keyboard-a11y-tester

Miradi inayofuata mazoea bora hapa chini inaweza kujihakikisha kwa hiari na kuonyesha kuwa wamepata nishani ya mazoea bora ya Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa programu haitakuwa na kasoro au udhaifu; hata mbinu rasmi zinaweza kushindwa ikiwa vipimo au dhana ni sahihi. Wala hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa mradi utaendelea kuwa na jamii ya maendeleo yenye afya na inayofanya kazi vizuri. Hata hivyo, kufuata mazoea bora kunaweza kusaidia kuboresha matokeo ya miradi. Kwa mfano, baadhi ya mazoea huwezesha ukaguzi wa watu wengi kabla ya kutolewa, ambayo inaweza kusaidia kupata udhaifu wa kiufundi ambao vinginevyo ni vigumu kupata na kusaidia kujenga uaminifu na hamu ya mwingiliano wa kurudia kati ya wasanidi programu kutoka makampuni tofauti. Ili kupata nishani, vigezo vyote vya LAZIMA na LAZIMA WALA USIWAHI lazima vifuatwe, vigezo vyote vya INAPASWA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana na thibitisho, na vigezo vyote vya PENDEKEZA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana (tunataka vifikiwe angalau). Ikiwa unataka kuingiza maandishi ya thibitisho kama maoni ya jumla, badala ya kuwa maelezo ya busara kwamba hali ni inakubaliwa, anza kifungu cha maandishi na '//' ikifuatiwa na nafasi. Maoni ni karibu kupitia tovuti ya GitHub kama masuala au maombi ya kuvuta Kuna pia orodha ya barua pepe kwa majadiliano ya jumla.

Tunafuraha kutoa habari katika lugha nyingi, hata hivyo, ikiwa kuna mgongano au kutokuwa na usawa kati ya tafsiri, toleo la Kiingereza ni toleo lenye mamlaka.
Ikiwa huu ni mradi wako, tafadhali onyesha hali ya nishani yako ya msingi kwenye ukurasa wa mradi wako! Hali ya nishani ya msingi inaonekana kama hii: Kiwango cha nishani ya msingi kwa mradi 13561 ni in_progress Huu ndiyo jinsi ya kuweka nishani ya msingi:
Unaweza kuonyesha hali ya nishani yako ya msingi kwa kuweka hii katika faili yako ya markdown:
[![OpenSSF Baseline](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561/baseline)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561)
au kwa kuweka hii katika HTML yako:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/13561/baseline"></a>


Hizi ni vigezo vya Kiwango cha Msingi 3. Hizi ni vigezo vya toleo v2026.02.19.

Baseline Series: Kiwango cha Msingi 1 Kiwango cha Msingi 2 Kiwango cha Msingi 3

        

 Misingi

  • Jumla

    Kumbuka kwamba miradi mingine inaweza kutumia jina sawa.

    An AI-assisted web accessibility tester that behaves like two W3C personas at once: a keyboard-only user ("Ade") and a screen-reader user ("Lakshmi"). It drives a page keyboard-only, records what happens at every focus stop, and emits evidence-linked findings mapped to specific WCAG success criteria — against any website.

    Tafadhali tumia muundo wa maneno ya leseni ya SPDX; mifano ni pamoja na "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", na "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Usitumie alama za nukuu za moja au mbili.
    Ikiwa kuna lugha zaidi ya moja, ziorodhe kama thamani zilizotengwa kwa koma (nafasi ni za hiari) na ziorodhe kuanzia iliyotumiwa zaidi hadi iliyotumiwa kidogo. Ikiwa kuna orodha ndefu, tafadhali orodhesha angalau tatu za kawaida zaidi. Ikiwa hakuna lugha (k.m., huu ni mradi wa nyaraka tu au wa majaribio tu), tumia herufi moja "-". Tafadhali tumia herufi kubwa za kawaida kwa kila lugha, k.m., "JavaScript".
    Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) ni mpango wa kuweka majina yenye muundo kwa mifumo ya teknolojia ya habari, programu, na vifurushi. Inatumika katika mifumo na hifadhidata nyingi wakati wa kuripoti udhaifu.

