZIMA yaongezwe kwenye seti ya majaribio ya kiotomatiki. [test_policy_mandated]

    A formal written policy exists. rules/coding-standards.md section 13.1 A1 to A3 requires happy paths, every enumerated edge case and every failure path (including the emission of the signal itself) to map to a test, and section 13.2 makes the mapping a required artifact of the pull request. Section 13.3 enumerates the refusals, including that classifying a coverage gap in new code as a follow-up is blocking. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/rules/coding-standards.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA ujumuishe, katika maelekezo yake yaliyoandikwa kwa mapendekezo ya mabadiliko, sera kwamba majaribio yataongezwa kwa utendakazi mkubwa mpya. [tests_documented_added]
    Hata hivyo, hata sheria isiyo rasmi inakubaliwa mradi majaribio yaongezwe kimakosa.

    CONTRIBUTING.md states it for hooks ("Changes to that hook need a corresponding test in tests/") and rules/coding-standards.md section 13 states it generally, with the Completion Ledger as the mechanism that makes it checkable in review. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md and https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/rules/coding-standards.md


  • Bendera za maonyo


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Miradi LAZIMA iwe na ukali wa juu zaidi na maonyo katika programu iliyozalishwa na mradi, iwezekanavyo vitendo. [warnings_strict]
    Baadhi ya maonyo hayawezi kuwashwa kwa ufanisi kwenye miradi fulani. Kinachohitajika ni ushahidi kwamba mradi unajitahidi kuwasha bendera za onyo ambapo inaweza, ili makosa yagundulika mapema.

    Maximally strict for the languages in use. shellcheck runs at error severity over every shell file in hooks/ and tools/ with no "|| true" escape, so a single finding fails the job: see the step "ShellCheck (error severity - hard gate)" in https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/shellcheck.yml. CodeQL runs the widest query pack, security-and-quality, rather than the default security-only pack. The redaction sweep runs under ZETETIC_PROFILE=strict, which promotes every finding to exit 1 (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml). Warning severity for shellcheck is currently informational, with the backlog measured and scheduled in issue #74.


 Usalama 11/13 ●

  • Maarifa ya maendeleo yenye usalama


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utekeleze kanuni za muundo salama (kutoka "know_secure_design"), pale inapohusika. Ikiwa mradi hauzalishi programu, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [implement_secure_design]
    Kwa mfano, matokeo ya mradi yanapaswa kuwa na mipangilio salama ya kuzuia makosa (maamuzi ya ufikiaji yanapaswa kukataa kwa chaguo-msingi, na usakinishaji wa mradi unapaswa kuwa salama kwa chaguo-msingi). Pia yanapaswa kuwa na kikuu cha kati kikamilifu (kila ufikiaji ambao unaweza kuwekwa kikomo lazima ufanyiwe ukaguzi wa mamlaka na usiweze kuvukwa). Kumbuka kwamba katika hali fulani kanuni zitagombana, na katika hali hiyo chaguo lazima lifanywe (k.m., taratibu nyingi zinaweza kufanya mambo kuwa magumu zaidi, kukiuka "uchumi wa utaratibu" / iweke rahisi).

    The principles are implemented, with one stated exception. Fail-safe defaults: the memory ACL denies any write outside a scope's owner list and tools/manifest_gate.py rejects an ungrounded source with exit 3. Separation of privilege: the release job holds only id-token and attestations write, everything else is contents: read. Open design: the enforcement surface and its documented limits are public (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents#what-this-system-does-not-do). Economy of mechanism: web_ingest, manifest_gate and semantic_layer import none of each other and are wired by a skill, so each is independently testable. The exception is complete mediation at one tool boundary, described under input_validation below.


