timetracker

Miradi inayofuata mazoea bora hapa chini inaweza kujihakikisha kwa hiari na kuonyesha kuwa wamepata nishani ya mazoea bora ya Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa programu haitakuwa na kasoro au udhaifu; hata mbinu rasmi zinaweza kushindwa ikiwa vipimo au dhana ni sahihi. Wala hakuna seti ya mazoea yawezayo kuhakikisha kuwa mradi utaendelea kuwa na jamii ya maendeleo yenye afya na inayofanya kazi vizuri. Hata hivyo, kufuata mazoea bora kunaweza kusaidia kuboresha matokeo ya miradi. Kwa mfano, baadhi ya mazoea huwezesha ukaguzi wa watu wengi kabla ya kutolewa, ambayo inaweza kusaidia kupata udhaifu wa kiufundi ambao vinginevyo ni vigumu kupata na kusaidia kujenga uaminifu na hamu ya mwingiliano wa kurudia kati ya wasanidi programu kutoka makampuni tofauti. Ili kupata nishani, vigezo vyote vya LAZIMA na LAZIMA WALA USIWAHI lazima vifuatwe, vigezo vyote vya INAPASWA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana na thibitisho, na vigezo vyote vya PENDEKEZA lazima vifuatwe AU visivyo fufufutiliana (tunataka vifikiwe angalau). Ikiwa unataka kuingiza maandishi ya thibitisho kama maoni ya jumla, badala ya kuwa maelezo ya busara kwamba hali ni inakubaliwa, anza kifungu cha maandishi na '//' ikifuatiwa na nafasi. Maoni ni karibu kupitia tovuti ya GitHub kama masuala au maombi ya kuvuta Kuna pia orodha ya barua pepe kwa majadiliano ya jumla.

Tunafuraha kutoa habari katika lugha nyingi, hata hivyo, ikiwa kuna mgongano au kutokuwa na usawa kati ya tafsiri, toleo la Kiingereza ni toleo lenye mamlaka.
Ikiwa huu ni mradi wako, tafadhali onyesha hali ya nishani yako ya msingi kwenye ukurasa wa mradi wako! Hali ya nishani ya msingi inaonekana kama hii: Kiwango cha nishani ya msingi kwa mradi 11719 ni baseline-2 Huu ndiyo jinsi ya kuweka nishani ya msingi:
Unaweza kuonyesha hali ya nishani yako ya msingi kwa kuweka hii katika faili yako ya markdown:
[![OpenSSF Baseline](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/11719/baseline)](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/11719)
au kwa kuweka hii katika HTML yako:
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/11719"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/11719/baseline"></a>


Hizi ni vigezo vya Kiwango cha Msingi 3. Hizi ni vigezo vya toleo v2026.08.28.

Baseline Series: Kiwango cha Msingi 1 Kiwango cha Msingi 2 Kiwango cha Msingi 3

        

 Misingi

  • Jumla

    Kumbuka kwamba miradi mingine inaweza kutumia jina sawa.

    Simple time tracking front end with optional Jira synchronization, AD/LDAP integration and XLSX export.

    Tafadhali tumia muundo wa maneno ya leseni ya SPDX; mifano ni pamoja na "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "GPL-2.0+", "LGPL-3.0+", "MIT", na "(BSD-2-Clause OR Ruby)". Usitumie alama za nukuu za moja au mbili.
    Ikiwa kuna lugha zaidi ya moja, ziorodhe kama thamani zilizotengwa kwa koma (nafasi ni za hiari) na ziorodhe kuanzia iliyotumiwa zaidi hadi iliyotumiwa kidogo. Ikiwa kuna orodha ndefu, tafadhali orodhesha angalau tatu za kawaida zaidi. Ikiwa hakuna lugha (k.m., huu ni mradi wa nyaraka tu au wa majaribio tu), tumia herufi moja "-". Tafadhali tumia herufi kubwa za kawaida kwa kila lugha, k.m., "JavaScript".
    Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) ni mpango wa kuweka majina yenye muundo kwa mifumo ya teknolojia ya habari, programu, na vifurushi. Inatumika katika mifumo na hifadhidata nyingi wakati wa kuripoti udhaifu.