    keyboard-a11y-tester

    An AI-assisted web accessibility tester that behaves like two W3C personas at once: a
    keyboard-only user ("Ade") and a screen-reader user ("Lakshmi"). It drives a page
    keyboard-only, records what happens at every focus stop, and emits evidence-linked
    findings mapped to specific WCAG success criteria — against any website. Both
    personas run in the same pass by default; a --persona flag restricts to just one.

    It has two layers:

    • a deterministic runner (scripts/runner.mjs) that owns the mechanical, reproducible
      work — driving the page keyboard-only, capturing a per-step trace + screenshots, and
      computing the machine-decidable checks for both personas;
    • an AI-judgment layer — the invoking agent — that reads the trace/screenshots/census
      and judges what rules can't (task completion, logical focus/reading order, form
      quality, announcement quality). See SKILL.md for how an agent drives it.

    Standalone and portable: it depends only on playwright, yaml, pngjs, pixelmatch,
    and @guidepup/virtual-screen-reader, needs no bundled test cases, and writes all output
    to a per-user temp directory (never into this folder). The screen-reader persona
    never drives a real screen reader (NVDA/VoiceOver) — see "Screen-reader detection" below.

    Documentation: docs/usage.md (setup, dependencies, quick start,
    CAPTCHAs) · docs/interface.md (full CLI reference, output file
    schema, WCAG checks table).

    Quick start

    As a Claude Code plugin — register this repo as a plugin marketplace, then install it:

    /plugin marketplace add ezufelt/keyboard-a11y-tester
/plugin install keyboard-a11y-tester@ezufelt

    The first command registers this repo as a marketplace (named ezufelt, per
    .claude-plugin/marketplace.json); the second installs the plugin. Once installed, the
    skill in SKILL.md becomes available to the agent.

    As a standalone clone — clone the repo and install its dependencies:

    git clone https://github.com/ezufelt/keyboard-a11y-tester.git
cd keyboard-a11y-tester
npm install
npx playwright install chromium

    Then drive it directly (see Run against any URL).

    Requirements & dependencies

    Requires Node.js ≥ 20 and Chromium (via Playwright), plus five small npm dependencies —
    no build step. Run node scripts/setup-check.mjs to verify both before your first run.

    See docs/usage.md for the full dependency
    table, licensing credit for @guidepup/virtual-screen-reader, and setup instructions.

    Run against any URL (no test file needed)

    # quick unattended blind Tab-crawl of the start page, per viewport
node scripts/runner.mjs --url https://example.com

# a full scenario, driven live by the agent one keystroke at a time
node scripts/runner.mjs serve --url https://example.com --goal "find the pricing page" \

     --viewport desktop --port 9400
#   → prints:  READY <session-dir>   (under the system temp dir)
node scripts/runner.mjs observe <session-dir>
node scripts/runner.mjs step    <session-dir> --press Tab      # one keystroke; prints observation
node scripts/runner.mjs step    <session-dir> --press Enter
node scripts/runner.mjs step    <session-dir> --type "hello@example.com"
node scripts/runner.mjs finish  <session-dir>                  # writes trace + findings
node scripts/runner.mjs stop    <session-dir>

    See docs/usage.md for the full
    quick-start walkthrough, and docs/interface.md for every CLI flag and
    the complete output file schema.

    Authenticated runs

    Pages behind a login can't be tested with a fresh, logged-out browser. Pass a Playwright
    storageState JSON file with --storage-state <file> to start the browser with its cookies
    and localStorage already loaded (e.g. an already-logged-in session). Generate one with
    context.storageState({ path: 'auth.json' }) or npx playwright codegen --save-storage=auth.json <url>.
    The file is validated (exists, parses as JSON, and looks like a real storageState export —
    i.e. has cookies/origins arrays) before the browser launches — a missing or malformed file
    fails the run immediately rather than silently testing the logged-out site. In serve mode
    it's applied once at launch and the session browser keeps the state alive for every subsequent
    step.