  • Tumia mazoea mazuri ya msingi ya usimbuaji

    Kumbuka kwamba programu fulani haihitaji kutumia taratibu za usimbuaji. Ikiwa mradi wako unazalisha programu ambayo (1) inajumuisha, inaamilisha, au inafanya usimbuaji kuwa hai, na (2) inaweza kutolewa kutoka Marekani (US) kwenda nje ya Marekani au kwa raia asiye wa Marekani, inaweza kuwa ni lazima kisheria kuchukua hatua chache za ziada. Kawaida hii inahusisha tu kutuma barua pepe. Kwa maelezo zaidi, tazama sehemu ya usimbuaji ya Kuelewa Teknolojia ya Chanzo Wazi & Udhibiti wa Usafirishaji wa Marekani.

    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifumo ya usalama ya chaguo-msingi ndani ya programu inayozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA ISITEGEMEE algoriti za kriptologia au hali zenye udhaifu mkubwa unaojulikana (k.m., algoriti ya hash ya kriptologia ya SHA-1 au hali ya CBC katika SSH). [crypto_weaknesses]
    Wasiwasi kuhusu hali ya CBC katika SSH unajadiliwa katika CERT: SSH CBC vulnerability.

    The only digest in the tree is SHA-256 and the only transport is the platform default TLS context. No SHA-1, no MD5, and no hand-selected cipher mode.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi INAPASWA kusaidia algoriti nyingi za kriptologia, ili watumiaji waweze kubadilisha haraka ikiwa moja imevunjwa. Algoriti za kawaida za funguo za simetria ni pamoja na AES, Twofish, na Serpent. Mbadala wa algoriti za hash za kriptologia za kawaida ni pamoja na SHA-2 (ikiwa ni pamoja na SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384 NA SHA-512) na SHA-3. [crypto_algorithm_agility]

    The project selects no cryptographic algorithm of its own. Transport algorithms are negotiated by the platform TLS stack and release signing is delegated to Sigstore, so there is no project-level choice for a user to switch.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA usaidie kuhifadhi vitambulisho vya uthibitishaji (kama vile nywila na ishara za nguvu) na funguo za kibinafsi za kriptologia katika mafaili ambayo yametengwa na habari nyingine (kama vile mafaili ya usanidi, hifadhidata, na kumbukumbu), na kuruhusu watumiaji kusasisha na kubadilisha bila ukusanyaji upya wa msimbo. Ikiwa mradi haufanyi usindikaji wa vitambulisho vya uthibitishaji na funguo za kibinafsi za kriptologia, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [crypto_credential_agility]

    The software processes no authentication credentials and holds no private keys. Release signing is keyless through Sigstore, where the signing certificate is short-lived and issued against the workflow's OIDC identity, so there is no stored private key to separate out or rotate.


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi INAPASWA kusaidia itifaki salama kwa mawasiliano yake yote ya mtandao, kama vile SSHv2 au zaidi, TLS1.2 au zaidi (HTTPS), IPsec, SFTP, na SNMPv3. Itifaki zisizo salama kama vile FTP, HTTP, telnet, SSLv3 au mapema zaidi, na SSHv1 ZINAPASWA kuzimwa kwa chaguo-msingi, na kuzimwa tu ikiwa mtumiaji anaisanidi mahususi. Ikiwa programu iliyozalishwa na mradi haiesaidii mawasiliano ya mtandao, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [crypto_used_network]

    Outbound fetches use the platform TLS stack correctly, but insecure schemes are not disabled by default. tools/web_ingest.py hands a caller-supplied URL to the standard library client without restricting the scheme first, so plain HTTP is accepted on the same footing as HTTPS. The fix is an allowlist at that boundary, re-applied after each redirect hop, with plain HTTP available only behind an explicit opt-in. Reported unmet rather than argued around.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi INAPASWA, ikiwa inasaidia au inatumia TLS, kusaidia angalau toleo la TLS 1.2. Kumbuka kuwa kilichotangulia TLS kiliitwa SSL. Ikiwa programu haitumii TLS, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [crypto_tls12]

    Outbound TLS goes through ssl.create_default_context (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/tools/web_ingest.py), whose minimum protocol version on the Python versions this project targets is TLS 1.2. The context is created once and reused for every fetch, including the robots.txt fetch, so no request escapes it.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA, ikiwa inasaidia TLS, ifanye uthibitishaji wa cheti cha TLS kwa chaguo-msingi inapotumia TLS, ikiwa ni pamoja na rasilimali ndogo. Ikiwa programu haitumii TLS, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [crypto_certificate_verification]
    Kumbuka kuwa uthibitishaji usio sahihi wa cheti cha TLS ni kosa la kawaida. Kwa maelezo zaidi, angalia "The Most Dangerous Code in the World: Validating SSL Certificates in Non-Browser Software" na Martin Georgiev et al. na "Do you trust this application?" na Michael Catanzaro.