 Udhibiti 15/21 ●

  • Udhibiti


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Ruhusa zinapopeana kwa kazi katika mfumo wa CI/CD, msimbo wa chanzo au usanidi LAZIMA upee tu ruhusa za chini zaidi zinazohitajika kwa shughuli zinazohusiana. [OSPS-AC-04.02]
    Sanidi mifumo ya CI/CD ya mradi ili kupea ruhusa za chini zinazopatikana kwa watumiaji na huduma kwa chaguomsingi, ukipandisha ruhusa tu inapohitajika kwa kazi maalum. Katika baadhi ya mifumo ya udhibiti wa toleo, hii inaweza kufanyika katika kiwango cha shirika au hifadhi. Ikiwa sivyo, weka ruhusa katika kiwango cha juu cha mfumo.

    Every workflow declares an explicit minimal permissions block: ci.yml, codeql.yml, security.yml, scorecard.yml and auto-merge-deps.yml use permissions: {} or contents: read, and elevated scopes are granted only where the activity requires them (packages: write and id-token: write for image publishing, contents: write and id-token: write for release provenance). See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/tree/main/.github/workflows


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mifuko ya CI/CD inayokubali pembejeo za mshirika anayeaminika LAZIMA isafishe na kuthibitisha pembejeo hiyo kabla ya kutumia katika mfuko. [OSPS-BR-01.04]
    Mifuko ya CI/CD inapaswa kusafisha (kunukuu, kutoroka au kutoka kwa maadili yanayotarajiwa) pembejeo zote za mshirika kwenye utekelezaji wa mtiririko wa kazi wa wazi. Ingawa washirika kwa ujumla wanaaminika, pembejeo za mwongozo kwa mtiririko wa kazi haiwezi kukaguliwa na inaweza kutumiwa vibaya na utekaji wa akaunti au tishio la ndani.

    No workflow interpolates collaborator-supplied values into shell commands; workflow_dispatch triggers declare no free-text inputs, and all run steps use fixed strings or environment variables. OpenSSF Scorecard's Dangerous-Workflow check scores 10/10. See https://securityscorecards.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/netresearch/timetracker


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Toleo rasmi linapobuniwa, mali zote ndani ya toleo hilo LAZIMA zihusianishwe wazi na kitambulisho cha toleo au kitambulisho kingine cha kipekee kwa mali hiyo. [OSPS-BR-02.02]
    Panga kitambulisho cha kipekee cha toleo kwa kila mali ya programu inayozalishwa na mradi, ukifuata kawaida ya uainishaji thabiti au mpango wa nambari. Mifano ni pamoja na SemVer, CalVer, au kitambulisho cha git commit.

    Releases carry no separate downloadable assets; the released artifact is the container image, which is tagged from the release tag via docker/metadata-action semver patterns (for example 6.3.4, 6.3, 6) and is additionally addressable by immutable digest on ghcr.io. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi LAZIMA ufafanue sera ya kudhibiti siri na ushahidi unaotumika na mradi. Sera inapaswa kujumuisha mwongozo wa kuhifadhi, kufikia, na kuzungusha siri na ushahidi. [OSPS-BR-07.02]
    Eleza jinsi siri na ushahidi vinavyodhibitiwa na kutumika ndani ya mradi. Hii inapaswa kujumuisha maelezo ya jinsi siri zinavyohifadhiwa (k.m., kwa kutumia zana ya usimamizi wa siri), jinsi ufikiaji unavyodhibitiwa, na jinsi siri zinavyozungushwa au kusasishwa. Hakikisha kwamba habari nyeti haziingizwi kwa msimbo katika msimbo wa chanzo au kuhifadhiwa katika mifumo ya udhibiti wa toleo.

    docs/secrets-management.md defines the policy across all three dimensions. Storage: a table of secret kinds and their stores (GitHub Actions secrets, GITHUB_TOKEN, keyless Sigstore, Vault, .env.local). Access: fork pull requests receive no secrets, and every secret has a named owner. Rotation: a trigger table including rotation within five working days when someone with access leaves, and at least annually for every long-lived credential. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/docs/secrets-management.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi ulipotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na maelekezo ya kuthibitisha uadilifu na uhalali wa mali za toleo. [OSPS-DO-03.01]
    Maelekezo katika mradi yanapaswa kuwa na habari kuhusu teknolojia iliyotumika, amri za kuendesha, na matokeo yanayotarajiwa. Inapowezekana, epuka kuhifadhi nyaraka hizi katika mahali pamoja na mfumo wa ujenzi na utoaji wa toleo ili kuepuka ukiukaji mmoja kuhatarisha programu na nyaraka za kuthibitisha uadilifu wa programu.