    A storageState file holds live session cookies/tokens — treat it as a secret. Don't commit
    it; .gitignore already excludes auth.json, storageState.json, and *storage-state*.json,
    but a differently-named file won't be caught automatically.

    What the runner does (deterministic layer)

    Playwright (full Chromium, new-headless + SwiftShader for real pixels) drives the page with
    only the keyboard — it never calls .click() or .focus(); if a control is only
    reachable by pointer, that is itself a finding. It drops to a raw CDP session for the
    accessibility tree (Accessibility.getPartialAXTree), the ground truth for name/role/state.
    At startup it fails fast if :focus-visible does not fire on CDP-driven key events
    (every focus-indicator check would otherwise be invalid) — skipped entirely when
    --persona screen-reader is passed, since that persona has no pixel/focus-ring work.

    Checks are evaluated per focus stop the persona actually visits (keyboard persona) or
    against a page-wide structural census (screen-reader persona) — this is scenario
    testing, not an exhaustive page audit. Conformance target: AA is pass/fail, AAA is
    informative.

    WCAG Level Persona Check
    2.4.7 AA keyboard Focus indicator present
    2.4.13 AAA (informative) keyboard Focus indicator strength
    1.4.1 AA keyboard Indicator is not colour-only
    2.1.2 AA keyboard Keyboard trap
    2.4.1 AA keyboard No skip link
    2.4.3 AA keyboard Positive tabindex
    3.2.1 AA keyboard Context change from focus alone
    3.3.2 AA keyboard File input named only by the user-agent default ("Choose File")
    4.1.2 AA keyboard Focusable control with no accessible name
    1.1.1 AA screen-reader Missing alt text/aria-label
    1.3.1 AA screen-reader Heading level skip
    1.3.1 AA screen-reader Duplicate, unlabeled landmark roles
    4.1.2 AA screen-reader Interactive control announced as a bare role
    4.1.3 AA screen-reader Declared live region that never announced anything

    See docs/interface.md for the authoritative version of
    this table (full check descriptions) and the W3C persona references.

    Output

    Everything is written under a per-user temp dir (${TMPDIR}/keyboard-a11y-tester/…, or
    --out): a trace.json (per-step evidence), deterministic-findings.json (WCAG findings),
    screen-reader-census.json (screen-reader persona), and cropped screenshots/step_NNNN.png
    per viewport. See docs/interface.md for the
    complete directory layout and field-by-field schema of every output file.

    Focus-visible detection (2.4.7 AA presence + 2.4.13 AAA strength)

    Presence (AA) uses two independent signals, so a faint-but-real indicator is never
    missed:

    1. the focused element's computed style declares an outline or box-shadow (ground
      truth — recorded in the trace as computed_focus_style), or
    2. pixels change on focus (catches background/colour indicators with no outline).

    Either one means the indicator is present → AA pass. Pixel diffing compares the focused
    frame to a scroll-aligned baseline (the next step's frame, where the element is no longer
    focused — so focus is never manipulated programmatically), measuring ring slices at
    increasing offset (thin and offset outlines), the interior, and top/bottom edge bands.

    Strength (AAA, informative) measures whether the indicator meets 2.4.13 Focus
    Appearance — changed area ≥ a 2px-thick perimeter of the control, and ≥ 3:1 WCAG luminance
    contrast between focused and unfocused states. Advisory only. (This measure is unreliable
    on pages that mutate between steps — e.g. "load more" — because the neighbour-frame
    baseline then differs by content, not just the focus ring; treat AAA numbers on such pages
    with caution. AA presence is unaffected, being driven by the computed style.)