    Certificate verification is on by default and is never disabled. ssl.create_default_context sets verify_mode to CERT_REQUIRED and check_hostname to True, and there is no CERT_NONE, no check_hostname = False and no unverified context anywhere in the tree. The context is preferentially built against certifi's CA bundle when available, falling back to the system store. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/tools/web_ingest.py


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Programu iliyozalishwa na mradi LAZIMA, ikiwa inasaidia TLS, ifanye uthibitishaji wa cheti kabla ya kutuma vichwa vya HTTP na habari ya kibinafsi (kama vile vidakuzi salama). Ikiwa programu haitumii TLS, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [crypto_verification_private]

    No private information is ever sent. The outbound client transmits only a User-Agent, Accept-Encoding and the conditional-GET validators (If-None-Match, If-Modified-Since); it sends no cookie, no authorization header and no credential. Certificate verification is performed by the default context before any request body or header leaves, and no fetch is made outside that context.


  • Kutolewa kwa usalama


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA uweke saini kwa kriptologia matoleo ya matokeo ya mradi yanayokusudiwa kwa matumizi ya kila mahali, na LAZIMA kuwe na mchakato ulioandikwa unaoweleza watumiaji jinsi wanaweza kupata funguo za umma za saini na kuthibitisha saini. Funguo ya kibinafsi kwa saini hizi LAZIMA ISIWE kwenye tovuti zinazosambaza moja kwa moja programu kwa umma. Ikiwa matoleo hayakusudiwa kwa matumizi ya kila mahali, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [signed_releases]
    Matokeo ya mradi ni pamoja na msimbo wa chanzo na matokeo yoyote yaliyozalishwa pale inapohusika (k.m., mifumo inayotekelezeka, vifurushi, na vyombo). Matokeo yaliyozalishwa YANAWEZA kuwekwa saini tofauti na msimbo wa chanzo. Hizi ZINAWEZA kutekelezwa kama lebo za git zilizowekwa saini (kwa kutumia saini za kidijitali za kriptologia). Miradi YAWEZA kutoa matokeo yaliyozalishwa tofauti na zana kama vile git, lakini katika hali hizo, matokeo tofauti LAZIMA yawekwe saini tofauti.

    Every release is cryptographically signed through Sigstore and the verification path is documented. The release workflow attests the tarball, the executable manifest and the CycloneDX SBOM with actions/attest-build-provenance under a least-privilege OIDC identity, and self-verifies with the shipped verifier before publishing (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/release.yml). Users verify with "gh attestation verify zetetic-team-subagents.tar.gz --repo cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents", documented at https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md. Signing is keyless, so no private key exists to be stored on the distribution site: the certificate is short-lived, issued by Fulcio against the workflow's identity, and logged in the Rekor transparency log.


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    INAPENDEKEZWA kuwa katika mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo, kila lebo muhimu ya toleo (lebo ambayo ni sehemu ya toleo kuu, toleo dogo, au kurekebishwa udhaifu uliotangazwa hadharani) iwekwe saini kwa kriptologia na iweze kuthibitishwa kama ilivyoelezwa katika signed_releases. [version_tags_signed]

    Release tags are annotated but not cryptographically signed: "git tag -v v2.35.0" reports no signature. The release artifacts are covered instead, each with a SHA-256 companion and a Sigstore build-provenance attestation (https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md). Signing the tags themselves would add a second, independent anchor and has not been set up.