    SECURITY.md carries a 'Verifying a release' section with runnable commands: sha256sum -c against the published checksum, 'gh attestation verify' for the source archive, 'cosign verify' for the image and 'cosign verify-attestation --type cyclonedx' for its SBOM. The certificate-identity patterns are anchored to the specific signing workflows, and the section warns explicitly against loosening them to the organisation prefix, which would accept a certificate from any workflow in the org. It also notes that the commands signal failure by exit status rather than output. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na maelekezo ya kuthibitisha utambulisho unaotarajiwa wa mtu au mchakato unaothibitisha toleo la programu. [OSPS-DO-03.02]
    Utambulisho unaotarajiwa unaweza kuwa katika muundo wa vitambulisho vya funguo vilivyotumika kusaini, mtoa na utambulisho kutoka cheti cha sigstore, au aina nyingine zinazofanana. Inapowezekana, epuka kuhifadhi nyaraka hii mahali palipo sawa na mirija ya kujenga na kutoa ili kuepuka ukiukaji mmoja kuhatarisha programu na nyaraka za kuthibitisha uadilifu wa programu.

    The same section identifies the expected signer and how it changes. Releases up to v6.4.0 were signed by this repository's own workflow and verify with '--repo' alone; from the first release after v6.4.0 the attestation is issued by a reusable workflow in netresearch/.github, so verification requires '--signer-workflow netresearch/.github/.github/workflows/attest-release-files.yml'. Both forms are documented with the boundary stated, and AGENTS.md records the same for maintainers. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe kauli ya maelezo kuhusu wigo na muda wa msaada kwa kila toleo. [OSPS-DO-04.01]
    Ili kuwasilisha wigo na muda wa msaada kwa rasilimali za programu zilizotolewa za mradi, mradi unapaswa kuwa na faili ya SUPPORT.md, sehemu ya "Msaada" katika SECURITY.md, au nyaraka nyingine zinazoweka wazi mzunguko wa maisha wa msaada, ikijumuisha muda unaotarajiwa wa msaada kwa kila toleo, aina za msaada zinazotolewa (k.m., marekebisho ya hitilafu, sasisho za usalama), na sera au taratibu yoyote husika ya kupata msaada.

    SECURITY.md states the support policy explicitly: only the current minor line receives fixes, and a new minor release ends support for the previous one. The supported-versions table carries an End-of-life column, currently listing 6.3.x as supported until 6.4.0 is released. It also records that there are no long-term-support branches. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zitoe kauli ya maelezo ya wakati matoleo au matoleo hayatapokea tena sasisho za usalama. [OSPS-DO-05.01]
    Ili kuwasilisha wigo na muda wa msaada kwa marekebisho ya usalama, mradi unapaswa kuwa na SUPPORT.md au nyaraka nyingine zinazoweka wazi sera ya mradi ya sasisho za usalama.

    SECURITY.md gives end-of-support statements per release line in a dedicated End-of-life column: 6.3.x ends when 6.4.0 is released, 6.0.x to 6.2.x were superseded by the following minor, and 5.x reached end of life on 2026-07-04 with the release of v6.0.0. Security fixes are explicitly not backported. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/SECURITY.md


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA ziwe na sera kwamba washirikiano wa msimbo wanakaguliwa kabla ya kupewa ruhusa za juu zaidi za rasilimali nyeti. [OSPS-GV-04.01]
    Chapisha sera inayoweza kutekelezwa katika nyaraka za mradi inayohitaji washirikiano wa msimbo kupimwa na kuidhinishwa kabla ya kupewa ruhusa zilizopandishwa kwa rasilimali nyeti, kama vile idhini ya kuunganisha au ufikiaji kwa siri. Inashauriwa kwamba upimaji ujumuishe kuanzisha mfululizo wa utambulisho unaoweza kuhalalishwa kama vile kuthibitisha ushirikiano wa mchangiaji na shirika linalojulikana na kuaminika.