    So 2.4.7 (AA) requires only that an indicator is visible with no size/contrast minimum: a
    faint 1px or low-opacity ring passes AA and is flagged weak at AAA — rather than being
    falsely reported as "no focus indicator."

    Screen-reader detection (Lakshmi)

    The screen-reader persona is emulated, never driven for real: @guidepup/virtual-screen-reader
    builds an ARIA/ACCNAME-spec accessible tree over the live page and computes what a
    spec-compliant screen reader would announce, entirely in the browser's own JS engine — no
    NVDA/JAWS/VoiceOver is launched, and it works the same way on any OS the runner itself
    supports.

    Its self-contained browser bundle is injected via Playwright's context.addInitScript,
    which is not subject to the page's own CSP — verified against both a synthetic CSP-locked
    page and a real CSP-locked production site. Once injected, its virtual cursor tracks
    real keyboard focus automatically     (it listens for native focusin events), so every
    step you drive with real Tab/Enter/etc. produces a matching sr_announcement with no
    separate "chasing" logic and no drift between what's focused and what's reported as
    announced. The same mechanism also wires a MutationObserver that computes WAI-ARIA
    live-region semantics and captures "assertive: …"/"polite: …" announcements as they
    happen — this is what 4.1.3 (Status Messages) findings are derived from.

    Separately, once per newly-visited page URL, an ephemeral instance walks the entire page
    in reading order (never touching the live per-step monitor) to build
    screen-reader-census.json — the source for the heading-hierarchy, duplicate-landmark,
    missing-alt-text, and bare-role-control checks, since those need whole-page context rather
    than just the stops a keyboard user's Tab order happens to visit.

    This augments but does not replace testing with a real screen reader and real users —
    the upstream library's own README says exactly that, and it's worth repeating: this checks
    what a spec-compliant screen reader should announce given the page's ARIA/HTML, not the
    specific quirks of any one real screen reader implementation.

    CAPTCHAs

    CAPTCHAs detect automation and refuse to run; the runner has a page-scoped, human-approved
    compatibility workaround. See docs/usage.md for details.

    License

    MIT © Everett Zufelt. See LICENSE.