  • Masuala mengine ya usalama


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Matokeo ya mradi LAZIMA yafanye ukaguzi wa pembejeo zote kutoka vyanzo visivyoaminika ili kuhakikisha ni halali (*orodha zinazokubalika*), na kukataa pembejeo zisizo halali, ikiwa kuna vizuizi vyovyote kwenye data kabisa. [input_validation]
    Kumbuka kuwa kulinganisha ingizo dhidi ya orodha ya "miundo mibaya" (aka *orodha za kukataza*) kwa kawaida haitoshi, kwa sababu washambuliaji mara nyingi wanaweza kuepuka orodha ya kukataza. Hasa, nambari zinabadilishwa kuwa miundo ya ndani na kisha kuangaliwa ikiwa ziko kati ya chini na juu zao (ikiwa ni pamoja), na vifungu vya maandishi vinaangaliwa ili kuhakikisha kuwa ni ruwaza halali za maandishi (k.m., UTF-8 halali, urefu, sintaksia, n.k.). Baadhi ya data inaweza kuhitaji kuwa "chochote kabisa" (k.m., kipakia faili), lakini hizi kwa kawaida zingekuwa nadra.

    Validation at the trust boundaries is mostly present and in one place it is the wrong shape. The memory tool checks every scope write against an owner list, tools/manifest_gate.py rejects an ungrounded source with a non-zero exit rather than passing it through, the hooks bound their stdin reads, and the fetch path caps response size and redirect depth. The gap is that one tool accepts a caller-supplied URL and validates the scheme with a downstream denylist rather than an allowlist at the boundary, which this criterion asks for explicitly. The maintainer has the specifics; the fix is to allowlist the accepted schemes where the input enters and re-check after each redirect hop, with a regression test for the rejected cases.


    Kwa shida ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Taratibu za kuimarisha ZINAPASWA kutumiwa katika programu iliyozalishwa na mradi ili kasoro za programu ziwe na uwezekano mdogo wa kusababisha udhaifu wa usalama. [hardening]
    Taratibu za kuimarisha zinaweza kujumuisha vichwa vya HTTP kama Sera ya Usalama wa Maudhui (CSP), bendera za mkusanyaji ili kupunguza mashambulizi (kama vile -fstack-protector), au bendera za mkusanyaji ili kuondoa tabia isiyofafanuliwa. Kwa madhumuni yetu upendeleo mdogo hauhesabiwi kuwa utaratibu wa kuimarisha (upendeleo mdogo ni muhimu, lakini tofauti).

    This criterion counts mechanisms such as HTTP response headers and compiler hardening flags, and explicitly excludes least privilege. The project produces no HTTP surface for a Content Security Policy to apply to and compiles nothing, so there is no -fstack-protector equivalent to enable. The protections it does use (bounded stdin reads, a response-size cap, a redirect cap, fail-closed gates and a credential-path denylist on agent reads) are real, but they are not what this criterion measures, so it is reported unmet rather than argued into a pass.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA utoe kesi ya uhakika inayosababisha kwa nini mahitaji yake ya usalama yanakidhi. Kesi ya uhakika LAZIMA ijumuishe: maelezo ya muundo wa tishio, utambulisho wazi wa mipaka ya kuaminiwa, hoja kwamba kanuni za muundo salama zimetumika, na hoja kwamba udhaifu wa kawaida wa utekelezaji wa usalama umekabiliana nao. (URL inahitajika) [assurance_case]
    Kesi ya uhakika ni "mwili wa ushahidi ulioandikwa unaotoa hoja inayoshawishi na halali kwamba seti maalum ya madai muhimu kuhusu mali za mfumo ziko na sababu za kutosha kwa programu maalum katika mazingira maalum" ("Uhakika wa Programu Kwa kutumia Miundo ya Kesi ya Uhakika Iliyopangwa", Thomas Rhodes et al, NIST Interagency Report 7608). Mipaka ya kuaminiwa ni mipaka ambapo data au utekelezaji hubadilisha kiwango chake cha kuaminiwa, k.m., mipaka ya seva katika programu ya kawaida ya wavuti. Ni ya kawaida kuorodhesha kanuni za muundo salama (kama vile Saltzer na Schroeer) na udhaifu wa kawaida wa utekelezaji wa usalama (kama vile OWASP top 10 au CWE/SANS top 25), na kuonyesha jinsi kila moja unavyokabiliana. Kesi ya uhakika ya BadgeApp inaweza kuwa mfano wenye manufaa. Hii inahusiana na documentation_security, documentation_architecture, na implement_secure_design.