    The project documentation contains no policy for reviewing code collaborators before granting escalated permissions to sensitive resources. Access is managed through Netresearch GitHub organization teams, but the review step is not written down. Documenting it is planned.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, rasilimali zote za programu zilizotolewa na zilizokusanywa LAZIMA zikabidhi pamoja na orodha ya bili ya programu. [OSPS-QA-02.02]
    Inashauriwa kuzalisha SBOM kiotomatiki wakati wa kujenga kwa kutumia zana ambayo imepimwa kwa usahihi. Hii huwezesha watumiaji kuingiza data hii kwa njia ya kiwango pamoja na miradi mingine katika mazingira yao.

    Published container images carry a software bill of materials. The image build produces an in-image SBOM attestation via buildx and a merged CycloneDX SBOM (composer.lock plus a Syft scan of the pushed digest), attached to the image digest as a Cosign attestation and uploaded as a workflow artifact; a separate attest-sbom job records a GitHub build attestation. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo linalojumuisha hifadhi nyingi za chanzo cha msimbo, miradi yote midogo LAZIMA ilazimishe mahitaji ya usalama ambayo ni kali au kali zaidi kuliko msimbo wa msingi. [OSPS-QA-04.02]
    Hifadhi yoyote ya ziada ya msimbo wa miradi midogo iliyozalishwa na mradi na kukusanywa katika toleo lazima ilazimishe mahitaji ya usalama kama inavyolingana na hali na nia ya msimbo husika. Kwa kuongeza kufuata mahitaji ya msingi wa OSPS yanayolingana, hii inaweza kujumuisha kuhitaji ukaguzi wa usalama, kuhakikisha kuwa haina udhaifu, na kuhakikisha kuwa haina masuala ya usalama yanayojulikana.

    The project consists of a single source code repository; there are no subprojects to hold to the primary codebase's security requirements. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zieleze kwa uwazi ni lini na jinsi gani majaribio yanaendeshwa. [OSPS-QA-06.02]
    Ongeza sehemu kwenye nyaraka za kuchangia inayoweka wazi jinsi ya kutekeleza majaribio kienyeji na jinsi ya kutekeleza majaribio katika mirija ya CI/CD. Nyaraka zinapaswa kuweka wazi majaribio yanajaribu nini na jinsi ya kutafsiri matokeo.

    docs/testing.md documents the test layers and how to run them, CONTRIBUTING.md states the testing requirements, the Makefile exposes the standard test targets, and .github/workflows/ci.yml defines when each suite runs (every pull request and push, with coverage on the nightly schedule). See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/docs/testing.md


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera kwamba mabadiliko yote makubwa kwenye programu inayotengenezwa na mradi yanapaswa kuongeza au kusasisha majaribio ya utendaji katika seti ya majaribio otomatiki. [OSPS-QA-06.03]
    Ongeza sehemu kwenye nyaraka za kuchangia inayoweka wazi sera ya kuongeza au kusasisha majaribio. Sera inapaswa kuweka wazi ni nini kinachojumuisha mabadiliko makubwa na majaribio yapi yanapaswa kuongezwa au kusasishwa.

    CONTRIBUTING.md requires tests for new and changed functionality and states per-layer coverage expectations (controllers, services, repositories, entities), with the author and reviewer checklists calling out test coverage explicitly. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Wakati kuruhusu kumefanywa kwa tawi kuu, mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo la mradi LAZIMA uhitaji angalau idhini moja ya binadamu asiye mwandishi ya mabadiliko kabla ya kuunganisha. [OSPS-QA-07.01]
    Sanidi mfumo wa udhibiti wa toleo la mradi kuhitaji angalau idhini moja ya binadamu asiye mwandishi ya mabadiliko kabla ya kuunganisha katika toleo au tawi kuu. Hii inaweza kupatikana kwa kuhitaji ombi la kuvuta kupimwa na kuidhinishwa na angalau mshirikiano mmoja mwingine kabla ya kunaweza kuunganishwa.