 Udhibiti 0/21 ●

  • Udhibiti


    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Ruhusa zinapopeana kwa kazi katika mfumo wa CI/CD, msimbo wa chanzo au usanidi LAZIMA upee tu ruhusa za chini zaidi zinazohitajika kwa shughuli zinazohusiana. [OSPS-AC-04.02]
    Sanidi mifumo ya CI/CD ya mradi ili kupea ruhusa za chini zinazopatikana kwa watumiaji na huduma kwa chaguomsingi, ukipandisha ruhusa tu inapohitajika kwa kazi maalum. Katika baadhi ya mifumo ya udhibiti wa toleo, hii inaweza kufanyika katika kiwango cha shirika au hifadhi. Ikiwa sivyo, weka ruhusa katika kiwango cha juu cha mfumo.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mifuko ya CI/CD inayokubali pembejeo za mshirika anayeaminika LAZIMA isafishe na kuthibitisha pembejeo hiyo kabla ya kutumia katika mfuko. [OSPS-BR-01.04]
    Mifuko ya CI/CD inapaswa kusafisha (kunukuu, kutoroka au kutoka kwa maadili yanayotarajiwa) pembejeo zote za mshirika kwenye utekelezaji wa mtiririko wa kazi wa wazi. Ingawa washirika kwa ujumla wanaaminika, pembejeo za mwongozo kwa mtiririko wa kazi haiwezi kukaguliwa na inaweza kutumiwa vibaya na utekaji wa akaunti au tishio la ndani.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Toleo rasmi linapobuniwa, mali zote ndani ya toleo hilo LAZIMA zihusianishwe wazi na kitambulisho cha toleo au kitambulisho kingine cha kipekee kwa mali hiyo. [OSPS-BR-02.02]
    Panga kitambulisho cha kipekee cha toleo kwa kila mali ya programu inayozalishwa na mradi, ukifuata kawaida ya uainishaji thabiti au mpango wa nambari. Mifano ni pamoja na SemVer, CalVer, au kitambulisho cha git commit.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi LAZIMA ufafanue sera ya kudhibiti siri na ushahidi unaotumika na mradi. Sera inapaswa kujumuisha mwongozo wa kuhifadhi, kufikia, na kuzungusha siri na ushahidi. [OSPS-BR-07.02]
    Eleza jinsi siri na ushahidi vinavyodhibitiwa na kutumika ndani ya mradi. Hii inapaswa kujumuisha maelezo ya jinsi siri zinavyohifadhiwa (k.m., kwa kutumia zana ya usimamizi wa siri), jinsi ufikiaji unavyodhibitiwa, na jinsi siri zinavyozungushwa au kusasishwa. Hakikisha kwamba habari nyeti haziingizwi kwa msimbo katika msimbo wa chanzo au kuhifadhiwa katika mifumo ya udhibiti wa toleo.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi ulipotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na maelekezo ya kuthibitisha uadilifu na uhalali wa mali za toleo. [OSPS-DO-03.01]
    Maelekezo katika mradi yanapaswa kuwa na habari kuhusu teknolojia iliyotumika, amri za kuendesha, na matokeo yanayotarajiwa. Inapowezekana, epuka kuhifadhi nyaraka hizi katika mahali pamoja na mfumo wa ujenzi na utoaji wa toleo ili kuepuka ukiukaji mmoja kuhatarisha programu na nyaraka za kuthibitisha uadilifu wa programu.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na maelekezo ya kuthibitisha utambulisho unaotarajiwa wa mtu au mchakato unaothibitisha toleo la programu. [OSPS-DO-03.02]
    Utambulisho unaotarajiwa unaweza kuwa katika muundo wa vitambulisho vya funguo vilivyotumika kusaini, mtoa na utambulisho kutoka cheti cha sigstore, au aina nyingine zinazofanana. Inapowezekana, epuka kuhifadhi nyaraka hii mahali palipo sawa na mirija ya kujenga na kutoa ili kuepuka ukiukaji mmoja kuhatarisha programu na nyaraka za kuthibitisha uadilifu wa programu.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe kauli ya maelezo kuhusu wigo na muda wa msaada kwa kila toleo. [OSPS-DO-04.01]
    Ili kuwasilisha wigo na muda wa msaada kwa rasilimali za programu zilizotolewa za mradi, mradi unapaswa kuwa na faili ya SUPPORT.md, sehemu ya "Msaada" katika SECURITY.md, au nyaraka nyingine zinazoweka wazi mzunguko wa maisha wa msaada, ikijumuisha muda unaotarajiwa wa msaada kwa kila toleo, aina za msaada zinazotolewa (k.m., marekebisho ya hitilafu, sasisho za usalama), na sera au taratibu yoyote husika ya kupata msaada.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zitoe kauli ya maelezo ya wakati matoleo au matoleo hayatapokea tena sasisho za usalama. [OSPS-DO-05.01]
    Ili kuwasilisha wigo na muda wa msaada kwa marekebisho ya usalama, mradi unapaswa kuwa na SUPPORT.md au nyaraka nyingine zinazoweka wazi sera ya mradi ya sasisho za usalama.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Inapokuwa hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na sera kwamba washirikiano wa msimbo wanapimwa kabla ya kupewa ruhusa zilizopandishwa kwa rasilimali nyeti. [OSPS-GV-04.01]
    Chapisha sera inayoweza kutekelezwa katika nyaraka za mradi inayohitaji washirikiano wa msimbo kupimwa na kuidhinishwa kabla ya kupewa ruhusa zilizopandishwa kwa rasilimali nyeti, kama vile idhini ya kuunganisha au ufikiaji kwa siri. Inashauriwa kwamba upimaji ujumuishe kuanzisha mfululizo wa utambulisho unaoweza kuhalalishwa kama vile kuthibitisha ushirikiano wa mchangiaji na shirika linalojulikana na kuaminika.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, rasilimali zote za programu zilizotolewa na zilizokusanywa LAZIMA zikabidhi pamoja na orodha ya bili ya programu. [OSPS-QA-02.02]