    https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/SECURITY.md covers two of the four required parts: it describes the threat (everything shipped executes in the user's session with no sandbox, and the payload does not even need to be compiled) and it argues that common implementation weaknesses are countered (shellcheck, CodeQL, Scorecard, the attested bundle and the install-path verifier). It does not identify trust boundaries as such and it makes no secure-design argument, so the assurance case is incomplete. Tracked with the four required parts as acceptance criteria in issue #70.


 Uchanganuzi 2/2 ●

  • Uchambuzi tuli wa msimbo


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA utumie angalau zana moja ya uchanganuzi tuli yenye sheria au mbinu za kutafuta udhaifu wa kawaida katika lugha au mazingira yaliyochanganuliwa, ikiwa kuna angalau zana moja ya FLOSS inayoweza kutekeleza kigezo hiki katika lugha iliyochaguliwa. [static_analysis_common_vulnerabilities]
    Zana za uchambuzi tuli ambazo zimeundwa hasa kutafuta udhaifu wa kawaida zina uwezekano mkubwa wa kuzipata. Hata hivyo, kutumia zana zozote za tuli kwa kawaida itasaidia kupata baadhi ya matatizo, kwa hivyo tunashauri lakini hatunahitaji hii kwa kiwango cha nishani ya 'kupita'.

    CodeQL runs the security-and-quality suite, which is the security query pack plus the quality queries, rather than a generic lint. It found real vulnerability-class defects and they were fixed: 33 alerts cleared at source in issue #60. https://github.com/cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/blob/main/.github/workflows/codeql.yml


  • Uchambuzi wa msimbo wa nguvu za ziada


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ikiwa programu iliyozalishwa na mradi inajumuisha programu iliyoandikwa kwa kutumia lugha isiyosalama ya kumbukumbu (k.m., C au C++), basi angalau zana moja ya nguvu (k.m., fuzzer au kitafutaji cha programu ya wavuti) LAZIMA itumike kwa kawaida kwa pamoja na utaratibu wa kugundua matatizo ya usalama wa kumbukumbu kama vile uandikaji zaidi wa kipengele. Ikiwa mradi hauzalishi programu iliyoandikwa katika lugha isiyosalama ya kumbukumbu, chagua "haihusiki" (N/A). [dynamic_analysis_unsafe]
    Mifano ya taratibu za kugundua matatizo ya usalama wa kumbukumbu ni pamoja na Address Sanitizer (ASAN) (inapatikana katika GCC na LLVM), Memory Sanitizer, na valgrind. Zana nyingine zinazoweza kutumika ni pamoja na thread sanitizer na undefined behavior sanitizer. Madai ya kila mahali pia yaweza kufanya kazi.

    The software is bash and Python. There is no C, C++ or other memory-unsafe code for a memory-safety dynamic analyser to target.



Data hii inapatikana chini ya Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). Hii inamaanisha kuwa Mpokeaji wa Data anaweza kushiriki Data, na au bila marekebisho, mradi Mpokeaji wa Data anapatanisha maandishi ya mkataba huu na Data iliyoshirikiwa. Tafadhali tambua Clement na wachangiaji wa nishani ya Mazoea Bora ya OpenSSF.

Ingizo la nishani ya mradi linamilikiwa na: Clement.
Ingizo liliundwa siku 2026-07-27 22:32:34 UTC, iliyosasishwa mara ya mwisho siku 2026-07-27 22:58:32 UTC. Ilipata mara ya mwisho nishani ya kupita siku 2026-07-27 22:58:12 UTC.