    The branch protection rule on 'main' does not require approving reviews - 'Require a pull request before merging' is disabled and no required_approving_review_count is configured - so a change can reach main without any non-author human approval. Note that CONTRIBUTING.md currently claims '2+ approvals from maintainers'; that claim does not match the enforced configuration and is being corrected. Verified in branch protection settings on 2026-09-18.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mradi unapotoa toleo, mradi LAZIMA ufanye ufuatiliaji wa tisho na uchambuzi wa uso wa shambulio ili kuelewa na kulinda dhidi ya mashambulizi kwenye njia za msimbo muhimu, majukumu, na mwingiliano ndani ya mfumo. [OSPS-SA-03.02]
    Ufuatiliaji wa tisho ni shughuli ambapo mradi unaangalia msimbo, michakato na miundombinu inayohusiana, viunganishi, vipengele muhimu na "kufikiria kama kibogoyo" na kufanya mapendekezo ya jinsi mfumo unaweza kuvunjwa au kuhatarisha. Kila tisho iliyotambuliwa imeorodheshwa ili mradi uweze kufikiria jinsi ya kuepuka au kufunga pengo/udhaifu wowote unaoweza kutokea kwa kujihadhari. Hakikisha hii imesasishwa kwa vipengele vipya au mabadiliko ya kuvunja.

    docs/threat-model.md contains the attack-surface analysis: a trust-boundary diagram identifying the four boundaries that carry untrusted data (the browser, the MCP client, and the two outbound integrations whose responses the application parses), thirteen numbered threats with controls and residual risk, and named critical code paths including LoginFormAuthenticator, LdapClientService, ScopeGuard and the raw DBAL call sites in EntryRepository. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/docs/threat-model.md


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Udhaifu wowote katika vipengele vya programu usioathiri mradi LAZIMA uzingatiwe katika hati ya VEX, ikiongeza kwenye ripoti ya udhaifu maelezo ya kutoweza kutumika vibaya (non-exploitability). [OSPS-VM-04.02]
    Weka mfumo wa mlisho wa VEX unaowasiliana hali ya utumiaji vibaya wa udhaifu unaojulikana, ikiwa ni pamoja na maelezo ya tathmini au marekebisho yoyote yaliyowekwa kusimamisha msimbo ulio na udhaifu usiotekelezwa.

    The project does not publish VEX documents. Dependency findings that do not affect the application are currently handled ad hoc rather than recorded with non-exploitability statements.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera inayofafanua kiwango cha chini cha kurekebisha matokeo ya SCA yanayohusiana na udhaifu na leseni. [OSPS-VM-05.01]
    Andika sera katika mradi inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya SCA yanayohusiana na udhaifu na leseni. Jumuisha mchakato wa kutambua, kutanguliza, na kurekebisha matokeo haya.

    docs/vulnerability-management.md defines the thresholds and the remediation timelines: composer audit blocks on any advisory at any severity, bun audit and npm audit block at high and above, and fixes are due within 7 days for Critical, 30 days for High, the next minor release for Medium and the next scheduled dependency run for Low. Licence and selection criteria are in docs/dependency-policy.md. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/docs/vulnerability-management.md


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera ya kushughulikia ukiukaji wa SCA kabla ya toleo lolote. [OSPS-VM-05.02]
    Andika sera katika mradi wa kushughulikia matokeo ya Uchambuzi wa Muundo wa Programu yanayotumika kabla ya toleo lolote, na ongeza ukaguzi wa hali unaothibitisha kufuata sera hiyo kabla ya toleo.

    The project has no documented policy requiring SCA violations to be resolved before a release. Releases are created manually and are not gated on dependency-audit results.


    Ya kutosha kwa nishani!