    Inashauriwa kuzalisha SBOM kiotomatiki wakati wa kujenga kwa kutumia zana ambayo imepimwa kwa usahihi. Hii huwezesha watumiaji kuingiza data hii kwa njia ya kiwango pamoja na miradi mingine katika mazingira yao.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi unapotoa toleo linalojumuisha hifadhi nyingi za chanzo cha msimbo, miradi yote midogo LAZIMA ilazimishe mahitaji ya usalama ambayo ni kali au kali zaidi kuliko msimbo wa msingi. [OSPS-QA-04.02]
    Hifadhi yoyote ya ziada ya msimbo wa miradi midogo iliyozalishwa na mradi na kukusanywa katika toleo lazima ilazimishe mahitaji ya usalama kama inavyolingana na hali na nia ya msimbo husika. Kwa kuongeza kufuata mahitaji ya msingi wa OSPS yanayolingana, hii inaweza kujumuisha kuhitaji ukaguzi wa usalama, kuhakikisha kuwa haina udhaifu, na kuhakikisha kuwa haina masuala ya usalama yanayojulikana.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Inapokuwa hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziweke wazi lini na jinsi majaribio yanavyotekelezwa. [OSPS-QA-06.02]
    Ongeza sehemu kwenye nyaraka za kuchangia inayoweka wazi jinsi ya kutekeleza majaribio kienyeji na jinsi ya kutekeleza majaribio katika mirija ya CI/CD. Nyaraka zinapaswa kuweka wazi majaribio yanajaribu nini na jinsi ya kutafsiri matokeo.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Inapokuwa hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera kwamba mabadiliko yote makubwa kwa programu inayozalishwa na mradi yanapaswa kuongeza au kusasisha majaribio ya utendaji katika seti ya majaribio ya kiatomati. [OSPS-QA-06.03]
    Ongeza sehemu kwenye nyaraka za kuchangia inayoweka wazi sera ya kuongeza au kusasisha majaribio. Sera inapaswa kuweka wazi ni nini kinachojumuisha mabadiliko makubwa na majaribio yapi yanapaswa kuongezwa au kusasishwa.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati kuruhusu kumefanywa kwa tawi kuu, mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo la mradi LAZIMA uhitaji angalau idhini moja ya binadamu asiye mwandishi ya mabadiliko kabla ya kuunganisha. [OSPS-QA-07.01]
    Sanidi mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo la mradi kuhitaji angalau idhini moja ya binadamu asiye mwandishi ya mabadiliko kabla ya kuunganisha katika toleo au tawi kuu. Hii inaweza kupatikana kwa kuhitaji ombi la kuvuta kupimwa na kuidhinishwa na angalau mshirikiano mmoja mwingine kabla ya kunaweza kuunganishwa.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, mradi LAZIMA ufanye ufuatiliaji wa tisho na uchambuzi wa uso wa shambulio ili kuelewa na kulinda dhidi ya mashambulizi kwenye njia za msimbo muhimu, majukumu, na mwingiliano ndani ya mfumo. [OSPS-SA-03.02]
    Ufuatiliaji wa tisho ni shughuli ambapo mradi unaangalia msimbo, michakato na miundombinu inayohusiana, viunganishi, vipengele muhimu na "kufikiria kama kibogoyo" na kufanya mapendekezo ya jinsi mfumo unaweza kuvunjwa au kuhatarisha. Kila tisho iliyotambuliwa imeorodheshwa ili mradi uweze kufikiria jinsi ya kuepuka au kufunga pengo/udhaifu wowote unaoweza kutokea kwa kujihadhari. Hakikisha hii imesasishwa kwa vipengele vipya au mabadiliko ya kuvunja.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati uko hai, udhaifu wowote katika vipengele vya programu visivyoathiri mradi LAZIMA viwe vimeainishwa katika hati ya VEX, ikiendeleza ripoti ya udhaifu na maelezo ya kutokutumiwa vibaya. [OSPS-VM-04.02]
    Weka mfumo wa mlisho wa VEX unaowasiliana hali ya utumiaji vibaya wa udhaifu unaojulikana, ikiwa ni pamoja na maelezo ya tathmini au marekebisho yoyote yaliyowekwa kusimamisha msimbo ulio na udhaifu usiotekelezwa.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati uko hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya SCA yanayohusiana na udhaifu na leseni. [OSPS-VM-05.01]
    Andika sera katika mradi inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya SCA yanayohusiana na udhaifu na leseni. Jumuisha mchakato wa kutambua, kutanguliza, na kurekebisha matokeo haya.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati uko hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera ya kushughulikia ukiukaji wa SCA kabla ya toleo lolote. [OSPS-VM-05.02]
    Andika sera katika mradi wa kushughulikia matokeo ya Uchambuzi wa Muundo wa Programu yanayotumika kabla ya toleo lolote, na ongeza ukaguzi wa hali unaothibitisha kufuata sera hiyo kabla ya toleo.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati uko hai, mabadiliko yote kwenye msingi wa msimbo wa mradi LAZIMA yaangaliwe kiatomati dhidi ya sera iliyoandikwa ya utegemezi mbaya na udhaifu unaojulikana katika utegemezi, kisha yazuiliwe katika hali ya ukiukaji, isipokuwa inapotangazwa na kuzuiliwa kama isiyotumiwa vibaya. [OSPS-VM-05.03]
    Unda ukaguzi wa hali katika mfumo wa kudhibiti toleo la mradi unaoendesha zana ya Uchambuzi wa Muundo wa Programu kwenye mabadiliko yote ya msingi wa msimbo. Hitaji kwamba ukaguzi wa hali upite kabla mabadiliko kusanywa.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati uko hai, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya SAST. [OSPS-VM-06.01]
    Andika sera katika mradi inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya Upimaji wa Usalama wa Programu Tuli (SAST). Jumuisha mchakato wa kutambua, kutanguliza, na kurekebisha matokeo haya.