    Mabadiliko yote kwenye msingi wa msimbo wa mradi LAZIMA yatathminiwe kiotomatiki dhidi ya sera iliyoandikwa kuhusu utegemezi hasidi na udhaifu unaojulikana katika utegemezi, kisha kuzuiliwa endapo kuna ukiukaji, isipokuwa pale ilipotangazwa na kufichwa kama isiyoweza kutumika vibaya. [OSPS-VM-05.03]
    Unda ukaguzi wa hali katika mfumo wa kudhibiti toleo la mradi unaoendesha zana ya Uchambuzi wa Muundo wa Programu kwenye mabadiliko yote ya msingi wa msimbo. Hitaji kwamba ukaguzi wa hali upite kabla mabadiliko kusanywa.

    Every pull request and push is evaluated against the documented policy in docs/vulnerability-management.md, and violations block the merge: composer audit (any severity) runs in the CI lint job and bun audit --audit-level=high runs in the frontend job, both without continue-on-error, and both jobs are inputs to the 'CI Success' aggregate, which is a required status check on main. npm audit additionally runs via security.yml. See https://github.com/netresearch/timetracker/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Nyaraka za mradi LAZIMA zijumuishe sera inayofafanua kiwango cha chini cha kurekebisha matokeo ya SAST. [OSPS-VM-06.01]
    Andika sera katika mradi inayofafanua kiwango cha marekebisho ya matokeo ya Upimaji wa Usalama wa Programu Tuli (SAST). Jumuisha mchakato wa kutambua, kutanguliza, na kurekebisha matokeo haya.

    No documented remediation-threshold policy for SAST findings exists in the project documentation. Thresholds are configured in GitHub code scanning protection rules (high or higher for security alerts), and PHPStan runs at level 10 with an empty baseline, but neither is written down as project policy.


    Si ya kutosha kwa nishani.

    Mabadiliko yote kwenye msingi wa msimbo wa mradi LAZIMA yatathminiwe kiotomatiki dhidi ya sera iliyoandikwa kuhusu udhaifu wa usalama na kuzuiliwa endapo kuna ukiukaji isipokuwa pale ilipotangazwa na kufichwa kama isiyoweza kutumika vibaya. [OSPS-VM-06.02]
    Unda ukaguzi wa hali katika mfumo wa kudhibiti toleo la mradi unaoendesha zana ya Upimaji wa Usalama wa Programu Tuli (SAST) kwenye mabadiliko yote ya msingi wa msimbo. Hitaji kwamba ukaguzi wa hali upite kabla mabadiliko kusanywa.

    Evaluation is now broad but only partly blocking. PHPStan at level 10 with an empty baseline, PHPat, Rector and PHP-CS-Fixer run in the CI lint job and do block, since 'CI Success' is a required status check. CodeQL covers javascript-typescript and the new semgrep.yml covers PHP with p/php, p/security-audit and p/secrets, uploading SARIF to code scanning — but semgrep is deliberately non-blocking ('the job does not fail the build') and is not part of the required checks, and code scanning findings are triaged rather than gated. With no documented severity threshold for SAST findings either, this is not yet met.



Unaweza kutumia zana na mifumo ya AI kupendekeza mabadiliko kupitia URL rahisi, kama vile https://www.bestpractices.dev/sw/projects/11719/choose/edit?osps_ac_01_01_status=Met&osps_ac_01_01_justification=GitHub+enforced. Angalia mfumo wetu wa mapendekezo ya otomatiki kwa jinsi ya kufanya hivyo. Data hii inapatikana chini ya Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0 (CDLA-Permissive-2.0). Hii inamaanisha kuwa Mpokeaji wa Data anaweza kushiriki Data, na au bila marekebisho, mradi Mpokeaji wa Data anapatanisha maandishi ya mkataba huu na Data iliyoshirikiwa. Tafadhali tambua Sebastian Mendel na wachangiaji wa nishani ya Mazoea Bora ya OpenSSF.

Ingizo la nishani ya mradi linamilikiwa na: Sebastian Mendel.
Ingizo liliundwa siku 2026-01-09 06:05:12 UTC, iliyosasishwa mara ya mwisho siku 2026-09-20 17:21:08 UTC. Ilipata mara ya mwisho nishani ya kupita siku 2026-02-25 23:03:38 UTC.