    Taarifa inayohitajika haijulikani, si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati uko hai, mabadiliko yote kwenye msingi wa msimbo wa mradi LAZIMA yaangaliwe kiatomati dhidi ya sera iliyoandikwa ya udhaifu wa usalama na kuzuiliwa katika hali ya ukiukaji isipokuwa inapotangazwa na kuzuiliwa kama isiyotumiwa vibaya. [OSPS-VM-06.02]
    Unda ukaguzi wa hali katika mfumo wa kudhibiti toleo la mradi unaoendesha zana ya Upimaji wa Usalama wa Programu Tuli (SAST) kwenye mabadiliko yote ya msingi wa msimbo. Hitaji kwamba ukaguzi wa hali upite kabla mabadiliko kusanywa.


Data hii inapatikana chini ya Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). Hii inamaanisha kuwa Mpokeaji wa Data anaweza kushiriki Data, na au bila marekebisho, mradi Mpokeaji wa Data anapatanisha maandishi ya mkataba huu na Data iliyoshirikiwa. Tafadhali tambua ezufelt na wachangiaji wa nishani ya Mazoea Bora ya OpenSSF.

Ingizo la nishani ya mradi linamilikiwa na: ezufelt.
Ingizo liliundwa siku 2026-07-10 18:22:26 UTC, iliyosasishwa mara ya mwisho siku 2026-07-10 21:04:01 UTC. Ilipata mara ya mwisho nishani ya kupita siku 2026-07-10 21:04:01 UTC.